Satan's Seed - Physical Humans? #1
Did Satan produce physical people?
The "Seed of Satan" Does the Devil Have Offspring on This Earth? A growing movement in this country is spewing out virulent hatred against certain ethnic and racial groups-particularly the Jews claiming that they are the lineal descendants of the serpentine creature who appeared to Eve in the Garden of Eden. Perhaps you have heard of this "seedline" teaching. If so, it is past time you saw the TRUTH about this hate-mongering doctrine! by Vance A. Stinson It's shocking but true! There are "ministers" right here in the United States of America who hold high the banner bearing the name of Jesus Christ, and, at the same time, propagate a venomous doctrine of hatred not unlike the one espoused by Adolph Hitler and his band of hate-mongering madmen! The Jew, they say, is the spiteful enemy of all that is good, right, decent, and Christian. Many of these preachers claim that the Jews of today are descendants of Cain, who they say was the "bastard son" born to a direct union between the "serpent" (Satan, or Lucifer) and Eve. This belief is called the doctrine of the "serpent's seed," often called "two seedlines" or "seed of Satan." "Seedline" preachers claim that today's Jews are counterfeits of the true descendants of the house of Judah; that rather than being a blessing to the world, as the true people of God were intended to be, these counterfeits keep a stranglehold on the economy of the Western world through their corrupt, usury based banking systems, and are behind the production of all forms of "entertainment" containing pornographic filth and anti-Christian messages. We are told that these "children of the Devil" cannot help but perpetrate the lies of their father; it's in their nature, as part of their genetic programming. One of their greatest lies, we are told, was the Holocaust, said to be the greatest hoax of the twentieth century - a lie concocted and perpetuated by the Jews in order to win the sympathy of the world, as they plot toward world dominion. It's no secret that there are despots and fanatics in this world who would like nothing better than the utter destruction of the Jews. Hitter tried it; Saddam Hussein has threatened it. But now, incredibly, we are seeing so-called "Christian ministers" - right here in the United States, advocating a doctrine of hatred against these same people! And, believe it or not, some of the more fanatical of this lot suggesting that the true Christian should be willing and ready to wage war against the Jews! HATRED IN THE NAME OF JESUS One particularly outspoken "seed of Satan" preacher stated in a message before a live audience: "I can never love a Jew, not in million years; and he'll never love me. There's an inborn enmity between us. We hate each other with a purple passion. I've read the last chapter of this book [the Bible], and we win, we win, with ... a purple hatred, a purple-passion hatred. " The preacher boasted of how he is not afraid to curse the Jews. "I call them the bastard sons of Satan that they are," he said; "kinky-haired, beady-eyed, forked-tongued little bastards...." He told of how he had said to his wife: "I doubt seriously if I die of old age.... I'm going to die in a bloodbath, gun battle, but I'm going to take a lot of them damn' Jews down with me when I go." He even seemed to suggest that wielding the sword against Jewery is a Christian duty. He stated: "I pity the minister who stands before Yahweh God with a clean, shiny, polished sword in his hand. When I stand before Him, I want notches on my word, lots of them. And I want blood on it, enemies' blood." The preacher adamantly insisted that Jews cannot become Christians, and will never enter the Kingdom of God. He stated that God Himself has promoted and perpetuated the hatred that supposedly exists between the Jews and White ("Adamite") Christians. You may find it hard to believe that a professing-Christian minister could stand up in a pulpit somewhere in the United States and spout such hate-mongering nonsense; nevertheless, it is true! The above quotations were taken from excerpts of two taped messages given in October and November of 1990. Some seedline preachers seem less malevolent than the one quoted above, though their doctrine still appeals to the prejudices of certain people. Dan Gayman, for instance, of the "Church of Israel," headquartered in Schell City, Missouri, writes: "Remember that God created all the races separately and distinctly, that He has a plan and purpose for every race, and that you should harbor hatred toward none of God's creation" (The Watchman, Summer, 1989, p.26). This seems to be in line with the teachings of genuine Christianity. Yet, notice what the same author wrote in the Summer, 1988 edition of The Watchman: "Is it not plain now for you to see that those people who have the Talmud as their Bible and the Synagogue as their temple, who have Lucifer as their God and usury as their economic weapon in this world, are indeed an evil people because they come from the fountain head of evil? Are you not able to see