Saturday, January 23, 2021

JOSEPH'S BIRTHRIGHT AND JUDAH'S SCEPTRE #2

 Joseph's Birthright #2


Race verses Grace


JUDAH'S SCEPTRE AND JOSEPH'S BIRTHRIGHT


by J.H.Allen (1917)



CHAPTER II.




     Since we are compelled to begin our search for light,

concerning every phase of these themes, along the lines of

Biblical history and prophecy, it will be well for us first to

gather from those sources a few of the greater and more general

facts. By so doing, we will find it to be a great help in our

study of the more special features of the subjects, as it will

enable us to place, with unerring certainty, each detail where it

belongs.

     It being true that the Lord included in the Abrahamic

covenants a promise that the forthcoming children of promise

should eventually develop into many nations, there are many other

things that must follow as a consequent; one of which is, that

for the accomplishment of this purpose, God must provide

sufficient territory or scope of country, which shall become the

home of each nation, for it is absolutely impossible that

flourishing nations shall exist without national homes.

     Pursuant to this thought, we know of no utterance in all the

Word of God which furnishes a more general or comprehensive

outlook than the following: "When the Most High divided to the

nations their inheritance, when he separated the sons of Adam, he

set the bounds of the people according to the number of the

children of Israel. For the Lord's portion is his people; Jacob

is the lot (cord, or line) of his inheritance." Deut.32:8,9.


     When Moses was commanded to write the above concerning the

division of the earth's surface to the sons of Adam, only a very

small portion of it was inhabited; nevertheless, in the mind of

God every Island was set apart, and every continent divided. For

the scope of the facts herein stated are world-wide, and embrace

within their sweep the entire inhabited and inhabitable portion

of the earth's surface. Also, those divisions were so arranged

and subdivided, and the boundaries so set, that every nation,

tongue, and people among the sons of Adam,-be they already in

existence, or be they among the forthcoming nations, had their

national home allotted unto them.

     Moreover, God always not only kept in mind that special

country which he had promised should become the everlasting

inheritance of the chosen race, but he also, when setting the

territorial bounds for other nations, remembered Israel, and

either restricted the boundaries of other nations, or enlarged

those divisions of country intended for Israel, which will be

needed by that immense multitude of people when they shall have

fulfilled their appointed destiny of developing into many

nations. For we must bear in mind that the posterity of Abraham

are a natural seed, according to the flesh, and that each special

nation of the many must have a place in which to dwell.

     In addition to the fact that these Abrahamic nations are a

fleshly seed, we must remember also that they are not necessarily

a race of saints; for it is a notorious fact that some of that

race have been, and others are now, just as wicked as that fallen

son of the heavens would have them; but, on the other hand, that

same race has furnished, and still is furnishing, men who are the

grandest and best of earth.

     When the time came for God to produce from the covenant man

a son who should be the further progenitor of the covenant race,

Abraham was anxious that Ishmael, his son by Hagar, the handmaid

of Sarah, should be used for this purpose, and exclaimed, "O that

Ishmael might live before thee !" To this earnest appeal the Lord

was not indifferent, and promised that he would bless Ishmael.

But on the subject of rejecting Ishmael as the covenant

inheritor, and making his covenant with a son who should be a

child of Sarah, as well as of Abraham, the Lord was inflexible.

His word of promise was the insurmountable barrier, and so he

said to Abraham: "Sarah thy wife shall bear thee a son indeed,

and thou shalt call his name Isaac ... and as for Ishmael, I have

heard thee ... twelve princes shall he beget, and I will make him

a great nation. But my covenant will I establish with Isaac,

which Sarah shall bear unto thee at this set time in the next

year."

     So Ishmael's posterity became alien before the legal line

had any existence, except that, on the authority and

responsibility of creative faith, the Lord counts things that are

not as if they were-for God had yet to create Isaac and bring

forth life out of that which was as good as dead.

     We have the record oś another racial choice and rejection

which was made before birth, that of Jacob and Esau, but before

we discuss the question of race versus grace,-as involved in the

caption of this chapter - relative to them, for it is over their

case that the subject is argued in the New Testament, we wish to

call your attention to the fact that after the death of Sarah,

Abraham married a second wife whose name was Keturah, by whom 

he had a number of sons. These sons in time became the fathers of

the Medes, Midianites, and other nations; but we can no more

reckon these nations as a part of the promised many, than we can

those which were formed by the posterity of Ishmael and Esau.

