Thursday, July 9, 2026

HEBREWS CHAPTERS 5, 6

 


 New Testament Bible
Story

Chapter One-hundred-two:

Epistle to Hebrews - Chapters Five and Six

                                    
CHAPTER FIVE

     The duty of the High Priest in religion is to offer both
gifts and sacrifices - of course we are speaking in times past
before the New Covenant age of Christianity.
     A High Priest being human, can also have compassion on those
who are not perfect, who sin, and who miss the mark of holiness.
The Priest being not perfect either, must also give offerings for
his sins. 
     Under the Old Covenant in Israel, the High Priest was
appointed by God as Aaron was, the calling not being men's ideas,
but the calling and service was from God. The Hebrews knew all
this truth, hence Paul leads into the same arguments of truth for
Jesus Christ. It was not some fancy vain idea of Christ to become
a High Priest for mankind towards God the Father. It was the
Father's will and plan and desire to have Jesus born through the
Holy Spirit into a human man. Hence the Scriptures can say, "You
art my Son, this day I have begotten you" (Psalm 2:7).
     And also the Scripture says, "You are a Priest after the
order of Melchizedek" (Psalm 110:6).
     We shall come back with Paul later, to a more detailed
connection and typology with Christ and Melchizedek, in chapter 7.

     Jesus was human as well as divine. Yes fully human and fully
divine. Jesus needed to be close to the Father in prayers and
supplications, with at times strong crying and even tears, unto
Him that was able to save Him from sin and death. And the Father
was indeed well pleased and did hear and did provide Jesus with
the Holy Spirit without measure, we are told in the Gospels.
Jesus needed mighty strength and power to withstand the
temptations and power of the Devil, and the pull of human nature.
Together with those factors and the factor of living in a society
that was sinful in many ways, it is mighty difficult to remain
sinless. Think about it. You may at times be close enough to God
to have no wrong thought, no wrong word, no wrong action. Maybe
you can be like that for an hour, maybe a few hours, maybe a half
day, possibility even a whole day. But think about having to try
and live like that day after day, week after week, month after
month, year after year!
     Surely living perfect and holy all your life, would take
MUCH prayer, MUCH supplication, many heart-felt TEARS at times.
     It was no easy cake walk for Jesus to remain sinless, why
just one sin from Him, and it would have been all over, and
mankind would or could never be saved to eternal glory in the
family of God.
     Jesus had to put forth great personal effort of mind to be
always so close to the Father, that with the help of the power of
the Holy Spirit, He could remain sinless. Yes, he was the Son of
God in a miraculous way, but He learned day after day just what
it meant to be OBEDIENT. Jesus learnt from the daily situations
of life that we encounter and which can effect our thinking and
our words and our actions, what it was like and what was needed
to continually be obedient to the will and way of the Father.

     Then when it was all finished for Him in this physical flesh
and blood life, He was glorified to eternal PERFECTION, where sin
could never again even be a temptation. Paul tells us also an
important truth here. Jesus was the AUTHOR - the one to write the
book so to speak - for eternal salvation. It is a truth that
clearly tells us that NO OTHER physical person who has EVER
lived, has EVER gained as yet, eternal salvation in glorious
perfection. No, not Enoch, no not, Moses, no not Elijah - NO ONE
except Christ has been glorified to eternal perfection of
salvation. Elsewhere in the writings of Paul he tells us that
Christ Jesus has PRE-EMINENCE in ALL things. And here in Hebrews,
part of that pre-eminence is being the AUTHOR or salvation. Jesus
has written the book on how physical people can obtain and
inherit eternal salvation. On this Website I have a full in-depth
study showing that Enoch, Moses, and Elijah, are NOT in heaven,
they are STILL dead, in their graves, and await the resurrection
of the dead. Paul also again clearly tells us this is so at the
end of Hebrews chapter 11. 

     If we OBEY Christ we can also inherit eternal salvation in
glorious perfection.

     Christ Jesus was called of God, and He was called to be a
High Priest AFTER THE ORDER of "Melchizedek." Paul said he could
say many things about this truth, but it would be hard to utter
these things to them, because they had dulled their ears to
hearing such wonders and truths. Paul got into some straight
talk, shoot from the hip words, at times, with people who had
closed their ears and mind to wonderful truths of God.
     Paul told them that THEY, those Hebrews should by now have
become TEACHERS of these truths, yet they themselves needed to be
taught AGAIN, the FIRST principles of God. They needed the MILK
of the word of truth, and could not digest strong meat. 
     What a sad state in the life of a Christian to be at the
point of not hearing God's word speak to you, revealing to you
deep and deeper things of the meat of the Father's truths. It 
something we need to be watchful with all of our lives, to never
be dull of hearing, complacent, having a "oh hum, ain't
interested in exploring deeper into God's word" attitude. We are
told by the apostle Peter to "grow in grace and knowledge" - we
can not do that if we are not "thinking" - "reading" -  "studying"
- "meditating" - "searching" - and always open to let the Holy
Spirit lead us into all truths. It's the attitude of having an
open mind, yet at the same time not so open that our brains fall
out, and then being pushed around with every wind of doctrine,
tossed here and there. It is having a fine balance between the
two. It can be done. It is not easy, and many have not learned
HOW to be balanced, and many have made shipwreck their eternal
salvation. But with God all things are possible. I personally
have experienced the wonder of it all, as God has led me, via His
Holy Spirit into all truths, certainly all truths that are
required for salvation, and many truths that are just great to
know, and open up and bring to life the power, and majesty, and
plan of the Almighty, as He works His work on this earth here
below.

     Paul says that STRONG MEAT belongs to those who have MATURED
in spirituality, who have been exercised by God's word, who use
it daily to exercise their spiritual muscles and build up their
strength of correct senses to discern both that which is evil and
that which is good (verses 1-14).

CHAPTER SIX

     Paul urges his readers to now leave the basic principles and
truths of God and move on to greater perfection. Yes, the basic
truths we need to clearly know, but after knowing them, we do not
stand still, we do not "tread water" but we SWIM on! 
     The foundational, tread the water truths of God, are now
listed for us. They are: REPENTANCE from dead works, FAITH
towards God, the teachings of BAPTISMS, the LAYING ON OF HANDS,
the RESURRECTION of the dead, and eternal PUNISHMENT.

     All these foundational truths are FULLY explored in the form
of IN-DEPTH studies on this Website.

     Paul gives a grave and sober truth here. Those who have been
called and chosen, who have truly been partakers of the heavenly
gift, who have been enlightened, who have had the Holy Spirit,
and who have indeed tasted the good word of God and the very
power of the age to come. IF THEY SHALL FALL AWAY, TO RENEW THEM
AGAIN TO REPENTANCE, as they have crucified the Son of God once
more, and so have put Him to open shame.
     What words to meditate upon! What soberness they contain!
What seriousness is in them! They are there in the holy word of
God. How many have lived and died being a part of this company
that cannot be renewed to repentance, only the resurrection will
tell.
     The illustration of the physical earth is now given. The
water from God comes on the earth, without partiality in the
general terms of it all, and some lands dressed and cared for by
men, bring forth foods fit for eating, but some parts of the land
bring forth thorns and briers, which are rejected, and even
cursed sometimes, whose end is to be gathered and burned in the
fire.

     As we read through the Gospels and the rest of the New
Testament, such illustrations of the good and bad, the wheat and
tares, the sheep and goats, are repeated often times. The bad,
the thorns and the briers, are one day to be gathered together
and cast into the furnace of fire, to be burned up, in the second
death that is spoken about in Revelation 20.
     
