Thursday, April 18, 2024

PASSOVER— JESUS PUT IN THE TOMB WHEN IT WAS EVENING!!!

  A COMPLETE STUDY

                       ON THE NT USE 
                         OF THE WORD

                      "EVENING"

                                by
                         Keith Hunt



     Studies are usually started because something, small or
large, is triggered in the mind by another article read, a
statement said by someone,  or  written by someone,  perhaps by a
question asked, maybe by a person finding what seems to them as a
contradiction in the Bible, or by some technical information
found on a certain point.  There are many reasons as to why an
individual will start an in-depth study on a specific word or
thought or doctrine in the Bible.
     This particular study was precipitated by an article I was
reading, actually a couple of articles at the same time, but
ceratin things from the one blended into a point found in the
other.  I had never thought about the matter of the word
"evening" very much, well not as used in the NT, I had studied it
in some detail as used in the OT.
     One thing I have leant over the years is that the truth of
God's word is deep and never ending, and I have leant also that
the Eternal never gives all the truth to anyone all at the same
time. Truth is ever being revealed to those who WANT and LOVE it,
to those who will be corrected from their errors.  Jesus promised
His true disciples that  when the Spirit came it would lead them
into all truth, but there are certain basic requirements laid
down in the word of the Lord to be a true disciple of Christ. 
One very important point or really a few points is that found in
Isaiah 66:2, " .......but to THIS man will I look, even to him
that is poor and of a CONTRITE spirit, and TREMBLES at My WORD." 

     The attitude of true repentance and a humble respectful fear
of the word of the Lord is essential in any person for them to
receive more truth.  This mind-set that is pleasing to God and
one He can look to and work with, must be able to put aside all
pre-conceived ideas, all theology teaching that may have been
acquired from other human persons. It requires the mind to be
clean from anything that would hinder the Spirit to guide into
all truth. This can be difficult for many people to do, for human
nature can be very strong at times, just not willing to let go,
clean itself out, and simply tremble before the word of the Lord.
It is often harder to  change  the mind and learn new things
about what the mind considers an old subject, than not knowing
anything about the subject in the first place.

     It is not easy for human nature to be corrected, to be shown
its errors, its misunderstanding, its false ideas that were built
upon a lack of in-depth research or careless reading into verses
things just not there.  Many millions of Christians believe many
false doctrines because of the previous points.  We who observe
the Sabbath, know that man does not have an immortal soul,  that
death is a sleep until the resurrection,  we who know such truths
can understand to a point, why so many are in the dark over what
seems to us as plain truth.  We will say, well they haven't
really studied  those subject in depth, or they misapply certain
verses, or they read into verses things that are not there.
     What we need to remember is that it could be possible we
also are in some parts of our theology, as they are, and growing
in grace and knowledge of Christ Jesus, as we are told to do,
cannot function if our minds are not trembling before the word,
and also loving the truth above all things, wanting it, craving
for it, thirsting for it like a man in the desert without water.
     We need to always keep in mind  2 Thes.2, verses 7 through
12. And the potent verse of Hebrews 4:12, "For the word of God is
quick and powerful, sharper than any twoedged sword, piercing
even to the dividing asunder of soul and spirit, and of the
joints and marrow......"  Then we have what Paul told Timothy in
2 Tim.3:16, "All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is
profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for
instruction in righteousness."

     So we have set the correct road to travel on, the mind is
ready, but there are a few other good things we need to
understand and to put into practice as we undertake any
study in the word on any topic, or as in this particular article,
as we study how the NT uses the word "evening."
     One very important rule is to collect together all the
verses that use the word "evening" in this study, or all the
verses on whatever Bible topic you are going to make an in-depth
study on.  The Bible Concordance by STRONG can help along this
line, yet BETTER STILL  (for our study in the NT) is the
ENGLISHMAN'S GREEK CONCORDANCE, which will give you every place
the word "evening" is found, in an easier way that using Strong's
Concordance.   We then need to look up each passage, read the
verse, and the context before and after to see if there is any
more help given to us in understanding how the word is used. 
Greek lexicons and the like, can be helpful, but only to a point.

     Often the true use and meaning as used by the writers of the
NT can only be ascertained by seeing every place within its
context where the word is used in the NT.  By this method you get
a "feeling" for the word, its possible main meaning and its
possible slight variations.  You will also notice it may not mean
exactly the same in all verses within a certain context. Yes, at
times the same word was used in different contexts with slightly
different purposes in mind.  This study will show a little of
that as we see how the word "evening" was used in the NT.

     Another very important Bible study basic rule to use is that
after getting all the verses together on the subject, you then
look for the easy to understand verses that may establish the
first and main (and maybe only) meaning of the word.  The verses
that really do have some teaching to them on the use of the word,
if of course there are such verses within our whole collection of
verses where the word is found.

     The TWO above rules we shall use as we now proceed to put
aside all Bible Dictionaries, all Bible Lexicons, all the words
of men as to what they might think or say on our word "evening."
We shall just look at all the places where this word "evening" is
used in the NT, just the Bible itself, and let the word of the
Lord show us the way the writers of the NT used this word.  We
shall try not to add or to take away from the word.


      ALL THE PLACES WHERE 'EVENING' IS USED IN THE NT

     From the volume I have of the Englishman's Greek
Concordance, page 581, we have two verses that use the Greek OPSE
and are rendered as "even" and "at even" in the KJV. They are: 
Mark 11:19  and  13:35.
     For the Greek word OPSIA we have 15 places where it is used
in the NT. This is the word we want to focus on and here are
those fifteen places:
     Mat.8:16;  14:15,23;  16:2;  20:8;  26:20;  27:57;  Mark
1:32;  4:35;  6:47; 11:11;  14:17;  15:42;  John 6:16;  20:19.

     Ah, now you may want to stop here and study all these verses
for yourself before you continue in my study.  Remember to read
the context.  See if you can find the KEY verses that really do
teach us about how this word is used.   
     Another key to correct Bible understanding is that we should
let the Bible INTERPRET ITSELF!  The plain simple verses come
first, then the other verses are understood in the light that the
plain verses given us.  In our case, if the word "evening" cannot
be found with words that modify it to mean late morning, or
middle afternoon or with words such as "at evening, being the
10th hour" (about 4 p.m.), and the plain verses show a basic time
frame that does not include an evening in the morning, or middle
afternoon, or even the 11th hour as the Jews would often put it
by the way they divided the day(which would be around our 5
p.m.), then we should be able to conclude the use of "evening" as
explained by the clear verses is the acceptable use whenever the
writers of the NT used the word.
     
     Let me remind you, we are looking at this word "evening" as
used by the NT, not as understood by some Greek scholar, or the
Jews of yesterday or today, or some Bible Dictionary that was
written by human hands.

     God uses the Greek word OINOS, translated wine in the KJV,
in every place where we find the word "wine."  Now it is quite
simple to look up all those verses where the word "wine" appear,
read the contexts, find the simple clear verses that put together
show OINOS is fermented juice of the grape, and then quite
logically see that when Jesus turned water into wine, He turned
water into fermented alcoholic wine, not unfermented Welch's
grape juice. I know Dr. Samuele Bacchiocchi can not see it, but
that does not mean you cannot. The Bible is pretty simple to
understand most of the time, if we let it interpret itself.
     So let us now start to find the simple verses concerning
this word "evening" - the verses that shed clear light as to its
time of day meaning.

              "EVENING" - UNDERSTANDABLE VERSES

     The first verse is right out of the mouth of Jesus Himself,
really pretty clear, well in the light of the fact that there is
no verse in the NT that tells us "evening" began at the stoke of
the 12th hour, or some human dial on a human made clock, it is I
think pretty clear.
     MATTHEW 16:2,  " He answered and said unto them, When it is
EVENING, you say, It will be fair weather: for the SKY IS RED. "

     If you like me have lived on the Western Prairies, you will
have no trouble getting the picture on this simple meaning to the
word "evening."  In this CONTEXT "evening" is when the sun goes
down over the horizon.  Please, let's not argue over a thing
like: "Well I've seen the sky red and the sun was up just a
little bit."  Most of the time, the sun has just disappeared over
the horizon when the sky can become, in that area of the horizon,
aglow with a brilliant red color.
     This is what Jesus was referring to, what the farmers are
referring to when they use that expression and prediction for the
coming weather.

     So, one very clear, easy to understand verse that tells us
in the NT "evening" is when the sun sets over the horizon.  Ah, I
think a child can understand that, maybe the wise and prudent can
not, but a child can.

     Here's another simple verse, just for the children among us:

" And at even, WHEN THE SUN DID SET, they brought unto Him....." 
(Mark 1:32).

     Here we find the NT writer QUALIFYING for us, with
additional words, the time of day he wanted us to clearly
understand that "evening" was, or had come.  Evening was
when the sun did set, when the sun went over the horizon, when
the sky could often be aflame with a red color.
     It would have been the cool of the day, when they brought to
Jesus perhaps dozens upon dozens of sick to be healed, and it is
written he healed many of them. You will find that before the
evening had come it was the Sabbath day, and yes, Jesus had
healed two that day, two we are told about, but obviously his BIG
HEALING drive did not begin until it was evening, when the sun
did set, and the whole town came out to Him.

