by Allen (1917)
THE SCEPTRE, AND THE DAVIDIC COVENANT
CHAPTER I.
There is no question, with those who have followed us thus
far, that the Birthright people have been cast out into an
unknown and far-away country, which, when they entered, was an
uninhabited and unexplored wilderness. While Israel has been
exploring, pioneering and settling this wilderness, the Lord has
so hedged up their way that they can find neither the paths by
which they came nor the place from whence they came.
Although lost, in so far as their national identity is
concerned, they are in the place where the Lord has said they
shall find grace, and where he has promised to speak comforting
words to their hearts - in the wilderness.
There we will leave them to fulfill their appointed destiny
of becoming a multitude of nations, while we follow the history
of the Scepter, and learn what the Word of the Lord has revealed
concerning his present and its future. For, if God has been true
to his word, and unless the faith of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob has
become of no effect, then the Scepter, as well as the Birthright,
has not only a present existence, but a glorious future.
When God made the covenant with Abram in which he made him
(prospectively) the father of many nations, thereby changing his
name to Abraham, he gave the promise, - "Kings shall come out of
thee." Also, when the promise concerning the multiplicity of
nations was reiterated to his wife, whose former name was Sarai,
but now Sarah, or princess, it was said, "Kings of nations shall
be of her" (R.V.). Thus by the choice or election of God were
they made, not only the progenitors of a race which was to
develop into "many nations," which were to spread abroad to the
North, South, East and West, but also a royal family. This, of
course, includes a Sceptre - the emblem and sign of royalty.
These promised blessings, given by the Lord and confirmed to
Abraham by an oath, were received by him in faith, and counted as
though they were already in existence, for the simple reason
that, when a thing is promised by the Lord and received by any
one in faith, that thing must eventually materialize, because
faith is the God-given force or power which will and must
eventually bring promised things into existence. Hence both "the
Birthright" and "the Sceptre" blessing passed from Abraham to
Isaac as a real inheritance; while he in turn bestowed them upon
Jacob, who so much desired them and considered them so surely to
exist already that he was willing to strike bargains for them, or
even resort to fraudulent measures to get possession of them.
At the death of Jacob these two covenant blessings the
Birthright and the Sceptre - were separated, the Birthright
falling to one of his sons and the Sceptre to another one of
them, as we have heretofore fully explained. When Jacob, at the
time of his death, while acting under the direction of the Holy
Spirit, gave the Sceptre blessing to Judah and his lineage, the
prophecy which he gave with it was,--"The sceptre shall not
depart from Judah, nor a lawgiver from between his feet, until
Shiloh come; and unto him shall the gathering of the people be."
(Gen. 49:10.)
After the Abrahamic people had cried down the Divine
Theocracy, rejected the Lord as their king, and insisted on
having a human king, they chose Saul. Although Saul was not of
the royal line, but a Benjamite, he was permitted to reign, for
the Lord had determined to give the people the desire of their
hearts. But after the downfall of that haughty Benjamite, David,
a son of the royal family, was enthroned, and to him were
reiterated the promises concerning the royal family, which had
been emphasized to Judah by his dying father when he bestowed on
him the covenant blessing of royal fatherhood.
When the Sceptre covenant was confirmed to David, the Lord
gave the message through Nathan the prophet in these words: "When
thy days be fulfilled, and thou shalt sleep with thy fathers, I
will set up thy seed after thee which shall proceed out of thy
bowels, and I will establish his kingdom. He shall build an house
for my name, and I will establish the throne of his kingdom
forever. I will be his father, and he shall be my son. If he
commit iniquity, I will chasten him with the rod of men. But my
mercy shall not depart from him, as I took it from Saul, whom I
put away before thee. And thy house and thy kingdom shall be
established forever before thee: Thy throne shall be established
forever." (2 Sam.7:12-16.)
David was so impressed with the magnitude of this prophecy
and with the period of time which it covered that he went in and
sat before the Lord, pondering over it, until in wonderment he
exclaimed: "Who am I, O Lord God, and what is my house that thou
hast brought me hitherto? And this was yet a small thing in thy
sight, O Lord God (i. e., the present power, glory and prestige
of David's house, throne and kingdom): but thou hast spoken also
of thy servant's house for a great while to come. And is this the
manner of man, O Lord God?" (2 Sam.7:18,19.) No. It is not the
manner of man to prophesy concerning things "for a great while to
come." But it is the manner of God. Yes, and it is the manner of
God to make good that which he has spoken. David understood this;
so he prayed - "And now, O Lord God, the word that thou hast
spoken concerning thy servant, and concerning his house,
establish it forever, and do as thou hast said."
If it be possible that there can be such power put into
written words as shall yet come from that voice which shall sound
the seven thunders, we pray that it may be put into those which
record the above facts; and thus compel our readers to see that
it is not the spiritual throne, the spiritual sceptre,the
spiritual house, nor the heavenly kingdom, which are therein
spoken of, but that it is the literal throne, the earthly
kingdom, and the lineal house of the Judo-Davidic family which
are the subjects of this prophecy; and that all these are to
endure FOREVER.
There is also in this prophecy a note of warning to David's
successor, which is given in the following:
"If he commit iniquity I will chasten him with the rod of men."
It is not at all presumable that the ruler, sitting on the
spiritual throne, and holding the sceptre over the heavenly
kingdom, would commit iniquity; hence no such a threat could have
been given with reference to him. But when it is applied to
Solomon, the immediate successor of his father David, and to
others of the royal line, it is altogether another question, for
many of them were as wicked as men ever get to be.
Further, this prophecy was to go into effect when David's
"days were fulfilled," and when the son who should be set up
after him would build a house for God. Solomon, who was "set up"
after David, did build a house to the Lord, viz., the temple at
Jerusalem. But the Messiah has never, as yet, built any such
house. Before the temple was built, and when Solomon was giving
orders to Hiram concerning the material for its construction, he
said: "Behold, I purpose to build an house unto the name of the
Lord my God, as the Lord spake unto David my father, saying, Thy
son whom I will set upon thy throne in thy room he shall build an
house unto my name." (I Kings 5:5.) Also, when the temple was
finished, Solomon, standing before the altar of the Lord, in the
presence of all the congregation of Israel, and with uplifted
hands spread toward heaven, in that wonderful prayer at the
dedication of the temple, said: "The Lord hath performed his word
that he spake; and I am risen up in the room of David my father,
and sit on the throne of Israel, as the Lord promised, and have
built an house for the name of the Lord God of Israel. There is
no God like thee, in heaven above, nor on earth beneath, who
keepest covenant and mercy with thy servant, * * * who hast kept
with thy servant David my father that which thou promised'st him;
thou speakest also with thy mouth, and hast fulfilled it with
thine hand, as it is this day. Therefore now, Lord God of Israel,
keep with thy servant David my father that thou promisedst him,
saying: There shall not fail thee a man in my sight to sit on the
throne of Israel." (1 Kings, 8:20-25.)
By this prayer we see that Solomon understood that the
throne, the kingdom, and the lineal house of David should stand
forever.
Solomon not only understood it this way, but declared it
before all the congregation of Israel, so that the entire nation
should be fully aware of the fact. This was so thoroughly known
in Israel and acknowledged by her prophets that, at the time of
the division of the race into two kingdoms in the days of
Rehoboam and Jeroboam, Abijah, in his zeal that the lineal rights
of the royal family might not be ignored, stood upon a mountain
in Ephraim and cried out: "Hear me, thou Jeroboam and all Israel.
Ought ye not to know that the Lord God of Israel gave the kingdom
over Israel to David forever and to his sons (not son, not one,
but many) by a covenant of salt?" (13:5.) The marginal reading
is, "a perpetual covenant."
The eighty-ninth Psalm contains much light regarding the
covenant under consideration, which the Lord made with David and
his sons, concerning the perpetuity of his throne, scepter,
kingdom, and his posterity. In it the Lord declares: "I have made
a covenant with my chosen, I have sworn unto David my servant,
saying, Thy seed will I establish forever, and build up thy
throne to all generations." Not a few, not some, not even
many, but "ALL generations."
Continuing, he says: "My mercy will I keep for him
forevermore, and my covenant shall stand fast with him. His
seed also will I make to endure forever, and his throne as the
days of heaven. If his children forsake my law, and walk not in
my judgments; if they break my statutes, and keep not my
commandments then will I visit their transgressions with the rod,
and their iniquity with stripes. Nevertheless, my lovingkindness
will I not utterly take from him nor suffer my faithfulness to
fail. My covenant will I not break, nor alter the thing that
has gone out of my lips."
Surely it is not possible to break the force of these words.
The proposition could not be stated in stronger terms. The Lord
simply will not break his covenant; he will not change, nor
modify, nor in any way or for any reason alter, the thing that he
has spoken, even if the children of David do forsake his law and
break every commandment in his statute book. If they do break his
law, he will chastise and punish with "the rod" and "with
stripes," but he will not suffer his faithfulness to fail.
The covenant is unconditional.
It "shall stand fast," no matter how often they are visited
with rod and stripe for their transgressions. No matter how
severe the punishment, the fact remains that - the throne, the
sceptre, the kingdom and the seed, must endure forevermore.
The fact that in this confirmation of the Davidic covenant
the Lord uses the expressions, "his children," "they" and
"their," all in the plural form, is proof that this covenant does
not have reference to the spiritual reign of his son Jesus Christ
in the hearts of Christians. Furthermore, it could not be
possible that Jesus Christ, he of whom the prophet Isaiah wrote
saying, "Unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given," whose
"name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, The Mighty God, The
Everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace," - we say it is not
possible for this Prince of Peace, who is The Mighty God, to
break his own commandments, forsake his own law, or disregard his
own statutes, and then punish himself for his own wickedness. No,
these warnings do not apply to the Immortal One, but to the frail
mortal sons of David, of whom Solomon was the first, and whom the
Lord punished for his wickedness, as we may learn by referring to
the eleventh chapter of 1 Kings, where we read as follows: "And
the Lord was angry with Solomon, because his heart was turned
from the Lord God of Israel, which had appeared unto him twice,
and had commanded him concerning this thing, that he should not
go after other gods, but he kept not that which the Lord
commanded. Wherefore the Lord said unto Solomon: Forasmuch as
this is done of thee, and thou hast not kept my covenant and my
statutes, which I have commanded thee, I will surely rend the
kingdom from thee, and I will give unto thy servant.
Notwithstanding, in thy days I will not do it, for David thy
father's sake; but will rend it out of the hand of thy son.
Howbeit, I will not rend away all the kingdom; but will give
one tribe to thy son for David my servant's sake." (1 Kings
11:9-13.)
Please notice how perfectly the facts agree, in every
detail, with the declared purpose of God. Solomon, the seed of
David, who was set up after him, who sat on the throne in the
room of his father, who built and dedicated the house of the
Lord, did forsake his God and refuse to obey his commandments. If
God is true to his word, he must punish any of the children of
David who thus forsake his law. So, as a punishment to Solomon,
he purposes to take the greatness and power of the kingdom away
from that son, who, as Solomon hopes, shall inherit the throne,
crown, sceptre and kingdom, in all its glory. But no; the Lord
purposes to take away the greater part of the national strength
and power of the kingdom and give it to one of the servants of
Solomon instead of the royal heir.
But while the Lord is declaring unto Solomon the punishment
which he purposes to visit upon him for his disobedience, he is
careful to say: "Howbeit, I will not rend away all the kingdom;
but will give one tribe to thy son."
Why not "rend away all the kingdom?"
The Divine reply is, "For David my servant's sake." Why for
David's sake?
Because the Lord gave the "kingdom over Israel to David and
his sons forever."
Ah, he dare not take away the entire kingdom from that royal
line! Yes, we can say "dare not," and emphasize it, too. And we
may also add, must not cannot, or any and all such expressions as
will voice our protest or express the impossibility of such a
thing. Indeed, the Lord himself has uttered a stronger protest
than ours could ever be. We say this because the Lord, in
this Psalm which we have under consideration, after saying, "My
covenant will I not break, nor alter the thing that is gone out
of my lips," has, in the very next statement, made use of words
which forever shut the door of retreat; for he not only took an
oath, in which he pledged his own holy character, but he brought
the physical universe into the contract, or at least that portion
of it which involves the continued existence of the present
arrangement of our solar system. His declarations are: "Once have
I sworn, by my holiness, that I will not lie unto David. His seed
shall endure forever, and his throne as the sun before me. It
shall be establshed forever as the moon, and as a faithful
witness in the heaven." (Psa.89:35-37.) Also, in the
twenty-ninth verse of that same Psalm is the following: "His
seed also will I make to endure forever, and his throne as the
days of heaven."
If we are willing to give these words their full and natural
meaning, then surely we must see clearly that it is the intention
of the Lord that we shall understand that, so long as the sun,
the "great light" which he created for a light by day, and the
moon the "lesser light," which he created to rule the night,
shall keep their appointed places in the heavens, traveling their
orbits, continuing to make their proper changes, passing through
their ecliptics, or completing their lunations, -- just so long
must they rise over, shine down upon, and set beyond, the limits
of, a kingdom on this earth over which some member of the
Judo-Davidic family is holding the sceptre. Just so long will
they continue to say, by their very presence in the heavens,
"We are witnesses unto men throughout all generations, that the
Lord God of Israel has not lied into his servant David."
Furthermore, it is certain that the expressions, "days of
heaven," and "a faithful witness in heaven," as used in these
Scriptures, are purely astronomic, and refer to the stellar and
atmospheric heavens. Hence the throne, kingdom, sceptre and
family of David must endure, "as the days of heaven," i. e., so
long as the earth continues to revolve on its own axis, thus
giving to itself that diurnal motion which causes day and night
to succeed each other, and which enables the sun and moon to
perform their functions of lighting the day and night.
"But," says one, "do not these sayings apply to the kingdom
and throne in heaven, where Christ, the seed of David, is now
sitting at the right hand of God? And is not the New Jerusalem,
which is above, and is the mother of us all, the celestial
capital of that kingdom?" To this we are compelled to give a
negative answer; for that celestial city has "no need of the sun,
neither of the moon, to shine in it; for the glory of God did
lighten it, and the Lamb is the light thereof." (Rev.21:23.)
"But," questions another persistent spiritualizer, "do not
the seed and throne mentioned in these Scriptures refer to
Christ, who is the 'Son of David,' in his spiritual kingdom,
which is set up in the hearts of men?" Again we are compelled to
reply in the negative, for the Holy Ghost is the divine
illuminator of that kingdom; the sun and the moon having never
been heavenly lights, only in an astronomic sense.
Furthermore, a mere glance at the context will reveal the
fact that the Lord is dealing with a very earthly seed and
kingdom; for, intermingled with the promises of an everlasting
seed, throne and kingdom, the declaration is made concerning the
children of David that, if they do not walk in his judgments and
keep his commandments, but forsake his law, and break his
statutes, then he will visit their transgressions with the rod
and their iniquity with stripes. But still, no matter how wicked
the ruler on the throne or the subject in the realm, he will not
suffer his faithfulness to fail, his covenant with David must
stand forevermore.
