Monday, June 1, 2026

ROMANS EPISTLE -- #6

 


 New Testament Bible
Story

 Chapter Seventy-four:

Paul writes Romans - Part six

                       
CHAPTER TEN

     Paul desired to see all Israel saved. He admitted they had a
zeal for God, but not according to correct knowledge. They did
not see Christ in the picture, they only saw the letter of the
written law and were trying to establish a right relationship
with God by serving the Old Covenant law, and had not yet seen
that without Jesus Christ as the foundation, they could not, and
never would, be reconciled or justified with God. The whole
object or end result of the Old Covenant law was to point to
Christ, as the way to be righteous - forgiven, justified, with
God (verses 1-4).

     He points out that Moses wrote about how the Old Covenant
law could make one righteous with God (Lev.18:5), and that was by
obeying all in the law without ever breaking the law. As it is
the law that defines what sin IS, then the only way to be
justified with God through the law, would be to never break any
part of it, then and only then could you live forever. And there
is only ONE human person that has ever done that - Jesus the
Christ. On the other hand Paul says, becoming righteous with God
by FAITH, does not count on doing some mighty deed like ascending
to heaven, but it has all to do with the word preached and faith.
And if you have faith in Jesus being sent by God to be our
Savior, sin bearer, then believing this makes you righteous or
justified with God, no matter who you are, Jew, Greek, Gentile.
God is mercifully rich towards anyone who calls upon Him for
justification through Christ (verses 5-13).

     Paul is once again repeating what he has said before. He
really wanted to nail this foundational truth down for them, and
so often repeated it though in slightly different ways. The truth
was that being forgiven of sins, becoming justified with God,
being declared righteous in God sight, was ONLY through the
sacrificial work of Jesus' death on the cross, as our sin bearer.
And we had to have FAITH and BELIEVE in this way that God had
provided for us.

     He then precedes to show that this way to salvation had been
preached, it had been proclaimed, God had sent it out from way in
the past, people had preached and taught this good news of FAITH
for justification. Faith then comes by hearing and hearing by the
Word of God. Paul relates that it was foretold by prophets such
as Moses and Isaiah, that God would have this truth proclaimed
and that others other than Israelites would hear it and accept
the good news of righteousness by faith. And at the same time
Isaiah said that Israel would hear but would not listen, would
not believe (Isaiah 65:2). Paul is now back talking about this
"election of grace" - only some in Israel coming to God's only
way to be saved and to find salvation (verses 14-21).

CHAPTER ELEVEN

     One of the greatest chapters in the New Testament on the
grace of God's calling, and the overall plan of salvation for
Israel and for all (as Israel being a type of all nations
on earth), concerning salvation. It is the chapter that makes it
abundantly clear that all people are spiritually blinded and only
God's calling of grace can remove that blindness, and God is NOT
removing that blindness but in a relatively few people, yet He
will in His time frame give a calling of mercy to all people.

     In all that Paul has said about Israel not finding the faith
to believe in the way of justification that God had always
declared would be the one and only way, he emphatically declares
in verses one and two, that God has NOT cast away His people
Israel. This is also where we learn  that  Paul was of the tribe
of Benjamin. He relates how in Elijah's time (2 Kings 19) when
Elijah thought he was the only one serving God, that the Lord had
told him, there were seven thousand in Israel that still
worshipped the true God, and had not bowed the knee to Baal
(verses 3-4).
     Paul then says it was even so at the time of his writing,
that SOME in Israel believed, those who were of the "election of
grace." And grace is not works, if it were of works, then it
could not be of grace. Verse 7 is POWERFUL - it is the "election"
that have obtain grace, and ALL the rest were BLINDED. And verses
8-10 blows you away by saying it is GOD THAT HAS BLINDED THEM !!

     Are they lost forever? He says, "GOD FORBID!"  But in God's
plan of blindness to the many, the Gentiles can have grace
extended to them. And then some Israelites may become jealous and
also find grace. He gives a parable of the olive tree in verses
17-24. The wild olive tree represents the Gentiles. Some of the
branches of the natural olive tree were cut off and so the
branches of the wild olive tree could be grafted in. It
was all to do with "belief" - believing the true way of
justification with God. The Gentiles were not to boast, for if
they continued not in the true faith they would be cut off and if
the Israelite continued not in unbelief they would be grafted
back in (verses 17-24).

     Then we have the wonderful verses of 25-36. 

     "I want you to understand this mystery dear brothers, so
     that you will not feel proud and start bragging. Some of
     Israel have hard hearts, and are blinded, but this will last
     only until the complete number of Gentiles comes to Christ.
     And so all Israel will be saved. Do you remember what the
     prophets said about this? 'A deliverer will come from Zion
     and will turn Jacob from all ungodliness. And then I will
     keep my covenant with them and take away their sins' (Isaiah
     59:2--21). 
     Many of Israel are now enemies of the Good News. But those
     elected are loved by God.
     For the gifts and calling of God are without Him ever
     turning back from. For in times past you did not believe
     God, but now have obtained mercy from Him, when many in
     Israel would not believe. And through your mercy those
     unbelieving Israelites will one day obtain mercy.  For God
     has put all in unbelief, that He might have mercy upon all
     in due time.
     O the depth of the riches both of the wisdom and knowledge
     of God! How unsearchable are His judgments, and His ways
     past finding out!
     For who has known the mind of the Lord? Or who has been His
     counsellor? Or who first gave to Him so God could give back
     to them? For in Him, and through Him, and to Him, are all
     things, to whom be glory for ever. Amen."

     Do you see what these wonderful verses teach? God has put
EVERYONE in a state of unbelief, BLINDNESS to the Gospel. He then
calls and has an "election of grace" - He opens the minds of
SOME, when He decides - the rest stay in blindness, BUT ONLY
till the Lord decides to remove their blindness. With Israel, it
was foretold by the prophets that MOST of them would remain in
blindness to the Gospel UNTIL the coming of the Messiah in glory,
what we call the "second coming of Christ" - and then the Lord
will set His hand to remove the sins of Israel, take away the
spiritual vail of blindness that covers their minds, and start to
save all of Israel. 
     It is all in God's salvation TIME PLAN for all people who
have ever lived. I expounded this is some detail as we went
through parts of the Gospels. All in due time will be given
mercy, given a clear and plain chance to know the truths of God
and the way to be saved through Christ the redeemer. Some have
mercy shown towards them now in this life time, others will have
it shown to them later. As Jesus said in the Gospels, there  will
be a resurrection of ALL people, all that are in the graves. Some
will be in the first resurrection to meet Christ in the air, in
the clouds (1 Thes. 4:13-18; with Rev.20:1-4). Those will be the
ones called and chosen from the time of Adam to Jesus' coming
again. Those not called during their physical life time, as most
of the children of Israel were not, will be raised in a second
resurrection, the books of the Bible will be opened to them and
the book of LIFE will be given them. It is their time to be shown
mercy (Rev.20:12-13).

     As Paul said, "O the depth of the riches both of wisdom and
knowledge of God! How unsearchable are His judgments, and His
ways." How wonderful is the love, the patience, and the mercy of
God.

CHAPTER TWELVE

     With the truth of God's mercy now presented to Paul's
readers he precedes to tell them HOW they should be living as
being under that mercy, as being called of God to have His
salvation.
     Being under God's grace means we are to live as a full
complete sacrifice, holy, acceptable, unto God, which is only our
reasonable service for such mercy and love. We are to be not
conformed to the ways of the world, but we are to be TRANSFORMED
by the RE-MAKING of our minds, to PROVE what is the GOOD and
ACCEPTABLE and PERFECT will of God. We are to not think of
ourselves above what we should, but to think in a sober manner,
as God as given to each of us a measure of faith. And this Paul
goes on to explain is the gifts from God that each have been
given. We are to use these gifts to serve all within the body of
Christ. We need to use them to their full potential and full
benefit for the members of the Church. Paul is instructing that
we need to know WHAT is our gift or gifts and so use them
accordingly. To try and function within gifts we do not have is
really like putting a square peg in a round hole, I guess you
could eventually force it in, but it never really fits properly
and could even mess things up as you try. 
     Christians under grace are to ABHOR that which is EVIL, and
to CLEAVE, hang on to for dear life we could say, to that which
is GOOD. We are to be kindly affectionate with brotherly love
towards each other, in respect preferring one another. We can
still like and enjoy to a point some outside the Church of God,
but our first love should be especially towards those in the
family of God. We are not to be lazy in our business of
work in this world, and we need to be zealous on serving the
Lord. We should rejoice in the assured hope we have of God's love
and plan for our eternal life. We are to endure trials and
tribulations, and continue in a constant mind of prayer, which is
having our mind constantly in close relations with our heavenly
Father. Christians are to give to other saints who are in need,
as they are able, and to be a people of hospitality (verses
1-13).

     Paul was not through with listing other proclivities that
should be part of a Christian's life.

     "Bless them which persecute you; bless and curse not.
Rejoice with them that do rejoice; and weep with them that weep"
We need to be able to empathize with people.
"Be of the same mind one towards another." Love each other. "Mind
not high things, but be content with mean things." Do not put
your consuming desire on having wealthy material things. "Be not
wise in your own conceits." Don't be vain minded with your ideas
that are not backed by God's word. You may be correct with some
thoughts as you live in this world, but don't be vain about it.
Then again you may be wrong, but vainly think you are correct,
and that makes you double the fool. "Do not give back evil to
others who do evil towards you. Be upright and honest with people
you deal with in this life. If it be possible, as much as what is
your part in it, live peaceably with all people." Sometimes
peace is not possible with some individuals and you may have to
stand up for your rights, but in the main try to live at peace
with people. "Dearly beloved, do not take vengeance, but put
wrathful revenge behind you, for it is written, 'Vengeance is
mine; I will repay, says the Lord.' Therefore if your enemy
hunger, feed him, if he is thirsty, give him a drink; for in so
doing you will lead him to be ashamed or embarrassed for what he
has done to you. Do not be overcome with evil but overcome evil
with good" (verses 14-21).

     Quite the list of conduct to live by as we move and work and
have our daily living among the brothers and sisters in Christ
and those out in the world.