     So far we have found two very plain verses connected with
the word "evening." Here is yet another one, but this time we
have to dig a little more and use the context, but it is there,
it is there.

     Matthew 20.  Let's start in verse.....well, first a little
understanding of how the Jews divided the daylight part of a day
will be helpful.  Remember Jesus once said, "Are there not twelve
hours in a day....." (John 11:9).  The Jews divided the daylight
portion of a 24 hour day into 12 equal parts, what we would call
an hour, so there were 12 hours from morning to evening or dawn
to sunset/dusk. and of course 12 hours from dusk to dawn. 
Generally those hours were thought of as from 6 a.m. to 6
p.m.(day) and 6 p.m. to 6 a.m.(night).  The Jews divided the
night into "watches."  6 p.m. to 9 p.m. was the first watch, 9
p.m. to midnight was the second watch, midnight to 3 a.m. was the
third watch, and 3 a.m. to 6 a.m. was the fourth watch.
     Back to Matthew 20.  A vineyard owner goes out early in the
morning, we are not told exactly how early, but we could guess at
around 6 or 7 o'clock in the morning. He hires persons to work in
the vineyard. Verse 3 tells us he goes out at the 3rd hour,
around 9 a.m. to hire more laborers. Verse 5, he goes out to hire
more laborers at the 6th hour - around 12 noon. Remember an hour
is an hour, not a second or a minute, so it was "around noon"
that he went out again.  Then about the 11th hour he goes out
once more to hire laborers to work in the vineyard(verse 6).
     I want to jump a few verses here to show you that it is
clearly told us that those who were hired at the 11th hour, did
work for ONE HOUR! Those who complained that they had worked all
day and the late comers only worked for ONE hour (for the same
reward) did state very plainly that the 11th hour workers DID
WORK for ONE hour (verses 9-12).
     So, it is quite simple, a child can do it, if you start to
work around the 11th hour and work for one hour, you finish
working around the 12th hour!  Simple arithmetic, no college
degree needed.
     The CONTEXT also clearly shows us that NONE of the laborers
GOT PAID  until AFTER the 11th hour workers had worked for one
hour, taking us to at least the 12th hour.  And that was the END
of the DAYLIGHT portion of the 24 hour day.  And so with that bit
of plain truth, we have what is written in verse eight!!
     " So when EVEN was come....." the owner of the vineyard
calls the hired laborers together to give them their wages for
their work of the day.
     EVENING is clearly not noon,  it is clearly not 2 p.m. nor
is it the 9th hour(3 p.m.), and it is also not the 11th hour
either!  Evening is AFTER the 12th hour, at the END of the
daylight portion of the 24 hour day.  They had worked during the
daylight hours of the day, the 12th hour came at the end of the
daylight, when the sun set over the horizon, when it would have
been difficult to see to work.  Evening THEN CAME, and the owner
was ready to pay them their wages.

     The Bible interprets the Bible, here evening was AFTER the
12th hour, for those called to work in the vineyard at the 11th
hour worked for one hour only, and then when evening had come
worked stopped and they were all going to be paid their wages.

     WE HAVE SEEN THREE EXAMPLES THAT CLEARLY,  
AS PLAIN AS THE NOSE ON YOUR FACE,  INTERPRET FOR US  
(we do not need Vine's Dictionary, Thayer's Greek Lexicon, or any Lexicon.  
We do not need " Word Meaning in the NT " by Ralph Earle or any other
fellow, we do not even need Strong's Concordance) WHAT THE WORD
"EVENING" MEANS AS USED BY THE WRITERS OF THE NT.
     You think it is all just too simple?  Not at all my friends!

     God has made sure that His word can be understood by those
with a child like mind, who will get all the scriptures together
on any subject and who will let the Bible interpret the Bible. It
is the so-called "educated" - the wise and the prudent, who often
have the most trouble reading and understanding the Bible.

                  A QUESTION WE NEED TO ASK

     The Lord has given us THREE witnesses, clear and plain
witnesses, as to the interpretation and meaning of the word
"evening" as used in the NT.  But we have other verses where that
word is used.  Our question must be then:  Is there another verse
that interprets "evening" to mean something, some time, OTHER
than at SUN-SET and after?  Is there a verse that says something
like, "At evening, at the 10th hour......"  or  "At evening, when
the sun was still high....."  Is there ANY verse that would put a
qualifying phrase with the word "evening" to show us that the NT
writers also thought of evening as SOMETIME BEFORE dusk, or when
the sun set over the horizon?
     Well go to it,  look at all the other verses in the NT where
the word "even" or "evening" is used.  Search the scriptures,
look them up!!
     
     You will find NOT ONE VERSE used by the NT writers where
they believed, taught, understood, interpreted, that "evening"
was ANYTHING OTHER than starting from at LEAST sun-set, dusk, the
time when the sun went down behind the horizon, and it was what
we often call twilight time, or dusk.  
     Letting the Bible interpret itself, we have NO CHOICE
(unless of course we are one of the wise and prudent, or just
want to hold to some pet doctrine come hell or high water) but to
see that the NT tells us that "evening" is not one bit earlier
than dusk or twilight, when the sun sets behind the horizon.

     There is not one verse in the NT that tells us: "You must
interpret "evening" by the Greek scholars to come" or "You must
interpret the NT use of "evening" by the Jewish Encyclopedias"
(The Jews reject the NT so how would they know how the NT uses
the word "evening" in any case).

     The word "evening" and how it is used by the NT writers is
interpreted for us by the very NT where the word is found.

                       A LATER EVENING

     We have seen that "evening" comes at sun-set, when the sun
drops down behind the horizon and the sky can often turn a
brilliant red color, when the 12th hour of the day has come and
work is stopped. So evening cannot in the NT (and this study is
dealing with the NT) be before about 6 p.m. (using the 12 hours
to a day, and basing it on the Jewish day clock) but it can be
later of course as sun-set can be after 6 p.m. So the context
tells us a possible close time frame. In the case of the vineyard
owner the context tells us that they were going on the Jewish
time clock of the daylight portion of a day, so we can know it
was evening in this case at around or shortly after 6 p.m. -
shortly after the 12th hour, when the 11th hour workers had
worked for an hour, and then all were paid their wages in the
"evening."  Unless there is a qualifying context such as in the
vineyard parable, "evening" must be understood as interpreted by
the other two scriptures we have seen, as being no sooner than
sun-set. It would take a qualifying phrase, or words within the
context (as in the vineyard parable) to make "evening" anything
other than sun-set, dusk.  Even the qualifying words found in the
vineyard parable, make it clear that evening did not come before
the 12th hour - before about 6 p.m. in that day the parable was
using. Of course if the sun sets at 5:15 because of the time of
the year, and we have no qualifying words in the context (as in
the vineyard parable) then evening in that context is sun-set, no
matter what time the hands on a man made clock show.

     But now in one passage we are going to find that the writers
of the NT thought it quite proper to think of "evening" as L   O 
N   G   E   R  than just twilight or dusk.  Twilight or dusk was
evening to them, yes, for sure, but sometime AFTER dusk could
ALSO be counted as "evening."  

     Let's turn to the gospel of Matthew and chapter 14.
 
     Many people from various cities had followed Jesus, there
was one particular multitude that He had compassion on and He
healed their sick (verses 13,14).  Then verse 15 says, "And when
it was evening......"  The Greek for "And when it was"  is one
word, and that word is in the Aorist tense. Now, the Aorist tense
is the expression of a momentary or transient single action in
past time. An example would be "he closed the door" (a single
action done in the past)  as opposed to "he is closing the door"
(a single action in the present).
     From what we have seen in our study so far, we would have to
understand this as no sooner than dusk, sun-set.  The action of
the sun going down over the horizon was a single action of that
time, and finished, the evening or dusk had come.  At that time
the disciples came to Jesus and notice what they said, which also
bears out that this evening was not early or late afternoon, but
evening or sun-set, they said, "...and the time is NOW PAST, send
the multitude away, that they may go into the villages, and buy
themselves victuals."
     Jesus had spent all day or all afternoon with them, healing
their sick, the day had moved on, the evening had now come, the
sun had set, it was dusk, and you can then imagine the disciples
concern. What would they all eat if Jesus did not send them away?
It would have only been very logical at that time of the day,
when the evening had come, to think about having these people go
away to eat their evening meal, especially as we are told there
were children present. So the logic in the context also shows
evening was indeed evening, not middle or late afternoon, but
evening.
     Christ did not send them away, but had them sit down and He
performed another miracle with the five loaves and two fish - He
fed them all with it, and still had twelve full baskets
remaining.  There were five thousand men and also women and
children, maybe 8 to 10 thousand altogether.  Please think now. 
From sitting down, to having twelve disciples  walk around or
have pass around baskets of food to perhaps 8 thousand persons or
more, to the time of eating the food, to the time of collecting
all the food that remained, HOW LONG DO YOU THINK IT WOULD TAKE? 
One hour, maybe two hours?   Well if we would say one hour and a
half, I think we would not be far out. Even if you want to go
with one hour, that's fine.
     After all this was done and finished, Jesus constrained His
disciples to get into a ship and go ahead of Him to the other
side (verse 22). He would send the multitudes away. Notice verse
23.  After the multitudes left Jesus went up into a mountain by
himself to pray. Then Matthew wrote, "....and when the EVENING
WAS COME He was there alone."   The Greek tense for "was come" is
the same as in verse 15, it is the Aorist tense.  Single action
in past time.  But did not Matthew already tell us that BEFORE
the five thousand plus people had been fed, that it was evening
ALREADY, that evening had come already?  Yes, he told us that in
verse 15.  But now he tells us that an evening had come that was
AFTER the feeding of the five thousand and after they had all
been sent away, and when Jesus went up into a mountain to pray by
Himself.  In other words to Matthew  the evening was  L  O  N  G 
E  R  than just the period that dusk, or twilight covers. To
Matthew evening could be on into the dark of night, for even if
you want to take only one hour for the five thousand to be fed,
by the time they all left and Jesus went into the mountain by
Himself to pray, it would have been DARK!!  Just no way around
it, by the time Christ was in the mountain it was dark but still
it was evening, as Matthew put it.
     So "evening" can be, within a certain context, used in the
NT as a time period that covers the beginning of dusk, sun-set,
and on into the dark, sometime after dusk.