The only conditions to the covenant are such as are entirely
beyond the power of man either to control or to break, viz., the
faithfulness of God in keeping and fulfilling his word, the
holiness of his characterfor he cannot lie - and the omnipotence
of his power to keep the sun, moon and the earth rolling onward
in their present cycles and order until, by the good pleasure of
his will, he shall change those ordinances and bring into
existence the new heavens and the new earth. Hence, the Holy
Ghost has inspired Jeremiah to write: "Thus saith the Lord: If ye
can break my covenant of the day, and my covenant of the night,
and that there should not be day and night in their season; then
may also my covenant be broken with my servant, that he should
not have a son to reign upon his throne." (Jer. 33:20,21.)
Previously, in this same chapter, and in the seventeenth
verse, the Lord has said: "David shall never want a man to sit
upon the throne of the house of Israel." Then he adds the
following: "If my covenant be not with day and night, and if I
have not appointed the ordinance of heaven and earth, then will I
cast away the seed of Jacob, and David my servant, so that I will
not take any of his seed to be rulers over the seed of Abraham,
Isaac, and Jacob." This, too, after saying: As the host of heaven
cannot be numbered, neither the sand of the sea measured: so will
I multiply the seed of David my servant." (Jer.33:22,25,26.)
In the statement, "David shall never want a man to sit upon
the throne," the word man is translated from the Hebrew "ish"
(iysh), which is defined as meaning "a man, a person, a certain
one, any one."
In the declaration that David should always "have a son to
reign upon his throne," the Hebrew word from which "son" is taken
is "Ben," which means "son, man, or a builder of the family
name." In the other expression, "take any of his seed to be
rulers," etc., the word "seed" is taken from the Hebrew
"Zara"--"a man, a person, a child, a nephew, a grandchild, or
relative."
This being the case - together with the fact that when
duration of time is being considered, there are no stronger words
in the Hebrew language than those which are translated "forever,"
"evermore," and "everlasting," then these following propositions
must stand:
(1) The Lord God of Israel made a covenant with David concerning
the perpetuity of his seed, throne, and kingdom, regardless of
the good or evil conduct of his descendants.
(2) The subjects of this Davidic kingdom must belong to the
lineage of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.
(3) Some person of the lineage of King David must be on that
throne (seat of power) who holds the sceptre, and reigns over
that kingdom.
(4) National afflictions will come upon them, as punishment for
their unrighteousness; but they will not be utterly destroyed;
for the kingdom must endure so long as there be day and night,
and the subjects must continue to increase until they become
innumerable.
(5) So long as the sun, moon and earth continue rolling onward in
their appointed orbits, just so long must the seed, throne, and
Israelitish kingdom of David be in existence, or we have no
longer a holy God ruling in the heavens and watching over Israel.
(6) In order to prove that God has become unholy, i. e., lied -
some man must yet find a fulcrum on which to rest his lever with
which he can stop the rotation of the earth, and then find some
way by which he can drive those witnessing lights from the sky;
or in some way break up the appointed ordinances of heaven and
earth, so that there cannot be day and night in their season.
Otherwise, the holiness and omnipotence of God must not be
questioned. This is the reason that David so triumphantly says to
him: "Thou hast magnified thy word above all thy name." (Psa.
138:2.)
(7) The fact that God has thus magnified his word above his name
would, in case of a failure on his part to perpetuate that which
he swears shall be in existence forever, give us authority to
impeach his testimony on every line, for it would undeify him.
..........
NOTE:
And the angel said to Mary the son she would have by the Holy
Spirit, was to be the Son of God - Immanuel - "God with us" - and
to Him would be given the Throne of David.
I submit it is against all natural logic to presume Jesus the
Christ would somehow be given a throne that has not existed for
thousands of years (it has alread been at least 2 and 1/2
thousand years if the throne of David came to an end when Judah
was finally deported to Babylon in 586 B.C. with the fall of
Jerusalem)....such a thought and promise is silly and illogical
to the extreme, for anyone to take a throne that has not existed
for thousands of years.
God cannot be counted a liar to David, the ideas of men may make
God a liar, and not able to perform His work, but the words given
by the Eternal to David about his throne enduring forever, are so
powerfully strong, those with simple childlike faith, will know
and believe that David's throne will exist on earth today; that
someone is now today, sitting on that throne ruling at least some
of the children of Abraham. And so it will be a throne that even
in the space-age world of the 21st century, will still exist, and
still be regarded with favor and respect and honor, by tens of
millions of people.
Is there such a throne today? A throne that is the most famous
throne in the entire world; a throne that defies the modern age
of modern enlightened technology; does such a throne exist today?
YES INDEED, and it should not take the reader very much thought
or time to figure which throne in the world is the greatest
throne that has ever been in the history of mankind.
Keith Hunt
To be continued
Judah's Sceptre and Joseph's Birthright Vindication of Promise to Jeremiah
by Allen (1917)
VINDICATION OF THE PERSONAL PROMISES TO JEREMIAH
Before we can gather up even the first link in the chain of
history as regards the "building and planting" which Jeremiah
must accomplish, we must take a glance at some of the facts
concerning the prophet's own history.
We have already noticed that when the Lord was instructing
Jeremiah in the work which he was to do, he said to him,
regarding those that should oppose or fight against him, "Be not
afraid of their faces, for I am with thee to deliver thee."
But Jeremiah seems not to have met with any special opposition
until during the reign of Jehoiakim. This was at a time when the
Lord commanded him to go into the court of the temple and speak
to the people as they gathered from all the cities of Judah to
worship; at the same time he told him to speak all the words
which he, the Lord, had commanded him, and to "diminish not a
word."
He was true to God, and faithfully delivered the Divine
message. The message itself was full of mercy, and accompanied
with a proviso that if every man would turn from his evil way
then the Lord would avert the impending calamities which hung
over the nation as judgments in consequence of their numerous and
manifold sins. But it only resulted in the prophets, the priests,
and the people gathering themselves into an excited, surging and
howling mob, which made a prisoner of Jeremiah, saying unto him,
"Thou shalt surely die."
Later, when the princes of Judah heard these things, they
came up to the temple, and in order that they might hear and
judge for themselves, Jeremiah was permitted to speak again. This
he did, still faithfully giving the unwelcome message of the
Lord. In conclusion, he said: "The Lord sent me to prophesy
against this house (the temple) and against this city all the
words that ye have heard. Therefore now amend your ways and
doings and obey the voice of the Lord your God; and the Lord will
repent him of all the evil that he hath pronounced against you.
As for me, behold, I am in your hand; do with me as seemeth good
unto you. But know ye for a certain, that if ye put me to death,
ye shall surely bring innocent blood upon yourselves, and upon
this city, and upon the inhabitants thereof; for of a truth, the
Lord hath sent me unto you to speak all these words in your
ears." The princes were evidently touched somewhat by this
appeal, and the people with them; for after this, both princes
and people stood against the prophets and the priests, and said,
"This man is not worthy to die." So a division arose among them,
which resulted in Jeremiah's being spared for the time and set at
liberty. But he continued his earnest expostulations with the
people because of their sins, and continued just as before his
startling annunciations concerning the impending ruin of temple,
city and nation,
These truths were so unwelcome and painful for the people to
hear, that other prophets soon began to appear who uttered
contrary predictions, no doubt for the sake of the popularity
which they should acquire among the people by prophesying the
return of peace and prosperity. Hananiah was the name of one of
these false prophets. On one occasion he broke a small wooden
yoke which Jeremiah wore upon his neck, which had been put there
as an object lesson by Divine direction. When this false prophet
broke that yoke, he told the people that the Lord said that the
yoke of Nebuchadnezzar, which was not only upon the neck of
Judah, but upon all nations, should be broken within two years.
But the Lord spoke to Hananiah, through his true prophet,
Jeremiah, and told him that, because he had made the people trust
in a lie, he should die that same year. And the record reads, "So
Hananiah, the prophet, died the same year in the seventh month."
Shemeniah was another of those lying prophets who was dealt with
in a manner which condemned him and exonerated Jeremiah. But
still Jeremiah's enemies, the priests, false prophets, and
certain elders, were not at rest, but continued their
persecutions until the result was that Jeremiah was thrown into
prison. With his liberty thus restricted he could not publicly
deliver his messages, so he called Baruch, the scribe, to his
assistance, and he wrote as Jeremiah dictated. This matter was
inscribed upon a roll of parchment, with the view of having it
read to the people in some public and frequented part of the
city.
The favorable opportunity occurred on the occasion of a
great festival, which was a feasting day, and which brought the
inhabitants of the land from all parts of Judea together at
Jerusalem. On the day of the festival Baruch took the roll and
stationed himself at the entry of the new gate of the temple,
and, calling upon the people to hear him, began to read. A great
concourse of people soon gathered around him who listened,
apparently with honest attention.
But one of the by-standers, Michaiah, went down into the
city to the king's palace, and reported to the king's scribes and
princes, who were assembled in the council chamber, that Baruch
had gathered the people together in one of the courts of the
temple, and that he was reading to them a discourse on prophecy
which had been written by Jeremiah. He also told them all he
himself had heard, as Baruch read the book in the hearing of the
people.
This aroused such an interest and anxiety among them that
they immediately sent Jehudi, an attendant at the palace, to tell
Baruch to come to them and bring the roll with him. As soon as he
arrived, they asked him to read what he had written. He did so,
and they were evidently much impressed, for the Scripture
statement is, "When they had heard all the words they were
afraid, both one and the other."
Their fear must have been great, because they felt a
conviction that these words were from the Lord, and that these
predictions would surely come to pass. This very fear created in
them a tender regard for both Baruch and Jeremiah, for they told
him that they would be obliged to report the matter to the king;
but they advised Baruch, saying: "Go hide thee; thou and
Jeremiah, and let no man know where ye be."
When the matter was reported to the king, the subject matter
of the book so angered him that when he had read only three or
four leaves, he took out his pen-knife and cut the entire roll to
pieces and threw it in the fire, and then ordered his officers to
"take Baruch, the scribe, and Jeremiah, the prophet; but the Lord
hid them." (Jer.36:26.)
Strange, isn't it, that they should have Jeremiah in prison,
and yet, when they come to look for him he cannot be found? But
then, we believe that when the Lord does a thing it is well done.
One thing we do know about this, that the Lord took him out of
prison to hide him, and that when he again appeared among men,
they did not imprison him on the old charge, for the Scripture
saith: "Now Jeremiah came in and went out among the people; for
they had not put him in prison."
Meanwhile, King Jehoiakim had received his promised burial,
that of "an ass, drawn and cast outside the gates of Jerusalem,"
"and his dead body," as Jeremiah says, was "cast out in the day
to the heat, and in the night to the frost."
The next time in which we find Jeremiah a prisoner is during
the reign of Zedekiah, who, as we have before mentioned, was the
prophet's own grandson. At this time Jeremiah's enemies
represented to the King that the predictions which were uttered
by the prophet were so gloomy and terrible that they depressed
and discouraged the hearts of the people to such an extent that
they were weakened in their power to resist, and that accordingly
he must be regarded as a public enemy. So persistently were these
claims urged that finally the King gave Jeremiah into the hands
of his enemies and told them that they might do with him as they
pleased.
There was a dungeon in the prison, to which there was no
access except from above. The bottom was wet and miry and covered
with filth and slime. It was the custom to let prisoners down
into its gloomy depths and leave them there to starve. Into this
filthy dungeon Jeremiah was cast and was left to die of misery
and hunger. But God brought Jeremiah into this world to
accomplish a work, for the accomplishment of which he himself had
pledged his reputation as God; consequently he could not afford
to let that man die then and there.
So the Lord began to trouble Zedekiah. His heart smote him,
his fears confronted him, and he trembled with misgivings lest he
had delivered a true prophet of God into the hands of those who,
he knew, would surely put him to death. So he inquired what had
been done with the prisoner, and learned that he had been
practically buried alive. Then, with fear-tortured haste, he
commanded an officer to take thirty men and get Jeremiah out of
that horrible pit "before he die."
When they went to the dungeon and opened the mouth of it
they found that he had sunk deep into the mire. They threw down
some old clothes, which he was to fold and place under his arms
and about those parts of his body where the ropes were to pass,
and where the greatest weight would come in pulling him out of
the mire and up out of that dismal pit.
After that Jeremiah had the freedom of the court of the
prison, and the King secretly sought him and begged him to reveal
the truth concerning his own fate and that of the kingdom of
Judah. Jeremiah did this faithfully, and the King found out all
that he sought to know; which proved to be much more than he
cared to learn, especially concerning his own fate.
While Jeremiah was shut up in the court of that prison the
word of the Lord came to him for the last time concerning the
destruction of the city. At the same time the promise concerning
the preservation of his own life was given, and was as follows:
"But I will deliver thee in that day, saith the Lord, and thou
shalt not be given into the hand of the men of whom thou art
afraid. For I will surely deliver thee, and thou shalt not fall
by the sword, but thy life shall be for a prey (booty or prize)
upon thee." (Jer.39:17,18.)
Jeremiah remained shut up in that prison until the
Babylonish forces captured the city, broke down the walls, burned
the Royal palaces and the houses of the people, thus making the
inside of those prison walls the only place of safety in all that
city.
Now, it is a remarkable fact, one well worthy of God and
certainly one most worthy of note, that the Lord had promised not
only that the prophet should be delivered from his enemies among
his own people, but also that the enemies of his people should
treat him well, and that amidst it all his life should be spared.
It is also a remarkable fact that, in view of all this, we read:
"Now Nebuchadnezzar, King of Babylon, gave charge concerning
Jeremiah to Nebuzar-adan, the captain of the guard, saying, "Take
him and look well to him, but do him no harm, but do unto him
even as he shall say unto thee." (Jer.39:11,12,)
The effect of this command from the conquering king was so
wonderful in its results, and the result was so absolutely
essential in order that Jeremiah might be free to finish his
Divinely-appointed task, that we are moved to give this result
just as it is recorded in the Word of God:
"And the captain of the guard took Jeremiah and said unto him ...
Behold I loose thee this day from the chains that were upon thy
hand. If it seem good unto thee to come with me into Babylon,
come and I will look well unto thee; but if it seem ill unto thee
to come with me into Babylon, forbear; behold all the land is
before thee; whither it seemeth good and convenient for thee to
go, thither go. * * * So the captain of the guard gave him
victuals and a reward (money) and let him go."
Query: Where did he go and why?
..........
To be continued
Judah's Sceptre and Joseph's Birthright The Royal Remnant that Escapes
by J.H.Allen (published in 1917)
A ROYAL REMNANT THAT ESCAPES
When Nebuzar-adan, the captain of the Chaldean guard, gave
Jeremiah privilege to go where he pleased, and provided him with
all that was needful for the journey, the record further
declares: "Then went Jeremiah unto Gedeliah, the son of Ahikam,
to Mizpah, and dwelt with him among the people that were left in
the land." (Jer.40:6.) The next verse of the same chapter states
that the people who were still in the land were "the poor of the
land, of them that were not carried away captive to Babylon."
This Gedeliah, the son of Ahikam, was the man whom the King of
Babylon had made governor of what little there was left in Judea;
for he had taken the masses of the people into captivity to
Babylon and made servants of them.
It seems that, since the capital city of Judea was now
destroyed, Gedeliah had been compelled to set up a provincial
government in some other city and had chosen Mizpah. Also, when
the refugees from among the Jews who had fled into Moab, Ammon
and Edom heard that the King of Babylon had left a remnant in
Judea and had set a governor over them, then they returned and
put themselves under him. So also did the several captains of
small outlying forces until, all told, there was quite a goodly
number in this remnant, as it was called.