     Paul does not want to leave them in utter despair and
downcast, as if he is telling them that THEY are in a hopeless
position, and can only face the fire of destruction. No, he does
NOT believe they are beyond all hope of salvation. In fact he
knows they have done well in the past, have had good works, labor
of love, showing it in the way they have served God and served
the saints, even ARE STILL serving the saints. He wants them to
CONTINUE to show the same DILIGENCE, to the full assurance of the
hope, unto THE END! He wants them to not be SLOTHFUL, lazy,
sleepy, in their spirituality, but to be followers of those who
through FAITH and PATIENCE (living and practicing what is right
in the sight of God) will INHERIT the promises pertaining to
salvation.

     He gives them the example of one of their great old fathers
- Abraham. He was faithful, he believed God, he obeyed God, he
served the Almighty. God had promised that his very descendants
in the flesh would be multiplied as the stars of heaven. Abraham
patiently endured, walking with God, serving Him, obeying Him,
and he finally received the son of promise.
     The Eternal had first PROMISED to Abraham, then God SWORE by
Himself, to Abraham that this would be so. There is none greater
than God, hence God swore by Himself. Men can make contracts with
each other, swear by this or that, to give some kind of assurance
to other men, that it will be so. But God has no greater to swear
by, so he swore on Himself, and it is written God cannot lie. 

     The AMPLIFIED BIBLE gives the sense of the last verses of
this chapter.

     "Accordingly God also, in His desire to show more
     convincingly and beyond doubt to those who were to inherit
     the promise, the unchangeableness of His purpose and plan,
     intervened (mediated) with an oath. This was so that, by two
     changeable things (His promise and His oath) in which it is
     impossible for God ever to prove false or deceive us, we who
     have fled (to Him) for refuge, might have mighty indwelling
     strength and strong encouragement to grasp and hold fast the
     hope appointed for us and set before (us). (Now) we have
     this (hope) as a sure and steadfast anchor of the soul (it
     cannot slip and it cannot break down under whoever steps
     out upon it - a hope) that reaches farther and enters into
     (the very certainty of the Presence) within the veil (Lev.
     16:2). Where Jesus has entered in for us (in advance), a
     Forerunner having become a High Priest forever after the
     order (with the rank) of Melchizedek (Psalm 110:4)." 
     (verses 1-20).

     Paul again ends his thought by bringing his readers back to
Jesus as being HIGH PRIEST in heaven above. The very High Priest
of the rank of the famous Melchizedek to whom their great father
Abraham gave homage. 

     Paul will now go on in chapter 7, with the important
connection between Melchizedek and Jesus Christ. The connection
is far greater than any spirituality that could be given to Aaron
and the Levitical Priesthood or any High Priest coming from that
line of Aaron and Levi.

                            ..................

Written December 2006

Wednesday, July 8, 2026

HEBREWS CHAPT.ERS 2, 3, 4


 New Testament Bible
Story

Chapter One Hundred-one:

Epistle to Hebrews #8

                     

                    Epistle to Hebrews chap. 2, 3, 4



CHAPTER TWO

     After all that was stated in the first chapter it was indeed
that we should not let anything slip away. The word of angels was
in times past, solid and steadfast, and those who did not heed
even angels received a just recompense for their folly. If that
being so, as it was, then how can we Christians escape a just
punishment, IF we neglect so great a salvation, which was
proclaimed by the Lord, and afterwards by those who heard Him
proclaim it. It was all backed up by God performing miracles,
wonders, signs, and by the gifts of the Holy Spirit, as God
willed (verses 1-4).

     Paul now once more affirms the GREAT and MIGHTY calling, and
what it all means for those who ARE the children of God, and the
very brothers and sisters of Christ. The "age to come" that Paul
and other apostles spoke about, as part of the Gospel message,
was not going to be ruled by angels, as they being in charge and
being the main beings over that new age, that the prophets of old
have spoken about in so much of their writings. 
     It is MAN, human kind, that is going to be the chief ones in
the new age of things. God the Father's plan in creating mankind,
was it have them as part of His family, above the angels in
authority and power, and it was human kind that was to be given
the whole universe to rule and help govern under the Father and
His first begotten and first born Son - Christ Jesus.
     Paul quotes from Psalm 8, that asks the question of "What is
man that you are mindful of him? You did make mankind lower than
the angels, but you in your plan have crowned him with glory and
honor, and have determined to set him over the works of your
hands."
     
     Paul was then inspired to tell us that when God had
determined to put mankind over His works, it did mean ALL His
works of creation, the entire universe. All things was eventually
to be in subjection to man. And there was NOTHING that was not to
be under the rulership of mankind. But as of yet, the present,
this was not the reality, all things are not yet under the
rulership of human kind (that was created as God tells us in
Genesis, after the God kind, "after OUR image" - God said).
     But, there is one fact, we do see Jesus, who was also for a
short while made into flesh and blood, a little lower than the
angels, for the purpose of suffering death (and so making
salvation possible for sinful mankind), NOW crowned with GLORY
and HONOR!!
     The Father had pre-determined to have MANY sons born to Him,
in the plan of salvation. Jesus, was the CAPTAIN, or LEADER, the
one to guide the way to the Father, was now made FULLY PERFECT,
in glory, and all that is perfection as God, and it was all done
through Him, Christ, suffering the life of being a human, knowing
all about what it is like to be flesh and blood.
     As Jesus had said in the real "Lord's prayer" of John 17,
that the Father, and Him, and all those who would belong to
Christ, were ONE. Jesus prayed to the Father that they would all
be ONE. Paul re-affirms here that it is so, and is the will of
the Father that Christ, and humans through salvation in Christ,
would be ALL ONE. Hence Jesus, is NOT ashamed to call His
followers BROTHERS! Here the Greek word does indeed mean
"brothers" - just as we think of brothers that come from the same
parents - very kin, very family. So, as the NT teaches over and
over again, God is a FAMILY, there is God the Father, and God the
Son, and all who are Christ's ARE HIS BROTHERS - they are part of
the VERY FAMILY CALLED GOD! 
     It is like the Father and Christ working a work whereby they
have between themselves PRODUCED "children" - of THEIR KIND, not
angel kind, or any other kind, but the very KIND that is God
KIND! 
     So, as children of parents partake of flesh and blood, so
Jesus partook of flesh and blood, in order to redeem and make a
way of salvation possible for the Father to have more children
born of Him. Jesus, through His death on the cross, was able to
destroy the works of Satan, and the power of death that the Devil
held over mankind. Jesus, was by living a perfect human life, not
sinning even once, delivering us from the fear and bondage of
eternal death because of sins we had done. 
     All that wonderful truth Paul had fully examined the his
epistle to the Romans.

     Jesus, did not step down to the angel level, like some
"superman" that was not really quite human, but He came as from
the seed of Abraham, very flesh and blood. He needed to be like
His BROTHERS, Paul states, so He could then be a MERCIFUL and
FAITHFUL High Priest in all things pertaining to God, and to be
able to make reconciliation for the sins of the people. In that
He went through the trials, tests, and faced all the same kinds
of temptations, we humans face, He is able to kindly help and
understand us who are tempted by sin and by the Devil.
     The work of Christ TODAY, sitting on the right hand of the
Majesty on High, as our High Priest, is often overlooked by far
too many ministers and people of the Christian religion and
faith. Paul will, in other chapters, amplify in this epistle to
the Hebrews, the OFFICE and function of Jesus as High Priest.
Such a function by Christ in heaven, is absolutely essential for
OUR salvation. Paul made it very clear in writing to the Romans,
that we are SAVED not only by the DEATH of Christ, but also by
His LIFE! Both the death and life, resurrected life, of Jesus are
paramount and vital to our salvation, and entering into the
eternal family of God (verses 5-18).

     The great truth of the DESTINY of Christians is given in a
full study of the subject on this Website, called "A Christian's
Destiny."