     And why should we be shocked at that thought?  For we often
do the same thing to this very day. Say it is the time of the
year when the sun sets at 7 p.m. I may say to a friend(who has a
dog like I do), "I will meet you in the park to walk our dogs
this evening at sun-set."  Later on, say about 9 p.m. when it is
dark, I may meet someone else in the park and say to them, "It's
it a lovely evening."
     Now, if I was still walking the park at say 11 p.m. I would
probably say to the person above, "Isn't it a lovely night."     
     There is a time (not fixed by a man made hour and minute on
a clock) when we move from saying "evening" to saying "night." 
It's just something we do automatically.  We just have a
"feeling" for evening extending from sun-set into darkness for a
while, before it becomes night.  Matthew was simply exhibiting
this common feeling for "evening."  To him the events that
started at the first evening, dusk, and continued into the
mountain where Jesus went alone to pray, was still evening,
perhaps a few hours in total length of time.

            ANOTHER SURPRISE - EVENING BELONGING
                    TO THE PRECEDING DAY

     Let's read Mark 4:35,  " And the SAME DAY, when the EVEN WAS
COME, He said......"
     "What!!"  Many Sabbath observers will now be saying, "but
evening belongs to the next day, the day just starting or coming
when evening comes, at sun-set."  And they will be off to search
the Greek, or try to figure around what is said here. They will
do hand stand, jumps, cart-wheels, and many other things to the
word to make this verse NOT SAY what it SAYS!
     But this verse does say what it says, that evening had come
and it was still the same day as before!

     Notice John 20:19, "The SAME DAY, at EVENING, being the
FIRST DAY OF THE WEEK......."
     This is when Jesus came through the walls of the room where
the disciples were gathered together for fear of the Jews, and
showed Himself to them.  And it was done at EVENING on the first
day of the week. This was not Saturday night, they had not yet
gone to the tomb, and did not know Jesus was already resurrected
on Saturday night. This was Sunday EVENING!
     And there is no reason to jump to the idea that John was
using Roman time, when in others parts of his gospel he clearly
used Hebrew time.
     We have seen from our study that letting the NT and only the
NT, interpret the use and meaning of "evening" we have no choice
but to realize that when Jesus came to them it was at DUSK,
SUN-SET, Sunday evening, and John says that time frame still
belonged to the FIRST day of the week, not the second day.

     Twice we find in the NT that an "evening" can BELONG TO THE
SAME PRECEDING DAY!!

     Again, for you Sabbath keepers who are now doing Olympic
hand flips on the mat of the word of God, to try to say this
cannot be correct, just STOP for a moment, and think back to the
OT, and if you are Sabbath keepers that also observe the
Festivals of Lev.23, then THINK about that chapter for a second,
calm down, and try to remember a certain verse. yes, that verse
is Lev.23: 32.
     Ah, ah, indeed so, even(a pun intended) the OT uses at
times, that "evening" BELONGS to the day PRECEDING it!  In God
giving instructions as to WHEN to observe the Day of Atonement,
He had Moses write it:  ".....a sabbath of rest.....in the NINTH
day of the month AT EVEN, FROM EVEN TO EVEN, SHALL YOU CELEBRATE
YOUR SABBATH."
     They had already been told this Sabbath day of Atonement was
the 10th day of the seventh month (verse 27).  Yet in verse 32,
they are to begin to observe it from EVEN(evening) of not the
10th day, but the NINTH day.  The evening or dusk coming AFTER
the daylight portion of the ninth day was here still referred to
as BELONGING to the NINTH day.

     The Bible starts out with the EVENING coming first and being
a part of the first day of the creation week (Gen.1).  Generally
speaking and in the MAIN, this is the way to understand it,
evening belongs to the day it starts, BUT.....never forget it, or
you can end up doing big cart-wheels with the word of God, all to
NO AVAIL, the word of the Lord does at times put "evening" as
BELONGING TO THE PRECEDING DAY. It is so, and you should get used
to the idea, for if you do not you will not see the real truth of
the matter about the last day of Christ's physical life on this
earth.

     The KEYS in the use of this word "evening" in the NT we have
now seen. They are important keys to remember as we use those
keys to correctly understand the rest of the NT scriptures that
use this word "evening."
     The verses we have left I will now look at in the order they
are found in the Englishman's Greek Concordance.

             THE REST OF THE VERSES AND THE REST
                        OF THE STORY

Mark 11:19

     This is quite a straight-forward verse, the evening came and
He went out of the city.  The events preceding were during the
daylight hours of the day. Jesus had gone to Jerusalem and thrown
certain ones out of the Temple.  With what we have leant from
our study, when the sun had set over the horizon,  when evening
had come they left the city.

Mark 13:35

     Again nothing earth-shattering in this verse. The word
"evening" (in this case "even")  is part of a common language 
that we all use in various ways at various times in our
descriptive explanations of things.  Certainly "evening" is part
of our 24 hour day, as is midnight, or morning, and the farmers
among us may still use "the cockcrowing."

Matt.8:16

     Jesus did healing miracles on the Sabbath day, that's one
thing that really got the Pharisees red hot with anger. But Jesus
did not hold tent meeting healing revivals on the Sabbath. Most
of His healings of the multitudes was done on the other six days
of the week.
     It had been the Sabbath. Christ had been in Peter's house
and He had healed Peter's mother-in-law. As the sun was setting
over the horizon, as the last bright rays disappeared (Luke
4:31-40), as the "even was come" (the Greek word for "was come"
is the same as in many other places we are looking at, and it is
in the Aorist tense - had in one action taken place in the past).

     When it was dusk, and the Sabbath past, then Jesus held His
healing revival, and a great multitude was about Him.

Matt.26:20

     This was the time Christ had told two of His disciples to go
and prepare the Passover, when the day of unleavened bread had
arrived that the Jews killed the Passover on (this I have fully
explained in other studies on the Passover). It was the 14th
day of the first month - Nisan.  As shown in other studies the
13th day had come to an end. It was time to observe the Passover
in the beginning hours of the 14th day.  The two disciples did as
Jesus requested of them and made ready the Passover  (verse
17-19). Jesus sat down sometime later after the Passover was
prepared and it was "...when the even was come...."
     The words "was come" is the same Greek word as before in
most of these passages, and it is in the Aorist tense - an action
already done in past time.
     This particular evening had begun earlier when the two
disciples had gone forth to prepare the Passover, on the day that
the Jews killed the Passover - the 14th.  So the evening was
already come, and when Jesus came to sit with the twelve to
partake of the Passover  later,  after it was prepared, Matthew
says evening have come already in the past.
     This is where "evening" is   L  O  N  G  E  R  than dusk,
sun-set, twilight and that part of time that leads into darkness.

     From the study above, this is "evening" that stretches from
dusk to sometime in the early hours of darkness.

