All About Jesus #2
His Divinity and Humanity
by Finis Dake If the body of Jesus was the Son of Jesus, and the inner man of Jesus was the Father of Jesus, then how could the Father say to the body, "I am the Son [body] of God?" If the Father inside was talking to the Son outside, then the body could not be the Son. How could the Son (body) be called "Jesus," as in Matt.1:21; 8:29; Mark 1:1; Acts 8:37; 1 Cor.1:9; 1 John 1:3,7; 3:23; 5:20; 2 John 3, and "Christ," as in Matt.16:16; 22:42; 26:63; Luke 4:4; John 20:31, if these two names have been the names of the Father from all eternity, as some argue. The Son (body) had a beginning in Mary 1900 years ago. These names were not the names of God from all eternity, for they were names given to the Son when He was born about 1900 years ago. Not one time are these names used of either person of the Godhead until Jesus was born and anointed by God the Father. The word "Jesus" was the human name given to the Son of Mary eight days after He was born (Matt.1:16,21; Luke 1:31-35; 2:21). It was and is still a common name like John, James, and other names. Josephus mentions thirteen men who are called Jesus. Several are mentioned in the New Testament (Acts 7:45; 13:6; Col. 4:11; Heb.4:8; Matt.1:21). Several in the Old Testament are called "Joshua" and "Joshua" and hundreds of people throughout history have been called Jesus and Joshua. If the New Testament had been written in Hebrew instead of Greek Jesus would have been called Joshua. The word "Jesus" is not an heavenly or divine name. It is an earthly human name given to the second person of the Godhead when he became a man. Therefore, it is His name as a man and not His name as God. The word "Christ" literally means "anointed" and is a name applied to Jesus when He became the anointed of God. It is like the word "Jesus," a name of his humanity, and of His anointing as a man and not His name as God. It is the same as the Hebrew word translated "Messiah" (Dan.9:24-27; John 1:41; 4:25). Jesus became the anointed of God or Christ thirty years after He was called Jesus. It was predicted in prophecy that God would make Him the "Anointed" (Ps.2:1-12; 143 11-18; Isa.11:1-2; 42:1-5; 61:1-2). History records that the time He became the "Anointed" of God was at His baptism (Matt.3:16-17; 12:15-20; Luke 3:21-22; Acts 10:38). Jesus confirmed the time He became God's "Anointed" (Luke 4:16:21). Jesus was anointed with the Holy Ghost and not with oil. He was anointed because He was the Son of the Father and it proves two persons - the one who anointed Him and the one who was anointed. Passages such as Luke 2:26; Gal.3:17; 1 Pet. 1:11 should be understood in the same sense as we would say that President George Washington was a surveyor. He was not this when he was president, but since he became president we could speak of any event of his life before he became president as what President Washington did. So it is with Christ. Since He became God's Christ we can now speak of Christ doing certain things even before He was anointed. 28. The Bible never speaks of the Father dying, but it does say that the Son died (Rom.5:10; Heb.6:6; John 3:16-18). The Son died in the same sense that other men die ... This proves that the Father and Son were two separate persons. 29. Jesus was "the only begotten of the Father" and "his only begotten Son," and He had to be a separate person from the Father in order to be begotten by the Father, and the Father had to be a separate person from Jesus in order to beget Him (John 1:14, 18; 3:16-18; 31-36; 1 John 5:1). No person can beget himself, or be begotten by himself, and no person can be his own father or son. Neither can any person beget part of himself, or be begotten by part of himself. 30. Many statements in the gospel of John prove that Jesus did not claim to be the Father, but He did say that God was His Father and His God (John 5:8-45; 10:18-36; 14:28; 20:17; Rev. 3:12); that God worked only through Him, and that He COULD DO NOTHING OF HIMSELF (John 5:19,30); that He not only COULD NOT, but that He DID NOT DO ANYTHING OF HIMSELF (John 5:30; 6:38; 8:28; 12:49-50); that He did only the Father's will and lived BY THE FATHER, as men are to do His will and live BY HIM (John 6:57); and that the work of God was to believe on the one whom the Father had sent (John 6:29; 3:2; 5:18; 8:54; 14:1). He said that His doctrine was not His, but it was the Father's (John 7:16-17; 8:26,38; 10:18; 12:49-50; 14:10-11; 17:8,14) and that if anyone would do the will of God he should know that He did not come and SPEAK OF HIMSELF, but that He spoke of the Father who had sent Him (John 7:16-18). He claimed