CHAPTER THREE

     Introducing Jesus as our High Priest, Paul says, we indeed
need to consider Him. It is He that is THE High Priest and THE
Apostle, not some human man. He was faithful to God the Father
who appointed Him to the work needed for our salvation, just as
Moses was faithful to his house, family of Israelites, and his
calling.
     Jesus, was counted with more glory than Moses, as the
builder of the house has more glory than the house itself. Paul
is showing that Jesus surpasses the man Moses. Showing to the
Hebrews that Moses, while a fine man, was inferior to the one who
became Jesus the Christ. 
     Jesus has a house-hold, being us Christians, if we hold fast
to the end, rejoicing in the hope of our salvation. We are to
LISTEN to Him, to listen and obey God. We are not to be like the
Israelites of old, who did not listen, and who most of the time,
did NOT obey and follow the way of God. After a while the Lord
said that those rebellious Israelites would not enter into the
promised land of rest.

     We are to TAKE HEED, lest their be in us an evil heart of
unbelief, which leads to departing from the living God. Is it
possible then for Christians to "depart from God"? Are Christians
"once saved always saved"? From this verse and many other verses
in the NT, it IS possible to fall from grace and depart from God.
The words of the NT teach no such doctrine as once saved always
saved. Jesus plainly said in the Gospels, "He that endures to the
end, shall be saved."

     We are to exhort each other, encourage each other, so there
will NOT be a heart in us that becomes hardened by the
deceitfulness of sin. We are made partakers of Christ, IF we HOLD
the beginning of our Christian confidence STEADFAST TO THE END!!
(verses 1-14).

     The example of the Israelites coming out of Egypt is given
to us. The generation of those 20 and older were all disobedient,
except a few. All had a wrong heart, all would die in the
wilderness over a forty year period, and they would not enter
into God's rest. They could not enter because of their unbelief,
which in plain language means, unfaithfulness, a departing from
the Lord, a heart, a mind-set that would not believe in God, which
translated into an attitude of mind that would NOT OBEY God
(verses 15-19).

CHAPTER FOUR

     Paul now ties into TYPOLOGY, with God's salvation rest, the
rest of the promised land to Israelites of old, and the SEVENTH
DAY rest of the fourth commandment of the great Ten Commandments.
     We are to take heed and fear lest the promise of eternal
rest for us, many of us should fall short of entering into it.
The goods news was preached to us as it was to the Israelites of
old. They did not profit from it because of their disobedient
heart. We today which have the good news are entering into God's
rest. The Greek is in the present continuous tense. We are God's
children now, hence we are now on the road to eternal rest, as
Paul has said, IF we remain steadfast to the end. The works of
God were finished as we see in the first chapter of Genesis,
which included sanctifying the SEVENTH day of the week. Yet, in
God's plan, not all was fully competed, the rest of eternal life,
was to be entered into by His children, who would obey His will
and who would remain faithful to the end. God did rest on that
seventh day of creation week, but that rest was a type of the
rest of the promised land to the Israelites under Moses, and it
was a type of the eternal rest of salvation to those who are
God's children in the spiritual salvation plan.
     God is still calling people to hear His voice, to listen to
Him, to OBEY Him, to enter His rest. The Old and New Testaments
prove that the rest of the promised land of Palestine, the
seventh day rest, and the eternal rest of salvation are ALL tied
together in perfect typology. The child of God will inherit not
only the promised land of Palestine in the future, but the whole
earth, and indeed the whole universe, together with the eternal
rest of perfection and glory, as being a part of the very family
of God.
     Joshua, in bringing the Israelites into the Holy Land of
Palestine, did not fully fill up the complete rest of God.
Neither did David exhaust the fullness of this rest in its
completeness when he talked about "Today, if you will hear His
voice, harden not your heart." 

     There is MORE to this REST than in Joshua's day or David's
day, more than just the promised land or the seventh day of the
week. There is an eternal aspect of God's rest.

     Yet, with all that said, Paul goes on to state that "There
REMAINETH (present continuous tense in the Greek) a keeping of a
sabbath (margin KJV) to the people of God. Paul uses here a once
in all the NT word - Sabbatismos - which literally means, a
keeping of the Sabbath. And he who has entered God's rest, now in
the spiritual sense, will cease from his own works, AS God did
from His. Sure there is the spiritual side to all this "works"
talk - believing God, obeying, following His will. But there is
the literal work of God resting on that literal seventh day of
creation week. So also the child of God will do - stop his own
work on the seventh day, keep the Sabbath of the fourth
commandment.  
     The typology all fits like hand and glove. Seventh day from
creation, God rested, the promised land of Palestine, promised to
the Israelites who would believe (trust) and obey, a rest of
peace for them, and the rest of eternal glory in the family of
God. Palestine still exists today, and will during the 1,000 year
reign of Christ on earth. The Sabbath is still here, the seventh
day of the week still exists, and will exist during the 1,000
year Kingdom of God on earth (Isaiah 66).

     So TODAY, we are to NOT follow the unbelieving hearts of the
old Israelites. We are to OBEY God; do His will; His Ten
Commandments still are for today, still need to be obeyed by
God's children, hence the fourth commandment of keeping holy the
seventh day, the Sabbath day, is STILL for the people of God to
obey. As God's children, we will stop our own carnal works of
sin, when we become a child of the Majesty on High, and we shall,
as He did, stop OUR works on the Sabbath day, or seventh day of
the week. We shall labour therefore to enter into the rest, of
all that the typology claims is God's rest, LEST any person FALL
after the same example (of the Israelites) of DIS-obedience
(margin KJV).
     
     Dr.Samuele Bacchiocchi has in his books on the Sabbath,
given full and indepth examination to Hebrews chapter four. The
reader is pointed to his books as well as many other fine books
on the Sabbath keeping topic (verses 1-11).

     We next have one of those often quoted and so somewhat
famous verses of the Bible, especially when it was used by the
old powerful speaking Evangelists of the 18th and 19th centuries.

     "For the word of God is QUICK, and POWERFUL, and SHARPER
     than any two edged sword, piercing even to the dividing
     asunder of the soul and spirit, and of the joints and
     marrow, and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of
     the heart" (verse 12).

     The next verses is to be expected after a verse like the
above. There is no creature that is not open in all ways before
His sight, so for us also, we are pretty naked to Him, if He
desires to strip us down and wants to see us for what we really
are. This is the God and our Father that we deal with, so we need
to walk accordingly.
     Paul, then returns to the thought that in all of the truth
of the previous two verses, we still have a High Priest in
heaven, Jesus, the Son of God, so we can be encouraged to HOLD
FAST our profession of Christianity. For this High Priest is not
an aloof person, never knowing what it is like to be human, but
was flesh and blood for a while, and knows very well what human
temptations are all about. He was tempted Himself (remember in
the Gospels those famous temptations by the Devil after Jesus had
fasted for forty days), but never gave in to those temptations,
He remained sinless all His days as a human being.

     We can, with such a High Priest on our side, come BOLDLY to
the throne of grace, and obtain mercy, and find grace to help us
in the time of need.

     What wonderful re-assuring words to end a passage that is a
grave warning for us to not neglect the grace and salvation of
God. Comforting words indeed, that serve to encourage us to keep
walking in the ways of the Majesty on High, to remain faithful
and so inherit the eternal rest of God.

                      ................