But the little province did not prosper long, for the King
of Ammon entered into a plot with Ishmael, the son of Nethaniah,
to assassinate its new governor. Johanan, the son of Kareah,
discovered this plot and told Gedeliah. At the same time he
offered to slay secretly this Ishmael, the would-be assassin; but
Gedeliah would not permit it, would not believe Johanan's story,
and accused him of speaking falsely concerning Ishmael.
However, it was only a short time until the plot was
successfully carried out; for Ishmael and nine of his
confederates slew not only the governor, but all the Chaldeans,
all the men of war, and all the Jews that were with him. His
object in all this was that he might easily make captives of the
rest of the people, who were unarmed, and carry them away into
Ammon to increase and strengthen the kingdom of the Ammonites.
To show that this was the object, we quote the full text of
the tenth verse of the forty-first chapter of Jeremiah. Still it
is not of any very special interest to us to know that such was
his object, but there is something in that text which is of the
greatest possible interest to us. The reason for Jeremiah's going
to Mizpah is there. The key to the possible fulfillment of
Jehovah's promise to David is there. The possibilities of the
success of Jeremiah's commission are there. The Divine support to
our faith and an opening door for the complete vindication of God
are there.
"Then Ishmael carried away captive all the residue of the people
that were in Mizpah, even the King's Daughters, and all the
people that remained in Mizpah, whom Nebuzar-adan, the captain of
the guard, had committed to Gedeliah, the son of Ahikam; and
Ishmael, the son of Nethaniah, carried them away captive and
departed to go over to the Ammonites."
What "The King's daughters?" we hear you exclaim.
Yes; but wait until we shall gather into one focus a few
other points, and then we can see the way perfectly clear for
Jeremiah to finish completely his God-given task.
When Johanan and the other captains of the fighting forces
heard what Ishmael had done they gathered themselves together,
started in pursuit and overtook him at Gibeon. At this juncture
the Scripture says: "Now it came to pass that when all the people
which were with Ishmael saw Johanan, the son of Kareah, and all
the captains of the forces that were with him, then they were
glad. So all the people that Ishmael had carried away captive
from Mizpah cast about and returned, and went unto Johanan, the
son of Kareah. But Ishmael, the son of Nethaniah, escaped from
Johanan with eight men and went unto the Ammonites." (Jer.41:13,
15.)
After Johanan had retaken this captive company, and Ishmael,
the traitor, had escaped, then he became afraid of the Chaldeans,
and feared that the King of the Chaldean Empire, Nebuchadnezzar,
who had placed Gedeliah over them, would, upon hearing what
Ishmael had done, send his army and destroy them. So, under the
distress and despair of the hour, Johanan, who was now their
recognized leader, with all the captains and the people, from the
least unto the greatest, made an appeal unto the prophet of God,
"and said unto Jeremiah the prophet, Let, we beseech thee, our
supplication be accepted before thee, and now pray for us unto
the Lord thy God, even for all this remnant (for we are left but
a few of many, as thine eyes do behold us); that the Lord thy God
may show us the way wherein we may walk, and the thing that we
may do."
In reply to this appeal Jeremiah told them that he would
pray for them and inquire of the Lord for them, but that they
must obey the Lord; for he would tell them just what the Lord
said, whether it was good or bad, and that he would keep nothing
back. To which they replied: "Whether it be good, or whether it
be evil, we will obey the voice of the Lord our God, to whom we
send thee; that it may be well with us when we obey the voice of
the Lord our God." Then Jeremiah besought the Lord, and the Lord
heard and gave instructions. Among other things the Lord told him
to say to them, "Be not afraid of the King of Babylon, of whom ye
are afraid; be not afraid of him, saith the Lord; for I am with
you to save you, and to deliver you from his hand." He also told
them not to go down to Egypt, as was their intention, thinking
they would be safe if they placed themselves under the protection
of the King of Egypt.
Furthermore, he told them that if they did go to Egypt the
very thing which they feared would come upon them, and they
should be destroyed, saying: "If ye wholly set your faces to
enter into Egypt, and go to sojourn there, then it shall come to
pass that the sword which ye feared shall overtake you there in
the land of Egypt, and the famine whereof ye were afraid shall
follow close after you there in Egypt, and there shall ye die."
The Lord also told Jeremiah that these people were
dissembling in their hearts, when they sent him to pray for them
and to make their request. So we are not surprised that it is
recorded that Johanan said unto Jeremiah: "Thou speakest falsely:
the Lord our God hath not sent thee to say, Go not into Egypt to
sojourn there: But Baruch, the son of Neriah, setteth thee
against us, for to deliver us into the hands of the Chaldeans,
that they might put us to death, and carry us away captive into
Babylon."
Neither are we surprised to read the result, which is
recorded as follows: "But Johanan, the son of Kareah, and all the
captains of the forces took all the remnant of Judah that were
returned from all the nations whither they had been driven, to
dwell in the land of Judah; even men, women and children, and the
KING'S DAUGHTERS, and every person that Nebuzaradan, the captain,
had left with Gedeliah, the son of Ahikam, the son of Shaphan,
and JEREMIAH, the prophet, and Baruch, the son of Neriah. So they
came into the land of Egypt; for they obeyed not the voice of the
Lord. Thus came they even to Tahpanhes." (Jer.43:5-8.)
Baruch, the scribe, was the companion of Jeremiah in prison,
when the Lord took them out and hid them. He was also his
companion in persecution and affliction and accusation. Now,
since we find his name mentioned as one of this company which
Johanan compelled to go to Egypt against the direct command of
God, there is just one prophecy concerning him which we need to
mention before we proceed further. It is as follows: "Thus saith
the Lord, the God of Israel, unto thee, O Baruch: Behold, that
which I have built will I break down, and that which I have
planted I will pluck up, even this whole land, * * * but thy life
will I give unto thee for a prey (booty or reward) in all places
whither thou goest." (Jer.45:2,4,5.)
Furthermore, when that company had reached Egypt and were at
Tahpanhes, the Lord again used Jeremiah to prophesy concerning
their destruction, and also concerning the King of Babylon and
his coming against Pharaoh-Hophra, the King of Egypt, and many
other matters; but we will only give a small portion - that which
pertains to the destiny of the people whose history we are
following.
The prophecy opens with these words: "The word that came to
Jeremiah concerning all the Jews which dwell in the land of
Egypt." Note carefully the following: "I will take the remnant of
Judah, that have set their faces to go into the land of Egypt to
sojourn there, and they shall all be consumed, and fall in the
land of Egypt; they shall even be consumed by the sword and by
the famine; they shall die, from the least even unto the
greatest, by the sword and by the famine; and they shall be an
execration, and an astonishment, and a curse, and a reproach."
(Jer.44:12.)
The complete destruction of that company is foretold in
those words; yet the Lord has in that company a few persons whose
lives he has promised shall be spared. So, before the prophecy
continues much further the following proviso is given: "None
shall return but such as shall escape." (Verse 14.)
And before the prophecy is ended abundant provision is made
for the very few whom God has promised shall live. Hence we find
in the prophecy as it continues the following: "Behold I shall
watch over them for evil, and not for good; and all the men of
Judah that are in the land of Egypt shall be consumed by the
sword and by the famine, until there be an end of them. Yet a
small number that escape the sword shall return out of the land
of Egypt."
Remember that the masses of the house of Judah, of the
Jewish people, were in captivity in Babylon, where they were to
stay for seventy years. Also remember that this remnant which
came into Egypt were only the ragged end of the nation, i. e.,
the poor of the land, and a few captains of small military
forces. Now, the Lord proposes to destroy this rag-tag remnant,
out of which "a small number shall escape." Now, let us take our
bearings.
1. We have in this company, which has come down into Egypt from
Judea, "the King's daughters." Since the plural form of speech is
used there are at least two of them - history says there were
three. These are the royal seed of the house of David, who are
fleeing from the slayers of their father, Zedekiah, the last King
of the house of Judah, and the slayers of their brothers, the
sons of Zedekiah and princes of Judah.
2. In company with these princesses is Jeremiah, their
grandfather, whom also the Lord has chosen to do the work of
building and planting. In the princesses the prophet has royal
material with which to build and plant.
3. In company with Jeremiah and his royal charge we have Baruch,
his faithful scribe, whom expert genealogists prove to have been
uncle to the royal seed.
4. God has promised that the lives of this "small number," only
five or six at most, shall be to them a prey (reward) in all
lands whither they shall go.
5. Prior to this, at a time when Jeremiah was greatly troubled,
when in his great distress and anguish of heart he cried unto the
Lord, saying: "Remember me, visit me, and revenge me of my
persecutors"; then the Lord said, "Verily it shall be well with
thy remnant; verily I will cause the enemy to entreat thee well
in the time of evil and in the time of affliction. And I will
make thee to pass with thine enemies into a land which thou
knowest not." (Jer.15:11-14.)
Note the expression "thy remnant," i. e., Jeremiah's, for it
is he who must build and plant that royal seed. Understand also
that Jeremiah and his little remnant were well acquainted with
Egypt, and since it was well known to them it could not have been
their final destination. Hence, this escaping royal remnant must
journey back to Judea, and then - whither?
"Into an unknown land!" Why? "For out of Jerusalem shall go
forth a remnant, and they that escape out of Mount Zion (on which
were the royal dwellings). The zeal of the Lord of hosts will do
this. And the remnant that is escaped of the house of Judah
(royal line) shall again take root downward and bear fruit
upward." (Isa.37:32-31.)
Hear it! O hear it! Ye men of earth, HEAR IT! "Shall again
take root downward" - be planted! "and bear fruit upward" - be
builded! Where? God should tell us where in His Word, and he
does.
..........
To be continued
NOTE:
WHAT A STORY! WHAT A WORKING FROM THE LORD! HE WILL BE TRUE TO
HIS WORD, TO HIS PROMISE TO DAVID.
ARE YOU BEGINNING TO SEE HOW THE ETERNAL IS GOING TO KEEP DAVID'S
THRONE ALIVE ON THIS EARTH?
Judah's Sceptre and Joseph's Birthright The Prince of the Scarlet Thread
by J.H. Allen (1917)
THE PRINCE OF THE SCARLET THREAD
While we leave our little royal "remnant" to make their
escape, let us look about and out into the fields of revelation
and history, to see if we can find some royal prince to whom
shall be wedded one of these princesses who are fleeing into that
"unknown land," where the Lord has promised that those who
compose this remnant shall again take root and grow.
While we are making this search it will be well to remember
that "God gave the kingdom over Israel to David forever," and
that "Israel" is not the name of the Jewish nation, but that it
is the name of the ten-tribed kingdom, which had been driven into
"an unknown land" about one hundred and thirty-nine years prior
to the flight of this remnant.
Let us also remember that the Sceptre, with all that belongs
to it, was promised distinctively to the Judo-Davidic family, and
not to the kingdom which bore the name of Judah, a name which,
together with its corrupted form, Jews, is the Biblical historic
name of the Jewish nation.
Judah, as we will remember, was the representative name of
that nation which was composed of the smaller portion of Israel's
seed, because it was to Judah's blessing and standard that the
people gathered who afterward became separated from the rest of
Israel, and were known as the Jews. They are the descendants of
these people who are still known as Jews.
On the other hand, according to a prophecy which shall be
cited in due time, the descendants of the ten-tribed kingdom,
which had been cast out into an unknown land, were to be called
by another name.
The fact that they were not to be known by the name of
Israel cannot annul the prophecy which was uttered by Abijah, as
he stood upon a certain mount in Ephraim and said: "Hear me, thou
Jeroboam, and all Israel; ought ye not to know that the Lord God
of Israel gave the kingdom over Israel to David forever, even to
him and to his sons, by a covenant of salt?"
Do you ask, "Is it possible that this little royal remnant
shall have gone to that same unknown land to which they of the
ten tribes had previously gone? Was it among that people that
this remnant was planted, and over whom the preserved sceptre
held its sway?" Let us examine the Scriptural evidence.
Ezekiel is believed to have lived contemporaneously with
Jeremiah. By taking the testimony of chronology, together with
the concurrence of many historic events, all may know that this
is true.
Jeremiah states historic events and utters prophecies which
relate chiefly to Judah, but gives only a little of that which
pertains to Israel; while Ezekiel does the reverse of this,
saying much that concerns Israel and but little that pertains to
Judah.
Still, what he does say concerning the destroyed
commonwealth of Judah, the plucked-up Sceptre and the overturned
throne of that royal family whose history we are studying, does
most undoubtedly furnish evidence which connects the remnant seed
and their monarchical belongings with the exiled house of Israel,
which has taken root, and whose people are gathering strength in
a country the location and geographical character of which are
described by the prophets, and which, at a time prior to the
prophecies, was an unknown and an uninhabited wilderness.
Jeremiah tells us that "Zedekiah was one and twenty years old
when he began to reign, and he reigned eleven years in
Jerusalem."
At a period which synchronizes with the time when Zedekiah
had reigned for six years, Ezekiel declares that the word of the
Lord came to him saying that he should prophesy against Judah and
Jerusalem, concerning the King of Babylon, who would come up
against them with the sword, and that at that time he should set
battering rams against the gates of the city, cast up a mount and
build a fort. The result of this would be that the city would be
taken.
At the same time the message from the Lord, which was
delivered by the prophet Ezekiel to Zedekiah, was "And thou,
profane, wicked Prince of Israel, whose day is come, when (your)
iniquity shall have an end, thus saith the Lord God: Remove the
diadem, and take off the crown; this shall not be (upon) the
same; exalt him that is low, and abase him that is high. I will
overturn, overturn, overturn it; and it shall be no more
(overturned) until he come whose right it is; and I will give it
to him." - Ezek.21:22-27.
We have no disposition to make an attempt to give words a
meaning which they will not bear, nor to attach any signification
to them which the context does not clearly indicate; but these
words do most certainly give us to understand that there is a
person, a male heir of the royal line, who is to be the immediate
successor of Zedekiah to the Davidic throne. Also, these words
teach that the crown is to be taken from off the head of
Zedekiah, upon whom it rested at the time when this prophecy was
given, and placed upon the head of this person whom the
Scriptures designate as "him that is low."
These words further teach that when the royal diadem, the
emblem of kingly power and exaltation, is taken from the one and
placed upon the head of that other person, that then the one who
was previously high is abased and brought low, but that the one
who hitherto was low is then exalted and made high. This is
essentially so, because the two men shall have then exchanged
places.
Furthermore, the expression, "This shall not be the same,"
taken together with the prophecy concerning the overturns, leads
us to expect a change of dynasty, at least on the side of the
male line, and also a change in the territorial or geographical
situation. This is still more apparent when we note that there
are to be three overturns, and that after the third overturn
shall have been accomplished, there are to be no more until
another certain person comes. Also, after the diadem has been
removed from the head of the prince who wore it at the time of
the first overturn and placed upon the head of "him that is low,"
it is to be noted that then either this man, who is the person
understood as the antecedent of the personal pronoun, "Him," or
his lineage, is to be dethroned by the Lord in favor of that
other person, who is designated as "he whose right it is," to
whom it shall then be given.