Could we do so, our task would be an easy one and our story soon

told; but we cannot do this, for the covenant nations must come

only from Abraham and Sarah through their only son Isaac, whose

posterity alone can be called, as they are called, "the Children

of the Promise," in contradistinction to those who belong to the

other families, and who are called "the Children of the Flesh."

This brings us to the question of race versus grace as understood

by the New Testament Church, and explained by the Apostle Paul,

who in his Epistle to the Romans says: "Neither, because they are

the children of Abraham, are they all (racial) children, but the

children of the promise are counted for the seed." As he carries

the argument still further, he makes this truth all the more

apparent by declaring: "In Isaac shall thy seed be called," and

then explains, as follows: "That is, they which are the children

of the flesh, these are not the (national) children of God; but

the children of the promise are counted for the seed. For this is

the word of promise, at this time will I come, and Sarah shall

have a son. And not only this; but when Rebecca also had

conceived by one, even our father Isaac (for the children being

not yet born, neither having done any good or evil, that the

purpose of God according to election might stand, not of works,

but of him that calleth). it was said unto her, the elder shall

serve the younger. As it is written Jacob have I loved, but Esau

have I hated. What shall we say then? Is there unrighteousness

with God? God forbid!" Rom.9:7-i4.

     With this argument before us, it is clear that it is only

the children of Isaac who are counted for. the national seed of

the covenant concerning the promised multitude, and that all this

question of election as regards Jacob and Esau is purely racial

and national. That is, one of these two nations which sprang from

the same mater is the recipient of national promises, glories,

honors, covenants, and service of which the other is not a

partaker.

     The argument is that when Rebecca, who we remember was to

become the mother of thousands of millions, had conceived by

Isaac, the father of the race, the result was that there were two

nations, or nationalities, in the womb - not necessarily a

nation, either of sinners or of saints. To convince us that the

election was purely racial, Paul throws in the parenthetical

clauses explaining that Jacob had done nothing good that he

should deserve these covenant blessings. But he also just as

assuredly affirms that Esau had done no evil that he should not

have them, for the choice was made before they had the power to

do good or evil, i.e., before they were born.

     The King James version is a little unfortunate in its use of

the word "hated," as herein used, for one meaning which is given

to the original word is, "to love less," and when used in

contrast to the word "love" as applied to Jacob, it will bear

that simple meaning. The fact, which Paul states, is simply that

God loved Jacob more and Esau less, or that he preferred one to

the other, and that this preference for one excluded the other.

So Paul asks the question, "Is there unrighteousness with God?"

and for a reply gives only that surprised exclamation, "God

forbid!" He scouts the criminating thought that it could possibly

be unrighteousness with God, that he should be pleased to choose

the white race with which to work out his purpose, instead of the

red, or copper-colored one; but makes the implication that there

would have been unrighteousness, of a very grave character, with

the Lord, if this election had been one of grace instead of

race-that is, grace unto salvation for Jacob and his seed, and

damnation, without any possible chance of grace, for Esau and his

children.

     Now for the facts concerning these contradistinctive

appellations, "Children of the Flesh" and "Children of the

Promise," as applied to the races which have Abraham for one

common father.


(1) God, as we have shown, made a covenant with Abraham, in which

it was promised that he should become the father of many nations,

hence Abraham was the inheritor of a promise from God.


(2) Isaac, who was a natural son of Abraham and Sarah, according

to the flesh, was not only the child of a special promise, but he

was also the first child of the covenant promise.


(3} After the death of Abraham, God confirmed the original

covenant promise to Isaac, the child of promise, as follows: "I

will perform the oath which I swear unto Abraham thy father; and

I will make thy seed to multiply as the stars of heaven, and I

will give unto thy seed all these countries; and in thy seed

shall all the nations of the earth be blessed" Hence Isaac also

became the inheritor of a promise from the God of his father.