Written November 2006 

HEBREWS CHAPTER ONE


 New Testament Bible
Story

Chapter One Hundred:

Hebrews - Chapter One

                  
CHAPTER ONE

     God had spoken in various past times and in different ways
to the ancient Israelites, by the prophets of old. As we read
through the Old Testament, we can clearly see the truth of what
Paul stated in the opening verse of the epistle to the Hebrews.
The many and diverse ways God's spoke to the Israelites gives us
the clear picture that the Almighty does work in different and
wonderful ways His work on this earth, as He carries out His
overall plan of salvation for the world and for the peoples of
Israel.
     Then in verse two Paul says God "Hath, in THESE LAST DAYS,
spoken unto US, by His Son....."  Did you catch it? "These LAST
DAYS." Jesus had come in "these last days" and spoken the words
of God the Father. Ah, so the phrase "last days" or "end times"
CAN mean the last 2,000 years since the time Jesus walked this
earth in the flesh, and preached the good news of the gospel. In
1 JOHN 2:18, we can also see that John understood "the last time"
to mean the very time he was living in. There is a broader span
of time that can be meant by the phrase "last time" or "end time"
than JUST the last few years of this age before Jesus returns to
earth to set up the Kingdom of God on earth.
     With this in mind, we need to be careful about narrowing
down the phrase "last time" or "end time" - people often today
say, "We are living in the end time."  Well, true enough, but
"end time" or "last days" can mean the last 2,000 years. Hence we
really do NOT have much idea as to when Jesus will return. It
could still be decades away or even a hundred years or so. All we
can do is watch the signs of the times .... WATCH, as Jesus said
we were to do. Time for God is not anywhere near time for us.
What seems like a long time to us, is but a blink of the eye to
God. How long the Father will allow the events of prophecy to
manifest themselves and come to pass, is entirely up to Him. He
can lengthen them out or shorten them up, as He sees fit.
Certainly there is MUCH in prophecy to yet take place, so we
watch, and we watch. And through it all we must remember that
Christ's coming is as close for us as our death. Will He return
in the life time of you who are reading these studies? Maybe, but
it is a maybe, for it maybe not. I'm sure many of the apostles of
the first century Church of God, thought Jesus' return would
never be at least 2,000 years away. 
     The "last days" can be way longer than many would like to
think it is. The main thing is to remain faithful to the way of
the Lord, to grow in grace and knowledge, and to endure to the
end of whatever physical life has been, or will be given to us.

     God has spoken to us through His Son in these last days, and
the Son was appointed heir of all things, nothing NOT being given
Him, and Paul plainly tells us that it was the Son who MADE THE
WORLDS. He also told us the same truth in his epistle to the
Colossians, chapter 1, verses 15-18. Jesus, was the CREATOR of
all that IS, in this physical world and in the unseen "spirit"
world.

     Jesus was also the very brightness of God's glory. No doubt
a double meaning here. He was the brightness of God's character
and nature, and He is in the very literal brightness today in
glory as we can see from the vision the apostle John had, as
recorded in the first chapter of the book of Revelation, where we
are given the picture of what Jesus looks like today in the
heaven of God's throne.
     Jesus was the EXPRESS IMAGE of the Father's person. You may
remember that one of the twelve asked Jesus to show them all,
plainly, the Father. Jesus replied that they who had seen Him had
seen the Father also.
     Jesus also upholds ALL THINGS by the very power of His word.
He and the Father are indeed ONE! They are two individual
persons, but in ALL respects they are the same. The only
difference is that, after Jesus had purged our sins on the cross,
he went back to heaven and is sitting on the Father's RIGHT HAND.
He is not sitting on top of the Father. He did not push the
Father off the heavenly throne, and take His place. The NT
Scriptures make it very clear that Jesus is AT the Father's RIGHT
HAND. The images of the throne room as given in the book of
revelation, show the Father to be on the heavenly throne, and
Jesus at His RIGHT HAND. The Father is the MAJESTY ON HIGH. The
Father is SUPREME in AUTHORITY. The Father is HEAD of Christ.
That truth is given in 1 Corinthians 11:3. I maintain that a
child reading the NT will come to see very clearly that the
Father is head of Christ. I came to see this when I was
about 9 years old. I came to see, just by reading the NT, that
there is no such doctrine as the "Trinity." God is NOT three in
one, or one in three. 
     The Trinity doctrine is very complicated by the way some
teach it, so much so that many just throw up their hands and say,
"It's just not possible to understand God."  It is a mystery they
will tell you. Nothing could be further from the TRUTH!! God has
over and over again made it clear in His word, concerning Himself
and His Son. I have many in-depth studies on this Website that
make clear to you WHAT God is like, and what the "Godhead" is all
about.

     Jesus sits at the RIGHT HAND of the Father, the Majesty on
High (verses 1-3).

     Paul now goes on to prove that the Son of God is way, way
more superior than the angels. He has first of all inherited and
obtained a more excellent name than what angels have. Jesus has
the name of SON of God. From Psalm 2:7 we learn that God had
foretold, "You are my SON, this day I have begotten you." No
angel was ever called the begotten son of God. Certainly not in
the way it was fulfilled in Christ Jesus. Jesus was UNIQUE in
birth. It was a MIRACULOUS and mind-numbing event, that no angel
has ever come close to having duplicated on themselves. 
     Paul then takes a verse from 2 Samuel 7:14, and applies it
to the nature of the birth of Jesus the Christ. "I will be unto
him a Father, and He shall be to me a Son." 
     Very interesting, in the nature of prophecy, is this
example. The context of it not suggesting at all that this would
be a prophecy of the relationship of the heavenly Father to His
Son Christ Jesus. The context of 2 Samuel 7 is the context of
David, the King of Israel. But as given here in Hebrews it is
applied to God the Father having a Son, in a very special way,
which none of the angels were ever destined to have happen to
them.
     And once more, using the Greek Septuagint version, Paul
renders Deut.32:43, as a prophecy of the first begotten of the
Father (Jesus the Christ) coming into the world and for the
angels of God to WORSHIP Him! 
     Amazing, so it will be to some. Deut.32:43 in the Hebrew and
hence in the KJV is not close to the rendition of the LXX or
Greek Septuagint. The reader is asked to study the study on this
Website called, "Paul's Use of the Old Testament." That study is
a truth that will shock most of you, the truth of how the Greek
translations of the Old Testament were used, especially by the
apostle Paul, the mighty Hebrew scholar, taught at the feet of
the famous Gamaliel of Judea, and then by Christ Himself (as Paul
tells us in the letter to the Galatians).
     The angels were to WORSHIP Christ, the Son of God the
Father. Now, angels do not worship each other, and worship is
only towards God. No other creature is worthy or holy enough to
be worshipped, only God is worthy and righteous and holy enough
to be WORSHIPPED. 
     Jesus was worthy and holy enough, perfect enough, godly
enough, to be worshipped. Only He was of the Godhead, made into
flesh and blood. But yet called Immanuel, by the prophet Isaiah,
which means, God with us. He was part of the Godhead from
eternity past. He did not grasp as being in the Godhead, but
emptied Himself, humbled Himself, put aside being in the very
Godhead, and came to earth as flesh and blood (all this Paul has
taught before in Philippians 2:5-11).

     We shall see very shortly that Jesus is called "God" - He
has a name with the title and very name "God" attached to it - He
is Jesus Christ God. He is God the Son. The Father is God the
Father. Both bear the name "God."  One is God the Father, the
other is God the Son.

     It was written of the angels that they were angel spirits,
and servants who could be like a flame fire (Psalm 104:4). A
flame of fire is nothing compared to the SUN. In Revelation
chapter one, Jesus EYES are like a flame of fire, but His
countenance is like the SUN in its full strength. No angel is
anywhere near being like God in appearance or in anything that
God IS! (verses 4-7).