that His message was true because He did not SPEAK OF HIMSELF, but that He spoke of the Father (John 7:18; 5:30-38; 14:10-11), that He spoke only what He had HEARD FROM THE FATHER (John 8:26-28,38-40), that He taught BY THE FATHER and that His teaching was not of Himself (John 8:28), that He did not PLEASE HIMSELF, but He lived to please the Father (John 8:29), that He was the "Son" of the house and not the "Father" of it (John 8:35-36; Heb.3:6), and that He had THE SAME RELATION TO THE FATHER that the Jews had to their father the devil (John 8:16, 3 5-44; 9:4). He taught that He, Himself, honored the Father as all men should (John 8:49); that He did not seek HIS OWN GLORY, but that there was "one" (not Himself, but ANOTHER, the Father) that honored Him and sought His glory (John 8:50,54; 12:26-28; 14:12-15; 17:1-5, 10); that He and the Father knew each other, but they were not each other (John 8:55; 10:15); that the Father loved Him for His unselfishness (it takes two people to love and be loved, John 10:17-18); that He had received commandments from the Father, and they were not His own (John 10:18; 12:49-50; 15:10); and that the Father gave Him His disciples (John 10:29; 17:1-25). He further claimed that he was equal to the Father as to deity and some things, but not equal in other things (Mark 13:32; John 5:17-39; 8:13-19,29-42; 19:18,24-29; Acts 1:7; 1 Cor.11:3; Rev.1:1); that He was not a "Spirit" being like His Father (Luke 24:39); John 4:24; Phil. 3:21); that He and the Father were in each other (united as one) in the same sense He and the believers were one (John 10:38; 14:10-11,23; 17:11,21-23; 2 Cor.5:17); and that He was the only way to the Father (John 14:6). Such simple language as that in all the above listed passages cannot be understood except in connection with two separate persons. 31. Jesus said that if He bore witness "of Himself" and if He was the only one that did bare witness, His testimony would not be true and He would not expect men to believe it any more than civil courts would accept only one witness (John 5:21-23,36; 6:38; 7:16-17,28; 8:13-19,37,42,54; 12:44,49-50; 14:10-11; 17:1-25). God repeatedly said in both Testaments that "in the mouth of two or three witnesses every word may be established" (Num.35:30; Deut.17:6-7; 19:15; Matt.18:16; Luke 24:48; Acts 1:8,22; 2:32; 5:32; 7:58; 10:31; 1 Thess.5:19; Heb.10:28-29; 12:1; Rev.11:5). Would God make a fixed law to establish truth by two or three separate witnesses and then break His own law and expect men to have confidence in Him? He would have no grounds to punish man for rejection of God's witness if God were only one person..... Jesus continued by saying that He had greater proof or witness than John the Baptist who had two witnesses, the Father and the Holy Ghost (John 1:31-34; 5:36). John did not have the miracles to confirm his word as did Jesus, who had the same two witnesses that John had plus the miracles (John 2:11,23; 3:2; 4:54; 5:20, 36; 7:2,26; 7:31; 9:16; 10:25-37,41; 11:42-47; 14:10-12; 15:24). When Jesus said, "I am not alone, but I [one person] and the Father [another person] that sent me" and is with me also bear witness, He simply stated that there were more persons in the Godhead than He, thus fulfilling the Word of God concerning more than one witness to establish a fact. He plainly said that the two witnesses in this testimony were the Father and Himself. "I am one that bears witness of myself, and the Father that sent me [another person] beareth witness of me" (John 8:13-18,29; 16:32). Again, in John 8:29 He said, "The Father bath not left me alone" and in John 16:32, "every man to his own and leave me alone: and yet I am not alone, because the Father is with me." What could be more clear in proving two distinct persons, called "the Father" and "the Son," both of them equally God? On the other hand, what foolish statements these are if Jesus is the only person in the Godhead. 32. In the following eighty separate statements of Scripture by Jesus Christ, He constantly affirmed that He was not the Father and not the only person in the Godhead. The grammar of these passages will not permit us to believe in only one person as being referred to. Jesus is the speaker, but He is not the one spoken of, as is made clear by reading these statements concerning Him and His Father. If we are not going to believe what God says in His revelation concerning Himself, His Son, and the Holy Spirit, then He is under no further obligation to give another revelation in order to make the subject of God clear to men. If we will not believe one revelation, we would not believe another. If we will believe at all, then let us believe these scriptural facts of human language concerning more than one person in the Godhead. Then we will not have to teach that God is a mystery ... cannot be understood, and the other foolish doctrines as expressed by men who refuse to take the plain language used by God in the Bible revealing the ... separate persons in the Godhead, as seen in Matt.7:21; 10:32-33; 11:27; 15:13; 16:17; 18:10,19,35; 19:17; 20:23; 24:36; 25:34; 26:29,39,42,53; Luke 2:49; John 5:17,43; 6:32,65; 8:19,28,38,49,54; 10:17-18,25,29,30,32,37; 12:26-28; 14:7,12,20,21,28; 15:1,8,10,4,23; 16:23-26; 18:11; 20:17,21; Rev. 1:1; 2:27; 3:5,12; 5:1-7,13; 7:9,15-16; 10:6; 11:15; 12:10; 21:22-23; 22:1-5. 