The next question for us to settle is, Who is this legally
possible person, that is to be the successor of Zedekiah, who is
spoken of as "him that is low"? for he is spoken of as "low" only
in the sense of nonruling.
By consulting the thirty-eighth chapter of Genesis we will
find a record of the conception and birth of twin boys, whose
conception and birth were both accompanied by such extraordinary
circumstances that the question of their parentage is forever
settled; for Tamar, the mother, did willingly stoop in order that
she might conquer Judah, the father, and compel him to do justice
by her.
The never-to-be-forgotten manner in which Judah was forced
to acknowledge that those children were his offspring and that
their mother was more righteous than he, does most certainly
place the fact of their royal lineage beyond the possibility of
cavil.
When the mother was in travail and after the midwife had
been summoned, there was the presentation of a hand. Then, for
some reason either human or Divine, the midwife knew that twins
were in the womb. So, in order that she might know and be able to
testify which was born first, she fastened a scarlet thread on
the outstretched hand. Since Judah's was the royal family in
Israel, and the law of primogeniture prevailed among them, it was
essential that this distinction should be made so that at the
proper time the first born or eldest son might ascend the throne.
After the scarlet thread had been made secure on the little
hand it was drawn back and the brother was born first. Upon
seeing this the midwife exclaimed: "How hast thou broken forth?"
Then, seemingly, she was filled with the spirit of prophecy and
said: "This breach be upon thee," and because of this prophetic
utterance he was given the name of Pharez, i. e., "A Breach."
Afterward his brother, who had the scarlet thread upon his hand,
was born, and his name was called Zarah, i. e., "The seed."
The very fact that Pharez was really born first would exalt him,
and it eventually did exalt his heirs, to the throne of Israel,
for King David was a son of Judah through the line of Pharez. But
just so surely as this son of Judah and father of David, who was
the first one of the line to sit upon that throne, was given the
name of Pharez, just so surely must we expect - with that little
hand of the scarlet thread waving prophetically before them -
that a breach should occur somewhere along that family line.
That breach did occur. We are now considering its history
and are well into its transition period, which began when the
Lord God sanctified Jeremiah, sent him into the world, and gave
him his commission to pull down and pluck up the exalted Pharez
line, and afterward to build and plant anew the sceptre, throne
and kingdom; while at about the same time the word of the Lord
came to Ezekiel and moved him to predict the removal of the crown
from the head of the one who is high, a proceeding which not only
involves the transfer of the royal diadem to another head, but
also an overturning; and when both the transfer and the
overturning shall have been accomplished, then the one who was
low will have been exalted and the exalted one will have been
brought low.
The immediate posterity of this "Prince of the Scarlet
Thread" is given as follows: "And the sons of Zarah; Zimri and
Ethan and Heman and Calcol and Dara, five of them in all." (1
Chron.2:6.) Thus the direct posterity of Zarah was five, while
that of Pharez was only two.
For the reason that our Lord sprang out of Judah, through
the line of Pharez, the unbroken genealogy of that family is
given in the sacred records; but the genealogy of the Zarah
family is given only intermittently. One thing is made quite
clear in the Bible concerning the sons of Zarah, and that is,
that they were famous for their intelligence and wisdom, for it
was only the great God-given wisdom of Solomon which is declared
to have risen above theirs, as is seen by the following: And God
gave Solomon wisdom and understanding * * * and Solomon's wisdom
excelled the wisdom of all the children of the East, for he was
wiser than all men - than Ethan the Ezrahite, and Heman, and
Calcol, and Dara. (1 Kings 4:29,3I.)
Furthermore, we find that two of them, Ethan and Heman, were
also noted singers, as we find by consulting the fifteenth
chapter of First Kings and the nineteenth verse. By noting the
titles of the eighty-eighth and eighty-ninth Psalms we also see
that one of them was composed by "Heman the Ezrahite," and that
the other was the song of "Ethan the Ezrahite."
It is not at all unlikely and would be but natural that
the Zimri who overthrew Baasha, the third King of Israel (not
Judah), belonged to the posterity of Zimri, the first-born son of
Zarah, son of Judah and twin brother of Pharez. For, as we have
shown, the seed of Jacob were at that time divided into two
kingdoms, with the posterity of Pharez on the throne ruling over
the kingdom of Judah. How natural it would be for the then living
members of that family to think, and to say: "This is the long
foretold breach for which we have been taught to look. This is
the time to assert our royal prerogatives, take the throne, and
rule over this the house of Israel."
It would be but natural for another reason, namely, there
has always been an attempt to fulfill, in the natural, every
promise that the Lord God has made to his chosen people. He
promised Abraham and Sarah that they should have a son. In order
that they might accomplish this end Sarah gave and Abraham took,
Hagar her handmaid, and the result was Ishmael.
Before Jacob and Esau were born the Birthright was promised
to the younger. Jacob, the younger, undertook to accomplish this
in the natural by taking unjust advantage of his brother and
deceiving his father.
So with Joseph: after God had promised the Birthright to him
he undertook in the natural to take advantage of the blindness of
Jacob.
Nevertheless, God in his own good time gave Sarah strength
to conceive; settled with repentant, wrestling Jacob, and
outwitted manceuvering Joseph.
So now, in his own good time, he has also made the predicted
breach, which shall result in the bringing down of the line of
Pharez, "the high," and which shall exalt the prosperity of
Zarah, "the low."
....................
To be continued
Judah's Sceptre and Joseph's Birthright The Prince of Scarlet Thread and Royal Remnant
by J.H. Allen (published in 1917)
THE "PRINCE OF THE SCARLET THREAD" AND "THE ROYAL REMNANT" UNITED
In connection with the record of the fact that the "high,"
or ruling, Prince of Judah has been uncrowned and dethroned, and
that the "low" has been crowned and placed on the throne, we find
that a royal prince, a royal princess and the ten-tribed kingdom
of Israel are all together in the same country, also that this
royal pair are united and placed on a throne, and are ruling over
the kingdom of Israel.
A RIDDLE AND PARABLE
These facts are recorded in the seventeenth chapter of
Ezekiel in the form of a riddle and a parable, which, together
with their explanation, make up the subject matter of the entire
chapter, which opens as follows "And the word of the Lord came
unto me saying, Son of man put forth a riddle, and speak a
parable unto the house of Israel; and say, Thus saith the Lord
God, etc." The Hebrew word which is here translated riddle is
defined as "A puzzle; hence a trick, conundrum, dark saying, hard
question," etc. These definitions correspond to our English
thought of an enigma, or something proposed which is to be solved
by conjecture; a puzzling question; or an ambiguous proposition.
A parable, on the other hand, is more like a fable or an
allegorical representation of something which is real in its
relation to human life and thought, and is represented by
something real in nature.
Thus the prophet in his introduction prepares us to expect
that the words which follow shall be enigmatical; and, since the
Lord commanded him to use this veiled language, we must adjust
ourselves accordingly, remembering that "it is the glory of God
to conceal a thing; but the honor of kings to search out a
matter." So, then, let us, it a spirit that shall be worthy of
kings, search out the matter of this riddle, which we will notice
is put forth unto the house of Israel, and not to the Jewish
people.
THE GREAT EAGLE
The first part of the riddle is given, as follows: "Thus
saith the Lord God: A great eagle with great wings, long-winged,
full of feathers, which had divers colors, came unto Lebanon, and
took the highest branch of the cedar; he cropped off the top of
his young twigs, and carried it to a land of traffick; he set it
in a city of merchants."
A few moments reflection will convince us that, whatever
else it may mean, the great eagle is intended to represent a
means of transportation; for the declaration is that "it came" to
a certain place, "and took" something which was in that place to
which it came, and "carried it into" some other "land."
We are also told that this means of transportation came to
Lebanon. Since Lebanon is a mountain range in Palestine, then the
place to which it came, and from which it departed is, most
certainly, Palestine.
YOUNG TWIGS
That which was taken away is declared to be "young twigs,"
which were taken from "the highest branch o f the cedar" of
Lebanon. Since the personal pronoun "his" is used, having "the
cedar" for its antecedent, it must represent a person. This
person is of the masculine gender, and father of the "young
twigs"; hence, these young scions are also persons.
Furthermore, it is a well authenticated fact that the cedar
of Lebanon is a symbol of royalty. Since the riddle contains
within itself such abundant evidence of this fact, which will be
made clear as we proceed, we will not need to go elsewhere for
proof.
SET IN A LAND OF TRAFFIC BY GREAT WATERS
Again, inasmuch as it is true of twigs that they must be
set, grafted, or planted, in order that they may grow and bear
fruit, or increase, so also it is declared of these young royal
scions that they were "set." The place also where they were set
was certainly well adapted for increase of population, or
subjects; that is, "a city of merchants, in a land o f trafick."
The second part of this riddle reads as follows: "He took also of
the seed of the land, and planted it in a fruitful field; he
placed it by great waters, and set it as a willow tree. And it
grew, and became a spreading vine of low stature, whose branches
turned toward him, and the roots thereof were under him; so it
became a vine, and shot forth sprigs."
"The seed o f the land" is most certainly the people of the
land. The land from which "he took" this seed, or people, is
Palestine; and the people of Palestine are distinctly Israelites.
And numerically, hence preeminently, they are always the
ten-tribed kingdom of Israel.
So these people who had been taken out of their own land
were "planted" in another, and that other has become to them "a
fruitful field," which is located "by great waters." Not by the
Mediterranean Sea, or the Great Sea, as it is called in
Scripture. But the new home of this removed people is "by great
waters." In their new home Israel "grew and became a spreading
vine." And since this riddle is dealing with the breach - as we
shall see - in which the "high" and the "low" princes of the
royal house are to exchange places, we are not surprised that
this spreading or outreaching vine is said to be of "Low"
stature, nor that its branches and sprigs turned toward him, or
that its roots, or growing power, was under him. If under him,
then he was over them, i. e., their ruler.
ANOTHER GREAT EAGLE
This riddle further says: "There was also another great
eagle with great wings and many feathers; and behold this vine
did bend her roots toward him, and shot forth her branches toward
him, that he might water it by the furrows of her plantation. It
was planted in a good soil by great waters, that it might bring
forth branches, and that it might bear fruit, that it might be a
goodly vine." Here we have the record of the arrival of another
passenger, who also came to that land of "good soil," which is by
"great waters," and who was brought there by the same means of
transportation, i. e., a "great eagle with great wings," as that
which brought the royal sons. This was not the same eagle, but
"another" eagle, or ship, for we believe this means of
transportation to have been the ships of Dan; since it is
declared that "Dan abode in ships," and that "they have taken
cedars from Lebanon to make masts" for their ships. We also know
that the seaport of Tyre, in Palestine, was the port into which
they must come for the cedars of Lebanon.
Yes, for the cedars of Lebanon!!! be they used as masts for
their ships, or as types of their royal princes. The tribe of Dan
also used the eagle as their standard, and they are said to have
used great carved eagles with outstretched wings as the
figureheads on the bows of their vessels. Also it is a common
thing to symbolize ships which are under full sail as flying
birds; and in this riddle the "long wings" represent the long
sails, which, like wings carry the "great" ship - the large bird,
or eagle ship - and her passengers to the land of traffic.
We are forced to the conclusion that the object which the
writer has in view in mentioning the coming of this second ship
is, that we may guess that another important personage had
arrived; for, after mentioning the ship's arrival, his next
expression is "Behold, this vine did bend her roots toward him."
Thus we learn that the person who came in the second ship was a
woman, and that her inclination and desire was toward the prince
who had preceded her into the same land.
Then, still under the similitude of a vine, and that which
is essential to its life and growth, viz., land and water, there
follows that which clearly indicates a unity of life, claims and
purpose. In fact, there was a marriage between the "her" and the
"him" of this riddle, the result of which was that she, too, was
"set" or "planted" in that land of a "goodly vine," albeit that
goodly vine is of "Low Stature"; and bore "fruit." That is,
offspring.
JEREMIAH AND KING'S DAUGHTERS
Since it is true that a prince can wed only with a princess,
it will be well for us, at this juncture, to remember that we
left Jeremiah and his little royal remnant of king's daughters on
their way to a land which was strange, or unknown, to them; yet
to a place where this preserved seed of David's line was to be
"planted," again "take root," and "bear fruit."
Now, it is a fact that the man and the woman of this riddle
were united. Also it is a fact that the woman was "planted" in
that land of good soil, into which she did "take root," and these
things were accomplished in order that she "might bear fruit."
In other words, that which hitherto has been the subject of
prophecy concerning Jeremiah's commission, and concerning his
royal charge, is now recorded as a matter of history. The analogy
is complete.
MEANING OF THE PARABLE
Still the explanation of this riddle makes all these things
so plain that we are not left to conjecture. For at the eleventh
verse the prophet says: "Moreover, the word of the Lord came unto
me, saying, Say now to the rebellious house, Know ye not what
these things mean? Tell them, Behold the king of Babylon is come
to Jerusalem, and hath taken the king thereof and the princes
thereof, and led them to Babylon."
The king of Babylon was Nebuchadnezzar, as we know. The king
of Jerusalem, and the princes thereof, were, as we also know,
Zedekiah and his sons.
Then follows a brief account of Zedekiah's treachery with
the king of Babylon, how he rebelled against him, and sent to the
king of Egypt for help.
Then comes a prophecy concerning the fact that King Zedekiah
shall die in Babylon.
After this comes the prophetic account of that band of
fugitives going to Egypt, and the declaration that they should
fall by the sword, etc., all of which we have given in detail.
But the outcome of it all, and that which pertains to our
immediate subject, begins again with the twenty-second verse. The
prophet, still using the symbols of the riddle, explains as
follows:
"Thus saith the Lord God, I will take of the highest branch of
the high cedar, and will set it." This is the royal prince who
came in Ship Number 1. He then proceeds to say: "I will crop off
from the top of his young twigs a tender one, and will PLANT It
upon a high mountain and eminent." This is the second importation
of royal branches, but this time it is the "top" or one whose
right it is to rule, a "tender one." That is, it is a tender
young girl, the top-most one of the young twigs that came in Ship
Number 2.
Where was she planted? "In the mountain of the height of
Israel," is the Divine reply. "What, ISRAEL?" Yes, Israel,
national Israel. Israel as a nation; but not Jewish-Israel, for
that kingdom is overthrown; the people are gone into the
Babylonish captivity; the king, with his eyes put out, is doomed
to die in chains in a Babylonish prison; the princes are dead;
the king's daughters have escaped out of Jerusalem; and the top-
most one of these tender twigs is planted here in the height of
the mountains of Israel, i. e., the THRONE.
"And it (that which was planted) shall bring forth boughs,
and bear fruit, and be a goodly cedar: and under it shall dwell
all fowl of every wing; in the shadow of the branches thereof
shall they dwell." The purport of this is so glaringly plain that
the most obtuse mind can see that it refers to the mixed
population which Israel, of necessity, must have gathered while
being sifted through other countries.
The prophet further declares: "And all the trees of the
field, i. e., all the people of that kingdom of Israel, "shall
know that I, the Lord, have brought down the HIGH tree, have
exalted the Low tree, have dried up the green tree, and have made
the dry tree to flourish. I the Lord have spoken and DONE it."
(Ezek.17:24.)
"Done what?" Brought down the HIGH from the throne, and
exalted the Low to the throne.