Matt.27:57

     " And when even was come, there came a rich man of Arimathea
named Joseph.....He went to Pilate and begged the body of
Jesus....."
     The words "was come" ....yes, you have it, the same as the
others above, and yes, the Greek is Aorist tense - action taken
place in the past.
     Letting the NT interpret the NT, letting the Bible interpret
the Bible, putting aside all pre-conceived ideas, teachings we
may have inherited, to one side, just going on what we have leant
from how the NT writers used the word "evening" - no more and no
less, the understanding of this verse is very clear.
     I have gone into great detail explaining it in an earlier
study, so I will not here repeat that detail. But by the time all
was done that afternoon of the 14th of Nisan, and no one was
going to come near the body of Jesus, for various reasons, not
the least that the Jews who wanted Christ dead before the Sabbath
of the 15th came, could not care one hoot what happened to Him
after He was dead. They sure were not interested in removing and
burying Him.  Also the flesh and blood family of Jesus were not
standing before Pilate to request His body, nor were any of the
close disciples of Jesus seeking His body.  By the time Joseph
realized all this, time had moved to "the evening."  It was
the evening and it was the "preparation" as other Gospel writers
record it( "And now when even was come, because it was
preparation, that is, before Sabbath"  Mark 15:42, original
Greek). 
     The sun had set, it was dusk, and it was evening that
BELONGED to the day of preparation. The Gospel writers used that
evening as belonging to the day that pre-ceded it, belonging to
the 14th day, the day of preparation for the coming 15th Sabbath
day, just as we have seen in our study above is used not only in
the NT but the OT as well.
     In the passage in Luke 23:50-56, the words connected with
Sabbath, "drew on," are in the Greek IMPERFECT tense.  This tense
is also PAST tense, not future tense. It is different from the
Aorist tense in that the Imperfect tense means an action comes in
the past and continues. Again I have fully explained this in
earlier studies on this topic. 
     Using the principle of Lev.23 and the evening coming after
the day of the ninth, but belonging to the ninth(verse 32), the
Gospel writers said it was the evening, but it was the evening of
the preparation day, the day of  the 14th. It would still be dusk
or sun-set, just as it was still dusk or sun-set of the ninth day
in Lev.23:32 when Israel was to observe the day of Atonement,
from that evening to the next evening, so they were then
observing the day of Atonement on the 10th day of the seventh
month (verse 27), and from even to even, but they started to
observe it the evening of the ninth day.
     Understanding this important use of the word "even" or
"evening" in the Bible from time to time, is one of the keys to
put all the verses in the NT on the death of Christ together so
it all fits and all makes a whole, without any contradictions
with the rest of the NT.
     Understanding the Greek tenses used can also be very
important at times. The problem with English is that it is
difficult if not impossible to express in one word some
of the Greek tenses, unless you translate the NT Greek in an
amplified type of English as the Amplified Bible does.  But then
the Amplified Bible does not give you all the Greek tenses in the
NT that's for sure. It was not really designed or published for
that ENTIRE service or purpose. The complete Greek tenses of
words used in the NT are found in such works as "The Analytical
Greek Lexicon" published by Zondervan.

     Joseph came to Pilate at sun-set, dusk, the evening of the
14th, the preparation day. By the time he had permission to have
the body of Christ, to walk to the hill, take it down and wrap it
in linen, and place it in the tomb that was nearby in a garden,
and the ladies followed all of this to see where the body was
laid, the Sabbath had and was continuing to come (imperfect
tense) just as Luke reported to us in his gospel, chapter 23.

Mark 6:47

     This is Mark's account of the same reporting that Matthew
did. We have covered this above.

Mark 11:11

     The same type of "evening" leaving from Jerusalem as He did
a day later from Jerusalem, that we covered above under Mark
11:19.

Mark 14:17

     Mark's account of it being the beginning of the 14th of
Nisan, the day they killed the Passover (verse 1), and two
disciples(the other gospels show) going forth to prepare
the Passover. Then Jesus with His twelve in THE EVENING eating
and observing the Passover meal.  This whole context showing that
the use of the word "evening" in the NT means evening, not
mid-afternoon or late-afternoon, but evening.

Mark 15:42

     The same as we have already seen above.  The evening had
come (Greek tense is Aorist). The evening belongs here to the day
pre-ceding it, the 14th day, so it is still preparation(the
Lev.23:32 principle), before Sabbath.

John 6:16

     Same here as in Matt.14:23 covered above.

                      IS THAT IT?

     Yes, friends, those are all the NT verses that use  the 
word "even" or "evening."  Put aside all the ideas of men, all
the Greek word dictionaries written by men, the Jews
interpretations who do not believe in the NT to begin with. Put
that all to one side, and the NT itself makes it clear as to how
it uses the words "even/evening."  Understand a few Greek tenses,
in a few passages, and everything just fits together like hand
and glove.

     The wonder of it all, O, the wonder of it all, as the old
hymn goes, but I'll changed the words here from, "that Jesus
loves me"(which He does) to "that the Spirit is still leading
into all truth" as Jesus said it would. It is indeed so doing for
those who will search the scriptures daily, be corrected and LOVE
the truth.

             ...................................

Written January 1998

Wednesday, April 17, 2024

PASSOVER— JESUS DIED ON WEDNESDAY AND RESURRECTED SATURDAY EVENING!

 

Jesus' Crucifixion on a Wednesday

Ancient Texts

CHRONOLOGY OF THE CRUCIFIXION AND RESURRECTION
ACCORDING TO ANCIENT TEXTS


by Blaine Newman (a minister of the Church of God, Seventh Day)



     In the Christian world today, the predominant view
concerning the chronology of Christ's last days, is that He
celebrated the Last Supper on Thursday evening, was arrested that
same night, crucified on Friday, and rose on Sunday morning. In
the early Church, however, one finds evidence of a widespread
view that Christ held His Last Supper on Tuesday evening. There
is also evidence, to a certain extent, that there were early
Christians who believed in a midweek crucifixion and a Saturday
....resurrection!

     To support the theory of a Tuesday night Last Supper
tradition, the earliest source where I have found evidence is the
"Didascalia Apostolorum," a church order which is supposed to
have been composed circa A.D. 200. It states:

"For while He was yet with us before He suffered as we were
eating the Passover with Him, He said to us, 'Today, in this
night, one of you will betray Me' And Judas came with the scribes
and with the priests of the people and betrayed our Lord Jesus.
And so in the night when the fourth day of the week drew on,
betrayed our Lord to them. But they made payment to Judas... on
the second day of the week ... For when we had eaten the Passover
on the third day of the week at even, we went forth to the Mount
of Olives, and in the night they seized our Lord Jesus." 1

     By the end of the third century a fast was celebrated on
Wednesday (until 3:00 p.m.) to commemorate Christ's arrest.
Victorinus, Bishop of Petau (martyred in A.D.304) explains:

"Now is manifested the reason of the truth why the fourth day is
called the Tetras, why we fast even to the ninth hour ... The man
Christ ... was taken prisoner by wicked hands, by a quarternion,
on account of the majesty of His works ... therefore, we make a
station or a supernumerary fast." 2

     Epiphanius, Bishop of Salamis (367-403 A.D.), says:

"Wednesday and Friday are days of fasting up to the ninth hour
because, as Wednesday began the Lord was arrested and on Friday
he was crucified." 3

     Even though at this time Friday was believed to be the day
of the crucifixion, Wednesday was still known as the day of
Christ's arrest. The early "Pseudopigraphal Book of Adam and Eve"
(composed approximately A.D.400) states the same. It says:

"Then the Word of God said to Adam: 'Adam, you have determined in
advance the days when sufferings will come upon me when I shall
have become flesh; for those days are Wednesday and Friday." 4

(The literal reading is actually the "fourth" instead of
"Wednesday" and "the preparation" in place of "Friday.")

     Another pseudepigraphal work called "The Narrative of
Joseph" (originally believed to have been composed in the fourth
century, but which copy we have only from the twelfth century)
states:

"Jesus also was taken on the third day before the Passover, in
evening. And on the following day, the fourth day of the week,
they brought Him at the ninth hour into the hall of Caiaphas." 5

     In most modern liturgical churches today, the reason for the
Wednesday fast is largely forgotten, however, the Wednesday, fast
is very much alive in Eastern Orthodox Churches. Even today in
the Coptic Church the reason for fasting on Wednesday echoes the
exact reason why the primitive Christian church fasted on
Wednesday. The Coptic Encyclopedia states:

"The Coptic Church ordains that Wednesday and Friday be observed
as fast days, the former being the day on which Jesus Christ was
condemned to be crucified, and the latter being the day on which
his crucifixion took place." 6

     Though the above quoted references show that a Friday
crucifixion was endorsed alongside a Tuesday last supper belief,
in the "Acts of Pilate" (a pseudepigraphal work originally
composed in the fourth century) a midweek crucifixion seems to be
indicated. According to the "Acts of Pilate," Karinus and
Leucius, two saints who were supposedly resurrected at the time
of Christ's resurrection, were reported to have been told by
Christ to stay at Jerusalem for three more days to complete the
observation of Passover. 7

     One Greek version says:

"Thereafter we went unto Jerusalem also and accomplished the
Passover." 

     One Latin version states: 

"For three davs only were allowed unto us who rose from the dead,
to keep the Passover of the Lord in Jerusalem with our kindred
(parents) that are living for a testimony of the resurrection of
Christ the Lord. And after three days, when we had kept the
Passover of the Lord, all they were caught up in the clouds which
had risen with us and were taken over Jordan and were no more
seen of my man." 8 

     Since Christ was killed on the preparation day of the
Passover, seven days of unleavened bread followed and then the
Passover festival was completed. The statement that only three
days were left to accomplish the Passover after Christ's
resurrection would indicate that Christ spent a full three days
and three nights in the grave, and not only parts of three days.
     Thus the Acts of Pilate seem to promote a midweek
crucifixion.
     If one assumes the Last Supper took place on a Tuesday
evening and Christ was crucified on a Wednesday, then Thursday
would have to be a Sabbath day, since the Scriptures state that
Christ was crucified on the preparation day before the Sabbath.
Luke 23:54 says, "And that day was the preparation, and the
Sabbath drew on." John 19:31 says, "The Jews therefore, because
it was the preparation, that the bodies should not remain upon
the cross on the Sabbath day, (for that Sabbath day was an high
day) besought Pilate that their legs might be broken and that
they might be taken away."