33. Jesus said that His Father was "greater than all" and "greater than I" (John 10:29; 14:28). He then could not be the Father. Paul also stated that the Father was the "head of Christ" (1 Cor.3:23; 11:3). 34. God the Father said of Jesus, "my beloved Son" (Matt. 3:16-17; 17:5; Ps.2:7). Jesus said of Himself, "I am the Son of God" (John 10:38). An angel declared Him to be "the Son of the Highest" and "the Son of God" (Luke 1:32-35 ). Demons said He was "the Son of God" (Mark 3:11) and "Son of the Most High God" (Mark 5:7). Apostles stated repeatedly that Jesus was only "the Son of God" (Matt.14:33; 16:16-17; Mark 1:1; John 11:27; 20:31; Acts 9:20), "the only begotten OF THE FATHER" (John 1:14,18; 3:16-18), "his own Son" (Rom.8:32), "the Son of the Father" (2 John 3), and "his dear Son" by whom God the Father created all things (Col.1:13-18). John said, "the Father sent the Son to be the Saviour of the world" (1 John 4:14); so there must be two separate persons referred to. John the Baptist also bare record "that this was the Son of God" (John 1:31-34). Others confessed that Jesus was "the Son of God" (Mark 15:39; 1 John 1:49; Acts 9:37), but not once did God, angels, demons, or men say that He was the Father. 35. Both the Father and the Son talked to each other in audible voices at the same time and place, and both voices were heard by a number of witnesses; so there had to be two persons who had their own separate bodies, voices, minds, etc., to be able to speak to each other in the same sense other persons do. (Matt.3:16-17; 17:5; John 12:27-30; 2 Pet.1:17). 36. Jesus taught that when men receive Him they also receive the Father, as when men receive Christ's disciples they also receive Christ (Matt.10:39-41). This does not mean that the Father and the Son were the same person any more than it proves that Christ and the disciples become one person when men receive Christ through them. Separate persons are involved in both statements, as is clear. 37. God the Father is called "he" (John 14:16); God the Son is called "he" (John 8:23-25) ... so if personal pronouns are used of each person in making a distinction between them as is done with other persons, there must be ... separate persons. 38. Christ is symbolized by "the vine," and the Father is spoken of as "the husbandman" in John 15:1-16. It is just as intelligent to call any vine its own keeper and both of them one person as to do so here. This figure clearly proves two persons. 39. Jesus taught that He and the Father had the same relationship to each other as did He and His disciples (John 15:10). Such relationship proves more than one person. One person could not have such relationship by Himself as is required of separate persons in this passage. 40. The word "both" means "two" and is used of the Father and the Son, thus proving two persons (John 15:24; 2 John 9). 41. The word "also" is used of the Father and Son, thus proving two separate persons (John 5:19, 27; 8:19; 13:32; 14:1). 42. Jesus again speaks of Himself and the Father as "two" persons: "They have not known the Father [one person] nor me" (another person). Again, "I go my way to him that sent me (John 16:3,5). Then He speaks of Himself and the Spirit ... Jesus did not say that He would come back as the Holy Ghost, but that He would stay in Heaven and "send him unto you," as fulfilled in Acts 2:33-36. If those who believe in only one person in the Godhead are not capable of understanding the most simple human language, then their case is hopeless. 