(4) The immediate posterity of Isaac, the promiseholder, were

Jacob and Esau, the persons whom Paul uses in making his argument

concerning the Lord's choice of race. Jacob, the younger of these

two, who were twins, was chosen by the promise-maker, before they

were born, to be the inheritor of the covenant promises. And so

the Divine promiser reiterates those promises to him, as follows:

"I am the Lord God of Abraham thy father, and the God of Isaac:

the land whereon thou liest, to thee will I give it, and to thy

seed: and thy seed shall be as the dust of the earth, and thou

shalt spread abroad to the west, and to the east, and to the

north, and to the south: and in thee and in thy seed shall all

the families of the earth be blessed." Hence Jacob also received

direct from the Lord the same covenant promises which had

previously been given to his fathers.


(5) Since there can be no mistaking the purport of these covenant

promises regarding a natural and multitudinous posterity for

these promise-inheritors, and inasmuch as these promises were

promised and repromised, by the Divine promise-maker to the

successive promise-holders, then, when that promised multitude of

people shall have materialized, it is they, and they only, who

can be called "The Children of the Promise." And the only crucial

test is that they be Abraham's seed who have descended from Isaac

through Jacob.


     Thus it is that the natural seed of Abraham, whose

genealogical tree sprouts from the Jacob roots, are the children

of the promise, and that others are not, although they also be

the natural sons of Abraham, but, not having come through the

family line of the promiseinheritors, they are "the Children of

the Flesh" only. While to Israelites only, the seed of Abraham,

Isaac, and Jacob, pertain the promises, the covenants, the

adoption, the glory, the special service, the giving of the

divine law, and through whom, as concerning the flesh, Christ

came. But no such national glory, honor, dignity, and exaltation

are promised to those other nations which sprang from that same

father through Ishmael, Esau, and the sons of Keturah : no, not

even such glory as comes from the least of these covenants

promises and blessings.


     Consequently, we can see why the Lord always declares

himself to be the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, and not the

God of Abraham, Ishmael, and Esau; and why it is that Paul's

kinsmen according to the flesh are exclusively the children of

the promise, for they are Israelities, to whom pertain the

promises, etc. That is, they are the people who owe their

existence to the fact that God was true to the promise which he

made to Abraham, repeated to Isaac, and reiterated to Jacob,

whose name was changed to Israel, and from whom come the elect

people whose general racial name is Israel. Thus each individual

member of the race is an Israelite, be he a good man or a bad

one, and belongs to the elect or chosen people of God.

     Therefore all this question of election between Jacob and

Esau, which has caused so many unjust conceptions of God and 

his precious saving truth, is a question of Race, and not of Grace.

However, there is both an election of race and an election of

grace, for Paul, when speaking of the seven thousand men who 

had not bowed the knee to Baal, declares that even now, "at this

present time, also, there is a remnant according to the election

of grace." But when he wrote regarding the attitude of a certain

part of the elect race toward the election of grace, he says: "As

concerning the gospel, they are enemies for your sakes; but as

touching the election, they are beloved for the fathers' sakes."

Here we find two elections, i. e., the election of race and the

election of grace.

     Touching the election of race, God could say, "And thou,

Israel, art my servant whom I have chosen, the seed of Abraham 

my friend." But, when it was a question of individual service or

relation to him, even among his chosen people, he could throw the

responsibility on them, and say: "Choose ye this day whom ye will

serve." Or when pressing the subject of eternal life to be accepted 

or rejected by each member of that elect race, God could say: 

"See, I have this day set before thee life and death," and then 

exhort them to "Choose life!"

     If it is a question of race election, and the fidelity of the 

Divine promise is at stake, it can be asserted that the will

of God, independent of the will of others, can cause certain

conditions to obtain; "that the purpose of God according to

election might stand"-not in the good or evil works, or unholy

natures of unborn babes, "but of him that calleth."

     When the call of God is of racial, or of national import,

God can say: "Hearken unto me, O Jacob and Israel my called." 

But if it is a question of personal election to the grace of

salvation, then faithful men of God may exhort other men, saying:

"Give diligence to make your calling and election sure." When it

is race, it is, "Whom I (God) have chosen." When it is grace, it

is, "Whosoever will, may come and take the water of life freely."

     When it is race, it is, "I have called thee by my name; thou

art mine." In grace it is "Whosoever believeth," of whom the Lord

says: "They are mine." In grace it is, "Come." In race it is

fate, destiny, kismet.