     Rabbi Samuel Lacks states, "The day of preparation (Greek
paraskeue) equals Friday or the day before a holiday." 9 
Since the day of preparation can mean a day before any holy day,
the preparation day Christ was crucified on could well have been
on a Wednesday and the Passover Sabbath on a weekday (i.e.,
Thursday). With this scenario, the Passover meal would have been
on a Tuesday. According to Leviticus 23:5-8 the fourteenth of the
first month is the day of the Passover meal and the day
following, the fifteenth, is a Passover Sabbath. It reads, "In
the fourteenth day of the first month at even is the Lord's
Passover. And on the fifteenth day of the same month is the feast
of unleavened bread unto the Lord. Seven days ye must eat
unleavened bread. In the first day ye shall have an holy
convocation: ye shall do no servile work therein."

     Therefore the Passover Sabbath could be on a weekday.
Christ died on the preparation day at the ninth hour (3:00 p.m.)
and was buried before sunset. If that day were a Wednesday, then
three full days and three full nights later would be Saturday at
3:00 p.m., or just before sunset.


(Though Jesus died somewhere around the middle of the afternoon,
see my study called "The Hour Jesus Died" - He was not put in the
tomb until AFTER the evening had arrived and AFTER the 15th day
Sabbath of the Feast on Unleavened Bread had begun. Thus it was
an evening burial and an evening resurrection - Saturday evening,
three days and three night later. Jesus was the "wave-sheaf" in
typology, and the Sadducees (not the Pharisees) cut the wave-
sheaf AFTER the weekly Sabbath during the Unleavened Bread feast.
It was cut the evening of the first day of the week. Jesus was
the first of the first-fruits. The resurrection of Christ was
typified then by the cutting of the first of the first-fruits of
the barley, to be prersented to God in a waving ceremony in the
Temple on the morning of the first day of the week. All of this I
expound in some detail in the last Gospel chapters of my "New
Testament Bible Story", as well as in Pentecost Feast studies -
Keith Hunt) 


     According to this chronology, Christ would have to be
resurrected on Saturday after 3:00 p.m., yet before sunset. He
would have been resurrected on the Sabbath day. 


(The full truth of the matter is that Jesus was not put into the
heart of the earth, the tomb, until AFTER the evening had
started (see my studies on "The NT use of the word 'evening'")
and the Sabbath of the 15th day had begun. See the last chapters
of the Gospels in "The New Testament Bible Story."
The resurrection was a FIRST DAY resurrection as God counts days,
evening to evening. Typology all fits - Christ the first of the
first-fruits, resurrected on the first day of the week - we call
Saturday evening. Pentecost, celebrated on Sunday, the first day
of the week, the Feast of the first ingathering, typology = the
saints, as we are called "first-fruits" to God in the book of
James. Jesus actually rested in the tomb on the Sabbath, and was
NOT raised from the dead until AFTER the Sabbath had ended.
Being a first day resurrection it made it relatively easy, over a 
period of a few hundred years, for the large body of Christians to 
adopt a Sunday as the Lord's day - Keith Hunt)


     This is evidently what some early Christians believed. In
the early Christian church there were many who believed that the
resurrection of Christ took place on the Sabbath, which is
Saturday, the seventh day of the week.


(Could well be true, but could well have been counting in Roman
time, meaning the evening of Saturday belonged to Saturday. We
have at least one recorded fact that this way was counted by
some. The Gospel of John - chapter 20:19 "The SAME DAY, AT
EVENING, BEING THE FIRST DAY OF THE WEEK .... JESUS CAME AND
STOOD IN THE MIDST OF THEM ..."
It is obvious here Roman time is being used - mid-night to mid-
night. The CONTEXT tells you clearly this was all happening on
the first day of the week - Keith Hunt)


     By the fifth century A.D., Easter Sunday celebrations of
Christ's resurrection were widespread in Christianity. However,
the Church historian Socrates (ca. 440 A.D) in a section of his
history entitled, "Differences of usage in regard to Easter,"
reveals that in the East there were Christians who celibrated
Easter on Sabbath instead of Sunday. He stated, "Others in the
East kept that feast on the Sabbath indeed." 10


(This could easily be explained if they were using mid-night to
mid-night, or Roman time. Then they would be including the
evening up to the hour of mid-night as the Sabbath, and knowing
Jesus rose in the evening of Saturday night, it would be for them
a Sabbath resurrection - Keith Hunt)


     Bishop Gregory of Tours (A.D.538-594) tells us that many in
France believed Christ arose on the seventh day of the week, even
though he himself defended a Sunday resurrection belief. He
stated, "Now in our belief the resurrection of the Lord was on
the first day, and not on the seventh as many deem." 11


(Again, depending what day recognizing they were all using could be
the samantic of time. Roman mid-night to mid-night would give you
a 7th day resurrection, but sunset to sunset, it would have been
a resurrection in the evening of the first day that Jesus rose
from the dead. And of course if some by this time were asserting
Jesus rose Sunday morning, then certainly it was a first day
resurrection - Keith Hunt)


     Alexander Ross (A.D.1590-1654) tells us the Armenians
believed in a Saturday resurrection, though he disagrees with
them. He stated:

"The Armenians taught ... that Christ rose from the dead on
the Sabbath day, whereas the Scripture tells us plainly that He
arose on the third day." 12

     Though the belief that Christ rose on the Sabbath has
appeared to be long forgotten and abandoned by most Christians
today, vestiges of this belief appear to have survived in an
indirect way through certain cerermonies in the eastern church.
For example, in the Coptic Church, on Holy Saturday "following
the ninth hour (i.e., 3:00 p.m.), the divine Liturgy is
celebrated." 13 

     As early as 400 A.D., both Socrates and Sozomen state that
in Egypt there was a Sabbath evening celebration of the
communion. I4 

     In the Nestorian Church in India the communion (Qurbana) is
still celebrated to this day at sunset on Holy Saturday in honor
of Christ's resurrection. Mar Aprem says, "On Holy Saturday it is
stated that Qurbana should be at sunset. Because it is believed
that Jesus rose from the tomb at that time." 15


(Ah, now are you noticing we are getting closer to the truth of
the matter. Some observing rites at SUNSET of the Sabbath. And a
Sabbath EVENING celebration of the communion in Egypt. Ah, some
had kept alive the fact that the resurrection of our Lord was
AFTER the Sabbath had ended and the evening of the first day of
the week had started, though if using mid-night to mid-night
recogning for the day, that evening would have been a Sabbath
evening. Either way, it is evident SOME were still keeping alive
the truth that Jesus was resurrected in the evening - Keith Hunt)


     Since Christ died at the ninth hour (3:00 p.m.) on the day
of preparation, and if this day was a Wednesday, then a full
three days and three nights later would bring one to 3:00 p.m.,
Saturday.
     Since Christ was buried before sunset, then Christ would
have been raised before sunset. The time of Christ's Saturday
resurrection would have been between 3:00 p.m. and sunset - no
later.

(Incorrect reasoning because of incorrect facts of what the
Gospels actually tell us. First is the "hour" Jesus died, it's
not as clear cut as saying 3 pm. But more important is what is
told us in all the accounts in the Gospels, what the Greek tenses
used mean, and what "evening" means as used in the NT. I go into
some depth on the study of "evening" in the NT and in the last
chapters of the Gospels in the "New Testament Bible Story."
Jesus was NOT put in the grave until AFTER the Sabbath had BEGUN,
and was NOT resurrected until AFTER THE WEEKLY SABBATH HAD
ENDED, in the period we call Saturday evening. It was a FIRST DAY
resurrection - Jesus was the FIRST of the first-fruits. The
saints are first-fruits, represented by the Feast of Pentecost on
the first day of the week. All the typology fits like hand in
glove - Keith Hunt)


FOOTNOTES

1.   

"Didascalia Apostolarum," (translated by R. High Connolly),      
Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1929,p.181. 

2.   

"The Writing of Quintus Sept. Flor. Tertullianus with the   
extant works of Victorinus and Commodianus," vol.3,    Edinburgh:
T & T Clark, 1895, pp. 388,389.

3.   

Annie Jaubert, "The Date of the Last Supper," N.Y., Alba House,
1965, p.77. 

4.   

Supra. n.3. p.79.

5.   


Ante-Nicene Fathers, Vol.8, Michigan. Wm. B. Eerdmans. 1956,
p.468.

6.   

The Coptic Encyclopedia, Vol.4, N.Y.: MacMillan Publishing
Company, 1991, p.1096.

7.   

Montague Rhodes James, "The Apocryphal Mew Testament." Oxford,
Clarendon Press, 1960, pp.142,143.

8.   

Ibid.

9.   

Samuel Tobias Lachs, "A Rabbinic Commentary of the New
Testament," New Jersey: Ktav Publishing House, Inc. 1987, 
p.437

10.

Nicene and Post Nicene Fathers, Vol.2, Michigan: Wm. B.
Eerdman's, 1952, p.131.

11.  

Gregory of Tours, "The History of the Franks." Vol.2,  (trans. by
D.M. Dalton), Oxford: Claendon Press, 1927, p.24.