CHAPTER THIRTEEN

     Verses 1-7 is concerning our living with and responsibility
towards "secular governments" of this world. It again has caused
some concern and questions in the minds of Christians, who find
themselves under an evil government of men. We can think about
those who lived under the government of Hitler before and during
the Second World War. Then there have been some terrible dictator
governments in some countries since the Second World War, who
have killed thousands, and imprisoned many more thousands, for
their own selfish reasons. Can such governments be said to be
"the minister of God to you for good" and "Whoever therefore
resists the power, resists the ordinance of God"? I think not, in
fact it certainly cannot be said they are from God or in any way
doing the service of the Lord. 
     The answer is again realizing that Paul is using a "general
statement" based upon a context where a secular government is not
evil towards its people. The Roman government of Paul's day
allowed people like the Jews to observe their religion. As long
as people were orderly they gave a lot of freedom to worship and
conduct their lives in a respectable manner. 
     What are Christians to do when they find themselves under an
evil government such as the one Hitler governed. We are given a
basic two ways to go in the New Testament. You either stand up
for what is right and proper, and take whatever persecution comes
upon you, or you pack your bag and FLEE!

     Verse 8 has also given some trouble as to what Paul is
saying. I like the "New Living Translation" - they put it this
way: "Pay all your debts, except the debt of love for others. You
can never finish paying that!"
     Paul quotes some of the Ten Commandments to show that we
need to observe them in our relationship with other human
individuals we converse with each day. It is another section that
makes it clear that Paul never thought or taught that the Ten
Commandments were abolished at any time.

     He finishes this section with reminding his readers that
they need to awake out of any spiritual sleep they may have got
themselves into, to put on the amour of light, to live and walk
in the way that is of Christ Jesus and not the way of the natural
flesh with its lusts. He reminds them that the day is far spent
and that the time of completion of their salvation is nearer than
when they first believed. 
     This is of course true at any time, for who knows how long
we shall live after the day we first believed and were called to
our salvation. As is commonly said among Christians, "We need to
live for God as if this is our last day in this physical life."

     In chapter 14, Paul moves into answering and giving
guidance, on a specific problem that was apparently taking place
among the brethren of the Church of God at Rome, and that was the
pros and cons of "meat eating" or "no meat eating" and "fasting"
and "days on which to fast."

               ..............................

June 2004

TO BE CONTINUED

SONG OF SONGS-- GOD'S INSTRUCTION ON SEX #8 - SOLVING PROBLEMS

 

Solomon on Sex #8

Solving Sexual Problems

Continuing with Dillow's book "Solomon on Sex" and the chapter
entitled "Solving Sexual Problems."


(Reflections #10, 11, 12, Song 5:9-6:13)

     In the last chapter we found Shulamith and Solomon involved
in a frustrating problem in their physical relationship. In this
section we see how they begin to solve their problems, and in
Chapters 10 and 11 the ultimate solution unfolds.
     Interestingly, the solution to their differences involved
assuming personal responsibility for the error rather than
focusing on the other's error.
     Instead of dwelling on how thoughtless Solomon was to
continually approach her late at night, she began to work on her
inner attitudes. Instead of thinking how selfish Shulamith is in
rejecting him, Solomon concentrates on loving her unconditionally
and "giving blessing for insult."
     In order for any problem to be resolved in marriage, both
partners must follow this pattern. What good is accomplished when
you continually resent your mate for his or her shortcomings?
When you and I stand before the judgment seat of Christ, He is
not going to ask how our mate treated us, but whether or not we
were faithful in assuming responsibility for our behavior. It is
God's responsibility to deal with an offending mate, not ours.


A CHANGE OF ATTITUDE 
(Reflection #10, Song 5:9-6:3)

CONTEXT

     Shulamith has awakened from her dream-filled sleep the
following morning. Before awakening, Shulamith asks the chorus to
help her find her beloved. She wants him because she is highly
aroused sexually (5:8), feels guilty about another rejection of
Solomon (5:6,7), and wants to make amends. This address to the
chorus provides a transition into the next scene. It gives the
pretext for the chorus to ask two questions revealing Shulamith's
decision to work on her attitude.
     The first question is found in 5:9: "What kind of beloved is
your beloved ..." The second is in 6:1: "Where has your beloved
gone ...?"
     The answer to the first question calls Shulamith back to the
nobility of her man and his physical attractiveness and
tenderness. Thus, she begins to focus her thoughts on his
positive traits and even his sexual appeal in order to increase
her own desire.
     The answer to the second question, "Where has your beloved
gone.." leads her to realize that much of their problem is due to
the nature of the job he has, "pasturing the flock" (6:2) -
tending the sheep (the people of Israel). As she thinks on this,
she renews her covenant and finds assurance that he is totally
hers even though some things need to be resolved (6:3).


COMMENTARY

5:9 CHORUS: 

          What kind of beloved is your beloved, O most beautiful
          among women? What kind of beloved is your beloved, Thus
          you adjure us?


     What is the purpose of this question? It seems to be
specifically designed by the chorus to lead Shulamith to focus on
her husband's many good points. While there is pain at constant
separation, they want her to realize it is worth it all in view
of the excellent qualities of the man God has given her. The
question has the intended effect; in the following verses she
extols her beloved's virtues and expresses a relaxed acceptance
of the fact he is away on the business of state (6:2-3).

5:10 SHULAMITH: 

          My beloved is dazzling and ruddy,

     The description that follows has some rather sensuous
details that suggest she is reflecting on a previous lovemaking
episode with him and pictures him nude in her mind. Again, it
must be realized the daughters of Jerusalem are simply a literary
device used, in this case, to bring out the excellences of the
king.
     To be "dazzling" is to be handsome, and to be "ruddy" means
to have healthy, reddish cheeks.

          Outstanding among ten thousand.

     This is an expression of surpassing beauty.

5:11 SHULAMITH: His head is like gold, pure gold;

     Beginning now with his head, she describes in matchless
imagery his shapely body. Gold connotes excellence.

          His locks are like clusters of dates, And black as a
          raven.

     Solomon has beautiful black hair. Ravens are known for their
consistent ability to provide for their young. They are often
used in terms of God's providential care of His creation? She
sees Solomon as always watching out for her.

5:12 SHULAMITH: 

          His eyes are like doves, 
          Beside streams of water,           
          Bathed in milk,
          And reposed in their setting.

     The dark iris surrounded by the gleaming white of the eye is
pictured as a dove bathing in milk

5:13 SHULAMITH: 

          His cheeks are like a bed of balsam, 
          Banks of  sweet-scented herbs;

     The bed of balsam refers to the custom of perfuming the
beard.

          His lips are lilies,
          Dripping with liquid myrrh.

     The lilies here are probably red lilies. The liquid myrrh
probably refers to the sweetness of his breath. Often sweet,
scented herbs were chewed to scent the breath or were mixed with
water to make a mouthwash.

5:14 SHULAMITH: 

          His hands are rods of gold
	    His fingers are full and round.
          Set with beryl;

     His fingernails are transparently pink.

          His abdomen is carved ivory 
          Inlaid with sapphires.

     The abdomen refers to the covered part of the body. It is
white and smooth like ivory. To be like ivory means to be flat
and firm. Also to see the "white" part of the body is to view
that part which is normally shielded from the sun by clothing. It
appears she is daydreaming about her husband's naked body. The
reference to blue sapphires is difficult. It probably refers to
the branching blue veins under the white skin.

5:15 SHULAMITH: 

          His legs are pillars of alabaster set on pedestals of
          gold;

     The phrase "legs" is often used of the upper part of the
legs. It denotes the loins (Gen.29:2; Exod.28:42; Dan.2:32) or
the part of the body where the legs begin to separate? They are
alabaster, strong and white like marble. They are set on feet
described as pedestals of gold.

          His appearance is like Lebanon, 
          Choice as the cedars.

     Lebanon speaks of majestic appearances. It was famed for its
fertility and beauty (Dent.3:25). The cedars were the tallest and
strongest of trees; so is her beloved outstanding among men. It
speaks of his strength and masculinity.

5:16 SHULAMITH: 

          His mouth is full of sweetness. 
          And he is wholly desirable.
          This is my beloved and this is my friend, 
          O daughters of Jerusalem.

     This refers to the mouth as an organ of speech, not of
kissing. She is praising his tender speech. The thing that
appealed to her wasn't just his physical manliness (5;9-15), but
his tenderness and gentleness with her (5:16). Paul says God's
"lover" has these two characteristics.

For the husband is the head of the wife as Christ is the head of
the church (Eph.5:23).

     A man is supposed to be a "head," a leader, to his wife. But
at the same time Paul says,

The Word became flesh and lived for a while among us. We have
seen His glory, the glory of the One and only Son, who came from
the Father, full of grace and truth (John 1:14).

     The husband, then, is to be characterized by strength and
tenderness (Song 5:9-16); he is to be a leader and a lover
(Eph.5:23-25); and he is to be full of truth and grace (John
1:14). These are the basic characteristics of the male role as
revealed in the Bible. The Lord Jesus was a man of grace; He
cried in the presence of women, He made little children feel at
home with Him, and He demonstrated profound tenderness and
compassion. But He could also walk through an angry mob, refrain
from accusing His accusers, set His will like steel, and be
obedient unto death.     

     Many problems in marriages today go of these characteristics
out of balance.

6:1 CHORUS: 

          Where has your beloved gone, 
          O most beautiful among women? 
          Where has your beloved turned, 
          That we may seek him with you?

     The chorus is satisfied with the answer, and now a new
question is in their mouths. Its purpose is to focus Shulamith's
attention on the fact that the reason he cannot be with her now
is that he is involved in affairs of state. She is, therefore, to
remember the understanding she had before they were married and
to choose to reject the thought of self-pity she feels at not
having Solomon at her side as much as she would like.

6:2 SHULAMITH: 

          My beloved has gone down to his garden, 
          To the beds of balsam,
          To pasture his flock in the gardens 
          And gather lilies.

     As discussed elsewhere (1:7; 2:16) this imagery refers to
Solomon's preoccupation with the affairs of state.

6:3 SHULAMITH: 

          I am my beloved's and my beloved is mine,
          He who pastures his flock among the lilies

     Shulamith has come to inner peace. She is a kings wife. He
must be away on business, but she confidently asserts her belief
in his love for her. It is significant that Shulamith views her
husband as a shepherd who pastures his flock. Despite all of
Solomon's shortcomings, he makes her feel totally loved,
protected, and cared for. She sees him not only as Israel's
shepherd, but as her shepherd.