     One is a chosen race, and the other is a chosen way. The way

is by faith that it might be of grace, but the choice of race is

according to the predetermined and predestined purpose of God.

In race election it is generation, or born of the flesh. In the

election of grace it is regeneration, or born of the Spirit.

In grace it is, "Whosoever offereth praise glorifieth me;" but in

race, it is, "This people have I formed for myself; they SHALL

show forth my praise."

     This declaration brings us to the consideration of the

purpose, or object, which the Lord has in choosing, and forming a

speciat race of men who, in spite of the wickedness of the great

bulk of them, he calls his own chosen people, and whose national

destiny he purposes to control.

     Much of the manifest purpose of God touching this people is

made known in that brief epitome given by the Apostle Paul, as

quoted above, respecting the national honors of his own people.

Figuratively speaking, every word in that resume of Israelitish

history and the summing up of their honors weighs a ton. As we

proceed with the story of Israel, it is our purpose to consider

these facts in detail, but at this juncture we will take time

only to say that, since the creation, no such opportunity, or

such fitting cause, for national honor and greatness has ever

come, or ever can come, to any other nation on the earth.

It would seem that their cup of glory was full to the overflow,

when through them the Lord sent his word from Heaven, and 

spread it abroad over the face of the inhabited portions of the earth,

and when God's word had been so fulfilled, and his purpose for

them so fully accomplished that they could say: "Unto us a child

is born, unto us a son is given; and the government shall be upon

his shoulder; and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counselor,

The mighty God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace."

     When they could say this - then it would seem that their cup

of national greatness and glory was overflowing, and that the

supreme purpose of God for them had been reached. But it is our

glad privilege to tell you that there is in God's word a declared

purpose, which must yet be accomplished through that elect race,

and until it shall be fulfilled, all that which is done is robbed

of fully nine-tenths of its power and glory; since, outside the

realm of faith, millions are today hopelessly drifting on the

shoals of constantly increasing forms of unbelief, and with the

great majority of men, the word of God must forever be regarded

as a cunningly devised fable, unless God has some plan of

vindication for it and himself.

     Furthermore, the great love of God is misunderstood and

despised; the blood of the atonement is trampled upon; Christ is

still considered by the many a bastard, a fraud, and a failure.

He is still put to an open shame in the house of his professed

friends; shipwrecks of a one-time faith and a present professed

faith in him are scattered everywhere. And so it is that God, his

Word, and his Christ, must yet be fully vindicated. And they

shall be, for God has promised it; and when this vindication

shall have been accomplished, then, and not till then, will

Israel have reached the supreme climax of greatness and glory 

of the purpose for which the Lord has chosen her.

     Harken ye unbelieving ones! Harken to this! "Thus saith the

Lord that created thee, O Jacob, and he that formed thee, O

Israel, ye are my witnesses, saith the Lord, and my servant

whom I have chosen; that ye may know and believe me, and

understand that I am He; before me there was no God formed,

neither shall there be after me. I, even I, am the Lord; and

beside me there is no Saviour. I have declared, and have saved,

and I have showed, when there was no strange God among you:

therefore ye are my witnesses, saith the Lord--that I am God." 

Isa.43:1,10-12.


     Note this, "That YE may know and believe ME, and understand

that - I AM HE."

     God not only intends to use the Israelites for the purpose

of convincing them that he is God, and the only God, but he also

intends to use them to convince the rest of the world. For he

says: "I will sanctify my great name, and the heathen shall

know that I am the Lord, saith the Lord God, when I shall be

sanctified in you before their eyes." - Ezek.36:23.

     This is the great purpose for which the Lord has chosen

Israel, and when this is accomplished, they shall have reached

the acme of national glory.

     If you ask, "Is the history of Israel, as a whole, a Divine

work?" we answer, yes. But if you ask, "Is that history designed

as a preparation for the moral creation which Jesus Christ came

to effect?" Our answer is, no; the law which the Lord gave to his

people was intended to accomplish that purpose; but the history

of Israel, together with prophecies concerning them, many of

which must yet become history, is for the vindication of God.

..........


To be continued


No comments:

Post a Comment