12.  

Alexander Ross, "Pansebeia: or A View of All the Religions  of
the World," London, John Saywell, 1658, p.219.

13.  

upra, n. 6, p.1252.

14.  

"The Sabbath in Scripture and History," (ed. Kenneth A. Strand),
Washington D.C.: Review and Herald Publishing     Association,
1982, p.171.

15.  

Mar Aprem, "Sacraments of the Church of the East," India:   Mar
Narsai Press, 1978, p.112.

                              ..............

Entered on my Website February 2008

Note:

Take the time to study my last chapters of the Gospels in my "New
Testament Bible Story" and it will make plain all the
circumstances around the death of Jesus, and why He was not taken
down from the cross and put in the Tomb until AFTER the Sabbath
(15th of the first month) of the Feast of Unleavened Bread had
started. Hence Jesus was resurrected three days and three night
later, after 6 pm or evening had begun in the time frame we call
(using the Roman calendar) Saturday evening.

When you understand ALL the typology of Christ being the FIRST-
fruits, the wave sheaf of the first harvest, His followers being
first-fruits unto God, the Feast of Pentecost being on the FIRST
day of the week, then we can fully understand Jesus being raised
from the dead Saturday evening, going to be presented to the
Father on the morning of the First day of the week, as the wave
sheaf was being offered in the Temnple.

Yes, a first day (during the very first hours of the evening of
the first day) resurrection for Jesus, made it somewhat easy for
Satan the Devil, within the first two hundred years to start
deceiving most Christians into accepting a First day Lord's day
and a First day Easter Sunday, instead of the 7th Day Sabbath and
the Feast of Passover.

As Dr. Samuele Bacchiocchi shows in all his Church History studies
the majority of Christians also (within a few hundred years)
wanted to "get away from" just about anything that could be
called "Jewish." So it was as time went on that the popular
"church" eminating from the city of Rome, gained more and more
influence over the larger part of Christianity. By the time
Constantine gained the throne of Rome in the early 300s A.D.
Roman Christianity became the state religion over all the Roman
Empire. The word "catholic" means "universal" - so became the
Roman Catholic Religion. The secular Empire and the religious
Empire was then the Holy Roman Empire of history.

Keith Hunt

PASSOVER— FOOT-WASHING— ORDINANCE OR EXAMPLE #2

 

FOOTWASHING ORDINANCE OR EXAMPLE?
Part Two

Written 1987
by
Keith Hunt


                                    Doing What Christ Said

     But, some will say, maybe we don't have to do it as an
ordinance at a certain time, but didn't Christ command us,
"......ye also ought to wash one another's feet. For I have
given you an example that ye should do as I have done to you"?
     Christ certainly did say that. But what did He mean?

     He also said: "If your eye offends you, pluck it out." What
did He mean? Do we accept that statement as a literal command?
Rather, don't we seek to understand the meaning of the words?

     Paul wrote five times, "Greet one another with a holy kiss."
What did he mean?  Do Christians today accept this plain
statement as a command?

     James wrote, "Is any merry, let him sing Psalms." What did
he mean? Do all Christians sing Psalms every time they are merry?

     Few of us take these other statements as commands or
spiritual requirements - we try to let the Bible interpret the
Bible in order to understand what is meant by the words.
     We should do the same with John 13:15-17.

Keith answers:

     It is true that Jesus said things that are not to be taken
in a literal sense, such as: "If your eye offend you pluck it
out." The rest of the Bible shows us that God would not want us
to mutilate ourselves. Yes, Jesus spoke in parables that were not
always to be applied literally in every respect, but had hidden
spiritual meanings or lesson. On the other hand, Jesus often said
things that were not analogies or symbolisms,  but were plain
do's and commands and teachings. With no spiritual
interpretations needed. 
     Must we be constantly seeking to "understand the meaning of
the words"? Must we always think Jesus was giving us a hidden
secret spiritual meaning to all He said and taught? 
     I have met those who look for the meaning of Jesus' words,
"I will come again" and do not believe He meant what He said, do
not believe we should take those words literally at all. Others
do not believe Christ pre-existed as an Eternal being, and the
statements of Jesus that show He did, they seek to understand the
meaning of the words - some hidden spiritualization. And so it
could go on and on, no one really knowing what the words of the
Bible are meaning, not knowing if an instruction was an ordinance
for the Church or just a custom, or a one time event, or
something else that needs interpreting another way. 
     It really should be no wonder that we have hundreds of
differing Christian sects, who differ on just about everything
the Bible says.

     The Bible should indeed interpret the Bible WHERE there is a
NEED to interpret and understand the meaning of the words. And in
SOME cases  THERE MAY BE A DEEPER SPIRITUAL lesson that is being
conveyed by a physical "do this in remembrance of me" command, or
"I have given you an example that you should do as I have done to
you" teaching. 
     BUT, the hidden meaning to the literal do's does not nullify
the performing of the physical, but adds more import and meaning
to the commands. 
     The spiritual meaning that Paul gives us about the physical
act of baptism in Romans 6 does not mean we are exempt from doing
the literal act. It adds greater meaning and insight and more
proof as to why we need to continue to do the literal command as
given by Jesus in Mat.28:19.

     As we follow the literal commands and instructions of
Christ's words REGARDING OTHER WORDS AND COMMANDS that He spoke,
so we should do the same with John 13:14-17. There is nothing in
those words to indicate it was a custom of the time at the
Passover meal to wash feet. The words show it was something NEW
that Jesus was doing, and the instructions He gave are pretty
straight and easy to understand. He said He was setting an
EXAMPLE for them to do likewise.

     Paul's admonition to follow courteous customs of the day
such as, "Greet one another with a holy kiss" or as we in this
age may say, "Greet each other with a hand shake" is a statement
that by the words and the context is a setting FAR REMOVED from
the context and words of Jesus in John 13. 
     There is little in common with Paul's general salutation for
people to "Greet one another with a holy kiss" and Jesus'
commanding words. I may write to a group of God's children and
casually - in a gernal way admonish them to greet each other with
a hand shake. It is an expression to get them to see that we
should appreciate each other. Not that I expect they will always
forever, and at all times, greet each other, without missing
someone at some time, with a hand shake.
     So it was with James when he wrote: "Is any merry, let him
sing Psalms." This is a GENERAL statement to praise the Lord when
you are happy. Not that other types of songs are excluded from
being sung, but a spiritual mind set should always be with you
at all times.
     Now compare these statements by Paul and James with Jesus'
words of John 13:14-17. I believe there is a LARGE DIFFERENCE! 
First, there are many more words from Jesus, as if He wanted to
make sure His followers did not forget or misunderstand that He
meant what He said and said what He meant. Second, the EXAMPLE -
that which Jesus DID was done so His disciples WOULD DO LIKEWISE.
     I FIND THE WORDS OF COMMAND AND EXAMPLE OF INSTRUCTION VERY
PLAIN AND VERY SIMPLE IN JOHN 13:14-17.
     As a young child would find many other words of instruction
from Jesus easy to read and understand in other parts of the four
Gospels, so I believe these verses would be just as simple to
read and comprehend and follow by the same young child.

     It's time for more of us to be more childlike in our reading
and doing of the Eternal's word.

ACD:

     Christ was talking about much than a pan and a towel once a
year. He was giving His disciples an example of humble and
selfless service - showing the kind of attitude they ought to
have towards one another as a way of life - 365 days a year.
     In verse 17, He said: "If ye know these things, happy are ye
if ye do them."  THESE THINGS refer to a whole way of life - a
way of serving, giving, and sharing - a way He illustrated very
powerfully throughout His entire life, not only that night when
He washed the disciples' feet.
     Certainly it wasn't wrong to wash someone's feet. And it
isn't necessarily wrong for Christians to do it ceremonially - as
long as they don't consider themselves more righteous than those
who don't perform this ritual.
     What does count is for Christians to practice love and
service - to have a feetwashing attitude all the time as a way of
life.

Keith answers:

     We have already agreed that what Jesus was doing in the
physical act and example of foot washing was to illustrate to His
disciples the life long attitude they should have towards each
other in humbleness and service.
     While Christ's words, "If you know these things" could be
rightly applied to refer to a whole way of life - a way of
serving, giving, and sharing, those words must also apply to the
immediate context of "you also ought to wash one another's feet.
For I have given you an example, that you should do as I have
done to you."

     ACD acknowledge it's not wrong for Christians to wash feet
in a ceremony service, but caution such not to consider
themselves more righteous than those who do not perform that
ritual. Self-righteousness is always to be avoided by the child
of God, or thinking oneself better than another. On the other
hand the instruction from Jesus is that the child of God is to
"hunger and thirst after righteousness" and to "do and teach"
even the least commandment (Mat.5:6,19).
     Did not Peter say that Christ left "us an example, that you
should follow His steps" (1 Pet.2:21). Maybe those who do follow
the example of Jesus in all things, will be accused of trying to
be more righteous than those who do not. But as long as their
attitude is one of humility, they have nothing to fear by this
argument from those who wish to spiritualize away the teachings
of Christ.
     The same argument could be used by those who believe they
can baptize with just a few drops of water, as opposed to
complete immersion. they could say: "Certainly it isn't wrong to
baptize by complete immersion in a ritualistic ceremony, as long
as those who do so practice do not consider themselves more
righteous than those who do not perform this ritual, but use a
few drops of water.
     There are those who practice keeping the "Lord's Supper" as
they call it, FOUR times a year(the SDA church is one of them) as
opposed to those who teach it should be observed only ONCE a year
on the 14th of Nisan. Now the four times a year groups could
argue, "Certainly it's not wrong to keep the Passover just once a
year, as long as those who do it this way don't consider
themselves more righteous than those who keep it four times a
year."