     There are two outstanding characteristics of a shepherd that
are applicable here. He was a PROTECTOR and LEADER. Much can be
said about the protective qualities of the shepherd. *
His main task, other than providing for his flock, was
protecting them from robbers, animals, and weather. The
shepherd's staff, a stick five or six feet long which sometimes
had a crook at the end, was used in the way Western men use a
cane or walking stick. It is also used in handling the sheep.
Thus, when David writes in Psalm 23, "Thy rod and Thy staff, they
comfort me," he is saying the Lord's protection comforts him, and
he feels safe.

* All the following material on the protective qualities of the
shepherd are taken from Fred Wright's "Manners and Customs of
Bible Lands" (Moody, 1953).

     Elements of protection embrace sacrificial labors of love.
The fact that the shepherd dedicated his life to his flock, even
to the point of losing his life, demonstrates emphatically his
care and concern for them. (Granted, he had a vested interest,
but don't husbands have a vested interest in pleasing their
wives?) A good husband must also be willing to "lay down his life
DAILY" for his wife. Laying down one's life daily in most cases
is more difficult than a once and for all physical death.
"Husbands, love your wives, just as Christ also loved the church
and gave Himself up for her" (Eph.5:25).

     Why? Because like begets like. When you say, "I willingly
sacrifice my wants for your wants," this produces a like response
in her. Perhaps that first this new task will evoke amazement,
curiosity, or a "how long will this last" attitude, but
eventually it evokes appreciation, thankfulness, and "I willingly
sacrifice my wants for your wants" too. Love begets love;
encouragement begets encouragement; concern, concern.

     As a leader, the Eastern shepherds never drives his sheep as
does the Western shepherd.   He LEADS THEM, usually going before
them. He may also walk by their sides an sometimes follow behind,
especially if the flock is headed for the fold in the evening
From the rear he can gather any stragglers and protect them from
wild animal attacks.
     Several flocks are sometimes allowed to mix at a well or in
the same fold. When it becomes necessary to separate the flocks,
one shepherd after another calls out his own call. The sheep lift
their heads and, after a general scramble, begin following each
one after his own shepherd. They are thoroughly familiar with
their own shepherd's TONE OF VOICE. Strangers have often used the
same call, but their attempts to get the sheep to follow them
always fails.

     Jesus implied His sheep hear and follow only his voice when
He said, "The sheep follow him, for they know his voice. And a
stranger they will not follow, but will flee from him; for they
know not the voice of a stranger" (John 10:4,5). The intimate
concern and care of the shepherd is the key reason the sheep
follow his voice. They know him and thus they TRUST his
leading (especially when he has proven trustworthy in the past).
     To illustrate the intimate knowledge and concern a good 
shepherd has for his sheep, we cite the following example.

     One shepherd in the Lebanon district was asked if he always
     counted his sheep each evening. He replied in the negative,
     and then was asked how then he knew if all his sheep were
     present. This was his reply: "Master, if you were to put a
     cloth over my eyes, and bring me any sheep and only
     let me put hands on its face, I could tell in a moment if it
     was mine or not.

     When H.R.P. Dickson visited the desert Arabs, he witnessed
an event that revealed the amazing knowledge some of them have of
their sheep. One evening, shortly after dark an Arab shepherd
began to call out one by one the names of his fifty-one mother
sheep, and was able to pick out each one's lamb and restore it to
its mother to suckle. To do this in the light would be a feat for
many shepherds, but this was done in complete darkness, and in
the midst of the noise of the ewes crying for their lambs, and
the lambs crying for their mothers.
     But no oriental shepherd ever had a more intimate knowledge
of his sheep than Jesus our great Shepherd has of those who
belong to His flock. He once said of Himself: "I am the good
shepherd, and know my sheep" (John 10:14).

     Most women want to be led. They do not want to be
browbeaten,treated as imbeciles unable to think or decide, or
coddled as children too immature to make decisions. That is not
leadership, but dictatorship, but only the haughty ego of the
"leader."

     Thus, Shulamith's "daydreaming" reveals two fundamental
attitudes helpful for the resolution of their sexual differences.
She first thinks of her husband physically as a means of
increasing her desire for him. She then thinks of the protective
care and security he has provided as her shepherd. So instead of
concentrating on his weaknesses, she concentrates on his
strengths. She assumes responsibility for her personal attitudes
and leaves Solomon's shortcomings in the Lord's hands.

THE RETURN OF SOLOMON 
(Reflection #11, Song 6:4-10)

     In the interlude between their problem (5:2-8) and its
solution (7:1-8:13), two fundamental attitudes are revealed. In
the proceeding reflection we see Shulamith concentrating on his
strengths. Now, in this reflection the poet directs us to another
crucial ingredient in resolving marital tension; we must learn to
respond to insult with blessing.
     As this scene opens, Solomon  returned. He praises her
beauty and gives her assurance of his exclusive love for her.
Consistently throughout the Song, Solomon is an excellent
example. Whatever tensions may have developed in their
relationship (5:4-6), they do not appear to affect Solomon's 
expression of love and praise fro her.
     Most husbands, when rebuffed after making a sexual overture
to their wives, tend to withdraw into a shell or react in a
"cutting" way. But Solomon demonstrates true love, always
responding properly, and lovingly demonstrates much patience and
confidence in the LORD to work things out.

6:4 SOLOMON: 

          You are as beautiful as Tirzah, my darling, 
          As lovely as Jerusalem,

     Tirzah was an old Canaanite city famous for its beauty and
renowned as the royal residence of kings after Solomon died.
Shulamith is from a higher mountainous region of the North, and
Tirzah is located in the mountains of the North also.

          As awesome as an army with banners.

     Why is Shulamith as awesome as an army in full battle array?
Because she has exerted upon Solomon a fearful power with her
beautiful eyes that pierce his heart and vanquish all resistance.

6:5 SOLOMON: 

          Turn your eyes away from me, 
          For they have confused me;

     One penetrating glance from her eyes causes Solomon's heart
to melt. Solomon then launches into a repeat of her beauties
expressed on the wedding night (4:1-7).

          Your hair is like a flock of goats
          That have descended from Gilead (see 4:1).

6:6 SOLOMON: 

          Your teeth are a flock of ewes
          Which have come up from their washing, 
          All of which bear twins,
     	    And not one among them has lost her young (see 4:2).

6:7 SOLOMON: 

          Your temples are like a slice of a pomegranate
          Behind your veil (see 4:3).

     Note the fact that the praise Solomon gives her here is
almost exactly identical to that which he bestowed upon her on
their wedding night (4:1-3). In effect, Solomon seems to say,
"Nothing has changed. Regardless of how you respond toward me,
this does not affect the love I have for you. I still view you as
I always have, even though in some points your performance has
not been up to the standards that I would desire."

     To adopt this kind of attitude shows Solomon truly loves her
as Christ loves the church (Eph.5:25). Christ loves us
consistently regardless of how we perform. That does not mean the
Shulamite should not improve her performance if it needs
improving, just as we need to improve our performance in our
relationship to christ. But she should not be under a law to
perform in order to gain acceptance. Consider 1 Peter 3:7 in this
connection.

You husbands likewise, live with your wives in an understanding
way....

The verb translated "live with" is consistently translated in
Septuagint translation of the Old Testament as "have sexual
intercourse with" (Deut.22:13; 24:1; 21:13; 22:22; 25:5; Isaiah
62:5; Gen.20:3). The phrase "an understanding way" implies
acquiring knowledge and insight through a process of personal
investigation. Thus an interpretive and expanded paraphrase of
the verse might read:

You husbands likewise, have sexual intercourse with your wife in
a way that is based upon insight gathered from personal
investigation of her needs.

Then in this connection consider 1 Pet. 3:9:

Not returning evil for evil, or insult for insult, but giving a
blessing instead; for you were called for the very purpose that
you might inherit a blessing.

     Part of having a sexual relationship with your mate in an
understanding way is not to respond with insult when hurt, but to
respond with blessing - with love and appreciation for his or her
strong qualities. Solomon's ego was undoubtedly severely slapped
when she refused love, but he reciprocated  by praising her and
seeking her best instead of responding to insult. 
     Many husbands are concerned with how to get their wives to
be more sexual and aggressive. A sure way to hinder them is to
respond with insult when they do not perform the way they are
supposed to. This simply drives a wedge into the relationship,
ultimately leading to complete loss of interest on the wife's
part and causing greater sexual problems.

     Note the promise in 3:10 to the husband and wife if they
respond properly:

For let him who means to LOVE LIFE and see good days refrain his
tongue from evil ...

     If you want things to improve in your relationship, be sure
your response to any offense your mate gives in sexual matters is
honoring to the Lord.
Solomon continues his praise,

6:8 SOLOMON: 

          There are sixty queens and eighty concubines, 
          And maidens without number;

6:9 SOLOMON: 

          But my dove, my perfect one, is unique:

     We have already discussed the matter of Solomon's polygamy
(Chapter 1). He may not have been a practicing polygamist at this
time. We know he inherited a harem from his father, David. The
passing on of the harem from king to successor has long been
observed. Roland de Vaux observes, "It appears that the kings
harem, at least in the early days of the monarchy used to pass
to his successor."

     Thus Solomon may not have been sexually involved with these
many concubines until later in his reign, when we know he began
to degenerate into lustful polygamy. But whether or not he was
does not detract from the validity of the principles he teaches.
Furthermore, God has put His approval on the principles by making
the Song of Solomon a part of Scripture.
     
     But what is the point of the comparison? He says she's
superior to all the queens and concubines in the empire. The
concubine in the ancient Near East had two basic functions. A
barren wife might have sons through her. But secondly, they were
for a man's "delight." Solomon comments on this in Eccles.2:8
where he says, 

I heaped up for myself also silver and gold, and the peculiar
property of kings and of countries; I got men singers and women
singers; and the delights of the children of men: mistress and
mistresses.

     The Hebrew word translated "delights" here refers to sexual
caresses and enjoyments of the pleasures of sexual love? It's the
same word used of Shulamith in Song 7:6, "How beautiful and
delightful you are" - skilled in giving sexually delightful
caresses. Thus, a concubine was a kind of mistress.

     The twentieth century call girl would to some extent
parallel the concubine, except these modern-day "mistresses" have
abandoned the child-bearing aspect! They simply provide skilled
sexual pleasure. The business world is full of these immoral
young women. While the skills they supposedly have are common
knowledge, only a husband not satisfied at home or deprived
sexually by his wife would tend to be interested. If a man
doesn't have a "magnet" at home, he might look elsewhere! This is
what Paul warns against.