"What else?" Made the long-foretold breach, remembered his
covenant with David, and kept faith with Jeremiah.
THE BREACH HEALED
For, since these trees are the royal cedars, and the male
heirs of the former reigning line have been dethroned in favor of
him that was low, who also is the "spreading vine of Low stature"
of the riddle, and who is now exalted by being enthroned, and
since a royal princess found her way to the land of the "vine of
low stature" and united her interests with his, "that he might
water the furrows of her plantation," we are safe in saying that
God has taken the crown from off the head of Zedekiah, the high,
who was of the Pharez line, and has placed it on the head of a
prince of Zarah, the low, to whom Zedekiah's daughter, the heir
to crown and sceptre, made her way, in company with Jeremiah, who
had charge of the royal paraphernalia, and who was divinely
commissioned to plant and build anew the plucked-up and
overthrown kingdom of David.
Christ came through the family line of Judah, David, Josiah
and Jeconiah, not through the breach; the breach ran through
Judah, David, Josiah and Zedekiah. So, the two branches of the
Judo-Pharez-David line diverge at Josiah. One of these lines
eventually gave birth to the Messiah; and, as we shall prove, the
other line, after having been united to the brother line of the
Scarlet Thread, are still holding that preserved throne and
sceptre, and raising the seed unto their fathers, Judah and
David; so that there shall never be a lack of some one of David's
children to sit upon that throne as rulers over the seed of
Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, and that the sceptre may not depart
from Judah till SHILOH COME.
THE ULTIMATE HEALING OF THE BREACH
Thus it is that one of these lines holds that sceptre, and
wears that crown as a fact, but the judo-David house has a
greater son to whom they belong by "RIGHT." When he comes, as
Shiloh, God will give it to him, for unto him shall the gathering
of the people be. At that time the breaches will be healed, and
he shall be called "The Restorer of the BREACH."
The question now is to find where that sceptre and throne
are today, for we are not only confronted with the question of
"Lost Israel," or the "Lost Birthright," which involves the whole
house of Joseph and the many nations into which they were to
develop; but we are also confronted with the question Of THE LOST
SCEPTRE which involves the Zedekiah branch of the house of David
and all its Heraldic Blazonry.
....................
NOTE:
OH, THE WORKINGS OF THE ETERNAL GOD. GREAT IS HIS
WAYS AND WONDERS TO PERFORM. THE PLAN OF GOD IS FOUND
IN THE RIDDLE AND PARABLE. THE ALMIGHTY WILL YET BE TRUE
TO HIS WORD TO DAVID.
DAVID'S THRONE WILL SURVIVE AND BE PLANTED IN A LAND WITH
GREAT WATERS, WHERE IT WILL TAKE ROOT AND EXPAND LIKE A
VINE OVER A WELL, AND A THRONE WILL RULE AND REMAIN EVEN
IN A SPACE-AGE WORLD.
A THRONE THAT MAY NOT HAVE INDIVIDUAL POWER PER SE, BUT IT'S
POWER WILL BE THE HISTORY OF ITS THRONE - SO ANCIENT AND SO
HONORED AND RESPECTED BY THE BILLIONS OF PEOPLE IT REIGNS OVER,
THAT IT WILL NEVER DIE, AND ONE DAY THE SON OF DAVID, HE WHOSE
RIGHT IT IS, WILL COME AND SIT ON THAT THRONE. THE GREATEST
RESTORER OF THE BREACH - THE ONE WHO WILL BRING IN THE
RESTITUTION OF ALL THINGS, WILL COME AND REIGN ON THE EARTH
SITTING ON DAVID'S THRONE.
DOES YOUR HEART REJOICE IN THE BEAUTY AND GLORY AND FAITHFULNESS
OF THE ETERNAL GOD, WHO CAN GIVE A PROMISE TO A MAN, AND BRING
TO PASS THAT WHICH IS PROMISED. PRAISE AND GLORY BE HIS!
Keith Hunt
To be continued
Judah's Sceptre and Joseph's Birthright Lost Israel located - First overturn
by Allen (1917)
LOST ISRAEL AND THE FIRST OVERTURN LOCATED
The fact that a great nation, composed of ten tribes of the
posterity of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, is lost, or unidentified,
among the nations of the world is well known to enlightened
students of the Old Testament. This truth has been a source of
such great mystery that it has both puzzled the minds and engaged
the interest of men to such an extent that many of them who are
the intellectual peers of the world have bent their best energies
to the work of hunting for this lost nation.
Thus, for many years, devout minds have been investigating
secular and sacred history, as well as sacred prophecy, which
must have become, or which must yet become, history. These men
have carefully traced, not only the perfectly connected outlines,
but also the details of history. Hence they confidently assert
there are no missing links in the chain of racial and national
events.
A large per cent of the men who have been thus engaged are
eminent in religious, historic and scientific research. Men who
have called to their aid chronology, astronomy, archeology,
ethnology, pyramidology and philology. Indeed, they have used any
and every science that could throw any possible light upon this
subject; for they have been irrepressible in their search after
facts, and are men who purpose, for the truth's sake, that the
Word of God shall be forced to stand every test, be it ever so
crucial, that its own internal matter demands.
It is the consensus of opinion among this class of men, the
number of whom is increasing daily, that the once-lost ten tribes
of Israel are found. Be they right or wrong, we are sure of this
one thing - namely, that there is a race of people here amidst
other races, who do not know their ancestral origin, and who
possess all the distinguishing marks whereby the Scriptures
declare the lost house of Joseph shall be found and recognized,
not only by themselves, but by the rest of the nations of the
earth.
Still, be this as it may, there is nothing for us to do now
but to take up the thread of our story, which is a "scarlet" one
and pertains to those members of the royal family whom we left on
the throne of Israel, and who were holding the sceptre of David
de facto, instead of the one to whom it belongs de jure, and to
whom the Lord will give "it," and not the Sceptre which belongs
to some other royal family, race or kingdom.
While dealing with the breach which occurred in the royal
family - which had been prophesied of, not only in the words
which were uttered by the midwife, but by the peculiar manner of
the birth of the Judo-Tamar twins, which also had been used as a
prophetic type or symbol - we said nothing about the three
overturns which are a part of Ezekiel's prophecy concerning some
of the chief details of this same breach.
One reason for this omission was that we could not give the
proof concerning the location of that "goodly land" to which the
royal branches, i. e., Judah's prince and David's princess, were
carried, and in which they were "set," without making many points
in proof of the present whereabouts of the still preserved seed,
and the perpetuated Crown, Throne and Sceptre of David. For it
was not our desire to give any such proof until we should first
prove that the building and planting which Jeremiah's commission
involved, had been accomplished, and that the transfer of the
crown had been made, that the high branch had been dethroned, and
that another branch--one equally high by birth, but "low," only
in the sense of non-ruling, and because of the law of
primogeniture - had been exalted by being enthroned.
Now, since we have shown that the Word of God emphatically
declares these things to have been accomplished, we are prepared
to show that the three prophetic overturns took place, and that
they took place in connection with these same royal ones,
together with their succession, whom we have followed to a new
country.
It is not possible to follow the history of these overturns,
nor to follow further the history of that branch of the royal
family which came into power when the breach was made, and to do
so independent of lost Israel; for it was to Israel that Jeremiah
fled with the "king's daughters" - the same people with whom the
royal line of Zarah had been for more than a century prior to the
time when Jeremiah joined them, and since that time, nationally
speaking, the fortunes and history of the Sceptre and Birthright
have become one. We must remember that the place where this
prince and princess were planted was in the "Height of Israel";
that it was all the trees in the field of Israel that were to
know the low tree had been exalted; that it was Israel, the dry
tree, which is made to flourish, and that has been dry hitherto
for lack of royal honors and royal blood, but now that a prince
and princess of the blood are on the throne, the once dry tree
doth flourish, but the former green tree, the Jewish kingdom -
not the nation - is dried up.
We must remember that Israel is the ten-tribed nation, the
Birthright people, whose ancient capital was Samaria, whose
representative name is Ephraim, the second son of Joseph, to whom
pertains the birthright; and that his two sons, Ephraim and
Manasseh, were to "grow into a multitude in the midst of the
earth," that they were finally to separate, Manasseh to become a
"great nation," and Ephraim to develop into many nations, a
multitude of nations, or a company of nations, as it is variously
given.
The first of these overturns is the one whose history we
have essentially given while dealing with the preservation of
King Zedekiah's daughters, and is the overturn of the kingdom
from Palestine to that goodly land, by the side of great waters,
where it took root, grew, flourished and became a spreading vine.
A ripple of holy joy went pulsing through our heart when we found
that the prophet had, in his riddle, used the expression,
"spreading vine" in connection with Israel. The Hebrew word,
sawrakh--spreading, as here used, is defined in Strong's
Exhaustive Concordance, "to extend, to spread, to stretch
exceedingly, to extend even to excess." Thus this new country,
this strange and unknown land, in which the royal remnant found
the cast-out people of Israel, is the place from which it is
declared that they shall spread out, that they shall exceedingly
extend their borders and so fulfill their national destiny.
How perfectly this harmonizes with the promises concerning the
"place" which the Lord made to David in connection with the
promises concerning the perpetuity of his seed, throne and
sceptre, and which was given at the same time, as follows:
"Moreover, I will appoint a place for my people Israel, and will
plant them, that they may dwell in a place of their own, and move
no more; neither shall the children of wickedness afflict them
any more, as beforetime."
(The verse just mentioned is VERY IMPORTANT, FOR IT TELLS US THAT
WHEN ISRAEL WAS DWELLING IN PALESTINE OR THE HOLY LAND, GOD HAD
ALREADY PLANNED THAT THEY WOULD BE MOVED, TO ANOTHER LAND, TO THE
VERY END TIME. This verse is in 2 Samuel 7:10 and is with the
context of God promising David that his throne would be forever -
Keith Hunt)
At this juncture we feel impelled, for fear you will not
think it out for yourselves, to point out the fact that the Lord
had cast Israel out of her land, and cast her afar off; and while
going to that far-off land she was to be "sifted through the
nations as corn is sifted in a sieve"; but after they have
reached their far-off destination, their God-appointed place,
then they are to move no more. For it is in reference to this
same casting out of the Ephraimic nation that Hosea declares:
"The children of Israel shall abide many days without a king, and
without a prince." But now, with this prophetic riddle fulfilled,
their king is with them, and the monarchy of Israel is
flourishing as a green, or living, tree.
Our next effort will be to find this far-off land, whose
history has been one of spreading out - yea, spreading out
exceedingly, even excessively.
The very fact that the Jews have a record of the birth, call
and commission of Jeremiah, and the history of the execution of
the first part of his commission, i. e., the tearing down,
rooting out and plucking up of the house and throne of David -
this, considered in the light of the fact that they can give no
account of him after his sudden disappearance from among them, is
evidence that he neither died nor completed his God-ordained task
among them. And all the civilized races of the world know that he
did not build that seat of power, nor plant those royal scions
among the Jews.
But since we find it on record that Jeremiah's work has been
accomplished, we know that it must have been he who did it; even
if his name is not mentioned in the Scriptural account of the
doing of it. For God would not permit some other man to do that
work, after having sanctified Jeremiah before he was born, and
brought him into the world for that purpose. We must bear in mind
the fact that the sacred account of the building and planting is
in the form of a riddle or parable, and that metaphors instead of
names are used for those concerned; the high and the low, the
enthroned and the de-throned, the young twigs and the tender
twigs, the planted and the planter. But we must remember also
that the name of "Israel," the special national name of the
ten-tribed kingdom, is mentioned as the receiver of the planted
and enthroned pair. And since the historic testimony declares
Jeremiah's work to have been accomplished in Israel, it is only
in Israel that we may hope to find evidences of that fact.
This necessitates the finding of Joseph-Israel, and they
shall be found, for God says they shall; and when they are found,
manifestly, there must be found with them a branch of the
Judo-Davidic family, who are their sovereigns.
Since the East is left in such utter darkness, not only as
to the fate of Jeremiah and his little Royal Remnant, but also as
to the destination of "the dispersed" ten tribes, who had been
lost, even to the Jews, so long before Christ came, that some of
them thought that no person except the Messiah could go to them,
or might even know where to find them, we must look elsewhere.
Also, because of their lack of historic data concerning the
completion of Jeremiah's work, and because his disappearance was
almost as marvelous as was the translation of Elijah, they were
ready to say that the Christ was Jeremiah. (Matt.16:14.) Their
thought was, no doubt, that Jeremiah, like Elijah, was still
alive, and that God would yet use him in connection with the
building and planting anew, or the restoration of the kingdom
among them, to which they looked forward with great anticipation
and hope.
But, as we were saying, since there is no light in the East
concerning these matters, let us scan the pages of prophecy to
see if there are any straws which point West. And since it is
said of straws that they show which way the wind blows, it will
be well for us to know that Hosea gives a prophecy concerning
Ephraim, in which he declares: "Ephraim, followeth after an East
wind." As an East wind is one which blows from the East and
travels to the West, this makes it certain that Ephraim did not
travel Eastward. For had he gone in an Easterly direction, he
must needs have gone facing an East wind; then he surely went
WEST. And since he was "cast afar off," he must be in the far-off
West.
When Jehovah confirmed his promise to David concerning the
perpetuity of his kingdom, throne, sceptre and house, and took
oath by his holiness that he would not lie to him, he said: "I
will set his hand (sceptre) in the sea." The clues which the
prophet Ezekiel gives in his riddle, as to the location of Israel
and the royal pair, are, that it is "a land of traffic," that it
has "good soil" and that it "brings forth branches"; that is,
that it is fruitful and populous. We are told it has a "city of
merchants," that "fowl of every wing dwell under the shadow of
its branches," i. e., mixed, or various people dwell under the
protection of its rulers; and that its location is by "great
waters," which, for reasons that will become more and more
apparent as we proceed, we affirm to be the Atlantic Ocean. For
the Lord gives a message to Ephraim through Jeremiah, saying: "I
am a father to Israel, and Ephraim is my first born. Hear the
word of the Lord, O ye nations, and declare it in the isles afar
off, and say, He that scattered Israel will gather him." In this
declaration we find that the far-off home of Ephraim-Israel is
in, not an island, but "the isles," i. e., a group of islands.
Thus Ephraim, also, is located in the sea, in the isles afar off.
The prophet Isaiah, in the forty-ninth chapter, addresses these
same people, saying: "Listen, O isles, unto me; and hearken, ye
people from afar. * * * Thou art my servant, 0 Israel, in whom I
will (still in the future) be glorified." And when speaking, in
the twelfth verse of this same chapter concerning the future
return of this same people to Palestine, their former home, at
which time he will be more fully glorified in them, the Lord
causes the prophet to make proclamation: "Behold, these shall
come from far off, and lo, these from the north and from the
west."
In the Hebrew there is no compound word for north-west as we
use it; hence the expression north and west. There is a group of
isles out in these "great waters," which are just as directly
north-west from Palestine as the lines of latitude and longitude
can lay them, namely, the British Isles. And we may just as well
jump into the midst of our proofs at once, since that is the
place where Ephraim-Israel shall chiefly be found. If not there,
it is because they have "spread out," from these VERY ISLES, for
it is a well authenticated fact that Jeremiah went to Ireland,
where he died, and that his grave is one of the well-known and
proudly-named spots of that country, whose history is one of the
mysteries of the world.