     It's time to get from behind this wall of "we want to do and
believe what is pleasing to us" and realize God does have THE WAY
to live and worship Him. He does not give us the right to
determine HOW we shall worship or obey Him, but only WHETHER we
shall or shall not do it HIS WAY. Too many want to serve God
while they sing to Him the song "MY way" and have put aside the
example and attitude Jesus left us when He said to the Father
"not MY WILL be done but YOURS."

ACD:

     The focal point of the meaningful occasion of observing the
death of Christ is JESUS CHRIST and His total sacrifice for us.
Our minds and hearts should be focused on Him when we gather
together to take the bread and wine in remembrance of His death.
And in many respects the physical logistics of a feetwashing
ceremony can detract from the meaning and significance of this
New Testament memorial.

Keith answers:

     ACD want us to understand that the physical "foot washing
ceremony" has a greater meaning than just the act itself, namely
- the spiritual lesson that Jesus' followers are to serve each
other on a daily basis, yet with such a great meaning behind a
physical acts they teach, "the physical logistics of a
feetwashing ceremony can detract from the real meaning and
significance of the New Testament memorial."

     I find this to be somewhat contradictory. It is human nature
to forget, as the weeks and months go by, the real meaning behind
the ceremony of the bread and wine - what it represents to us for
our eternal salvation - and start to take sin and holiness and
why Christ had to die for us in a less than serious attitude. God
knew this was the way of human nature and made sure that once a
year through a very special ceremony we would be reminded of the
death of Jesus. 
     So also with the instruction we are given over and over
again in the NT to love and serve the children of the Father. It
is human nature to forget those teachings and develop a less than
serious attitude towards serving our Christian brother and
sister. Knowing this to be the case, our Lord instituted a
ceremony on the last Passover He partook of that would, each
year, be an annual reminder to His followers that they were to
serve each other in humility every day of their lives. 
     That annual reminder was a foot washing service to be
performed each year on the Passover evening.

     No doubt other arguments could be found as to why we do not
have to perform feet washing on the Passover evening, but what is
the bottom line?

                      Bottom Line

     Turn to Luke 17 and verse 5. The disciples wanted their
faith to be increased. Look at the lesson Jesus gave them as to
HOW to have MORE faith. Notice especially verse 10. 
     Let's suppose you could argue correctly that you did not
have to be a part of a foot washing ceremony - that it is NOT
commanded of God. So you busy yourself finding all the laws and
instructions from the Eternal that ARE commanded. You busy
yourself doing them all your Christian life, and then stand with
confidence before the Lord one day. You tell Him you've done ALL
the things COMMANDED, and you await His reply.
     What a SHOCK to hear Him say, "After you have done ALL
THINGS COMMANDED you, do you not know that I still consider you
an unprofitable servant, for you have ONLy done that which was
your DUTY TO DO. I expect my servants to DO MORE THAN JUST THEIR
DUTY!"

     I would rather be SAFE than  SORRY!!  If you have performed
foot washing and it was NOT required, what have you lost? 
Nothing!  You just increased your faith. If you did NOT perform
foot washing and it WAS required, what have you lost?

     Read again Luke 17:10 but this time also add Matthew
25:14-30.
                     ...................


PASSOVER— FOOT-WASHING—- ORDINANCE OR EXAMPLE #1

 

FOOTWASHING ORDINANCE OR EXAMPLE?
Part One


     In 1987 an article was published by ACD(Association for
Christian Development, WA) called "Footwashing - Ordinance or
Example?"  They put forth many arguments concerning this topic. I
answered them at the time. 
     Two of the main ministers of this organization at the time
was the founder Ken Westby and also the now late Dr. Charles
Dorothy. I was somewhat surprised at what I read in their article
because I had met both of them, even had a Feast of Tabernacles
with Dr. Dorothy present under their banner. I met and talked
with Charles Dorothy a lot over that Feast time. I really liked
him as a humble man. He was very down to earth, easy to dine and
relax with, and a very fine Flamenco Guitar player. He was also a
scholar of Hebrew and Greek.
     Dr. Dorothy had managed to show Ken Westby and the ACD that
they were wrong in their many years of teaching people that the
Feasts of the Lord were not to be observed. Now there was a
transition among them to return to observing the Festivals of
God as they had done when part of the old WCG. 
     I respected Ken Wesby for being willing to be corrected, for
realizing they had been wrong in that teaching, and a willingness
to change to the truth once more.
     So their article on "footwashing" was somewhat of a shock to
me. I felt it needed to be answered. I will now begin to present
to you their entire article as it was in 1987 and my answers to
their arguments. I have not had contact with the ACD and Ken
Westby for many years now. This old article I present to you with
my 1987 answers MAY NOT BE THEIR PRESENT STAND ON THE MATTER OF
FOOTWASHING!  I ask the reader to please keep that in mind. I
really do not know what their teaching is today on this part of
the Passover observance. But the article and my answers I hope
will be of service to those who are today questioning this
practice within the service of the memorial of our Lord's death.

ACD:

     On a solemn evening almost 2,000 years ago, a young teacher
took a basin of water and washed the feet of His twelve students.
And ever since there has been controversy over the meaning of
what He did.
     Was He simply teaching a lesson - illustrating a point? Or
did He intend for His followers down to this day to wash one
another's feet as a religious ordinance or ceremony?

                 Different Points of View

     That teacher, of course, was Jesus Christ. And Christians
down through the centuries have had different understandings of
the meaning of His washing the disciples' feet(recorded in John
13:1-17).
     Some have taken Jesus' example as an ordinance to be
performed by all believers for all time. They feel a foot washing
ceremony should accompany the taking of the bread and wine in
commemorating Christ's death. Some believe it should be done only
by the religious leaders.
     Another point of view is that Christ was not instituting a
ceremonial ordinance at all. Since the people of that day walked
dusty roads in open sandals, the washing of feet was part of
their daily routine. Christ was instructing His disciples to
serve one another throughout their lives, whether that required
performing even the most menial tasks like the washing of others'
dirty feet. Since people today wear shoes, walk on sidewalks, and
ride in cars, 20th century Christians should serve others in ways
more in keeping with our time and circumstances.
     Christ did not intend for the disciples to literally wash
one another's feet as a ceremony. Rather, He was simply giving
them a poignant example - as an object lesson of the attitude of
service they should have towards one another throughout the year.

Keith answers:

     I do take Jesus' example and words of instruction to mean
that Christ was instituting an ordinance to be performed by all
believers for all time. Certainly this ordinance is teaching the
lesson that God's children are to serve one another throughout
their lives.

ACD:

                   The First Feetwashing

     There can be no doubt that the washing of feet was a very
practical part of daily living in the time of Christ. People wore
open sandals and walked dusty and muddy roads - feet got dirty. A
good host would naturally provide water for his guests so they
could wash their feet and be refreshed. See Genesis 18:4; 19:2;
24:32; 1 Samuel 25:41; Luke 7:38, 44. Naturally, the washing of
feet was considered a menial job - a person would normally wash
his own feet, or a servant would wash them for him.
     The evening before His crucifixion, Christ gathered with His
disciples for a final meal (John 13:1-17). After supper Jesus did
something that shocked the disciples. He washed their feet. This
would be like the company president shining the shoes of his
employers. It just didn't make sense to the disciples for their
Master and Teacher to be washing their feet. Yet it taught a
lesson that they needed very much to learn.
     That very evening the disciples had argued about which of
them would be the greatest (Luke 22:24-27). Christ responded,
".......but he that is greatest among you, let him be as the
younger; and he that is chief, as he that doth serve."  And
Christ, in washing their feet, was illustrating in a very
powerful way the type of lives He wanted them to live - lives
characterized by service. As He served them, so they should serve
one another as a way of life.

Keith answers:

     The washing of feet referred to in the first paragraph above
was done when the visitor entered the home. The foot washing that
Jesus performed had nothing to do with the host foot washing of
his guests. First, Jesus was not gathering with His disciples
just for a "final meal" (Mat.26:1,2,17-20). It was during(Greek
of John 13:2) this Passover supper meal that Jesus performed the
foot washing service. Yes, this service of Jesus did illustrate
the type of lives He wanted them to live towards each other. We
believe Jesus knew that His disciples would need a yearly
reminder of this, just as they would need a yearly reminder of
what His death for them should mean in their lives. So He
instituted a new ordinance to accompany the New testament
Passover ordinance. An ordinance that is physical (foot washing)
to remind us annually of the more important life style of serving
our brother with humility.