Stop depriving one another, except by agreement for a time that
you may devote yourselves to prayer, and come a together again
lest satan temp you because of your lack of self-control (1
Cor.7:5).

     He implies if a husband and wife do not satisfy each other
sexually, both or one might be tempted by Satan to get that
satisfaction somewhere else! The best prevention for adultery is
complete satisfaction at home.

Note:
[While I have no problem with the understanding that concubines
could give and perform great sex, to liken them to modern "sex
for sale" ladies or in the closet mistresses, is a pure lack on
study on the truth of the matter. Concubines were WIVES, but
classified as "secondary" wives, whatever that portended in that
old society of B.C. days. The fact is they were still wives. This
I have shown in my study on this Website under the subject of
Polygamy. Dillow did not do his home-work and so his comments
here are at variance with the facts - Keith Hunt].


6:8 SOLOMON: 

          There are sixty queens and eighty concubines, 
          And maidens without number;
          But my dove, my perfect one, is unique:

     He is saying Shulamith is superior in every way to any
concubine of the empire. Even though Solomon may not have been
sexually involved with any of these women at that time, he knows
about their "skills" just as we hear today. Shulamith is superior
as a lovemaking partner. She is more "skilled" than any of them!
I'll never forget the message my wife heard by one of the most
godly Christian women I ever met. Her testimony has been written
in a number of books. She is the wife of one of the most
prominent evangelical leaders of our time and is a widely
sought-after speaker to women's groups all over the country. She
was speaking to a group of wives on the subject of sex in
marriage.
     In essence she said the following: "You know, girls, a
prostitute is skilled in all the techniques of giving sexual
pleasure to a man she does not even know or love. If they can do
that for a man they do not even know or love, just for money,
surely we should be even more skilled in giving sexual pleasure
to our husbands whom we do love."

     Shulamith was superior to all would-be mistresses in her
husband's eyes-are you? Solomon said this was true of Shulamith,
and this book presents sex in marriage as the "flame of the Lord"
(8:61.
     The same idea is implied in Prov. 5:1-23.

An Immoral Harlot 

("Keep your way far from her," 5:8)

A Loving Wife 

("Drink water from your own cistern" 5:15 "Rejoice in the wife of
your youth" 5:18 "Be exhilarated always with her love" 5:19 "Let
her breasts satisfy you at all times" 5:19)

     Wives, are your husbands rejoicing in, being exhilarated by,
and being satisfied with your skill in making love? The contrast
of the temptation of a harlot with the love of a wife certainly
suggests a wife ought to have more to offer her man physically
than a professional mistress!

     I would like to conclude this discussion by posing a
question for you wives to ask yourselves. Please do not think I
am advocating immorality when 1 ask you to ask it. But, if your
husband began to search out a mistress, would he select you?
Would you qualify - sexually, I mean? If not, then you might
consider a few changes.

     Solomon has praised his wife above all the women in his
court. In the following verses he deals with some of the reasons
he praises her.

6:9 SOLOMON: 

          But my dove, my perfect one, is unique: 
          She 's her mother's only daughter;
          She is the pure child of the one who bore her.

     The phrase suggests she was her mother's favorite.

          The maidens saw her and called her blessed 
          The queens and concubines also, they praised her,
          saying

6:10 SOLOMON: 

          Who is this that grows like the dawn,
          
     "She outshines all others like the early dawn, which looks
down from heaven over the mountains down to the earth," Zockler
says.

          As beautiful as a full moon, 
          As pure as the sun,

     She had blazing radiance. Arabic poets frequently compared
feminine beauty to the sun and the moon.

          As awesome as an army with banner. (See 6:4)


SHULAMITH IN THE GARDEN 
(Reflection #12, Song 6:11-13a)

     In this section Shulamith takes her leave of Solomon and
goes to a garden on the palace grounds for meditation. Previously
she had two problems: (1) guilt at refusing Solomon's advances
and (2) a desire to see the countryside once again. Solomon's
lavish praise assuring his acceptance of her just as she is has
dealt with the first problem. Only one remains--a desire to
return to the country she left.
     The logical connection of this scene to the preceding verses
seems to be it is the answer to the question raised in 6:10 ("Who
is this that grows like the dawn?"). Shulamith's answer, as the
scene will reveal, is that she is a country girl in the palace of
a king, one whose soul is craving to visit the Lebanon mountains
she loves.
     The scene involves a dialogue with the imaginary chorus.

6:11 SHULAMITH: 

          I went down to the orchard of nut frees 
          To see the blossoms of the valley,

     The passage suggests the springtime once again, Perhaps her
thoughts went back to Solomon's springtime visit during their
courtship.

          To see whether the vine had budded 
          Or the pomegranates had bloomed.
          Before I was aware, my soul set me 
          Over the chariots of my noble people.

This is the most difficult verse in the book to interpret
Although interpretations differ tremendously, it seems that we
must take verse 13 into account, ("Come back, come back, O
Shulammite"), implies Shulamith is entertaining the thought of
leaving the palace.
     The thought seems to be this: Shulamith is in the garden
quietly meditating on the beauty around her and thinking of home.
Gradually her thoughts begin to drift back to life in the palace.
She thinks of the lonesome hours she spends waiting for Solomon's
attention and often feels alone and forsaken, a country girl in a
king's palace.
     As she is absorbed in her thoughts, the sound of a chariot
bounding along a distant road breaks the hush of the morning.
Suddenly the desire comes upon her to get in one of the chariots
and flee the palace. The text makes it quite clear that she does
not do so, but her "soul set her over (in) the chariots" - her
heart longed to be in one. She is not thinking of forsaking
Solomon; rather it is a sudden impulse to flee to the country she
loved. The chariots of her noble people refer to the chariots
which belong to the retinue of the court.

6:13 CHORUS: 

          Come back, mine back, O Shulamite

     The chorus calls her longing heart back to reality by saying
"Come back," psychologically speaking, four times. This is the
first time the word SHULAMMITE is used in the book. without doubt
the word is the feminine form of "Solomon." It suggests she is
the "other-part of" solomon. she is one flesh with him. that
realization brings her thoughts back to her lover and her desire
to make love with him.

          Come back that we may gaze at you.



COMMENT

Of shepherds and sex

     A shepherd is a protector and a leader. As a husband, are
you? If you are not and you find your wife is not particularly
responsive sexually, it could be related to these factors. The
number one concern of men, according to one survey, in their
sexual relationship with their wives, is that their wives are not
aggressive enough. This survey indicates that 19 percent of
Christian husbands (that's one out of every five men who read
this book) complain of their wife's lack of interest in sex.
Have you considered the relationship between your leadership and
her loving? Let me explain.

     God has obviously set up a line of authority in all spheres
of human existence (family, church, government). He has done so
for good reason. No one can carry all the responsibility. Thus,
the person over you in your job does not require you to shoulder
his responsibilities as well as yours. Yet, too many wives are
bearing responsibilities God never intended them to carry. For
example, in your family, who carries the emotional burden for how
your children turn out? Who carries the emotional burden for
their discipline? According to the Bible, she is not to carry
that burden; you and I are! (Eph.6:1-4)
     The thing that makes the chain of command work is its
capacity to absorb shock. Something is always going wrong in
life. Does that something always crash in on your wife, or is it
intercepted and absorbed by you?
     This works in the business world. A firm on the West Coast
recently received a number of awards for outstanding business
achievement. Yet, in their everyday workings, they violated many
basic principles of sound business management. An examination
into the inner working revealed that the reason for this firm's
success was three men. These men were shock absorbers. Every time
financial collapse, business reversal, personal problem, or legal
hassle threatened the firm, these men absorbed the shock. As the
shock waves began to wind their way down the chain of command,
they ran smash into these three men and stopped!
     As a result, the employees underneath them came to work free
from worry and pressure. They didn't have to absorb the pressures
of their supervisors and they therefore produced to their
maximum.

     Your wife is like one of those employees. When the shock
waves of life's reversal come crashing in on your family, if
there is a man there to absorb them and to provide a protective
shield, she is emotionally released to be a woman. I'm not saying
you shouldn't ever share your problems with her. You should share
them all with her. She is a joint heir of the grace of life. One
of the reasons you married her was because she was a source of
strength. The issue is, how do you share your problems?
Do you do it in a depressing, defeated, and complaining way that
simply burdens her with not only her sphere of problems but now
yours too? Or do you do it like this, "Honey, we've really got
some things we need to trust the Lord for, I've been laid off,
and there are no job prospects and no money. Right now I have no
idea what we are going to do, but I know that God has a purpose
in it, and I'm really looking forward to what He is going to do.
Let's pray and trust this situation to him." 

     Thus, instead of dumping the problem on her and asking her
to prop you up, you've asked her to join you in trusting the
problem to the Lord. What makes the difference is your attitude.
We're not saying you have to be the strong silent type that
smiles as he leads his troops into battle with both legs shot
off, but if you are continually whining and communicating
weakness to her, she can't be expected to follow your lead with
much confidence in bed or anywhere else.
     If you are a protector and a leader, if you assume personal
responsibility for that home and for her welfare and happiness,
if you assume responsibility for the kids, the bills, the
family's future, its goals, you are a shepherd like Solomon.
Furthermore, you are creating an atmosphere in which she feels
secure and trusting. You are creating a climate that makes her
feel she can trust in you and rely on you.

     How is being a shepherd related to sexual love?

     In a massive study of 500 women covering five years, Seymour
Fisher came to some startling conclusions about one of the most
common sexual problems among women - inability to experience
orgasm. Some studies have indicated that as many as 40 percent of
American women married twenty years or more have never
experienced orgasm. In a study I conducted of some 158 women, 39
percent indicated they experienced orgasm "sometimes, rarely, or
never.""
     One of the common characteristics of a large percentage of
non-orgasmic wives in Fisher's study was feelings about loss.
"Overall, there was enough evidence to suggest that a woman's
ability to reach orgasm is tied to her feelings about loss.
apparently, the more she feels that she cannot depend on being
able to hold the people and things she values, the more limited
is her orgasm capacity."
               