JESUS IS CALLED "GOD" 

     Verses 8 and 9, of Hebrews one, makes it as clear as the sun
shining in a cloudless day, that Jesus bears the name "God"! He
is then God the Son, or as stated before, Jesus Christ God.
     The word "God" is used in various ways in the NT. It is used
as a "personal name" for God the Father, in some contexts. It is
used as a name of Jesus in some contexts. It is used as a "sur-
name" for all in the Godhead or in the very Family of God. Hence
Jesus can be rightfully called Jesus Christ God. The Father is
God, and the Son is God, both in the Godhead. Both being separate
individual persons, with spirit bodies, so God the Son can sit at
the right hand of God the Father, in the heavenly throne room. It
is quite simple really. The Godhead consists as of today, TWO
BEINGS, both bearing the name "God." The Godhead is NOT a
Trinity, in any way that Trinitarians like to teach. The Godhead
is TWO beings, personal beings, with their own personal spirit
bodies. One is the being we call God the Father, and the other is
the one that sits on His right hand, we call the Son of God, or
Jesus Christ God.

     We have Paul proving from the very Scriptures of God the
Father, that Jesus, has the name "God." He quotes from Psalm
46:6,7, "Thy throne, O GOD, is for ever and ever, a sceptre of
righteousness is the sceptre of thy Kingdom. You have loved
righteousness, and hated iniquity, therefore GOD, even thy God
has anointed you with oil of gladness above your fellows."
     Jesus is here called "God" and yet we also see that Jesus
has a "God" who has appointed and anointed Him in such a way (for
His love of and loyalty to righteousness) that is ABOVE any other
anywhere in the whole created universe. The rest of the NT proves
beyond any doubt that of all human flesh and blood people, of all
the angels and created beings in the unseen world, Jesus
inherited from physical life a position of glory ABOVE any one,
and is seated at the right hand of the Majesty on High. 
     The NT declares that Jesus existed from eternity, that he
was God and was WITH God (John chapter one), that He put aside
that position in the very Godhead, to become a physical man, so
He could conquer sin and Satan, be a perfect sacrifice through
His shed blood on the cross, and so redeem mankind, and make
their salvation possible. He was so faithful and righteous (never
having any sin, no not one) to His offering Himself as the
atoning sacrifice for any and all people, that in His
resurrection, He was made again part of the very Godhead, with
the glory of the Father, and with the very name once more of
"God."

     Paul's mind now returns to the Scriptures that tell us that
Jesus (before He came to earth as Jesus the Christ) was the very
person who LAID THE FOUNDATION OF THE EARTH, and the HEAVENS are
the very works of His hands. Jesus was the one who did the
creating of all things. It was the Father, the Majesty on High,
who desired it, and the one who became Jesus, did the actual
creating! (Psalm 102:25).
     The next quote is taken from Isaiah 34:4. One day the
physical world will perish, so also the heavens in some way, they
wax old as a garment, they are running down so to speak, they
will need TO BE CHANGED! Other verses in the Scriptures also tell
us that one day there will be a new heaven and earth, and maybe
much of a new universe. BUT, in contrast to all that Jesus is and
remains the SAME, and He will never grow old. He is eternal. His
glory as given in a fashion to us in the first chapter of the
book of Revelation, will NEVER dim, and His divine character of
perfection and holiness and righteousness, will always be the
SAME, forever.

     Paul ends his teaching on this matter by once more showing
from the Scriptures that the ANGELS of God, were NEVER to be in
such a high exalted position as sitting on the right hand of the
God the Father, and having their enemies made to be their foot-
stool (Psalm 110:1).
     From Psalm 103:20, the angels were created to be "serving
spirits" - and to mainly serve those who would be heirs of
salvation. 
     In simple terms, the angels were created to have the
important, yes, job of serving human flesh and blood people, whom
would be heirs of God the Father, in the plan of salvation. The
angels do many mighty things in the universe at large, this we
can see from reading the book of Daniel, as well as other parts
of Scripture, that show us what some of the jobs are that angels
do. But here Paul makes it clear that the MAIN function for them
is to serve at various (often unknown and unseen ways) times, US
humans who are heirs of God, through Jesus Christ. We shall see
in Hebrews chapter two, that we humans, were created to RISE
ABOVE the angels and be the actual and literal bothers and
sisters of Jesus. Paul in Romans 8, says we are co-inheritors
with Jesus of the SAME glory He inherited when He was resurrected
from death. Again, many parts of the NT prove that God the Father
is REPRODUCING Himself, that He will have MANY SONS born to Him.
Jesus will always be the greatest in authority, always be at the
Father's right hand, always the greatest next to the Majesty on
High. The Godhead will expand, that is what the Father desires,
but God the Father will always be supreme in authority, with
Jesus His Son next in authority. Who will be on Christ's right
and left hand? You will remember two of the twelve wanted those
positions, Jesus said it was NOT for Him to give or decide, but
the Father would give those high positions to whomsoever He
willed and decided.

     WHAT A WONDERFUL CHAPTER OF THE BIBLE!!  So much great and
magnificent truths proclaimed in such relatively few verses.
Meditate on them, be inspired, be lifted up, be humbled, and
constantly PRAISE the Father for His LOVE and His wanting to
share what He IS, with us humans who can be His very children
(verses 8- 14).

                     ............................................

November 2006

PAUL WRITES HEBREWS-- INTRODUCTION #6

 

 New Testament Bible
Story

Chapter Ninety-nine:

The Epistle to Hebrews - Introducation #6

                         
                     OUTLINE OF THE EPISTLE TO HEBREWS



The following is taken from the NKJV Personal Study Bible; Nelson
Publishers, 1990,1995.


I. The Son is God's final Word  1:1-4:13

     A. Christ superior to the angels  1:1-3
     B. Christ the eternal Son  1:4-2:18

     1. Superior because of His divine Sonship  1:4-14
     2. We must obey Him  2:1-4
     3. Superior because of His obedient humility  2:5-18

     C. Christ superior to Moses  3:1-4:13

     1. The Son superior to the faithful servant  3:1-6
     2. Christians are not to imitate unfaithful Israel  3:7-4:13

II. The Son is our High Priest  4:14-10:18

     A. Christ's priesthood produced  4:14-5:11

     1. An appropriate priesthood  4:4-16
     2. A superior priesthood  5:1-11

     B. The need for maturity  5:12-6:20

     1. The danger of immaturity  5:12-6:8
     2. God's provision for pressing on  6:9-20

     C. Christ's eternal priesthood  7:1-28

     1. Melchizedek superior to Levi  7:1-10
     2. The Son has replaced Aaron  7:11-28

     D. Christ's exalted priestly ministry  8:1-13

     1. Exercised at God's right hand  8:1-5
     2. Mediating a better covenant  8:6-13

     E. Christ's once for all sacrifice  9:1-10:10

     1. Not offered in the earthly sanctuary  9:1-10
     2. Accomplished by His own blood  9:11-22
     3. Completed once for all  9:23-28
     4. Made effective by obedience  10:1-10

     F. Summary  10:11-18

III. Response to out High Priest  10:9-13:17

     A. Enter the Holiest  10:19-31

     
     1. Draw near in faith  10:19-25
     2. Do not fall back through disobedience  10:26-31

     B. Persevere in faith  10:32-12:17

     1. You have endured suffering  10:32-39
     2. Old Testament saints endured suffering  11:1-40
     3. Christ endured suffering  12:1-4
     4. All God's children endure suffering  12:5-17

     C. Obey God's voice  12:18-29

     1. Access into God's presence  12:18-24
     2. The urgency of listening to God  12:25-29

     D. Obey in practice  13:1-17

     1. Show brotherly love  13:1-6
     2. Bear Christ's reproach  13:7-17

IV. Blessing and farewell  13: 18-25

                            ...................