ACD:

                     Not An Ordinance

     Jesus went on to explain to the disciples what He had done
to them. He said; "Ye call me master and Lord: and ye say well;
for so I am. If I then your Lord and Master, have washed your
feet; ye also ought to wash one another's feet. For I have given
you an example, that ye should do as I have done to you" (John
13: 13-15).

     Note that Jesus said nothing about WHEN or HOW they were to
wash one another's feet. And there is no record of the disciples
immediately taking up pans of water to wash feet. In fact, there
is no example anywhere in the New testament of feetwashing being
done as a ceremonial ritual.
     Paul, in giving the Corinthian Church the instructions which
Christ delivered to him (1 Cor.11:23), mentioned nothing about
feetwashing.
     Matthew, Mark, and Luke all omitted Christ's washing of feet
in their accounts of the Last Supper. Evidently not one of them
considered the incident to be an integral part of the bread and
wine memorial Jesus instituted that evening.
     Only John mentions it, and he was writing 60-70 years after
the event and 30-40 years after Matthew, Mark, and Luke had
written their accounts. John's Gospel records many of the
profound teachings of Christ about love and service (see John
13-17). Jesus' example of washing the disciples feet that night
fit in as a vivid illustration of the spiritual principle He was
teaching.
     There is simply no Biblical proof that the washing of the
feet was intended by Christ as an ordinance that should be done
by Christians today. Rather, His one-time example of feetwashing
illustrates the attitude that should characterize a Christain's
life 365 days a year.

Keith Answers:

     I strongly disagree with the statement "Jesus said nothing
about WHEN or HOW they were to wash one another's feet." The WHEN
is given by Jesus' example - at Passover. He could have performed
this foot washing on another day or on one of the other occasions
(there was more than one time they argued over who was the
greatest - see a Harmony of the Gospels book) when they disputed
among themselves as to who would be the chief. Jesus clearly
said, "I have GIVEN YOU AN EXAMPLE THAT YOU SHOULD DO AS I HAVE
DONE TO YOU."  The example was at Passover time. The HOW is
simply to wash THE FEET of one or more of Jesus' disciples. Does
God have to give us a text book on "How to wash feet" ?  I think
not!
     
     Because we cannot find another example in the NT of Passover
foot washing does not automatically nullify the example and
specific command Jesus gave us. Turn to Matthew 5:40,41. Can we
find anywhere in the NT a specific instance where a man was
sued at the law, his coat taken away and he gave also his cloak?
Finding no such happening, does that automatically "do away" with
this instruction from Jesus?  Can we find in the NT someone who
was compelled to go a mile and he went two mile?  Not finding
this happening does not annul the command of Jesus!
     Can we find in the NT where those commands and precepts are
repeated?  No we cannot!  But that fact does not make them void.
God does not HAVE to repeat Himself to make it true. Mankind may
have to do so, and have more than one witness, BUT GOD DOES NOT!
He is always true though every man be a liar.

     Concerning Paul writing to the Corinthians about things
Christ had delivered to him. Did Paul in his letter to them write
about ALL AND EVERYTHING that Jesus had taught him? I think not!
Paul was concerned with only TWO ASPECTS of the Passover service
in the main - the parts that were being perverted, and what had
been told to him were being done that should not be done, which
were: 1) Getting drunk on the wine. 2) Making a big meal out of
it and letting the poor go hungry.     
     He tells them the way it should be regards these two parts
of the Passover service. Presumably, they were not in error with
the foot washing part of the Passover. If they had only been in
error as to the taking of the wine, Paul would have only
corrected them on that. His letter is predominately a corrections
of SPECIFICS which were brought to his attention by another
party. The argument of silence is not one that I would like to
use when I face my Savior in the judgment.

     The argument of Matthew, Mark, and Luke not considering the
incident to be an integral part because they did not mention
it(the foot washing), reminds me of the Church of Christ minister
telling me that they kept the laws of God that could be found in
the NT. If they could not find a law repeated in the NT they did
not observe it. Or the group that told me they only followed a
point of instruction if it was repeated two or three times, for
the scripture said: "in the mouth of two or three witnesses shall
a thing be established." They forgot the context of the verse,
that it was for MAN within a court of law, and it was
to do with SIN or the DEATH penalty (Deut.17:6; Num.35:30;
Deut.19:15). God really does NOT HAVE to repeat Himself or be
backed up by anyone, He is God, and He is PERFECT, His word is
sure the first time out of His mouth. God is NOT DOUBLE
MINDED as man is (James 1:8,17).
     And there was the man who said to me he would only follow
the scriptures that Jesus had, and the four Gospels.

     Only MATTHEW mentions that Jesus would be "three days and
three nights in the heart of the earth."  Evidently Mark, Luke,
and John, did not find the ONLY SIGN that Jesus would give to His
Messiahship that important.
     John in his Gospel mentions many things that Matthew, Mark,
and Luke obviously did not find an important or intrinsic part of
the ministry of Jesus, if we use the same argument.
     The argument of this man only mentioning this, and that man
only mentioning that, and this was written by this man so many
years after this other man wrote, is an argument I have seen used
by many individuals and groups to "do away" with just about
any law, command or instruction that God or Jesus ever gave.

     The proof that the washing of feet was intended by Christ as
an ordinance that should be done by Christians TODAY, is found in
the CLEAR words of Jesus - so clear a child could understand: "If
I then, your Lord and Master, have washed your feet, YOU ALSO
SHOULD WASH ONE ANOTHER'S FEET. FOR I HAVE GIVEN YOU AN EXAMPLE,
THAT YOU SHOULD DO AS I HAVE DONE TO YOU.......IT YOU KNOW
THESE THINGS, HAPPY ARE YOU IF YOU DO THEM" (John 13:14-17).

To be continued...


PASSOVER— 1 CORINTHIANS 11: 20-34

 

                    PASSOVER
                    UNDERSTANDINGS
                   

              QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
                    ON 1 COR.11:20-34


Written April 1997
by 
Keith Hunt 



     It will take more than one study to cover all the things
that need to be examined in this section of scripture. So let's
begin.

     Verse 20 and the phrase "When you come together" is often
explained, depending who is doing the explaining, as ONCE a day,
ONCE a week, ONCE a month, THREE or FOUR times a year, and other
various times, many or few.
     How can we know HOW MANY TIMES a year we are to observe the
memorial of our Lord's death that this section of the letter to
the Corinthian church is giving instructions upon?
     First, we need to acknowledge that the NT Greek did have
words that it used elsewhere for out English words of "day" -
"week" - "every Sabbath" - "each month" - "every three months" -
"two memorials a year"  etc.
     It would have been very easy for the Holy Spirit to have
inspired Paul to use such language here, IF God has wanted to
tell us that the memorial of our Savior's death was to be
observed MORE THAN ONCE a year. This would have been an excellent
place in the NT to have so instructed us. But Paul did not use
any such language, or Greek phrases as above. Verse 20 by itself
CANNOT prove anything about how often to observe the NT symbols
of Christ's death.
     Yet, we are not left completely in the dark regarding the
answer to our question. The CONTEXT must be taken into
consideration. They were as Paul knew COMING TOGETHER!  They were
meeting together as a group of people, in ONE place. They were
from the context pretending to observe the death of Jesus. Oh,
they were doing it WRONG and with MANY errors involved that Paul
corrected them on, but they were claiming to observe the Lord's
death, and Paul was talking about the observance of the memorial
of the Lord's death. All I believe agree on that point.

     Paul within this context, in verse 23, gives us the key as
to how many times a day, week, month, or year, he expected them
to observe this memorial. He had received it RIGHT FROM THE LORD
HIMSELF,  and which he had at one time before this letter was
written, INSTRUCTED THEM upon. It was the NIGHT that Jesus was
betrayed that the NT symbols were introduced for the NT
remembrance of Christ's death.

     We have seen in our past studies that THAT NIGHT was the
Passover night of the 14th of the first month. At the VERY
BEGINNING of the 14th, NOT the end of the day but the START of
the day, the NIGHT of the 14th. We have seen that the Gospels(all
of them) make this truth VERY CLEAR! And we have seen from the
Gospels of Matthew, Mark, and Luke, that is was indeed the
PASSOVER meal, the Passover supper meal, that Jesus with His
disciples DID OBSERVE!  We have seen they DID PREPARE AND EAT
IT THAT NIGHT OF THE 14TH!
     We can search the NT from front to back and we shall never
find ANY scripture to say that the ONCE A YEAR observation of the
Passover/True Lamb of God, memorial service, was ever CHANGED
from once a year celebration to more than once a year. We
can see from the Gospels and from this passage we are studying,
that the SYMBOLS were changed, that Jesus indeed changed it from
a supper meal to a simple bread and wine and foot washing
service, BUT the time of day and how many times a year it was
to be observed was NEVER changed.
     Some will immediately cry out verse 26 and the phrase "For
as OFTEN as you eat....." and say it can be observed as often we
like to observe it.  Well I shall come to that verse later with
some in depth comments and we shall see from the Greek, that is
not what it means. But in our next study for that.

     Back to verse 20 through to 22.  They were indeed coming
together to observe the Lord's death. It is clear from these
verses they were MAKING A LARGE MEAL of it. And what a mess they
were making of even that fact. