Paul's Teaching on Temple rituals and Animal sacrifices
It was okay ... BUT ...
PAUL'S TEACHING ON ANIMAL SACRIFICES AND TEMPLE RITUALS by Keith Hunt In my study on the book of Galatians we covered the BACKDROP to why Paul wrote the letter to the Galatian Christians. After the apostles had preached boldly and widely the name of Jesus Christ (through Him was the forgiveness of the sins and not by the laws of Moses or spilling the blood of animals or the physical rite of the circumcision covenant, and Temple rituals) as personal Savior, certain individuals came contradicting and gainsaying the gospel of justification by faith in Jesus and teaching that it was by the means of circumcision and keeping the laws of Moses that one could be justified and saved. As we look below at the following, (taken from Alfred Edersheim's book called THE TEMPLE) we shall see that the teaching of the Rabbis (what the blood of bulls and goats was understood to do for the offerer) makes what we have stated in our Galatians study that much more meaningful. A system of beliefs that taught that the death and spilling of animal blood together with the blood of circumcision COULD ATONE for human sin. After generation after generation of such belief, it would make it very difficult for the religious leaders of such learning to be persuaded that such a belief was in error, and that the only way to justification with God was by means of the blood of a man - namely one called Jesus Christ. It can be seen how those leaders of the "circumcision party" would want to cling to a belief that had been held for generations, with the proudness and pomp of the temple and its service. When we consider the fact that the Gentile nations also had their temples, priesthoods and animal SACRIFICES - their spilling of blood - it will not be difficult to see how quickly and easily they would have been deceived into abandoning the truth that Paul taught them, and accepting the teaching of those who came among them and taught that the spilling of human blood (via circumcision) along with animal blood (sacrificial system of the laws of Moses) could atone for sins and justify. The whole culture of Jewish and Gentile religious life evolved around TEMPLES, PRIESTHOODS, and the SPILLING OF BLOOD BY ANIMAL SACRIFICES, and the BLOOD of CIRCUMCISION. Therefore it should be of no great surprise for us, to find that within the early NT Church we find a group of believers who clung tenaciously to physical circumcision and all the law of Moses (Acts 21:18-20; 15:5,1). We should note carefully that contrary to what some individuals said about Paul's teaching, he did not teach AGAINST circumcision and the law of Moses PER SE - at times he conformed to performing them when it was a matter of expedience (Acts 16:1-3;18:18; 21:21-26;24:10-21). Some of Paul's words of defense as he stood before Festus were, "Neither against the law of the Jews, neither against the temple, nor yet against Caesar, have I offended anything at all" (Acts 25:8). The Jews indeed brought many complains against Paul, "which they could not prove" (verse 7). The truth is readily seen - if those strict religious temple worshipping Jews COULD HAVE proved that Paul had been and was teaching people to forsake Moses THEY SURE WOULD HAVE! But they could prove no impropriety against Paul in regards to their religious system, and as Festus told Agrippa, "...when the accusers stood up, they brought NONE accusation of such things as I supposes: But had certain questions against him of their OWN SUPERSTITION, and of one Jesus, which was dead, whom Paul affirmed to be alive (Acts 25: 18-19). The difference between the Rabbis and Paul was not WHETHER one should partake of circumcision and temple rituals or not, but one of THEOLOGICAL significance - was circumcision, sacrificial rites and the laws of Moses to be performed in order to secure justification? The Rabbis taught they were - that none could be saved without them (Act 15:1) - Paul taught that justification came by FAITH in the blood of Jesus, that true circumcision was of the heart (Rom. 2:28,29; 3:23-30). The Rabbis taught that the BLOOD of ANIMALS, ATONED for human sin - Paul taught that only the blood of Christ could atone for our sins, and that it was "not possible that the blood of bulls and of goats should take away sins" but those animals sacrifices were to remind people of sin year after year, (Heb.10:3,4). If you have not yet read our by study "SAVED BY GRACE" please make sure you do. Nothing is more important than for you to KNOW what is the TRUE and ONLY way to be saved. QUOTING form Alfred Edersheim's book (I recommend ALL the books written by Edersheim, the Jewish Christian scholar) THE TEMPLE, in reference to Jewish Temple teachings at Paul's time: "There is no atonement except by blood." In accordance with this we quote the following from Jewish interpreters. Rashi says, 'The soul of every creature is bound up in its blood; therefore I give it to atone for the soul of man - that one soul should come and atone for the other.' Similarly Aben Ezra writes" 'One soul is a substitute for the other.' And Moses ben Nachman: 'I gave the soul for you on the altar, that the soul of the animal should be an atonement for the soul of the man.' The quotations might be ALMOST INDEFINITELY MULTIPLIED. Another phase .... appears in such Rabbinical statements as that by the imposition of HANDS: 'The offerer, as it were, puts away his sins from himself and transfers them upon the living animal; and that, as often as any one sins with his soul, whether from haste or malice, he puts away his sin from himself, and places it upon the head of his sacrifice, and it is an atonement for him.' .....There is yet one other place on which the Synagogue lays stress. It is best expressed in the following quotation, to which many similar might be added: 'Properly speaking, the blood of the sinner should have been shed, and his body burned, as those of the sacrifice. But the Holy One - blessed be He! - accepted our sacrifice from us as redemption and atonement. Behold the full grace which Jehovah - blessed be He! - has shown to man! On His compassion and in his fullness of His grace He accepted the soul of the animal instead of his soul, that through it there might be an atonement.' END quote from Edersheim's book pp. 118-120 Haaaaa!! Do you now see what Paul and the other apostles were up against as they preached CHRIST JESUS as the Son of God and as the ONLY SACRIFICE that could AT-ONE-MENT between God and mankind? The Rabbis of Paul's day in their generations of belief, taught and believed, that the blood of animals, the soul of the animal DID ATONE - cleanse from sin, the one doing the offering of the animal sacrifice. Now as you read the book of Acts and the book of Galatians, you should be able to see more clearly the SITUATION of Paul and others in their preaching and teaching the CHRISTIAN GOSPEL in a Jewish world and culture, a Jewish culture that even influenced GENTILES who had accepted the God of Israel and were converts to Judaism. Today, after the Temple and animal sacrifices came to an end in 70 AD, what do the religious Jews teach? They still do not accept Jesus as the Christ as the Messiah. They teach that they can go to God and ask for forgiveness of sins, and they are forgive. They teach that in so doing they can obtain heaven and eternal life, WITHOUT JESUS THE CHRIST in their life in any way whatsoever! This is where, according to New Testament writings the JEWS are in complete ERROR and teach a FALSE belief or shall we say DOCTRINE. The New Testament makes it VERY CLEAR there is NO SALVATION outside of accepting Jesus the Christ as PERSONAL Savior!! The day will come when spiritual BLINDNESS will be taken away from the Jews, and they will KNOW that Jesus was/is the Christ, was/is the very Messiah, they had looked for and hoped for. .................. Written first in 1985 and re-written October 2007 |
No comments:
Post a Comment