      Recently I heard a good illustration. A man up on the roof
is trying to fix his TV antenna. Suddenly it begins to rain, and
as he struggles with the guy wires, he slips. He begins to tumble
down the roof, makes a last ditch effort and grabs the drain
trough. He is hanging from the edge some three stories up, and
his fingers begin to give way. Desperately he struggles to hold
on, but his strength is almost gone. Not knowing what else to do,
he looks up into the sky and asks, "Is there anyone up there who
can help me?" Sure enough, a little cloud forms and parts in two,
and a voice booms out from behind the cloud, "Believe and let
go."
     The man hangs there staring blankly into the heaven for
about thirty seconds and then shouts, "is there anyone else up
there who can help me?"

     Before that man will "believe and let go," he wants to know
the voice can back up its command. He wants to know someone will
be there to catch him before he hits the ground. He wants a sense
of trust and confidence in the "somebody."
     The same situation applies to a wife as she moves towards
orgasm. Men and women tend to conceptualize sexual intercourse in
slightly different ways. A man tends to think of intercourse as a
taking or a possessing. A woman  man, on the other hand, tends to
see it as a yielding, a giving of herself. Thus for her to be
totally free, she must feel secure in the permanence of your love
and the security of your relationship with her.

     As she is moving towards orgasm, the sexual tension develops
gradually to a point where there is a blurring of perceptual
reality. As objects become hazy she may picture the relationship
"slipping away." To yield totally is like "Believe, and let go."
Perception is fading and she now must "let go." Yield. If there
is any insecurity or lack of trust in the marriage relationship,
she may subconsciously pull back and cannot "let go" as
perceptual reality darkens. She transfers her lack of security
and permanence in the relationship outside the bedroom into the
bed itself, and it sets up a mental block that keeps her from
moving to climax.

     This by no means the only reason women do not achieve
orgasm, but it appears to be a major one. I know many men who are
wonderful "shepherds" whose wives have never experienced an
orgasm; however, all too frequently the problem is rooted in a
lack of a trusting and secure relationship.
     She wants to feel you are a man ... that you will protect
her, lead her, and take care of her forever. If you communicate
indifference, weakness, or deliberate insensitivity you can upset
the balance of her emotional mechanism. Thus, sexual problems are
usually relationship problems and not just the woman's problem.

"Why don;t you go see a doctor and find out what's wrong with
you?" some husbands ask. There is nothing wrong with her in most
cases; there is something wrong with your relationship, and that
is just as much your fault as hers.
     One well-known sexual treatment clinic has come to a
dogmatic conclusion that there is no such thing as a woman with
the problem of "frigidity." There are only marriage relationships
with the problem of frigidity. The relationship is the problem,
not the woman!

     Edgar Rice Bourroughs had the right idea about male-female
relationships when he told the Tarzan stories. An ape-man in the
jungles of Africa was raised by some gorillas. One day a woman
named Jane (Ph.D.in something), came into Tarzen's world, and he
married her. Tarzan knew what he wanted, and Jane knew what she
wanted - Tarzan. She may have had a Ph.D., but Tarzan called the
shots. Once they got that straightened out, they had a swinging
time together! He offered security, strength, and protection!

A love affair with your husband's body

     Shulamith has a love affair with her husband's body. She
daydreams erotically of his physical manliness. She has a problem
getting her sexual desire up to Solomon's, so one way she raises
it is to think sexual thoughts about her husband during the day.
Shirley Rice speaks of having a "holy lust" for your husband.
Shulamith did (Song 5:9-16).

     Do you think about your husband sexually or do you just
think of "what a nice guy he is"? Do you think of how great it is
to make love with him, or do you think of him as "that wonderful
father and provider"? It is perfectly "holy" to think erotic,
sexual thoughts about your husband during the day. It's in the
Bible.
     Too frequently women who cannot climax tend to view their
husband's genitals as separate from their husband as a person.
They would never daydream about their husband's body as Shulamith
did; it seems repulsive to them. This is a major cause of
orgasmic dysfunction. You are to consider his genitals as part of
him as a person. You are to consider his semen as life, his life!
This is easy to grasp in connection with conception and
pregnancy, but not in regard to sex.

Three basic attitudes for solving problems

     This series of three reflections reveals three basic
attitudes adopted by Shulamith and Solomon in the interim between
the beginning of the sexual problems and their solution. These
attitudes are crucial for the resolution of all marital problems

FIRST, there is the assuming of responsibility for one's own
behavor instead of blaming the mate.

The SECOND basic attitude necessary for problem-solving is to
render a blessing when hurt or offended by one's mate (1 Peter
3:9).

The THIRD basic attitude revealed here is a complete and
transparent communication of one's real feelings. To suggest
marriage problems can be solved by simply assuming responsibility
for one's own behavior and responding with a blessing is quite
simplistic and can lead to suppression of negative feelings. It
is vitally important that all negative feelings be freely and
totally vented. even anger should be fully expressed.

     The Scriptures admonish us to "be angry but sin not" (Eph.
4:26). I think this means our anger is never to dissolve into
personal attacks, bitterness, or name calling. An "explosion" of
pent-up tensions in a marital relationship can often have a very
healthy effect. If you have been hurt by your mate, by all means
express your hurt and reveal your feelings. How else can he work
on the problem unless he knows specifically what it is? On the
other hand, continual nagging and criticism is counter-
productive.

     Make your feelings known and strive for a few "reminders" as
possible, trusting god to work changes. If there seems to be no
response, professional help should be considered before
communication lines become so frozen that it becomes impossible
to find release in the relationship.


     The two lovers of the Song are well on their way to
resolving some of the problems they encountered in regard to
sexual compatibility. The first step in the direction of a
solution involved a change of attitude. Now, in the following
reflection, a change of action is apparent as Shulamith
aggressively takes the initiative in their loveplay.


FOOTNOTES

1.   The Interpreters Dictionary of the Bible, ad. Arthur
Buttrick, four Vols. (New York: Abingdon Press, 1962), 4,13.
2.   Rant Delitzsch, "Song of Songs" (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans,
n.d.), p.104.
3.   Otto Zockler, "The Song of Solomon" Lane's Commentary, 12
Vols.; Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1960 [orig. ed. 1872], V. 107.
4.   Fred Hartley Wright, "Manners and Customs of Bible Lands"
(Moody, 1953). 
5.   Delitzsch, p.109.
6.   Roland de Vaux, "Ancient Israel" (New York: McGraw-Hill,
1965), p.116. 
7.   Inerpreters Dictionary of the Bible, 1, 666.
8.   Translation by Delitzsch, p.238. 
9.   Zockler, "Ecclesiastes," P.56. 
10.  Zockler, "Song," p.111.
11.  H. R. Rowley,"The Meaning of the 'Shulamite,'" " The
American Journal of Semitic Languages and Literature, 56
(January, 1939), 84-91.
12.  Christian Family Life Marital Information Survey, 1974. 
13.  Ibid.
14.  Seymour Fisher, "Understanding the Female Orgasm," p.74.

STATS FOR MAY - VERY FINE, BEST EVER!!!

GREATEST MONTH EVER WAS MAY FOR INTEREST IN MY BLOG


TOTAL WAS 


Last Month - MAY -160539

ROMANS EPISTLE #5

 

 New Testament Bible
Story

Chapter Seventy-three:

Paul writes Romans - Part five

                      
CHAPTER EIGHT

     With all that Paul has laid out in the preceding chapters it
is with confidence he says at the start of chapter eight, "There
is therefore no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus,
who live not after the flesh, but live after the Spirit."
     The law of itself could not save you, it was weak in that
regard, all it could do was reveal to you what sin is. But God
had another law so to speak, a way or a law of the Spirit of
life, to free us from the way or law of sin and death. That way
was to send Jesus in the flesh, to overcome sin in the flesh, to
live a perfect live, a sinless life, and so sin itself was
condemned to have no more power over us. Jesus took our sins upon
Himself and so the power of sin and death was lifted from us. It
was not lifted so we could freely go on sinning, but it was
lifted so the righteousness of the law might be performed and
activated in us, for he says again, that we Christians no longer
walk in accordance with the sinful desires of the flesh, but we
walk, live, after the Spirit, and we know the Spirit of God leads
us to serve and obey God (verses 1-4).

     Paul now moves into a somewhat deep discussion of our nature
before we repented, were baptized, and received the Spirit of
God, and the nature we now have as converted Christians with the
Spirit of God. He really looks at the two mind-sets, the one
BEFORE becoming a Christian and the other AFTER we are a
Christian. He shows that after knowing the correct way to
justification, forgiveness, through Christ, we must be led
on to live a different life (in thought, body, words, and deeds)
than the one we lived before we received the Spirit of God. He is
again answering the argument that being saved by grace does NOT
mean we can go on sinning and live our old way of life, that
was so often filled with sin and transgression of God's holy,
just, good, and righteous law.

     He says that if you do not let the Spirit of God lead you,
then you will follow the natural mind-set of those without God
and Christ in the world. If the Spirit of God is leading you then
you will live the correct godly way.  The two ways are opposite
to each other. Living without the leading of God's Spirit will
bring DEATH, but to have a mind led by the Spirit will bring
LIFE, and peace of mind here and now. This is all so, for he
states to just have a mind without God's Spirit influencing it,
is a mind that does not think about God's ways, does not make any
note of what is right or wrong from the Lord's perspective
of things. The natural mind just does what seems right in its
eyes. It is not focussed on God's law per se. Yes, the natural
mind may not sit down and say it hates God and His laws, the
natural mind may at times do some of the laws of God. Many people
know that to murder someone just because they said a nasty word
to you, is not going to end in a nice way for you. 
     But overall the natural mind, does not seek and desire to
serve and love and obey the laws of God, for its thoughts are not
thinking about God and His law as such, for the natural mind is
not being led or influenced by the Spirit of God. So in this
respect the natural mind cannot be God's friend, the natural mind
is then in an overall position of being against God, and so as
Paul said, an enemy to God, for it does not seek to be subject to
the law of God.
     In a salvation sense then, those who are in a state of only
having a natural mind, a mind that really does not think about
God or His law or His correct way to live, cannot, as for
salvation, please God.
     We need to remember that if such persons have never been
called by God, never having their spiritual blindness removed,
then that is God's doing, and so the Lord understanding that, can
give them good things pertaining to this life. It is only in
relation to being saved and having salvation that such carnal,
natural minded people, cannot please God. Certainly He can be
pleased with them if they do not murder other people, or do not
commit adultery, or bow down before some wood or stone idol, or
disrespect their parents. Many people lead a "good life" as we
put it - they do not hate God but do not think about Him either -
still their natural mind is NOT WITH God, hence you will perhaps
remember Jesus saying in the Gospels, "He that is not with me is
against me." So in spiritual salvation matters they cannot please
God (verses 5-8).

     What Paul is getting at is that his readers should NO LONGER
be in this condition, living the natural mind-set without
guidance from the Holy Spirit. He says, "But YOU are NOT in the
flesh, but in the SPIRIT, if so be that the Spirit of God dwells
in you. Now if anyone does not have the Spirit of Christ they do
not belong to Him" (verse 9).
     He once more says Christians who have Christ are dead
because of sin, they have as we have seen died in Christ who took
our sins, but are also alive again through the Spirit because of
righteousness, because the Spirit working in Christ the righteous
one saved them from death to give them life, and so the Spirit of
power that raised Christ from the dead, will also give eternal
life to whom that Spirit dwells in (verses 10-11).
     And what is Paul's deduction for all the grace given to
Christians? It is that they are to live NOT after the ways of the
natural flesh that does not know or does not acknowledge God and
His way of life. For to turn grace into living after the natural
flesh will mean you will die - you will not live in eternity, but
if through the power of the Spirit we kill the works of the
flesh, we shall live in eternity. Adding to this he says that
having the Spirit means we are sons of God and can rightly call
Him "Father." If we are then children of God we are HEIRS of God,
and joint-heirs with Christ, and if we in this life suffer for
His sake, we shall be glorified like He was when He was
resurrected (verses 12-17).

     We need to meditate deeply on the words that we are HEIRS of
God and joint- heirs with Christ. Most just do not realize what
is being revealed to us here. Christians are heirs, not of some
angel like Gabriel, but heirs of God the Father Himself. The
Father wants to share with His children ALL that He IS and ALL
that He HAS. Please read 1 John 3:1-3. Christians are one day to
be ABOVE angels! Paul said in 1 Corinthians 6, that Christians
were to judge angels. The destiny that God wants for YOU and for
me, is truly mind-bending. Is it then too much that the Lord asks
of us that we serve and obey Him and His holy, just, and good,
law and commandments? I think not!

     Paul finished his thought here with saying we must also be
willing to suffer with Jesus, if we want to be glorified with
Him. And this triggers a thought in Paul's mind concerning
sufferings that we may face in this life for Jesus' sake. We have
said that Paul was one of those "different" kind of writers, he
often went off on another thought that came to him while saying
something in a certain context. It is like going on a main road
then taking a side road for a while to view other parts of the
whole travel experience, then coming back on to the main thought
or road again later.
     Here Paul brings in "sufferings" with the thought of being
God's son with His Spirit. Enduring now for a time, the
sufferings that may come upon us, is not to be compared
to the GLORY which we shall have one day. In fact he says, the
whole creation is in a figure of speech crying out and longing
for the day when God's children will be glorified, yes, and even
we Christians long for that day. We now have the firstfruits of
the Spirit, a blessed spiritual life, but with patience we wait
for that day when we shall be glorified as Jesus was glorified in
His resurrection. I refer you again to 1 John 3:1-3 (verses 18-
25).

     Again, all this puts another thought into Paul's mind, and
that is the answer to the times when, through our sufferings, we
just cannot find the words to express ourselves to God, when we
are so "stressed out" shall we say, that we are "lost for words"
- we get down on our knees to beseech God, and we just do not
seem to be able to put our thoughts into words, or express
ourselves to Him.
     In verse 26, 27, Paul tells us that "the Spirit" helps our
human weakness for words at those times, and intercedes on our
behalf to the Father. 
     Here is another of those times when CONTEXT reading of Bible
passages is vital so we do not develop false theology ideas. The
words used by Paul, "the Spirit" in verse 26, 27, he interprets
for us in verse 34. It is Jesus who makes intercession for us.
And Paul again in 1 Timothy 2:5 says there is only ONE mediator
or interceding person between God and mankind - Christ Jesus!  So
who is it that talks for us to the Father when we do not have the
words? Paul interpreting Paul, or Scripture interpreting
Scripture - it is "the Spirit" or Christ Jesus that intercedes
for us at such times. It is NOT some third person of some three
person "Trinity" that intercedes for us, it is Christ Jesus, who
Paul at times called "THE Spirit."

     After that thought of who gives help when we need to express
ourselves to God, he answers the thought of why sufferings in the
first place, by saying that though we may be puzzled about them
at times, all the things of life work towards an end good for all
that have been called by God, according to the purpose He is
working out in His overall plan. And that plan was to call ones
to be like His Son Jesus. Christ was the firstborn of many others
who are to be also like Him. God knew from the beginning that He
would predestine or pre-determine that there would be a chosen
group of people from the time of Adam to the time of the first
resurrection. And so in determining that, they would of course be
called by God to salvation, and those called, would be justified
through Christ, as we have seen from all that Paul has previously
been teaching, and those justified, would then be in the first
resurrection to glory. And we have seen (in different previous
chapters) that glorification will be at the coming of Jesus in
power and glory to set up the Kingdom of God on earth.
     Predestination here and in a few other passages of the New
Testament, does NOT mean that YOU and all other individuals
called to salvation from Adam's time, were somehow known by God
years before each was born.  
Only a few individuals were known by God BEFORE their human birth.  
Jesus was, John the baptist was, Jeremiah was, and Cyrus a Persian king was (who
was to do God's will for a certain purpose). And the one most miss----

          The apostle Paul--  "But when God, who set me apart from my mother's  womb and called me by his grace, was pleased to reveal his Son in me so that I might preach him among the Gentiles, my immediate response was not to consult any human being.”(Galatians 1:15-16 

That's it  in the entire Bible that are revealed to us God said He knew
before they were born. But the Eternal Father did have set
out in advance before Adam was created, that there would
always be some called to salvation from the very beginning, and
they would eventually make up all those saints who will be in the
first resurrection to glorification, at the second coming of
Jesus back to this earth (verses 28-30).

     He points all this out to give the assurance to his readers
that God is FOR THEM, and so if God is FOR His children then who
can be against them.  All that Christians may face in this life
they can face and overcome, endure, and subdue, for God is WITH
them, God gave His Son for them, and Jesus His Son is on the
Father's right hand interceding for all the saints. 

     He finishes chapter 8 with the verses that have become a
great source of comfort and inspiration to Christians around the
world:

     "Can anything ever separate us from Christ's love? Does it
     mean He no longer loves us if we have trouble or calamity,
     or are persecuted, or are hungry or cold or in danger or
     threatened with death? Even the Scriptures say, 'For your
     sake we are killed every day; we are being slaughtered like
     sheep.' No, despite all these things, overwhelming victory
     is ours through Christ, who loves us. And I am convinced
     that nothing can ever separate us from His love. Death
     can't, and life can't. The angels can't, and the demons
     can't. Our fears for today, our worries about tomorrow, and
     even the powers of hell can't keep God's love away. Whether
     we are high above the sky or in the deepest ocean, nothing
     in all creation will ever be able to separate us from the
     love of God that is revealed in Christ Jesus our Lord" (New
     Living Translation).

CHAPTER NINE

     As Paul was talking about God's chosen, his mind now shifts
to the people of Israel as a whole.  He is so grieved over them
that he would have given up his own salvation life if they could
have all been saved. They were the people to whom God had
revealed Himself and given them so much. The great fathers like
Abraham came from them, and Christ was born from those people.
But he does see a silver thread among the dark cloth, some
Israelites did serve God. And so the true Israelite, a true child
of Abraham, are not really those who are just physically
descended from Abraham.  In fact Paul understood that it was
prophesied that the literal physical descendants of Abraham
would be called after Isaac. And so it is, for the main body of
the 12 tribes of Israel, the 10 tribes were taken into captivity
by the Assyrians in 745-718 B.C. and never returned to Palestine.
They eventually migrated through Europe and were known as Isaac's
sons or Saxons, and then Anglo-Saxons.
     It was through a promise of God to Sarah, Abraham's wife
that the children of Israel would come, through Isaac their son
of promise, and it was decided by God that it would be Isaac's
son Jacob and not Esau the older son, that would carry the
promise. It was all to do with the election of God, according to
His calling and will. So it was for those called to salvation
among the Israelites, it was God's grace and calling, not
something they could work at and earn through something from
themselves. He will come back to this very important point of
election and grace later, but for now his mind is on the right of
God to choose who He will have mercy on and who He will work
through. His mind for now is set on God's power to choose whom He
will choose to fulfil His purpose. The election of God's grace is
where it is at, for yesterday and for today (verses 1-13).

     Here is how Paul put it:

     "What shall we say then? Is there unrighteousness with God?
     God forbid! For He said to Moses, 'I will have mercy on whom
     I will have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I will
     have compassion' (Ex.33:19). So that it is not of him that
     wills it, nor of him that runs or works at it, but God that
     shows mercy. For the Scripture said concerning Pharaoh,
     'Even for this same purpose have I raised you up, that I
     might show my power in you, and that my name might be
     declared throughout all the earth' ((Ex.9:16).
     Therefore has He mercy on whom He will have mercy, and whom
     He will He hardens their heart" (verses 14-18).

     We need to read these verses for what they simply state and
believe them. I explained in certain parts of the Gospels we went
through, that it is clear ALL people are in spiritual
BLINDNESS....UNTIL God chooses to open their mind to spiritual
truths. We have seen that being called to know the truths of the
Lord is in God's hands. I refer you again to verses such as John
6:44, 63-65 and Deut.5:29; 29:4 with Number 11. If God does NOT
open the heart and mind to spiritual truths then that person
cannot understand salvation, they are still in their blindness
and the vail of darkness remains over their minds - see 
2 Corinthians 3:13-18. 
     We need not be concerned for their salvation, for God is
working with a plan of salvation for every human being that has
ever lived. Some are called to salvation in this life time, but
most are not. And as Paul here tells us with some of those NOT
called in this life time to know God and His salvation, He can do
with them whatever He likes, even to the point of what is related
here to us about Pharaoh. We saw as we went through the Gospels
that there is a large resurrection to physical life for millions,
probably BILLIONS in total from all ages, at the end of the 1,000
year Kingdom age on earth (read all of Revelation 20). All the
people, both young and old, poor and rich, famous and infamous,
kings, queens, and the ordinary peasants, will be raised to
physical life once more and given the word of God, have the tree
of life presented to them, have their minds opened to spiritual
truth, and mercy for salvation granted to them. The Pharaoh of
Moses' day will  be among those billions.
     Paul will return again to this truth of calling and the
election of grace for SOME and BLINDNESS for the rest, in chapter
11.