It is a well-known fact that the history of no country on
the face of the earth has so puzzled historians as that of
Ireland. There is both a sacred and secular reason for this. The
secular reason is that Ireland steps into the arena of history
with a monarchical kingdom running in full blast, and men do not
know how it got there. The sacred reason is because God has
issued a mandate, saying: "KEEP SILENCE before me, O islands, and
let the people renew their strength." (Isa.41:1.)
In the next verse the Lord asks the question: "Who raised up
the righteous man from the EAST?" Then in the fourth verse he
answers his own question, saying, "I the Lord, the first, and the
last; I am he," and in the eighth verse of the same chapter,
still addressing the dwellers in the isles, he says: "Thou art
Israel, my servant Jacob, whom I have chosen, the seed of Abraham
my friend. Thou whom I have taken from the ends of the earth."
i. e., literally, from the rising of the sun, from the beginning,
or from the East.
This statement, coming from such high authority, forever
settles the question as to the origin of the peoples who dwell in
those far-off northwest isles.
We have read many authors on the subject of the Hebrews in
Ireland, who claim to have searched carefully and critically
through all available chronicles, records and histories and they
all agree that a perusal of these various authorities is not only
heavy reading, but that they are very obtuse, and that they are
actually confusing, bewildering and tormenting to all who do not
take the word of God as an ally in the work of unraveling their
mysteries; for, all of these authorities do agree in stating the
following facts:
1. About 585 B.C. a "notable man," an "important personage," a
patriarch, a saint, an essentially important someone, according
to their various ways of putting it, came to Ulster, the most
northern province of Ireland, accompanied by a princess, the
daughter of an eastern king, and that in company with them was
one Simon Brach, Breck, Brack, Barech, Berach, as it is
differently spelled; and that this royal party brought with them
many remarkable things. Among these was the harp, an ark and the
wonderful stone called Liafail, or stone of destiny, of which we
shall have much to say hereafter.
2. This eastern princess was married to King Herremon on
condition, made by this notable patriarch, that he should abandon
his former religion, and build a college for the prophets. This
Herremon did, and the name of the school was Mur-Ollam, which is
the name, both in Hebrew and Irish, for school of the prophets.
He also changed the name of his capital city, Lothair - sometimes
spelled Cothair Croffin - to that of Tara.
3. The name of this Eastern princess is given as Tea-Tephi, and
it is a well-known fact that the royal arms of Ireland is the
harp of David, and has been for two thousand and five hundred
years.
Ezekiel in his riddle, when speaking of the coming of the
female passenger who came to that land in the second vessel, whom
he afterwards proves to be a princess, speaks of "the furrows of
her plantation." It is a truth, and, to us, a marvelous one, that
the province of Ulster used to be called the "Plantation of
Ulster," as any one may know if they will take the trouble to
consult "Chamber's Encyclopedia" on the word "Ulster."
Further, the crown which was worn by the sovereigns of that
hitherto unaccounted-for kingdom in Ireland had twelve points.
Who shall say that "the king's daughter" was not planted there;
and that the first of the three of Ezekiel's prophetic overturns
was not from Palestine to Erin?
..........
NOTE:
YES INDEED THE HISTORY OF IRELAND IS PRESERVED IN THEIR
ANCIENT WRITINGS, JUST AS THE ANCIENT HISTORY OF ENGLAND
AND WALES IS PRESERVED IN WELSH WRITINGS. FINALLY TODAY
THE ANGLO-SAXON HISTORIANS HAVE ACCEPTED THE IRISH AND
WELSH HISTORIES AS TRUE AND RELIABLE. SO NOW THE CLOUD
OF MYSTERY THAT HUNG OVER THE ANCIENT PEOPLES OF BRITAIN
IS MADE MANIFEST TO THOSE WHO HAVE A LOVE OF THE
TRUTH.
Keith Hunt
To be continued
Judah's Sceptre and Joseph's Birthright Jacob's Pillow-Pillar Stone
by Allen (published in 1917)
JACOB'S PILLOW-PILLAR STONE
When the Abrahamic covenant promises were given to Jacob, he
was making a journey from Beersheba to Padan-aram. He had but
recently received from his father Isaac the "Blessing," which
carried with it those much desired covenants and the special
blessings and promises which pertained to them. When Isaac gave
this blessing to Jacob, he told him not to take a wife of the
daughters of Canaan, the land in which they were then living, but
to go to Laban, his mother's brother, and to take a wife from
among his daughters.
It is hardly to be supposed that Jacob was traveling
entirely alone, for that was not the Oriental custom. We learn,
from incidental remarks that are dropped elsewhere in reference
to this journey, that he had with him a tent which was pitched at
night, and that the journey was made on foot, for he walked with
a staff. The sacred record deals chiefly with that which took
place between Jacob and the Lord, with but the slightest
incidental mention of details, as concerning a certain sundown,
and stones for pillows. The first mention of stones for pillows,
with reference to this occasion, is plural; but suddenly one of
those pillow stones is brought into great distinction.
The facts which brought that special stone into such
prominence may be quickly read, for the Bible account of them is
very short; but we doubt whether many who have read the record of
those facts realize their true symbolic import. We doubt also
whether we shall be able to explain, even approximately, not only
the great distinction which has been bestowed upon that stone as
a symbol, but also the exalted place it has occupied ever since
it came into historic notice, or the supreme greatness of that
position to which prophecy declares it shall yet be raised. If we
read the prophets aright, no such glorious prominence, highly-
honored use, or divinely-declared purpose, has ever been given to
any other inanimate thing on the earth, as that which is yet in
reserve for that special pillow stone upon which Jacob rested his
head on that certain night, when he camped before Luz, while on
his way to Padan-aram.
It seems to have been the custom among Oriental travelers,
when they pitched their tents for the night, to take stones for
headpieces, or bolsters, in order to raise that part of their
bedding on which their heads rested to a comfortable position for
rest and sleep. At least, this is what Jacob did, and as he
slept, he dreamed. In his dream he saw what is called a ladder,
but which may be called a staircase, or an open way that reached
from earth to heaven, for "the top of it reached to heaven." The
angels of God were ascending and descending by this existing way,
which for the time was made visible to the inheritor of the
covenant promises; and, at the top, above all that throng of
radiant comers and goers, the Lord stood, and gave Jacob the full
text of the covenants, as formerly given to Abraham and Isaac.
Upon hearing and receiving these promises from the Lord,
Jacob awoke, startled, convicted and afraid; startled because, as
he thought, he had accidentally got into God's house, and
stumbled through the gate which led away from this world to that
pure one of which he had just caught a glimpse; afraid, just as
any man would be who had defrauded his brother, and taken
advantage of the love and confidence of a blind and aged father;
convicted! It could not have been otherwise, for he had caught a
glimpse of the holiness of God and the purity of a sinless world.
Hence, in the agony of that psychical fear, which must ever be
experienced by the wicked when brought in contact with absolute
holiness, he cried out, "How dreadful is this place! This is none
other but the house of God, and this is the gate of heaven."
That which would have been a great joy to a holy man was
only a means of torture to this sinful one, who was fleeing from
the anger of an outraged brother. But he soon began to yield
himself to God, and as he yielded there came to him that ever
accompanying desire, i. e., the desire to worship. With these
things there came also spiritual intuitions of coming events, and
of their importance to him in his relations to the divine
covenants. Then Jacob, awed by the sublime majesty of the Holy
One, deeply impressed by the greatness of the promises made to
him, stirred in the depths of his inner nature by the heavenly
vision, pressed by the weight of responsibility, yet encouraged
by the dawning gladness in his heart, and moved by the spirit of
prophecy, took the stone upon which his head had rested, and set
it up for a pillar of witness.
At the same time he anointed it with oil, called it Bethel,
used it for an altar at which to worship, and upon which to make
a vow unto the Lord God of his fathers, saying: "If God will be
with me, and keep me in this way that I go, and will give me
bread to eat, and raiment to put on, so that I come again to my
father's house in peace; then shall the Lord be my God and this
stone, which I have set for a pillar, shall be God's house: and
of all that thou shalt give me, I will surely give the tenth unto
thee."
It is a most significant fact that the name Bethel, or God's
house, should have been given to this stone by the one who was
the father of the twelve patriarchs, who were the progenitors of
that great multitude which is also called "The House of God,"
"The Host of God" and "The Families of God." Also in the
eighty-third psalm, The House of Israel, the Hidden Ones, which,
while hidden, are to develop into many nations, are called "The
Houses of God."
We must bear in mind the fact that Jacob gave the name of
Bethel not only to the place, or locality, where the stone was
set up, but also to the stone pillar, for he emphatically
declared: "This stone, which I have set for a pillar, shall be
God's house." We understand, however, that God inspired both the
choice of this stone and its name, for when he next spoke to
Jacob he said: "I am the God of Bethel." That means, I am the God
of God's house; or, in other words, the God of the Bethel stone
which is in the place called Bethel. Thus the Lord associates
himself not only with the place where he appeared to Jacob, but
also with the Bethel rock.
(I was educated in a Church of England school. The first half-
hour of each school day was devoted to the Bible. When we came to
reading this section of Genesis, I well remmeber our teacher
saying that the "Coronation Stone in the corination chair" was
the stone that Jacob anointed the night he had this dream from
God. When I finally did get to London and Westminster Abbey, in
the very literature at the Abbey, for tourists to buy, was the
tradition that the Corination Stone was Jacob's pillar-stone -
Keith Hunt)
Twenty years later Jacob returned to the land of Canaan with
great riches, and with the knowledge that his prosperity was the
result of divine favor and intervention; for the Lord had shown
him how one who is called "The Angel of God" was given power to
control the breeding of the cattle. Thus Jacob was made to know
that God had accepted and met all the conditions which he had
made to him by vow on the Bethel pillow-pillar stone.
Before Jacob reached Canaan he had confessed his
wrongdoings, and made peace with his brother; and God had taken
away from him not only the name of supplanter, but also the
inborn supplanter nature, and given him the victorious name of
Israel.
It is a well-known fact that the place called Bethel and the
city of Luz were so near each other that the two names are used
interchangeably in the Scriptures, or rather that the name Bethel
often included the little city, which was previously called Luz.
But before we can understand the true relation of both Bethel and
the Bethel rock to our general subject, we must know to whom, or
to which one of the tribes, Bethel was given as a possession.
The sacred historian, when describing the boundaries of the "lot"
in Canaan which fell to Joseph, describes one of those border
lines as follows: "And (it) goeth out from Bethel to Luz, and
passeth along unto the borders of Archi to Astaroth." (Josh.16:
2.) Also, in the description of that portion which fell to the
children of Benjamin - their portion lay between Judah and
Joseph, Judah being to the south, and Joseph to the north of
Benjamin - we have the following: "And the border went over from
thence (Beth-aven) toward Luz, to the side of Luz, which is
Bethel, southward." (Josh.18:13.) From this we perceive, not only
that Benjamin's border was south of Bethel, but also that Bethel,
the place where Jacob set up the Bethel pillarstone, was on the
south side of the city proper.
Further, it is recorded that the children of Dan could not
conquer the Amorites, but that the Amorites drove them into the
mountains, and occupied those portions of Dan's inheritance which
best suited them. But it is also recorded that the house of
Joseph did conquer those Amorites, that they compelled them to
become their dependents, and that they fixed their boundary
lines. In the description of these boundaries we have the
following: "And the coast of the Amorites was from the going up
to Akrabbim, from the rock, and upward." (Judges 1:36.) Some may
think that this reference to the rock refers to the rock Etam, or
Etam-rock. This is not possible, because both Etam, the city, and
the rock Etam are southwest of Jerusalem in the hill country of
Judea, and had nothing whatever to do with the borders of Joseph,
Dan or the Amorites. Hence the phrases, "from the rock and
upward," can mean only Bethel, the place of the rock, or, from
the BETHEL ROCK, and up into the mountains of Ephraim-
Samaria-Israel.
Again, concerning the house of Joseph, Bethel and Luz, we
have the following: "And the house of Joseph, they also went up
against Bethel and the Lord was with them. And the house of
Joseph sent to descry Bethel. (Now the name of the city was Luz.)
And the spies saw a man come forth out of the city, and they said
unto him: Shew us, we pray thee, the entrance into the city, and
we will Shew thee mercy. And when he shewed them the entrance
into the city, they smote the city with the edge of the sword;
but they let go the man and all his family. And the man went into
the land of the Hittites, and built a city, and called the name
thereof of Luz." (Judges 1:22-26.) Thus, with the building of
that other Luz, the name of Luz not only departed forever from
Bethel, but it is never again mentioned in sacred history.
Finally, when Jeroboam, of the house of Joseph, was made king of
the ten tribes, and became fearful that the people would, if
allowed to go up to Jerusalem to worship, kill him, and go again
to Rehoboam, king of Judah, he, to prevent this, made two golden
calves, of which it is said: "He set the one in Bethel, and the
other put he in Dan." His right to place one in Bethel was
undisputed, because it was not only "the king's sanctuary," but
it was also in his own tribal territory. He had a sovereign's
right to place one in Dan, for all who went there to worship were
confederate with him. The Dan referred to was the city of Dan,
which was situated in the northern part of his realm.
Now, one point is settled beyond the possibility of doubt,
and that is, that Bethel was a part of the inheritance which fell
to the house of Joseph when the land of Canaan was divided among
the children of Jacob. This brings us to a vital point concerning
the subject in hand, namely:
That not only Bethel, the city, or place, but also that Bethel
the pillar-rock was given to the birthright family; and that
Israel carried that rock with them into Egypt and in their
subsequent journeyings in the wilderness.
Proof:
Jacob died in Egypt, and his posterity were in Egypt at the
time. When dying, "Jacob called unto him his sons and said,
Gather yourselves together, that I may tell you that which shall
befall you in the last days." When his sons, in response to his
call, came together, he gave a prophecy concerning that which the
posterity of each of them would be in the last days. But while he
was making the prophecy concerning Joseph and his house, to whom
he had just given the birthright, he stopped in the midst of his
prophetic utterances, and used the following parenthetical
expression: "(from thence is the shepherd, the stone of Israel":)
"Thence," as herein used, is an adverb used as a noun, and
is equivalent in value to that place, or the place to which it
refers. The phrase, from thence, means "out of there, out from
thither, (or) out of that place." Since the place from whence*
the stone came was the inheritance of Joseph, and since Bethel,
the place of the stone, was the inheritance of Joseph, we must
know that it came from thence, i. e., Bethel. Thus, the very fact
that Jacob, when dying in Egypt, made use of those words in
reference to that Bethel stone, carries proof on its very face
that the stone was not, at that time, in the place where it had
formerly been, but that it was with them there in Egypt, and had
previously been committed to the care of the house of Joseph.
......
* Whence, present form of the old word thence.
......
It has been estimated that the number of the Israelites
which came out of Egypt in the Exodus were two millions and a
half. All who will take time to think will soon comprehend how
impossible it would be, even for a fertile country, much less a
desert, to supply such a multitude, as well as their cattle, of
which not a hoof was left behind, with food and water unless
special arrangements were made for an extra supply. But in this
case, as a matter of course, that was not done; hence it became
necessary for God to furnish the supply of food and water for
that vast concourse of people, and also for their herds and
flocks.