PAUL WRITES HEBREWS-- INTRODUCTION #5

 

 New Testament Bible
Story

Chapter Ninety-eight:

The Epistle to Hebrews - Introduction #5

                          
The following is taken from Albert Barnes' "Notes On The New
Testament"



THE DESIGN AND GENERAL ARGUMENT OF THE EPISTLE

     The general purpose of this epistle is, to preserve those to
whom it was sent from the danger of apostasy. Their danger on
this subject did not arise so much from persecution, as from the
circumstances that were fitted to attract them again to the
Jewish religion. The temple, it is supposed, and indeed it is
evident, was still standing. The morning and evening sacrifice
was still offered.  The splendid rites of that imposing religion
were still observed. The authority of the law was undisputed.    
Moses was a lawgiver, sent from God; and no one doubted that the
Jewish form of religion had been instituted by their forbear,
conformity with the direction of God. Their religion had been
founded amidst remarkable manifestations of the Deity - in
flames, and smoke, and thunder; it had been communicated by the
ministration of angels; it had on its side, and in its favour,
all the venerableness and sanction of a remote antiquity; and it
commended itself by the pomp of its ritual, and by the splendour
of its ceremonies. 
     On the other hand, the new form of religion had little or
nothing of this to commend it. It was of recent origin. It was
founded by the Man of Nazareth, who had been trained up in their
own land, and who had been a carpenter, and who had had an
extraordinary advantages of education. Its rites were few and
simple. It had no splendid temple-service were none of the pomp
and pageantry, the music and the magnificence, of the ancient
religion. It had no splendid array of priest, in magnificent
vestments, and it had not been imparted by the ministry of
angels. 
     Fishermen were its ministers; and, by the body of the
nation, it was regarded as a schism, or heresy, that enlisted in
its favour only the most humble and lowly of the people.
     In these circumstances, how natural was it for the enemies
of the gospel in Judea to contrast the two forms of religion, and
how keenly would Christians there feel it! All that was said of
the antiquity and the Divine origin of the Jewish religion, they
knew and admitted; all that was said of its splendour and
magnificence, they saw; and all that was said of the humble
origin of their own religion, they were constrained to admit
also.
     Their danger was not that arising from persecution. It was
that of being affected by considerations like these, and of
relapsing again into the religion of their fathers, and of
apostatizing from the gospel; and it was a danger which beset
another part of the Christian world.
     To meet and counteract this danger was the design of this
epistle. Accordingly, the writer contrasts the two religions in
all the great points on which the mind of Christians in Judea
would be likely to be effected, and show. the superiority of the
Christian religion over the Jewish in every respect, and
especially in the points that had so much attracted their
attention, and affected their hearts. 

     He begins by showing that the Author of the Christian
religion was superior in rank to any, and all, who had ever
delivered the word of God to man. He was superior to the
prophets, and even to the angels. He was over all things, and all
things were subject to him. There was, therefor, a special reason
why they should listen to him, and obey his commands. Ch.i.,ii.
     He was superior to Moses, the great Jewish lawgiver, whom
they venerated so much, and on whom they so much prided
themselves. Ch.iii. 
     Having shown that the Great Founder of the Christian
religion was superior to the prophets, to Moses, and to the
angels, the writer proceeds to show, that the Christian religion
was characterized by having a High Priest superior to that of the
Jews, and of whom the Jewish high priest was but a type and
emblem. 
     He shows, that all the rites of the ancient religion,
splendid as they were, were also but types, and were to vanish
away - for they had had their fulfilment in the realities, of the
Christian faith. He shows, that the Christian's High Priest
derived his origin, and his rank, from a more venerable antiquity
than the Jewish high priest did; for he went back to Melchizedek,
who lived long before Aaron; and that he had far superior dignity
from the fact, that he had entered into the most Holy place -
into heaven. The Jewish high priest entered once a year into the
most holy place in the temple; the Great High Priest of the
Christian faith had entered into the most holy place - of which
that was but the type and emblem - into heaven.   
     In short, whatever there was of dignity and honour in the
Jewish faith, had more than its counterpart in the Christian
religion; and, while the Christian religion was permanent, that
was fading. 
     The rites of the Jewish system, magnificent as they were,
were designed to be temporary. They were more types and shadows
of things to come. They had their fulfilment in Christianity.
That had an Author more exalted in rank, by far, than the author
of the Jewish system; it bad a High Priest more elevated and
enduring; it had rites, which brought men nearer to God; it was
the substance of what in the temple-service was type and shadow. 
     By considerations such we these, the author of this epistle
endeavours to preserve them from apostasy. Why should they go
back? Why should they return to a less perfect system? Why go
back from the substance to the shadow? Why turn away from
the true Sacrifice to the type and emblem? Why linger around the
earthly tabernacle, and contemplate the high priest there, while
they had a more perfect and glorious High Priest, who had entered
into the heavens? And why should they turn away from the only
perfect sacrifice - the great offering made for transgression -
and go back to the bloody rites, which were to be renewed every
day? And why forsake the perfect system - the system that was to
endure for ever - for that which was to vanish away?   

     The author of this epistle is very careful to assure them,
that if they thus apostatized, there could be no hope
for them. If they now rejected the sacrifice of the Son of God,
there was no other sacrifice for sin. That was the last great
sacrifice for the sins of men. It was designed to close all
bloody offerings. It was not to be repeated.

     If that was rejected, there was no other. The Jewish rites
were soon to pass away; and even if they were not, they could not
cleanse the conscience from sin. Persecuted, then, though they
might be - reviled, ridiculed, opposed, yet they would not
abandon their Christian hope, for it was their all; they should  
not neglect Him who spoke to them from heaven, for, in dignity,
rank, and authority, he far surpassed all who, in former times,
had made known the will of God to men.

     This epistle, therefore, occupies a most important place in
the book of revelation, and without it that book would be
incomplete. It is the most full explanation, which we have, of
the meaning of the Jewish institutions. In the epistle to the
Romans we have a system of religious doctrine, end particularly a
defence of the great doctrine of justification by faith.         
     Important doctrines are discussed the other epistles; but
there was something wanted, that would show the meaning of the
Jewish rites and ceremonies, and their connexion with the
Christian scheme; thing which would show us how the thing was
paratory to the other; and, I may add, something that would
restrain the imagination, in endeavoring to show how the
one was desired to introduce the other. The one was a system of
type, and shadows. 
     
     But on nothing is the human mind more prone to wander, then
on the subject of emblems and analogies. This has been shown 
in the experience of the Christian church, from the time of
origin to the present. Systems of divinity, commentaries, and
sermons, have shown everywhere how prone men of ardent
imaginations have been, to find types in every thing pertaining
to the ancient economy; to discover hidden meanings in every 
ceremony, and to regard every pin, and hook, and instrument of
the tabernacle, as designed to some truth, and to shadow forth
some tale or doctrine of the Christian revelation. 

     It was desirable to have one book that should tell how that
is; to fetter down the imagination, and bind it by severe rules,
and to restrain the vagaries of honest but credulous devotion.

     Such a book we have in the Epistle to the Hebrews. The
ancient system is there explained by one who had been brought up
in the midst of it, and who understood it thoroughly; by one who
had a clear insight into the relation on which it bore to the
Christian economy; by one who was under the influence of Divine
inspiration, and who could not err. 

     The Bible would have been incomplete without this book: and
when I think of the relation between the Jewish end the Christian
systems - when I look an the splendid rites of the ancient
economy, and ask their meaning - when I wish a full guide to
heaven, and ask for that which gives completeness to the whole -
I turn instinctively to the Epistle to the Hebrew.     

     When I wish, also, that which shall give me the most
elevated view of the Great Author of Christianity, and of his
work, and the most clear conceptions of the sacrifice which he
made for sin; and when I look for considerations that shall be
most effectual in restraining the soul from apostasy, and for
considerations to enable it to bear trials with patience and with
hope, my mind recurs to this book; and I feel, that the book of
revelation, and the hope of man would be incomplete without it.


                          .......................................