     The argument will be immediately raised that, "Well, if it
is all to do with God's will as to who is called to salvation and
who is left in blindness and hardness of heart, then really no
one can be blamed for not doing God's will, and why should He
then find fault with anyone?" (verse 19)
     Paul answers this argument, but not in any detailed way, he
simply replies to it with:

     "No, but, O man, who do you think you are to tell God what
     to do? Shall that which is made say to him that made it,
     'Why did you make me such and such?' Does not the potter
     have power over the clay, and with the same lump of clay he
     can make one vessel to be honored and another vessel to be
     dishonored? So, with God, He may decide to be patient in
     wrath to show His power of wrath to others, and endure for a
     while with patience upon the vessel He decided would have
     His wrath and destruction. Hence he makes known the riches
     of His mercy to those He decided would have His mercy and
     have their calling to eventual glory. And sometimes this was
     all known to God in advance. Even as He had decided to call
     us Christians to receive His mercy and glory, and not of
     Jews only but also of the Gentiles" (verses 20-24).

     He proves that God in this age is only calling to salvation
a relative few by quoting from Hosea 2:23 and 1:10, where God
states that those who were not His people shall be called His
people and children of the living God. Then he moves to the
prophet Isaiah and quotes chapters 10:22; 11:5; 28:22 and 1:9
with Lamentation 3:22. It is clear that Paul believes these
verses show God had only determined to save or have mercy upon
a relative few, in the context of salvation in the Christian age.
And that God's calling would include people from outside of
Israel, or from the Gentiles.

     Now with this all said, his thoughts go back to the way of
justification that he was covering in earlier chapters, and ties
the truth of the true way to justification with why the majority
of the Jews have failed to attain reconciliation and forgiveness
with God in the New Covenant age.
     The Gentiles did not have the knowledge of God revealed to
them as did the Jews who had been given the Old Covenant. By and
large the Gentiles were not even looking for the truth of God,
but as the Gospel was proclaimed to them they saw the truth about
being justified or forgiven of sins was through FAITH in the
sacrifice of Jesus the Messiah, as their sin bearer.
     The Jews on the other hand, who did have God revealed to
them and all the Old Testament Scriptures, did not obtain (in the
most part) the righteousness of God because they sort it by the
works of the law, trying to earn it by works and did not have
faith in the true way of justification with God, namely through
Jesus the Messiah. They stumbled at Christ, would not accept Him
as the sacrificial Savior of sins. Paul says this was also
prophesied to be this way, and that can be found in Psalm 118:22;
Isaiah 8:14; 28:16.

     Paul will further expound on the contrast between the works
of the law and the work of faith in obtaining right standing with
God, in chapter 10.

            .....................................

May 2004

TO BE CONTINUED

Sunday, May 31, 2026

ROMANS EPISTLE #4

 


 New Testament Bible
Story

Chapter Seventy-two:

Paul writes Romans - Part four

                 
CHAPTER SIX

SYMBOLISM OF WATER BAPTISM

     Paul anticipated the argument coming back at him for what he
had taught about grace and justification, that if his position
was correct, then people should practice MORE sin so grace could
be glorified even more. His fast and immediate answer to this
was, "GOD FORBID!" He said that those who had died to sin could
no longer live in sin. He goes on to explain this sentence.
     It all has to do with water baptism, and what that rite
pictured or symbolized. Being baptized in water, immersed fully
under water, which correct water baptism does (the New Testament
Church of God knew no such practice as sprinkling a few drops of
water over someone to baptize them, even the large and very old
Roman Catholic church for many centuries of the Christian age,
baptized with full immersion. This fact can be found in the
Catholic Encyclopedia), pictures our dying with Christ. If we did
not come up from under the water we would die, and as it is done
in the name of Jesus, Paul says, "as were baptized into Jesus
Christ, were baptized into His death" (verses 1-3).

     As Jesus was raised from the dead by the Father, so we are
raised from the watery grave so to speak, to have a NEW life that
we are to walk in. Jesus was raised to a new glorified life, and
as we have died in Him in water baptism, so we shall be one
day in the likeness of His glory (see 1 John 3:1-3 on that
matter, and 1 Corinthians 15 which we have covered in previous
chapters), which to Paul meant that Christians now have a new
life to live after they are baptized.
     Verse six say it all. Our old man with its sins was
crucified or put to death in Him through water baptism. Going
under the water symbolized that we were willing to put the
old sinful man to death, to destroy sin, that we "might not serve
sin."  It is as plain as the nose on your face as we say, that
baptism means we are willing to NOT SERVE sin any longer, that we
HENCEFORTH have a different mind-set, one that wants to go in the
opposite direction of serving sin. And by putting a few
Scriptures together we can understand the New Testament
definition of what sin IS - see 1 John 3:4; James 2:10-12.
We are then to have a mind-set of wanting to obey the Ten
Commandments (and we must remember that the Ten commandments are
amplified or magnified by the whole Bible, so it is indeed a
mind-set of doing what Jesus said in Matthew 4:4 - that is
"living by every word that proceeds out of the mouth of God").

     Paul gives the illustration that if we be physically dead,
we can no longer sin. Then he proceeds to our being dead in
Christ. Our water baptism was as if we died with Christ on the
cross, and so being "dead with Him" in a figure, we shall also
"live with Him" in another figure of speech. As Jesus was raised
from the dead, and He died because HE took all our sins upon
Himself and died the penalty of sin for us, which penalty was
death. But now He is alive again, raised from the dead, in
glorified eternal life, death can never touch Him. He is
completely free from sin ever being able to tempt Him, let alone
perhaps sin (remember the Scriptures teach in the book of Hebrews
that Jesus was tempted in all points like us, but never sinned).
Now being raised from death to immortal life, Jesus is free from
even the temptation to sin. Christ died to sin, or for our sins,
once upon the tree, but now lives as God lives, never to sin or
even be tempted with sin. It is a life where sin is not even
there in any sense period (verses 4-10).

     The following verses of Paul are so plain and so easy to
understand, when we know what sin IS, then even little children
can understand what Paul is clearly saying in verses 11-14. I
will quote them from the "New Living Translation" published by
Tyndale House.

     "So you should consider yourselves dead to sin and able to
     live for the glory of God through Christ Jesus. Do not let
     sin control the way you live, do not give in to its lustful
     desires. Do not let any part of your body become a tool of
     wickedness, to be used for sinning. Instead, give yourselves
     completely to God since you have been given new life.
     And use your whole body as a tool to do what is right for
     the glory of God. Sin is no longer your master, for you are
     no longer subject to the law, which enslaves you to sin.
     Instead, you are free by God's grace."

     God has through Christ delivered us from the law that
enslaved us to death, for the law had said to the judge that we
were guilty of breaking it, we had sinned, and were so condemned
or enslaved to have the penalty of law breaking applied to us. We
had gone through many red stop lights, and were now enslaved or
captured by the policeman's law radar detector, and were found
guilty of breaking the law, and so the penalty of breaking the
law was upon us. But the judge had given us grace, or mercy,
through his son, who had be willing to pay our law breaking fine
for us, in our stead. We were free by grace from the sin we had
committed, and so now we were to have a mind-set that wanted to
never break the law again, that wanted to never sin again. We are
now to yield our body and mind and life to being like an
instrument in God's hands that only produces the righteousness of
God (again see Ps.119:172 for one definition of righteousness).
Being under the "grace" of the judge would mean we were willing
to put sin away, and never want to serve sin again, we would now
have the desire and heart to not obey sin, but just the opposite,
to obey righteousness.

     Paul says in verse 15, that we "are not under the law but
under grace."  How this phrase has been misused by so many  over
the years is a classic example of the silly, Biblically
uneducated people, who claim to be guides and leaders in Bible
understanding and in the way of the Lord concerning salvation.
They are instead truly as Jesus said of the same type of
individuals in His day, "blind leaders of the blind" who both
shall fall into the pit.
     Whatever Paul is saying here in this verse, it does concern
SIN! And he clearly says ONCE MORE, that in all that he has been
teaching, that if the argument is put forth that being under
grace means we can serve sin more and more, then he answers loud
and emphatically....GOD FORBID!!

     Putting Scripture with Scripture, we have already seen what
sin IS. Breaking the law of God, the Ten Commandments, is
sinning. Paul is in this section of his epistle, making the point
that a Christian being baptized and starting on a new life, must
put away sin, must not serve sin, so he CANNOT be here in verse
15, stating you can have the mind-set to NOT obey the law of God.
It is obvious from the CONTEXT, that "we are not under the law,
but under grace" does NOT mean we can live and practice a way of
life that breaks the law of the Lord. The ONLY meaning of this
phrase can be that as we are delivered from the penalty of
breaking the law, which hung over us, as we are under or have
been given grace, mercy, forgiveness, of our sin of law breaking,
we cannot now go ahead and live a life of sin, or law breaking.
The judge in giving you grace or forgiveness for going through a
number of red lights, is NOT giving you the freedom to continue
to go through any and all red lights you come to, as you now have
his grace.

     Paul goes on to make what he has just stated about grace and
law and sin very easy to understand and never to mis-apply what
he is teaching on the matter. I will give you verses 16-23 from
the "New Living Translation."

     "Don't you realize that whatever you choose to obey becomes
     your master? You can choose sin, which leads to death, or
     you can choose to obey God and receive His approval. Thank
     God! Once you were slaves to sin, but now you have obeyed
     with all your heart the new teaching God has given you. Now
     you are free from sin, your old master, and you have become
     slaves to your new master, righteousness. I speak this way,
     using the illustration of slaves and masters, because it is
     easy to understand. Before, you let yourselves be slaves of
     impurity and lawlessness. Now you must choose to be slaves
     of righteousness so that you will become holy. In those 
     days when you were slaves of sin, you weren't concerned with
     doing what is right. And what was the result? It was not
     good, since now you are ashamed of the things you used to
     do, things that end in eternal doom. But now you are free
     from the power of sin and have become slaves to God. Now you
     do those things that lead to holiness and result in eternal
     life. For the wages of sin is death, but the free gift of
     God is eternal life through Christ Jesus our Lord."