that they have always been a vagabond and fugitive race because they inherited these genetic qualities from Cain? ... Do you not understand why they have always been the shopkeepers, merchants, and bankers of all the nations and not the farmers and tillers of the land? When you build the genetic link to these people back to Cain, you have all the answers just as close by as your nearest Bible" (p. 27). Such a teaching can only arouse bigotry, hatred; give people with anti-Semitic inclinations an "excuse" for their prejudice. But, hopefully, all will admit that if the teaching is not true - if the "seed of Satan" doctrine is not in agreement with the Word of God - then it obviously has NO PLACE in Christianity! It should be - must be - cast out as the ungodly, hate-mongering, DAMNABLE HERESY that it is! Herein you will find undeniable proof that the "serpent's seed" teaching stands in bold contradiction to the clear and simple TRUTH of your Bible! But first, let's briefly review the basic premise of this doctrine. "...THY SEED AND HER SEED" Seedline preachers claim that Genesis 3:15 lies at the very foundation of scriptural truth. It is held up as "probably the single most important verse in the Holy Scriptures" (Charles Lee Mange, The Two Seeds of Genesis 3:15, p.4), and is said to be "the KEY to the grand truth of the Holy and Sacred Scriptures" (ibid.). It is called "the seed plot of all scripture," and its "proper understanding" is said to be "vital to the total pattern of discerning all scripture" (ibid. p.12), and necessary "to a mature understanding of Scripture or the World Situation" (ibid. p.13). In Genesis 3:15, God says, "And I will put enmity between thee [the "serpent," or Satan] and the woman [Eve], and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel." Seedline proponents argue that if "her seed" (Eve's legitimate posterity) is a literal, flesh-and-blood race, then "thy seed" (Satan's progeny) must also be a literal, flesh-and-blood race. We are inconsistent in our interpretation, we are told, if we say that one "seed" is literal and the other is spiritual, or symbolic. Thus, two races came from Eve - one by Satan, the other by Adam. Adam's descendants, through Seth, are said to be the "holy people" who have proclivities toward righteousness and good deeds; while Satan's descendants, through Cain, have the characteristics of the father of their race. As you might imagine, the "forbidden fruit" (Genesis 3:6) Eve partook of was not an apple! It was, we are told, illicit sexual relations with the Devil. According to the teaching, the "tree of the knowledge of good and evil" represents the serpent, or Satan; the Hebrew word translated "eat" can be rendered "lay"; the word "food" refers to sex; "fruit" implies offspring, or the "seed" that produces offspring. Thus, Genesis 3:6 may be interpreted this way: "And when the woman saw that Satan was good for sex, and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a serpent to be desired to make one wise [note: sex and wisdom are related in pagan religions], she took of the seed thereof, and did lay...." Cain and Abel (Genesis 4:1-2), we are told, were twins, but had different fathers. Satan was the father of Cain; Adam was the father of Abel. "Two seeds" proponents point out that it is possible for twins to have different fathers. The serpent's seedline began with Cain, survived the Flood through one or more of Noah's daughters-in-law, and continued through the Canaanites and related peoples. In the time of Jesus, they were found among the Pharisees, and in the world today, they are known as Jews, who seedline preachers say are counterfeits of the true House of Judah. Proponents of this doctrine play hop-scotch through the Scriptures, seeking out words and phrases that seem supportive of their belief. They point to Matthew 3:7, where John the Baptist calls the Pharisees and Sadducees a "generation [race] of vipers [serpents]"; to Matthew 23, where Jesus calls the scribes and Pharisees "serpents," a "generation of vipers," and "children f them which killed the prophets." They frequently cite John 8:44, where Jesus, speaking to a group of Jews, says, "Ye are of your father the devil, and the lies of your father ye will do." They claim that it was this counterfeit bastard seedline" who cried out, "Let Him [Jesus] be crucified!" (Matthew 27:22-23), and who said, "His blood be on us, and on our children" (verse 26). One of the most frequent scriptural references appearing in seedline publications is I John 3:12, which speaks of "Cain, who was of that wicked one...." Another is John 10:26, where Jesus says to the Jews, "But ye believe not, because you are not of my sheep...." They also trace the Devil's seedline through the Old Testament. They seem especially fond of passages such as Zechariah 14:21, which foretells the time when "there shall be no more the Canaanite in the house of the LORD of hosts"; and Obadiah 18, which speaks of a time when "there shall not be any remaining of the house of Esau." To this latter verse, the afore-mentioned preacher added his commentary: "Praise