In part 6, I will reproduce from the KJV Study Bible, the outline
of the book of Hebrews (Keith Hunt)

November 2006

PAUL WRITES HEBREWS-- INTRODUCTION #4

 

 New Testament Bible
Story

Chapter Ninety-seven:

Epistle to Hebrews - Introduction #4

The following is taken from Albert Barnes' "Notes On The New
Testament."



THE LANGUAGE IN WHICH IT WAS WRITTEN

     This is a vexed and still unsettled question, and it does
not seem to be possible to determine it with any considerable
degree of certainty. Critics, of the ablest name, have been
divided on it; and, what is remarkable, have appealed to the same
arguments to prove exactly opposite opinions - one class arguing
that the style of the epistle is such as to prove that it was
written in Hebrew, and the other appeal to the same proofs to
demonstrate that it was written in Greek. 
     Among those who have supposed that it was written in Hebrew
are the following, viz. :- Some of the Fathers - as Clement of
Alexandria, Theodoret, John Damascenes, Theophylact; and among
the moderns, Michaelis has been the most strenuous defender of
this opinion. This opinion was also held by the late Dr.James P.
Wilson, who says, "It was probably written in the vulgar language
of the Jews; that is, in that mixture of Hebrew, Syriac, and
Chaldee, which was usually spoken in the time of the Saviour, and
which was known as the Syro-Chaldaic."
     On the other hand, the great body of Critics have supposed
it was written in the Greek language. This was the opinion of
Fabricius, Whitby, Beausobre, Capellus, Basnage, Mill, and
others; and is also the  pinion of Lardner, Hug, Stuart, and
perhaps of most modem critics. These opinions may be seen
examined at length in Michaelis' Introduction, Hug, Stuart; and
Lardner.

     The arguments in support of the opinion, that it was written
in Hebrew, are briefly the following: 

(l) The testimony of the Fathers. Thus, Clement of Alexandria
say., "Paul wrote to the Hebrew, in the Hebrew language, and Luke
carefully translated it into Greek." Jerome Says, "Paul, as a
Hebrew, wrote to the Hebrews in Hebrew - Scrlpserat ut Hebraeus
Hebraeis Hebraice;" and then he adds, "This epistle was
translated into Greek, so that the colouring of the style was
made diverse in this way from that of Paul's." 

(2.) The fact that it was written for the use of the Hebrews, who
spoke the Hebrew, or the Talmudic language, is alleged as a
reason for supposing that it must have been written in that
language. 

(3) It is alleged by Michaelis, that the style of the Greek, as
we now have it, is far more pure and classical than Paul
else-where employs, and that hence it is to be inferred, that it
was translated by some man who was master of the Greek language.
On this, however, the most eminent critics disagree.   

(4) It is Alleged by Michaelis, that the quotations in the
epistle, as we have it, are made from the Septuagint, and that
they are foreign to the purpose which the writer had in view as
they are now quoted, whereas they are exactly in point as they
stand in the Hebrew. Hence, he infers, that the original Hebrew
was quoted by the author, and that the translator used the common
version at hand, instead of making an exact translation for
himself. Of the fact alleged here, however, there may be good
ground to raise a question and if it were so, it would not prove
that the writer might not have used the common and accredited
translation, though less to his purpose than the original. Of the
fact, moreover, to which Michaelis here refers, Professor Stuart
says, "He has not adduced a single instance, of what he calls a
WRONG translation, which wears the appearance of any considerable
probability."  The only instance, urged by Michaelis, which seems
to me to be plausible, is Hob.i.7. 

     These are the principal arguments which have been urged in
favour of the opinion, that this epistle was written in the
Hebrew language. They are evidently not conclusive. The only
argument, of any considerable weight, is the testimony of some of
the Fathers, and it may be denoted whether they gave this as a
matter of historical fact, or only as a matter of opinion. See
Hug's Introduction, § 144. It is morally certain, that, in
one respect, their statement CANNOT be true. They state, that it
was translated by Luke; but it is capable of the clearest proof,
that it was not translated by Luke, the author of the Gospel and
the Acts of the Apostles, since there is the most remarkable
dissimilarity in the style.

     On the other hand, there are alleged in favour of the
opinion, that it was written in Greek, the following
considerations, viz. :-

(1) The fact that we have NO Hebrew original. If it was written
in Hebrew, the original was early lost. None of the Fathers say
that they had seen it; none quote it. ALL the COPIES that we have
are in GREEK. If it was written n Hebrew, and the original was
destroyed, it must have been at every early period; and it is
remarkable that no one should have mentioned the fact, or alluded
to it. Besides, it is scarcely conceivable that the original
should have so soon perished, and that the translation should
have altogether taken its place. If it was addressed to the
Hebrews in Palestine, the same reason which made it proper that
it should have been written in Hebrew, would have led them to
retain it in that language; and we might have supposed, that
Origen, or Eusebius, or Jerome, who lived there, or Ephrem the
Syrian, would have adverted to the fact, that there was there a
Hebrew original. The Jews were remarkable for retaining their
sacred books in the language in which they were written; and, if
this were written in Hebrew, it is difficult to account for the
fact, that it was so soon suffered to perish.

(2) The presumption - a presumption amounting to almost a moral
certainty - is, that an apostle writing to the Christians in
Palestine would write in Greek. This presumption is based on the
following circumstances: 

(a) The fact, that all the other books of the New Testament were
written is Greek, unless the gospel by Matthew be an exception.
(b) This occurred is cases where it would seem to have been as
improbable, as it was that one writing to the Hebrews should use
that language. For instance, Paul wrote to the church in Rome in
the Greek language, though the Latin language was that which was
in universal use there.  

(c) The Greek was a common language in the East. It seems to have
been familiarly spoken, and to have been and commonly understood.

(d Like the other books of the New Testament, this epistle do not
appear to have been intended  to be confined to the Hebrews only.
The writings of the apostles were regarded as the property of
the church at large. Those writings would be copied,
spread abroad. The Greek was a far better language for such a
purpose than the Hebrew. It was polished, and elegant; was
adapted to the purpose of discoursing on moral subjects; was
fitted to express delicate shades of thought; and was the
language which was best understood by the world at large.
     
(e) It was the language which Paul would naturally use, unless
there was a strong reason for his employing the Hebrew.     
Though he was able to speak in Hebrew, (Acts xxi.40,) yet he had
spent his early days in Tarsus, where the Greek was the
vernacular tongue, and it was probably that which he had first
learned.  Besides this, when this epistle was written he had been
absent from Palestine about twenty-five years, and in all that
time he bad been there but a few days, He had been where the
Greek language was universally spoken. He bad been among Jews who
spoke that language. It was the language used in their
synagogues, and Paul had addressed them in it. After thus
preaching, conversing, and writing in that language for
twenty-five years, is it any wonder that he should prefer writing
in i t - that he should naturally do it? and is it not to be
presumed that he would do it in this case? These presumptions are
so strong, that they ought to be allowed to settle a question of
this kind, unless there is positive proof to the contrary.

(3) There is internal proof that it was written in the Greek
language. The evidence of this kind consists in the fact, that
the writer bases an argument on the meaning and force of Greek
words, which could not have occurred had he written in Hebrew.   
Instances of this kind are such as these.    

(a) In ch.ii. he applies a passage from Psa. viii. to prove that
the Son of God must have had a human nature, which was to be
exalted above the angels, and placed at the head of the creation.
The passage is, "Thou bast made him a little while inferior to
the ANGELS," ch.ii.7. margin. In the Hebrew, in Psa. viii.5, the
word rendered angels, is  - Elohim - God; and the sense of
angel, attached to that word, though it may sometimes occur, is
so unusual, that an argument would not have been built on the
Hebrew. 