     It is really simple to understand if you really want to
understand. The Bible tells us what sin IS and what righteousness
IS. I have given you those Scriptures that interpret for us sin
and righteousness. Paul is clearly saying that when we are
forgiven of our sins through the grace of God via the blood
sacrifice of Jesus Christ, we must have a new mind-set, which is
one of turning from living the way of sin and turning to obey the
righteousness of God. How people can try to say that Paul was the
teacher who abolished the law of God, the Ten Commandments, is to
me the hight of New Testament ignorance. Then again I know the
reason some have this theology. It is because they will not obey
the FOURTH of the Ten Commandments, and so will twist themselves
into every contortion they can possibly come up with to teach
others that the law of God is abolished under the New Covenant.

CHAPTER SEVEN

     Paul now draws on a point of the law, the Old Covenant in
this case, not the law of the Ten Commandments per se, because it
has to do with marriage and re-marriage. He tells them that they
should know the law applies only to a person who is still living.
He illustrates with the basic law of marriage. In a general sense
the law bound a woman to her husband till death. If he died then
the laws of marriage no longer applied, she could re-marry, but
if she tried to do this when he was alive, she would be
committing adultery. 
     Before we proceed with exactly what Paul was illustrating
with all this, I want to mention that the law Paul was stating
about marriage, was a GENERAL statement only.
     Most people are unaware of the principle of "general
statements" in the Bible. There are dozens and dozens of them. An
example would be this; the New Testament states "It is given unto
men to die once, and after this the judgement." This is a general
statement, for we know that a number of people in the Bible were
raised from the dead to physical life again (the famous example
is Jesus raising Lazarus from the dead), hence those people died
TWICE.  Another general statement is that which has perplexed
many, found in the book of Proverbs; "Train up a child in the way
he should go, and when he is old he will not depart from it."
This is also a general statement, because it is a fact of life
that some parents have trained very well their children or child
in the way of the Lord, the way they should go, when they were
children, but the child or children, never accepted that way in
which they should go, and died (young or old) as un-converted
none Christians. The frustrating problem that many parents have
had over this verse is put to rest and peace, when we understand
that it is a general statement only. It does not apply in every
case.
     So this example of Paul here about what many claim is THE
ONLY law of marriage and re-marriage - death of one of the
parties. Such is not the case, for Paul was taking his example
from "the law" - the Old Covenant, and the fact is the Old
Covenant under Moses DID ALLOW for DIVORCE and RE-marriage is
certain situations. This can be easily seen from reading the
ENTIRE Old Testament. What Paul was doing was giving a general
statement example in marriage. To cover the exceptions to the
general rule would only have clouded what Paul was illustrating
for his main point, which was not really anything to do with
marriage and re-marriage per se.

     Now to what Paul was getting at. He explains in verses 4-6.
And once more here is where many have very badly not understood
Paul. Many say this is another section where he "abolishes" the
law of the Ten Commandments.  Of course if such people would
read verses 7-25, and see that Paul in his mind-set ready did
want to obey the law of God, and admitted it was holy, the
commandments were holy, just and good, then they would seek for
the true understanding of verses 1-6.
     From verse 4 to 6 is Paul's explanation of verses 1-3.
Before you died in a figure with Christ on the cross, you were
held in the power of the law. Now what power does the law have?
Can the law talk to you? No, it cannot. Can the law say you are
innocent if you break the law? No it can not. Can the law show
mercy to you for transgressing it? No it can not! The only thing
where the law has power over you, is to condemn you for breaking
it. You then before dying in a figure with Christ on the cross,
were held in the condemnation power of the law, in this case of
humanity, it is the penalty of death that the law demands from
you for being a sinner, for breaking the law. You were held under
that power of condemnation, but when in a figure you died with
Christ on the cross, you paid the penalty, it held no more power
over you, you were free from it's power of death, free to marry
another, be united with someone who was raised from the dead to
glorious immortal righteous life. That someone who you can now
also be united with in the same kind of life of righteous living,
is Christ Jesus.
     The sinful life is gone, it is dead. You have died through
Christ to that old sin that hung over you, and the penalty which
the law demanded you pay.  It's all taken care of, it's all paid
in full, because you died in figure through Jesus' death on the
stake. And now you are free from condemnation to be married to
Him that was raised from death to glorious life that can only
live righteously with God. We are now in a new marriage, with
a new husband, with a new fresh start and with a new mind-set of
leaving behind the husband of sin and death, and being joined to
a husband of perfect righteousness, so we also can as a result,
produce good fruit, good deeds, a good way of living for God.

     I will add words in brackets to amplify the "New Living
Translation" of verses 5-6.

"When we were controlled by our old nature (our husband in Paul's
example) sinful desires were at work within us, and the law
aroused these evil desires that produced sinful deeds, resulting
in death (the law stood and beamed a light on sin, even
magnifying it, and then we could see where our desires of sin had
led us to sin, and so then condemned us to death). But now we
have been released from the law, for we died with Christ
(released from its condemnation and penalty, for that is Paul's
context. We in the person of Christ died on the cross, the law's
power of death paid in full, so we are free from that powerful
old husband), and we are no longer captive to its power (yes, the
context of Paul is the law's power, the old husband's power of
death over us). Now we can really serve God (our new husband) not
in the old way by obeying the letter of the law (we may have had
a partial observance of God's law  in certain ways - many people
do not murder, or bow before a stone or wooden idol in their back
yard - our old husband may not have been totally evil, but we
were still far from obeying God as He would want us to obey Him),
but in the new way by the Spirit (Jesus came to magnify the law -
see Isa. 42:21. We saw how he magnified it when we went through
the "sermon on the mount" as it is often called - Mat.5,6,7. We
are now married to a new husband - God, and He demands a walk of
life that is in Spirit and in truth - John 4:24. He demands a
serving of Him in a much deeper way than the way we lived under
our old husband)."

GOD'S LAW REVEALS OUR SIN

     This is the way the "New Living Translation" heads verses
7-13. I will give you their translation.

     "Well, then, am I suggesting that the law of God is evil? Of
     course not! The law is not sinful, but it was the law that
     showed my sin. I would never have known that coveting is
     wrong if the law had not said, 'Do not covet.' But sin took
     advantage of this law and aroused all kinds of forbidden
     desires within me! If there were no law, sin would not have
     that power. I felt fine when I did not understand what the
     law demanded. But when I learned the truth, I realized I had
     broken the law and was a sinner, doomed to die. So the good
     law, which was supposed to show me the way of life, instead
     gave me the death penalty. Sin took advantage of the law and
     fooled me; it took the good law and used it to make me
     guilty of death. But still, the law itself is holy  and
     right and good. But how can that be? Did the law which is
     good, cause my doom? Of course not! Sin used what was good
     to bring about my condemnation. So we can see how terrible
     sin really is. It uses God's good commandment for its own
     evil purposes."

     Ah, yes, this is exactly what I have been bringing out to
you. Paul interprets himself. He knows the law itself is good,
holy, just, and did you notice he said that where there is NO law
there is no power. Obviously if there is no law you cannot break
it. For some to say that the law of God was abolished at the
cross is to say that since the cross there has been no sin, hence
you and I are not sinners, and we need not a Savior. How silly,
how il-logical are some of the reasonings of some Christian
teachers. The law cannot possibly be "done away with" for it is
the law that tells you what sin IS, as Paul has just shown us.
     He personifies sin here. Personification is taking an
object, a thing, and making it into as if it is a person. Sin
became a person in a figure of speech, and sin looked at the
law of God and said, well I can take this holy and good and
righteous law, and use it to smash over the head every person,
for if they know the law or if they do not know it, no person has
ever observed it perfectly, they have broken it in one way or
another, and I can use it to condemn them all to the law's
penalty - death.  So sin stood before the judge and with a holy
and good law (the law of stopping at red lights is a good law, it
protects us as we travel around the roads. Just think about our
roads not having red and green lights at intersections - what a
mess of accidents and death and injury there would be) said,
"Look all these people have broken this holy law, and so I demand
the penalty for breaking this good law be applied to them. I
demand they all be put to death." Sin as a person used God's holy
law to its own evil end - to condemn us all.

     Paul then goes on to say in verse 14, "The law is good then.
The trouble is not with the law but with me, because I am sold
into slavery, with sin as my master" (New Living Translation).
     He goes on to say: 

     "I'm somewhat baffled and amazed, for what I should do I
     often don't do, and what I hate I often find myself doing.
     If I'm then doing what I should not do, then I have to admit
     the law is good. Then I know it is not really the deep
     mind-set I have towards good, but it is the nature of sin
     that still remains in me. Of myself, in my natural flesh
     there is no real help, for I have the right mind-set towards
     good, but how to perform it I find not in my natural nature.
     For the good I should do, I do not, and the evil I should
     not do, I often do. It is the natural sinful self that pulls
     me towards doing what I should not do. It is then like an
     invisible law, that when I want to do good, evil is still
     present with me. In my deep mind-set I delight in the law of
     God after the inner heart. But then I see another invisible
     law inside of me, making war against the law of my mind's
     delight, and it brings me into captivity to the law of sin
     that is still inside me. I often feel wretched.
     Who shall deliver me from this sinful law of death? I thanks
     God through Jesus Christ our Lord. He is my victory. So it
     is with my new mind-set that I serve the law of God; but
     with the natural flesh I still serve the law of sin" (my own
     paraphrased rendering of verses 15-25).

     Paul, as a Christian, under the New Covenant, with Jesus as
Savior, wanted to go the right way, he wanted to SERVE the LAW
(sure did not believe it was abolished) and do what was righteous
and good. At the same time he still had what we often call "human
nature" inside of him, and it was like a law of gravity that
pulled towards doing and going the WRONG way, the way of sin.
There were then TWO gravity laws so to speak, inside of him, each
pulled against the other. And without help from someone, the law
that pulled towards evil often won the battle. But he finished on
the positive....he has someone that can give him victory over the
pulling law of sin, and that someone was Jesus Christ. We
can now put this with that great verse of Galatians 2:20.

     Jesus lives in the true Christian and we live by the faith
OF Jesus, His faith IN us, and He within us gives us the victory
in the main (we do as Christians fall at times - see 1 John 1:8 
to  2:6) over the law of the pull towards sin.

     It is very clear that the whole CONTEXT here shows the LAW
of God, the Ten Commandments has NEVER been abolished.

     And being in Christ, or as Paul has said, Christ in us,
leads to no condemnation.

                 ..........................

May 2004

TO BE CONTINUED