God," he said; "when this thing finally goes down, you'll search this kingdom over and you will not find one single solitary Jew left anywhere, because God has spoken it." We could cite many other scriptures seedline preachers commonly use as prooftexts, but the above should give you a sufficiently clear picture of their doctrinal position and of the prejudice and hatred that so obviously underlies their position. Prejudice and hatred are by no means rare in the world in which we live. Chances are, some of you reading this article have had, at one time or another, negative feelings toward people of racial or ethnic origins different from your own. Perhaps some of you have feelings strong enough that you could be easily influenced by the "seed of Satan" teaching. If so, realize that such feelings can actually blind you to the truth of the revealed Word of God! So lay aside whatever prejudices you may have, now, as we put this seedline doctrine to the acid test of Holy Scripture! It's time we stopped allowing our feelings - our prejudices, our animosities, our biases - to shape and form our beliefs! It's time we start letting the Bible give us our beliefs, and stop trying to read our own ideas into the Bible! It's time we understood the TRUTH of this matter! WHO WAS CAIN'S FATHER As stated above, seedline preachers claim that Cain and Abel were fraternal twins begotten of different fathers. Cain, said to be Satan's son, was begotten first, before his twin brother Abel, the son of Adam. Advocates of the doctrine say that this agrees perfectly with Genesis 4:1-2. But first, before we examine this passage, let's define two important terms: exegesis and eisegesis. Simply stated, exegesis is the use of those interpretational principles whereby one derives information from a specific text. Eisegesis, on the other hand, is the reading of one's own concepts and ideas into a specific text. As anyone should be able to see, the use of eisegesis in interpreting the Scriptures can only lead to blatant error! With this in mind, let's see if we can determine what Genesis 4:1-2 really says. "And Adam knew Eve his wife; and she conceived, and bare Cain, and said, I have gotten a man from the LORD. And she again bare his brother Abel. And Abel was a keeper of the sheep, but Cain was a tiller of the ground." Notice that this passage does not tell us that Cain and Abel were fraternal twins. Just as we are not told how much time passed before Cain and Abel took up their occupations of "keeper of sheep" and "tiller of the ground," we are not told how much time passed between the births of the two boys. The "fraternal twins" theory is just that - a theory! The passage does tell us that Cain was the son of ADAM! Notice that (1) Adam "knew" Eve (all biblical scholars agree that the word "knew," in this case, denotes a sexual union), (2) Eve conceived, and (3) Eve gave birth to Cain. Eve conceived after Adam "knew" her, and a male child, Cain, resulted from that union! This is what the passage clearly says, and this is the ONLY natural way to understand it! (The same sequence-(1) sexual union, (2) conception, (3) birth - is found in verse 17, and all agree on who is the father!). The only way to make Cain the son of anyone other than Adam is to read into the passage something that is not there! This is eisegesis, and, as we have noted, eisegesis is a sure road to FALSE DOCTRINE! Now, let's see yet another example of how seedline preachers pervert the true meaning of the Holy Scriptures. EVE'S AFFAIR WITH THE DEVIL We have noted, seedline preachers claim that the "tree of knowledge of good and evil" represents Satan the devil. We also noted that they insist upon "consistency" in interpreting the symbols and terms we find in the Scriptures. They are notoriously inconsistent in applying their own rule! Notice how the word "tree[s]" is used in Genesis 3:1-3: "Now the serpent was more subtle than any beast of the field that the LORD God had made. And he said unto the woman, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every TREE of the garden? And the woman said unto the serpent, We may eat of fruit of the TREES of the garden: But of the fruit of the TREE that is in the midst of the garden, God hash said, Ye shall not it, neither shall even touch it., lest ye die." If the "tree which is in the midst of the garden" represents some thing other than a tree, as seedline preachers claim, then shouldn't they stick to their rule of "consistency" and insist that ALL the "trees of the garden" represent something other than TREES? In FACT, doesn't "consistency" demand that the fruit-bearing trees of the garden represent living beings on the same order as the Devil? And what of the word "fruit"? If the "fruit of the tree which is midst of the garden" is interpreted as the serpent's producing "seed," shouldn't all other references to "fruit" in this section of Scripture be interred accordingly? Further, if "eat" means "lay" - thus carrying sexual connotations - then what are we to do with Genesis 2:16-17, where God tells Adam that he may "freely eat" of "every tree of the