It is a well-known fact that the Lord continually provided
food for Israel during these forty years of wanderings in the
desert-wilderness. But, because there are only two instances
recorded in which the Lord supernaturally provided them with
water, most people think these were the only instances in which
water was thus provided. Yet, all who will give the subject just
a little investigation will soon know that such is not the case.
The first mention of no water for the people to drink was while
the Israelites were encamped at Rephidim. Without previously
selecting one special rock, the Lord said unto Moses: "I will
stand before thee there upon the rock in Horeb, and thou shalt
smite the rock, and there shall come water out of it." The
phrase, "There in Horeb," points out the place where the rock was
at the time, and if the Lord, when he spoke of the rock, had used
the demonstrative form, and said "That rock," then we should know
that he was designating which one, or a certain one not yet
selected, but the fact that he said "The rock" is proof to us
that he was speaking of a rock with which they were already
familiar. May it not have been the Bethel pillar rock, "the
shepherd, the stone of Israel," which had been committed to the
keeping of the house of Joseph?
This possibility is more clearly manifest in the account of
the other circumstances when there was no water, which occurred
at Kadish, a city in the border of Edom, the country which
belonged to the descendants of Esau. At this place the people of
Israel were very bitter against Moses and Aaron, and said unto
them, "Why have ye brought up the congregation of the Lord into
this wilderness, that we and our cattle should die there? And
wherefore have ye made us to come up out of Egypt, to bring us
into this evil place? It is no place of seed, or of figs, or of
vines, or of pome-granites; neither is there any water to drink.
And Moses and Aaron went from the presence of the assembly unto
the door of the tabernacle of the congregation, and they fell
upon their faces, and the glory of the Lord appeared unto them.
And the Lord spake unto Moses, saying: Take the rod, and gather
the assembly together, and speak ye unto the rock before their
eyes; and it shall give forth his water, and thou shalt bring
forth to them water out of the rock; so thou shalt give the
congregation and their beasts drink. And Moses took the rod from
before the Lord, as he commanded him. And Moses and Aaron
gathered the congregation together before the rock, and he said
unto them: Hear now, ye rebels; must we fetch water out of this
rock? And Moses lifted up his hand, and with his rod he smote the
rock twice: and the water came out abundantly, and the
congregation drank, and their beasts also." (Num.20:5-11.)
We have quoted this account in full, from the beginning of
the complaint by the people until the water was given, that our
readers may see that, although the phrase "the rock" is used four
times, there is not the slightest indication that there was any
selection, or indication of preference for any certain rock in
the vicinity of Kadish, or that one was not already chosen, and
in their midst. It was to show also that at the very first
mention of water for the people from "this rock," all that was
necessary, as a preparatory measure, was for the Lord to say to
Moses, "Speak to the rock"; and also that when the people were
commanded to "gather before "the rock," they understood so well
which rock it was that, in all that vast company of two and a
half millions, no explanations were necessary. Hence, it must
have been among them before this, and well known. Let us also
bear in mind that this name, "The Rock," was used in the same
relation at Rephidim, and yet the children of Israel had removed,
journeyed and pitched their tents twenty-one* times after leaving
Rephidim, and here at Kadish there is with them that which is
still familiarly known as "THE ROCK."
We all know that stones are rocks, and that rocks are
stones, so that a rock or stone is only one rock or stone, and
the appellation "The Rock," and "The Stone," must refer to some
special or particular stone or rock. As we have seen, Israel must
have been in
......
*See Numbers, 33d chapter.
......
possession of just such a special rock, i. e., the Bethel stone,
and that Jacob set it up and called it a "Pillar." Later, in the
days of Athaliah, after she tried to destroy all the males of
"the seed royal," but did not succeed, for the reason that an
infant son of Ahaziah, whom Athaliah succeeded to the throne, was
stolen from those whom she had ordered slain and hidden. The
stealing and hiding of this infant was so cleverly done that it
was not missed by the court slayer. This infant, whose name was
Joash was kept hidden from the wicked queen for six years.
During this time she reigned, not knowing that there was a male
heir to the throne who could dethrone her. But in the seventh
year the secret was revealed to the "rulers over hundreds," and
to "the captains of the guards," and quiet arrangements made to
proclaim the seven-year-old prince as their king. The plans were
successful, and Athaliah knew nothing of it until she heard the
people in the temple shouting "God save the king!"
Thus it is recorded: "And when Athaliah heard the noise of
the guard and of the people, she came to the people into the
temple of the Lord. And when she looked, behold! the king stood
by a pillar, as the manner was." (2 Kings 11:13-14.) Concerning
this pillar, Dr. Adam Clark's translation reads, "Stood on a
pillar," which he explains is "The place or throne on which they
were accustomed to put their kings when they proclaimed them."
But in the revised version it is rendered, "Standing by the
pillar, as was their custom," the article denoting that
particular pillar by, or upon, which it was the custom of Israel
to crown their kings.
Again, when the good king Josiah made a covenant before the
Lord, in the presence of all the people, that he would destroy
idolatry out of the land, it is written, "And the king stood by a
(or the) pillar and made a covenant before the Lord." (2 Kings
23:3.) There is, in the Second Chronicles, a recapitulation of
this circumstance concerning Josiah, which gives the following,
"And the king stood in his place." His place, we are told, was by
the pillar, which might properly be translated pillar-stone, upon
which all the kings of Israel were crowned, made covenants, took
oaths, or made vows, as did Jacob when he first set it up for a
pillar and made it God's house.
This stone is not only called "The Pillar," "The Rock,"
"Bethel," and "The Stone of Israel," but, wonderful to tell, it
is also called "The Shepherd." And since it is really the stone
of Israel we should expect it to be with them to whom it
belonged, but since it is also the Shepherd of Israel, its very
name and character, - for with God names are always
characteristic - demand that it should be with Israel in all
their wanderings. Hence, this SHEPHERD--though it is only a stone
- as any other shepherd would do, must go with His flock.
We have said that this stone of Israel, was a type, or
symbol. For proof, let us go back to the place called Bethel.
There we shall find that Jacob, after setting up "The Rock" for a
pillar, also anointed it with oil, which in sacred symbols is
typical of the Holy Ghost. And, according to sacred history, this
Bethel stone is the only single, individual stone that has ever
been anointed; hence, among stones it is pre-eminently "the
Anointed One." When Christ, the great prototype, came, and was
anointed with the Holy Ghost, he was pre-eminently, among men,
"the Anointed One."
Also, concerning "The rock" which accompanied Israel, the
Lord could say to Israel's leader, "Speak to THE ROCK." But, on
the other hand, Israel also could say, concerning that divine
presence which went with them, "Let us sing unto THE Rock of our
salvation."
Again, this stone is called "The Shepherd o f Israel." But
there is also a divine one unto whom Israel prayed, saying, "Give
ear, 0 Shepherd of Israel." Later, when this same Shepherd was
manifest in the flesh, he said, "I am the Good Shepherd," and his
apostles spoke of him as "The Great Shepherd" and "The Chief
Shepherd." Hence, the oft-repeated metaphor of "sheep" and
"flock," in both the Old and the New Testaments.
Further, Israel had a pillar-rock, which went with them as
their shepherd in all their journeyings in the wilderness; but it
is also written that "The Lord went before them by day in A
PILLAR of a cloud, to lead them in the way; and by night in A
PILLAR of fire, to give them light!"
Still further, that the Scriptures might be fulfilled,
Israel's divine Shepherd-rock was smitten, for it is written,
"Smite the Shepherd." So, too, Israel's literal Shepherd-rock was
smitten. The Lord knew that he must be smitten for the sins of
the people, and, that the type and prototype might agree, he gave
command, "Smite the rock." Oh, the pain of it all!--especially
to him; but he shall yet see the desire of his heart, i. e., his
emotional nature, his soul, and be satisfied. It is also said of
Israel that they "Did all drink the same spiritual drink, for
they drank of that Spiritual Rock that followed them, and that
Rock was Christ." It is also true that they did all drink from
the same refreshing stream which flowed from that literal Rock
which also went with them, for it was their Shepherd-rock. No
doubt Israel was supplied with water from this rock in the
wilderness, as well as at Rephidim and Kadish, for the country
between these two places is much more desert than these cities.
At Kadish Moses sent messengers to the king of Edom, asking
permission for the Lord's host to pass through his country, and
told them to say, "Thus saith thy brother Israel, Let us pass, I
pray thee, through thy country we will not pass through the
fields, or through the vineyards, neither will we drink of the
water of the wells; we will go by the king's highway; we will not
turn to the right hand nor to the left, until we have passed thy
borders. * * * If I and my cattle drink of thy water, then I will
pay for it: I will only, without doing anything else, go through
on my feet."
Just imagine a company of two and one-half million traveling
on foot through a country which is several hundred miles in
length, giving assurance to its ruler that they would keep to the
highway, and not turn to the right and left, for any reason, nor
drink water out of the wells (i. e., pits, fountains, springs, or
wells; literally their water supply) of that country. Israel
could afford to make this proposition, for both their
Shepherd-rocks were with them, i. e., the literal and
the spiritual rock, and they knew that he, who had hitherto
furnished them with food and water, would still continue to
supply them until the end of the journey. Otherwise Moses would
never have made such a promise.
True, there was a conditional promise made, in which there
is a promise to pay for any of the water of Edom which might be
used. But this, as you see, was made chiefly, if not altogether,
on account of the cattle, which they might not be able to control
and keep to the dusty highways, while passing by the cool and
tempting pools and springs of water. This might prove to be a
difficult task for the drovers, especially in the heat of the
day; hence this proviso. They were not supposed to get water from
the rock until they had completed their day's journey and pitched
their tents.
Thus we have seen that among the Israelites there were two
rocks, two houses, two kingdoms, two nations, or a Sceptre and a
Birthright company. Of these two great divisions, Judah and
Joseph are the representatives. By divine appointment one of
these rocks was given to the Birthright family, and the other to
the Sceptre family. The Bethel-Pillar-Shepherd-Stone of Israel
was given to Joseph, but to Judah was given the Spiritual Rock,
for it is written that "Our LORD sprang out of Judah." BOTH OF
THESE ROCKS, each in a different way, HAVE BEEN REJECTED, but
EACH OF THEM SHALL YET BECOME THE HEAD OF THE CORNER.
....................
NOTE:
YES, IT IS OFTEN OVERLOOKED THAT THE TWO MILLION, PLUS
(AND IT MAY WELL HAVE BEEN MORE THAN 3 MILLION PLUS,
WITH THE STRANGERS ALSO THAT WENT UP OUT OF EGYPT WITH
THE ISRAELITES) CATTLE, OF ISRAELITES, WOULD NEED A HUGE
AMOUNT OF WATER EACH DAY. IT IS STRETCHING THINGS TO
THINK THE WILDERNESS WANDERINGS HAD THE NATURAL AMOUNT OF
WATER FOR MILLIONS OF PEOPLE PLUS THEIR CATTLE. SO THE
MIRACLE OF WATER FROM "THE ROCK" MAKES COMPLETE SENSE.
Keith Hunt
To be continued
Judah's Sceptre and Joseph's Birthright The Other Overturns
by Allen (published in 1917)
THE OTHER OVERTURNS
In connection with the prophecies concerning the removal of
the crown of David from the head of Zedekiah to the head of a
prime who belonged to the hitherto non-ruling branch of the royal
family of Israel's race, the Lord said, "I will overturn,
overturn, overturn it; and it shall be no more (moved or
overturned) until he comes whose right it is; and I will give it
to him." These words teach that, after the removal of David's
crown from the head of the then ruling prince, there were to be
three overturns - no more, no less and that after the third
overturn the crown must rest, or stay in the place where it is
left by the third overturn, until that person comes to whom it
belongs by right. Then at least one more overturn will be
necessary, for that seat of power must yet go back to the city of
David.
The first of these overturns we have already traced from
Palestine to the islands of the north-west, which are in the
"great waters." We now propose to show that the other two of
these predicted overturns took place in those self-same islands,
or, in other words, that these three overturns landed the sceptre
and throne alternately in Ireland, Scotland and England; and
that, even after the third overturn, the kingdom is still, as the
word of God declares, "in the isles afar off," and "in the sea."
It will be impossible to follow the history of the overturns
of this kingdom, unless we again take up the thread of history as
it concerns the pillar stone, upon which the kings of Israel were
crowned; for, strange as it may seem to some people, both ancient
and modern history come honestly to the rescue of prophecy, and
follow that stone through each of these overturns.
We have already seen, according to Josephus, that, prior to
the return of the Jews from Babylon, Ezra (Esdras) received a
letter from Xerxes, which was so full of offered favors, love,
and fraternal greetings, that he sent a copy of it to the ten
tribes in Media-Persia, and asked them to return with the Jews to
Jerusalem. But the ten tribes refused this offer, and Josephus
tells us that the entire body of Israel remained in that country.
On the other hand, Ezra (Esdras), who was in a position to know
more about them, says that they decided not to return, and also
that they took counsel among themselves, and resolved that they
would go further away into an unknown country. In accomplishing
this. Esdras says, "They entered into Euphrates by the narrow
passages of the river. For the Most High then shewed signs for
them, and held still the waters till they were passed over. For
through that country there was a great way to go, namely, of a
year and a half." This is in harmony with the following: "The
breaker is come up before them; they have broken up, and have
passed through the gate and are gone out of it, and their king
shall pass before them; and the Lord on the head of them." (Micah
2:13.)
The clause, "They have passed through the gate," and the one
by Ezra, "They have entered into the narrow passages," are
parallel, and refer to the same circumstance and place. This
gate, or narrow passage, which is up among the headwaters of the
Euphrates, is now called the Caucasian Pass, or the Pass of
Dariel. As Israel goes out through this pass, Micah says that the
Lord is on the head of them, but it is left for Ezra to say that
the Lord gave Israel evidence of his presence, because he gave
them signs and held still the floods, as he did at Jordan, until
they passed over.
But while the Lord is with Israel, it is said of their king
that he shall pass before, or precede them to that unknown
country to which they are going. It is for this reason that Hosea
says, "The children of Israel shall abide many days without a
king, and without a sacrifice, and without an image," or, as the
marginal reading gives it, "without a sanding pillar." Young, in
his Exhaustive Concordance, gives among other definitions of the
original Hebrew word, both that of memorial stone and pillar.
Other scholarly men who have investigated this text, in
connection with its context, even give us pillar-rock and
pillar-stone as the correct rendering.
All this, supplemented by the fact that the word of God
associates the absent king with the absent pillarstone, justifies
our conclusion, that the pillar in question is the Bethel pillar
stone which was used as a coronation stone, consequently it was
left with the royal family which ruled over the Jews until the
overthrow of Zedekiah.
We must also remember that Jeremiah and his little remnant
were taken, against their will, and against the direct command of
God, to Egypt, and that while there they dwelt in Taphanhes.
Morton W. Spencer says, "It is an undeniable historical fact that
about 580 B.C. (i. e., the very time of the captivity of the Jews
in Babylon), that a princess from the East did arrive in the
north of Ireland. Her name was Tephi, a pet name like "Violet,"
denoting beauty, fragrance. Tea Tephi was her full name, found in
Hebrew. The Tea, a little one, and Tephi answering to a surname.