43. Jesus used personal pronouns in referring to Himself and the Father (John 14:23; 17:1-25; etc.) He used the first, second, and third personal pronouns of Himself, the Father, and the Holy Spirit; and not once do we find Him misusing them (John 14:12-17, 23-26; 15:1-26; 16:7-15; 17:1-25). If they were used rightly, then there must be separate persons in the Godhead. John 17 alone has 162 personal pronouns used by Jesus to and of Himself, of the Father, and of His disciples. He repeatedly calls the true God "Father" and calls Himself "thy Son." He prayed for the disciples to be "one" as He and the Father were "one," and this could not refer to "one person" but "one" in unity. Jesus used "I" and "me," first personal pronouns, in referring to Himself, and "thou," "thee," and ,thine," second personal pronouns, in referring to the Father, whom He was addressing. He used "they" and "them" in referring to the disciples for whom He was praying and "we" and "us" when referring to Himself and His Father, proving that He and His Father were more than one person as much as the disciples were. 44. Jesus said, "All power is given unto me in Heaven and in Earth" (Matt.28:18). Somebody had to give Him this power, and He had to be greater than Jesus, or He would not have it to give. The only one Jesus said was "greater than I" is the Father (John 14:28). The apostles later confirmed this fact of the Father being greater than Jesus, for they said that the Father was "the head of Christ" (1 Cor.11:3), that Jesus had been exalted by the Father above everyone else (1 Cor.14:24-28; Eph.1:20-23; Phil. 2:8-11; Heb.1:1-3; 12:2; 1 Pet.3:22), and that the Father had made Jesus both "Lord and Christ" (Acts 2:33-36), the heir of all things (Heb.1:2; Rom.8:17), the medium of approach to God (Heb. 1:4; John 3:16-18; Acts 4:12; 1 John 3:23; 5:13), and the source of redemption to men (1 Cor.1:30). These facts prove the Father to be a separate person from the Son. 45. Jesus said that He was the same that He claimed to be "from the beginning" (John 8:25). Because He always claimed to be only the Son and not the Father, we can rely upon the fact that He could not be the Father. The statement "He that hath seen me hath seen the Father" (John 14:9), does not say that He was the Father. The Greek word for seen is 'horao,' to discern, to experience, perceive, comprehend. Like the English word seen, it means here to truly comprehend and not only to see with the eyes, as it is used in John 1:18; 6:46; 8:38; 1 John 3:6; 2 John 11. No statement in John 14 says that Jesus was the Father in person, but six times this chapter makes it clear that He was not the Father: (1) "Ye believe in God [one person], believe ALSO in me" (John 14:1-2). (2) "In my Father's house [not my house] are many mansions" (John 14:1-2). (3) "No man cometh UNTO THE FATHER, but BY ME" (John 14:6). (4) "If ye had known ME [Jesus], ye should have known MY FATHER [another person] ALSO" (John 14:7). (5) "He that hath seen [comprehended, experienced] ME [one person] hath seen [comprehended, experienced] THE FATHER (another person, John 14:9). In John 1:18 it is stated that no man had "seen" (fully comprehended) the Father save Christ, who came to reveal and declare God to men. If Christ came truly to demonstrate God, then John 14:9 proves He had succeeded in bringing God to men in actual demonstration of Him by His own life. (6) "I [one person] am in the Father [another person] and the Father in me. . . . I speak NOT OF MYSELF; but the Father that dwelleth in me, HE DOETH THE WORKS. I [Jesus] go to the Father," so He could not be the Father (John 14:10-15). "He that hath seen me hath seen the Father" is a statement of true representation of another person (1 John 2:6; 3:3,7; 4:17; 1 Cor.11:1; Phil.4:9; 2 Cor.3:1-3,18; Rom.8:29). One who is truly like Christ as He was like the Father can say, "He that hath seen me hath seen Jesus Christ." VI. THE THEORY OF ETERNAL SONSHIP DISCUSSED .............. TO BE CONTINUED It is only in the last 10 years or so that I have heard about the teaching that "God" or the "Godhead" is just ONE person - One person who can be the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, at any time, or can be all three at any given time, but still remain as ONE person. Now, you go figure that one out. Then it is also within about the last 10 years that I have heard the teaching that God is NO PERSON at all, that God or the Godhead, is simply too much to be confined to a literal "personal being" and so God must not be thought of as any kind of a literal being. So I guess to those people who hold such an idea of God, then God is just a MIGHTY NOTHINGNESS. I have answered this "nothingness God" teaching in another study on this Website. As Finis Dake has shown so far, the Scriptures on this subject of God the Father and Jesus Christ, being TWO SEPARATE PERSONAL BEING is as clear and as plain as the sun shining in a cloudless sky. The truth of the matter is taught to us OVER AND OVER again in the pages of the Bible, especially the New Testament - Keith Hunt. |
No comments:
Post a Comment