garden" except the "tree of the knowledge of good and evil"? And what are we going to do with the third chapter, where the word appears fifteen times? Why not look this word up in a concordance, and see how it is used in the second and third chapters of Genesis? You will find that it cannot possibly mean anything but "eat"! Surely any unbiased student of the Holy Scriptures can see the folly in the seedline preachers' interpretational methods! There can be little doubt that some amount of symbolism can be found in the Genesis account, but the idea that Genesis 3:6 is a description of an illicit sexual relationship involving Eve and the Devil is a classic example of eisegesis - reading one's own ideas into a specific text! A natural reading of the text leaves no room for the idea that "serpent" and the "tree" are one and the same; no room for the idea that Eve's affair with the serpent in any way involved SEX. Clearly the "seed of Satan" finds no support in the Genesis account. We can only conclude that the doctrine is the bastard offering of those seduced by the malignant HATRED that comes in the guise of "righteousness"! THE GENETICS "GOSPEL" According to seedline preachers, the unfortunate progeny of the "spurious counterfeit seedline" behave wickedly because they have been genetically programmed to behave that way. They are utterly helpless to behave any other way. The "holy" seedline-beginning with Adam, and continuing through Seth, Noah, Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, etc. - on the other hand, have an inborn proclivity toward righteousness and good works. They are the true, genetically "pure," Israelites (or "Adamites") who accepted Christianity, who recognized the voice of their Shepherd and followed Him. Today, they are the White, Anglo-Saxon, Celtic, Lombardic, Germanic, Scandinavian, Slavonic, and Kindred peoples. The outspoken preacher quoted near the beginning of this article described this group as God's "...royal priesthood, his prize possession, his dynasty of priests." He advised his audience to engage in "fruit inspection" in order to find out "who's who, and who's Jew" - for the two seedlines, we are told, can be distinguished by their "fruits." Gayman writes: "Just as the true seed of Abraham, descended through Isaac and Jacob-Israel, has always displayed a proclivity toward acceptance of Jesus Christ, confirmed a belief in the Bible, has sought to build churches and embrace the faith of Christianity, so have the children of Satan, the seedline of evil sought to battle against Jesus Christ, wrestle and fight against the Bible, wear down and destroy Christianity, and seek the ruin demise of Christian culture from this earth. A bit of simple logic will tell you that if good and positive things have been sought by the true seed of Abraham, then negative and evil programs have been the inspiration of those who are the counterfeit seed of Abraham" (The Watchman, Summer, 1988, p.25). The "genetics" message comes across loud and clear. We can determine who the genetically defective "seed of the serpent" are by simply looking at their "fruits" - their works, or deeds. And, we are told, we must realize that they cannot "change their spots," cannot turn to God in true repentance. Their "genetic incoding" - inherited from their father the Devil - simply will not permit it. If this is true, then we should not be able to find any evidence in Scripture that Cain or any of his descendants could have changed for the better. But we do find such evidence! Notice Genesis 4:3-7: "And in process of time it came to pass, that Cain brought of the fruit of the ground an offering unto the LORD. And Abel, he also brought of the firstlings of his flock and of the fat thereof. And the LORD had respect unto Abel and to his offering: But unto Cain and of his offering He had no respect And Cain was very wroth, and his countenance fell. "And the LORD said unto Cain, Why art thou wroth? and why is thy countenance fallen? If thou doest well, shalt thou not be accepted [margin: lifted up]? and if thou doest not well, sin lieth at the door. And unto thee shall be his desire, and thou shalt rule over him [margin: resist sin]." The New American Standard Bible renders the latter portion of verse 7 this way: "And if you do not do well, sin is crouching at the door, and its desire is for you, but you must master it." If Cain could not help but commit sin - if he was bound by his "genetic incoding," and could only do what he had been programmed to do - then WHY did God admonish Him to DO BETTER, and to MASTER ANY DESIRE TO COMMIT SIN? If Cain had no choice in the matter, then God's admonition would have been pointless! Clearly, Cain was not locked into some pattern of behavior predetermined by his "genetic incoding"! True, he went on to murder his brother, but he did have a choice in the matter - it was not a matter of genetics! Moreover, if the so-called "holy seed" have proclivities opposite those of the "wicked seed," then why did the House of Israel fail so miserably? Why did the descendants of Jacob-Israel turn to evil time after