Taph, the root word, is used in many scriptures (Gen.34:29, and
Deut.1:39) (Vide Concordance). Her names were interchangeably
used as Tea, Taffe, Taffes, Tephi, the Eastern Princess, the
Daughter of Pharaoh, and Tea Tephi; either of these serve to
identify her as "The King's Daughter." In Egypt she was offered
protection, and from her the city of Taphanhes or Dahpnae was
named, doubtless, and to this day we are shown the site of "The
Palace of the Jew's Daughter," by the Arabs. The fact that she
fled the country is still preserved in her name, Tarah, meaning
one banished or flight.
The name of Pharaoh is neither a given nor a surname, but it
is the Egyptian name for king or monarch. The very fact that
Irish historians called Tea Tephi "The Daughter of Pharaoh" is
proof that they knew her as "The King's Daughter." Also this
name, "The King's Daughter," is the only one used in the Bible
account of the first overturn to designate that daughter of
Zedekiah who succeeded him to the inheritance of David's throne,
excepting, of course, that metaphorical name, "Tender twig," of
Ezekiel's riddle. Since the name Tea means "little one," and
since a tender twig is also a little one, it certainly takes no
great stretch of faith to believe that these two names belong to
one and the same person. Especially is this the case when we
consider that in the Tea Tephi of Irish history we have a king's
daughter, with a Hebrew name, who not only came from the East,
but also from Egypt, and who is the daughter of a Jew.
But there are still other facts connected with the arrival
of this princess in Ireland, which, as we consider them, will
strengthen our faith more and more. Tea Tephi was accompanied by
an aged guardian, who was called Ollam Folla, more Hebrew words
which mean revealer, or prophet. The prophet was accompanied by a
man who was his scribe, whom the chronicles of Ireland called
Brug, or Bruch. Baruch was Jeremiah's scribe while they were in
Judea; he went with the little remnant to Egypt, and escaped when
the rest did; for his life, like the lives of the rest of his
party, was to be preserved in all places whither he should go.
This little company disappeared from Egypt, but surely they
reappeared in Ireland, for, marvel of marvels! they brought with
them a pillar-stone; which has ever since been used as the
coronation stone of the kingdom.
Later, Tea (sometimes spelled Teah) Tephi herself was
crowned upon this pillar-stone, and the name of Erin's capital
was changed from Cathair Crofin to Tara, which is also another
Hebrew word. But at this juncture history comes to our help, and
with unquestioned authority declares that, from that time until
the present, every king and queen who has reigned in Ireland,
Scotland or England has been crowned upon that self-same pillar
or coronation stone. Queen Victoria herself was twice crowned
upon that stone, the first time as Queen of England, and the
second time as Empress of India.
On the occasion of Queen Victoria's coronation, June 28th,
1837, an article appeared in the "London Sun," which gives a
description of the coronation chair and the coronation stone, as
follows: "This chair, commonly called St. Edward's chair, is an
ancient seat of solid hardwood, with back and sides of the same,
variously painted, in which the kings of Scotland were in former
periods constantly crowned, but, having been brought out of the
kingdom by Edward I, in the year 1296, after he had totally
overcome John Baliol, king of Scots, it has ever since remained
in the Abbey of Westminster, and has been the chair in which the
succeeding kings and queens of this realm have been inaugurated.
It is in height six feet and seven inches, in breadth at the
bottom thirty-eight inches, and in depth twenty-four inches; from
the seat to the bottom is twenty-five inches; the breadth of the
seat within the sides is twenty-eight inches, and the depth
eighteen inches. At nine inches from the ground is a board,
supported at the four corners by as many lions. Between the seat
and this board is enclosed a stone, commonly called Jacob's, or
the fatal Marble, Stone, which is an oblong of about twenty-two
inches in length, thirteen inches broad and eleven inches deep;
of a steel color, mixed with some veins of red. History relates
that it is the stone whereon the patriarch Jacob laid his head in
the plains of Luz." This, as you see, was published more than
sixty years ago, before it was thought possible that the
Anglo-Saxons were the descendants of Joseph, the inheritor of the
birthright blessing which God gave to his fathers, Abraham, Isaac
and Jacob.
This article further says that "this stone was conveyed into
Ireland by way of Spain about 700 years before Christ. From there
it was taken into Scotland by King Fergus, about 370 years later;
and in the year 350 B.C., it was placed in the abbey of Scone, by
King Kenneth, who caused a prophetical verse to be engraved upon
it, of which the following is a translation 'Should fate not
fail, where'er this stone is found, The Scots shall monarch of
that realm be crowned.' This antique regal chair, having
(together with the golden sceptre and crown of Scotland) been
solemnly offered by King Edward I. to St. Edward the Confessor,
in the year 1297 (from whence it derives the appellation of St.
Edward's chair), has ever since been kept in the chapel called by
his name; with a tablet affixed to it, whereon several Latin
verses are written, in old English characters. * * * The stone
maintains its usual place under the seat of the chair."
Prior to the time that King Kenneth had his verse engraved
on that Coronation Stone, there was a prophetic verse which had
attached itself to it, which Sir Walter Scott has rendered, one
word excepted, as follows: "Unless the fates are faithless grown,
And prophet's voice be vain, Where'er is found this sacred stone
The Wanderers' Race shall reign."
Think of it! For more than seven hundred years this stone
has been in Westminster Abbey. Dean Stanley, in his "Memorials of
Westminster Abbey," says: "The chief object of attraction, to
this day, to the innumerable visitors to the Abbey, is probably
that ancient Irish monument of the empire known as the Coronation
Stone." He calls it a "Precious Relic," and says that King Edward
I. said that "It is the one primeval monument which binds
together the whole empire." The Dean further adds: "The iron
rings, the battered surface, the crack, which has all but rent
its solid mass asunder, bear witness to its long migrations. It
is thus embedded in the heart of the English monarchy, an element
of poetic, patriarchal, heathen times, which like Araunah's
threshing floor in the midst of the temple of Solomon carries
back our thoughts to races and customs now almost extinct, a link
which unites the throne of England with the traditions of Tara
and Iona, and connects the charm of our complex civilization with
the favors of Mother Earth, the stocks and stones of savage
nature. Faithful or foolish, the sentiment of the nation has,
through three hundred generations of living men, made it felt
that Jacob's Pillar Stone was a thing worth dying for in battle.
By the treaty of Northampton in 1328, the emeralds, pearls, and
rubies were carried off without a murmur. But the Ragged Old
Stone - Oh no!---the Londoners would have died for that! The
stone of Scone, on which it was the custom for the kings of
Scotland to be set at their coronation, the Londoners would on no
account suffer to be sent away."
Dr. Poole says: "This stone is a dull, reddish or purplish
sandstone, with a few small embedded pebbles; one of these is
quartz and two others of a dark material. The rock is calcareous
and is of that kind which masons call freestone. Chisel marks are
visible on one or more of its sides." There is no rock of this
kind in England, Ireland or Scotland. But the Rev. Canon Tristram
says that there is a stratum of sandstone near the Dead Sea just
like this stone, which by the English people is called Jacob's
Pillow Stone. This stone is called by the Irish and by the Scotch
'Lia Fail' and 'The Stone of Destiny.' In Irish Lia is stone and
Fail is fate, hence, the stone of fate, or the stone of destiny.
But it is that only because it is Jacob's Pillow-Pillar Stone.
This is the reason that Tea Tephi was called "The Daughter of
God's House." (Log, or Lug, Celtic for God, and Aidh, a house;
hence the word Lughaidh.)
Amergin, chief bard to King Dermod, monarch of Ireland in
the sixth century, in the "Notes of the Annals of the Four
Masters," refers to Tea Tephi as follows:
"A rampart was raised around her house, For Teah, the daughter of
Lughaidh, She was buried outside in her mound, And from her it
was named Tea-mur."
The parentage here assigned to Tea Tephi could have been for
no other reason than that she was the daughter of "God's house,"
to the people to whom she brought "God's house," the Stone, which
was their Shepherd-stone, i. e., Bethel. Morton W. Spencer says
that Lia (sometimes spelled Leag) is an Irish word and means "a
stone," but that Phail is Hebrew, and is itself a Scripture word,
and is of the deepest import, for it means wonderful, and is so
translated in Isa.9:6.
This we have verified, and it clinches our thought that the
Bethel stone, or Lia Fail, the Stone Wonderful, is indeed a
symbol of that Divine Rock, that Wonderful One, THE ROCK OF OUR
SALVATION.
The fact that there are iron rings in the stone which is in
the Coronation Chair, and that they are worn, is remarkable. The
question arises, How and when were they worn? It could not have
been in the royal halls of Tara, nor in the abbey of Scone, nor
since it came to Westminster, nor in the temple of Jerusalem; but
surely it could have been when, for forty years, Israel journeyed
through the wilderness, and had both literal and spiritual drink
from their Shepherd rocks that followed them.
The modern classic Hebrew uses little dots like periods to
represent the vowel sounds. These dots are placed in various
positions about the alphabetical characters which represent the
consonant sounds. But it is a well known fact that in ancient
Hebrew writings, both secular and sacred, there are no
characters, not even the little dots, to represent the vowel
sounds. Hence, the vowels are absolutely unwritten, and the
consonants of a word are so arranged that the speaker is
compelled to give the vowel sound while pronouncing the
consonants. Take, for instance, the word Bethel. There, in the
original, we have only that which is equivalent to the English
B-th-l. At Bethel, as we have already shown, when Jacob set up
the Bethel stone, he used it for an altar, at which he
worshipped, and upon which he made his vow. Prof. Totten, of New
Haven, says: "The altars of ancient Ireland were called Botal or
Bothal, meaning the house of God." That is, it is the Hebrew word
B-th-l, and has the same meaning.
Thus the Bethel stone again proves itself to be a perfect
type of Christ, for although Christ is many other things, he is
also the Christian's altar. Proof: Jesus said to the Pharisees:
"Whether is greater, the gift or the altar that sanctifieth the
gift?" In this we see that the altar is that which sanctifies.
Elsewhere we are told that "Jesus Christ, of God, is made unto us
sanctification." Since it is the altar which does the
sanctifying, then he who sanctifies is the altar. Thus, it is
written, "We have an altar, whereof they have no right to eat
which serve the tabernacle. * * * Wherefore Jesus also, that he
might sanctify the people (i.e., do that which the altar does)
with his own blood, suffered without the gate."
Yes, the Altar-Shepherd was smitten, and concerning that
other rock, Dean Stanley speaks of the crack, which, he says,
"has all but rent its solid mass asunder." Could it be possible
that rent was made when and because Moses smote the rock when he
was told to speak to it? But, be this as it may, history has made
it impossible to escape the fact that, like a true Shepherd,
this stone has followed the fortunes and misfortunes of its
people for two thousand five hundred years. Joshua, at one time,
took a stone, set it up, and said unto all Israel. "Behold, this
stone shall be a witness unto us; for it hath heard all the words
of the Lord which he spake unto us: it shall be therefore a
witness unto you lest ye deny your God." Thus we see that a stone
may be a witness; and the historians of Great Britain, either
wittingly or unwittingly, have made Lia Fail (sometimes spelled
Leag Phail) a witness to an unbroken line of sovereigns, for it
has been the throne upon which their rulers have been
consecutively crowned, ever since it was landed in Ireland.
Further, there have been just three overturns of this
kingdom. The first, as we have shown, was from Palestine to Tara,
in the plantation of Ulster, through Tea Tephi, Jeremiah's ward,
the "King's Daughter." The second overturn was from Ireland to
Scotland, through Fergus, who sent for Lia Fail, the Stone of
Destiny, and had it brought from Tara to Iona, where he was
crowned. The third OVERTURN was from Scotland to England. At this
time the throne was brought from Scotland and placed in
Westminster Abbey, where it rests under the protection of the
greatest monarchy on earth.
Hence, if this Coronation Stone which is in Westminster,
which the English call Jacob's Pillow, and which their Scotch and
Irish ancestors called "God's house," "B-th-l," "The Stone of
Destiny," and "Leag Phail," "The Stone Wonderful," - we say, if
this stone is indeed what these names and what its history
declare it to be, then it is indeed the veritable throne of
Israel, upon which the sons of David were formally crowned in the
Temple of God at Jerusalem. Consequently, in this also, God has
kept faith with David, and preserved his throne through all
generations that are past.
This makes us feel like singing the Doxology, because it is
just as it should be. When the Bethel stone was in Bethel place,
it was "God's house," in God's house; when it was in the Temple,
it was still God's house, in God's house; when, as one of the
jewels of empire, it was taken by Teah, the "tender twig," and
placed in the heights of Israel in the islands of the sea, it was
still God's house, in God's house. The descendants of Teah and
Herremon are the custodians of that rock today, and their
subjects possess all the distinguishing marks whereby prophecy
declares the lost house o f God shall finally be recognized and
found. And in the midst of this great national or racial house
there is a house of God, a "spiritual house," which is by some
called "Spiritual Israel," and which is, like literal Israel was,
FOUNDED ON A ROCK.
..........
NOTE:
CAN IT BE BUT A CHANCE, A STRANGE TWIST OF HISTORY
THAT SUCH A STONE HAS BEEN A STONE TO CROWN KINGS AND
QUEENS OF IRELAND, SCOTLAND, AND ENGLAND, THEM SITTING
UPON THIS STONE. THE CONTINUING THRONE OF BRITAIN, IN A
MODERN SPACE-AGE WORLD IS REALLY QUITE STRANGE IN ITSELF,
BUT TO HAVE A STONE WITH SUCH HISTORY, AND LOOKED UPON
WITH SUCH SERIOUSNESS AND HONOR, MAKES THE THRONE OF
BRITAIN EVEN MORE MYSTERIOUS AND SO TRADITIONALLY
IMPORTANT. THE THRONE IS AS MUCH ENJOYED AND RESPECTED
AS IT EVER WAS. YES THE LATE DIANNA, AND HER CHILDREN
HAVE BROUGHT BACK THE LOVE AND RESPECT OF THIS THRONE,
IF IT WAS DYING IN POPULARITY, IT NO LONGER IS. THERE
IS NOW NO THOUGHT OF THIS THRONE COMING TO AN END. THE
PRESENT QUEEN ELIZABETH CHANGED AND MOVED IN THE RIGHT
DIRECTION AFTER DIANNA'S UNTIMELY DEATH, TO MAKE THE
THRONE EMOTIONALLY CONNECTED TO THE PEOPLE, AND DIANNA'S
CHILDREN ARE MAKING IT EVEN MORE SO. CAN THIS BE SAID
TO BE JUST "CHANCE" OR IS THERE THE HAND OF GOD IN IT
ALL? I THINK THE LATTER IS THE TRUTH OF THE MATTER.
YES, THIS BRITISH THRONE AND ITS ENDURANCE, IS NOT A
MATTER OF JUST CHANCE, BUT IT IS INDEED THE VERY THRONE
OF DAVID, AND WILL GO TO DAVID'S GREATEST SON - CHRIST
JESUS, WHEN JESUS RETURNS TO THIS EARTH TO ESTABLISH THE
KINGDOM OF GOD FOR THE FIRST THOUSAND YEARS, AS WE ARE
TOLD IN CHAPTER 20 OF THE BOOK OF REVELATION.
Keith Hunt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No comments:
Post a Comment