(b) In ch.vii.1, the writer has explained the name Melchizedek,
and translated it king of Salem - telling what it is in Greek - a
thing which would not have been done if it had be written in
Hebrew, where the word was well understood. It is possible,
indeed, that a translator might have done this; but the
explanation seems to be interwoven with the discourse itself, and
to constitute a part of the argument.   

(c) In ch.ix.16,17, there is an argument on the meaning of the
word COVENANT - which could not have occurred had the epistle
been in Hebrew. It is founded in the DOUBLE meaning of that word
- denoting both a covenant and a testament, or will. The Hebrew
word, - Berith - has NO such DOUBLE signification. It means
COVENANT only, and is never used in the sense of the word WILL,
or TESTAMENT.  The proper translation of that word would be -
"syntheke" - but the translators of the Septuagint (the Greek
translation of the Old Testament - Keith Hunt) uniformly used the
former, - "diatheke" - and on this word the argument of the
apostle is based. This could not have been done by a translator;
it must have been by the original author, for it is incorporated
into the argument.  

(d) In ch.x.3-9, the author shows that Christ came to make an
atonement for sin, and that in order to this it was necessary
that he should have a human body. This, he shows, was not only
necessary, but was predicted. In doing this, be appeals to
Psa.xl.6 - "A body halt thou prepared form me." But the Hebrew
here is, "Mine EARS hast thou opened." This passage would have
been much less pertinent than the other form - "a body hast thou
prepared me;" and, indeed, it is not easy to see how it would
bear at all on the object in view. Sea ver.10. But in the
Septuagint the phrase stands as he quotes it - "a body hast thou
prepared for me" a fact which demonstrates, whatever difficulties
there may be about the principle on which be makes the quotation,
that the epistle wee written in Greek. It may be added, that it
has nothing of the appearance of a translation. It is not stiff,
forced, or constrained in style, as translations usually are.    
It is impassioned, free, flowing, full of animation, life, and
colouring, and has all the appearance of being an original
composition.   

So clear have these considerations appeared, that the great body
of critics now concur in the opinion that the epistle was
originally written in Greek.


THE  DESIGN AND GENERAL ARGUMENT OF THE EPISTLE


                            ............................................

The use of the Greek Septuagint (Greek translation of the Old
Testament) in the first century Church of God, and in the
writings of the apostle Paul, with other Greek translations and
paraphrases of parts of the Old Testament, may come as a surprise
to many. The use of the Greek was extensive and the reader is
pointed to an indepth study on this Website "Paul's Use of the
Old Testament" to show the truth of the matter - a truth that
will shock and certainly be a surprised education for many.
(Keith Hunt)

We shall continue with comments from Albert Barnes in number 5 of
this Introduction to Hebrews.

November 2006

Tuesday, July 7, 2026

PAUL WRITES HEBREWS #3

 

 New Testament Bible
Story

Chapter Ninety-six:

The Epistle to Hebrews - Introduction #3

                             
The following is taken from Albert Barnes' "Notes On The New
Testament."


THE TIME WHEN WRITTEN

     In regard to the time when this epistle was written, and the
place where, critics have been better agreed than on most of the
questions which have been started in regard to it. Mill was of
opinion, that it was written by Paul in the year 63, in some part
of Italy, soon after he bad been released from imprisonment at
Rome. Wetstein was of the came opinion, Tillemont also places
this epistle in the year 63, and supposed that it war written
while Paul was at Rome, or at least in Italy, and soon after he
was released from imprisonment. Basnage supposes it was written
about the year 61, and during the imprisonment of the apostle.
Lardeer supposes, also, that it was written in the beginning of
the year 63, and soon after the apostle was released from his
confinement. This also is the opinion of Calmet. 

     The circumstances in the epistle, which will enable to form
an opinion on the question about the time and the place, are the
following:

(1) It was written while the temple was still standing, and
before Jerusalem was destroyed. This is evident from the whole
structure of the epistle. There is no allusion to the destruction
of the temple or the city, which there certainly would have been
if they had been destroyed. Such an event would have contributed
much to the object in view, and would have furnished an
irrefragable argument, that the institutions of the Jews were
intended to be superseded by another and a more perfect system.  
Moreover, there are allusions in the epistle which suppose that
the temple-service were then performed. See Heb.ix,9; viii.
4,5. But the city and temple were destroyed in the year 70, and
of course the epistle war written before that year.

(2.) It was evidently written before the civil wars and
commotions in Judea, which terminated in the destruction of the
city and nation. This is clear, because there are no allusions to
any such disorders or troubles in Palestine; and there is no
intimation that they were suffering the evils incident to a state
of war. Comp.ch.xii 4. But those wars commenced A.D.66, and
evidently the epistle was written before that time.

(3) They were not suffering the evils of violent persecution.    
They had indeed formerly suffered, (comp.ch.x.32,34 ;) James and
Stephen had been put to death, (Acts vii., xii;) but there was no
violent and bloody persecution then raging, in which they were
called to defend their religion at the expense of blood and life.
Ch.x.32,33. But the persecution under Nero began in the year 64;
and though it began at Rome, and was confined, to a considerable
degree, to Italy, yet it is not improbable that it extended to
other place, and it is to be presumed, that if such a persecution
were raging at the time when the epistle was written, there would
be some allusion to this fact. It may be set down, therefore,
that it was written before the year, 64.

(4) It is equally true, that the epistle was written during the
latter part of the apostolic age. The author speaks of the former
days, in which, after they were illuminated, they had endured a
great fight of afflictions, and when they were made a
gazing-stock, and were plundered by their oppressors, (ch.x.32,
34;) and he speaks of them as having been so long converted, that
they ought to have been qualified to teach others, (ch.v.12;) and
hence it is fairly to be inferred, that they were not RECENT
converts, but that the church there had been established for a
considerable period. It may be added, that it was after the
writer had been imprisoned - as I suppose in Caesarea, (see
§3)- when they had ministered to him, ch.x.34. But this was as
late as the year 60.

(5) At the tine when Paul wrote the epistles to the Ephesians,
Philippines, and Colossians, he had hopes of deliverance.   
Timothy was evidently with him. But now he was absent. Ch.xiii
23. In the epistle to the Philippians, (ch.ii.19-23,) he says, 
"But I trust in the Lord Jesus to send Timotheus shortly unto
you, that I may be also of good comfort, when I know your state."
He expected, therefore, that Timothy would come back to him at
Rome. It is probable that Timothy was sent soon after
this. The apostle had a fair prospect of being set at liberty,
and sent him to them. During his absence at this time, it would
seem probable, this epistle was written. Thus the writer says, 
(ch.xiii.23) "Know ye that our brother Timothy is SET AT LIBERTY"
- or rather, SENT AWAY, or SENT ABROAD, (see note in that place;)
"with whom, if he come shortly, I will see you."  That is, if he
returns soon, as I expect him, I will pay you a visit. It is
probable that the epistle was written while Timothy was thus
absent at Philippi; and, when he returned, Paul and he went to
Palestine, and thence to Ephesus. If so, it was written somewhere
about the year 63, as this was the time when Paul was set at
liberty.

(6.) The epistle was written evidently in Italy.  Thus, in ch.   
xiii.24, the writer says, "They of Italy salute you:" This would
be the natural form of salutation, on the supposition that it was
written there. He mentions none by name, as he does in his other
epistle., for it is probable that none of those who were at Rome
would be known by name in Palestine. But there was a GENERAL
salutation, showing the interest which he had in the Christians
in Judea, and expressive of regard to their welfare. This
expression is, to my mind, conclusive evidence that the epistle
was written in Italy; and IN Italy there was no place where this
would be so likely to occur as at Rome.

THE LANGUAGE IN WHICH IT WAS WRITTEN

                          ......................

We shall continue with the comments of Albert Barnes in the
Introduction to Hebrews, number 4.

November 2006