time? You would think that a people with proclivities toward righteousness would respond positively to God, especially after seeing the mighty miracles He did in Egypt, and after having escaped into the wilderness by way of a miraculous opening in the Red Sea. But after witnessing these marvellous miracles, hardly any time had passed before they turned to idolatry (Exodus 32). It would seem that a people with a natural inclination toward faith and good works would delight in hearing the voice of God, and would be overjoyed to receive His commandments (see Deuteronomy 5). But such was not the case with the "holy seed" Israel. Their negative attitude and lack of faith brought a most revealing response from God: "O that there were such an heart them," He said, "that they would fear me, and keep my commandments always, that it might be well with them, and with their children for ever!" (verse 29). If the true descendants of Jacob-Israel always had a proclivity toward accepting Christianity, building churches, and believing the Bible, then why did the vast majority of them stumble at the "Stumblingstone" (Romans 9:31-33); why were they called a disobedient and gainsaying people" (Romans 10:21; Isaiah 5:l-2); why did the majority of them "fall," leaving only a remnant (Romans 11) to form the foundation of the New Testament church? And if the Israelites have always had a greater proclivity toward accepting Christianity than non-Israelite races, how do you explain the fact that once Paul's ministry was well underway, more non-Israelites than Israelites were converted to Christianity? (Please read the ninth, tenth, and eleventh chapters of Romans.) And why do we find, in the very end of the age, the conversion of 144,000 Israelites, compared with an innumerable multitude - perhaps hundreds of thousands - "...of all nations, and kindreds, and people, and tongues" (Revelation 7:4-9)? Where is the evidence of this so-called "genetic incoding" that causes Shem's descendants to behave one way and Canaan's descendants to behave another way? The truth is, no such evidence exists! Throughout much of their history, the children f Israel seemed all too eager to embrace the ways of the heathen - to erect idols, commit whoredom, forget God's holy law! It may be true that different races have (to some extent) different inborn proclivities, but when measured against the standards of God's law of righteousness, every race comes up short! And if not for the GRACE OF GOD, none of us would stand a chance! That's why Paul could say, "For there is no difference between the Jew and the Greek: for the same Lord over all is rich unto all that call upon Him" (Romans 10:12). CAN ANGELS MARRY Seedline advocates often point to Genesis the sixth chapter as "proof' that angelic beings can (or could, before the Flood) cohabit with women and engender children. Let's read a portion of the text, and see if the theory holds up. "And it came to pass, when men began to multiply on the face of the earth, and daughters were born unto them, That the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose" (verses 1-2). Seedline preachers tell us that the "sons of God" were angels - in this case, fallen angels, or demons, who were merely following along in the talon-tracks of their diabolical leader. They assume that because the expression "sons of God" is used of angels a few times in the Old Testament, it must be speaking of angels in this passage. However, they entirely overlook the fact that the expression "sons of God" (or "children of God") is used far more often of HUMAN BEINGS - particularly God fearing human beings - than of angels. Further, it never seems to occur to seedline proponents that "sons of God" is hardly an appropriate expression for demonic spirits! If we understand "sons of God" to mean God-fearing human beings, then the major theme of the chapter becomes crystal clear: God-fearing men married the daughters of men who did not fear God. This led to less God-fearing and more of the opposite - until, finally, there were no God-fearing people left, except for Noah (please read the entire chapter). The origin of the "giants" (Hebrew: nephilim) mentioned in verse 4 is not clear. The verse seems to say that they were on the earth before the "sons of God" took wives of the "daughters of men." Whether this is correct or not, there is certainly no reason to believe that the nephilim were half-human/half-angel creatures. A simple concordant study of the word will show that nephilim - "giants" - were still on the earth long after the Flood. After considering the facts - after accepting what the text does say, and dismissing what it does not say - we find no support for the "angels married women" theory. Our position is further strengthened by Jesus' statement that the "children of the resurrection" shall be "like the angels" in that they "neither marry, nor are given in marriage: Neither can they die anymore" (Luke 20:35-36). Clearly, Genesis the sixth chapter provides no support for the "seed of Satan" doctrine! .................. TO BE CONTINUED |
No comments:
Post a Comment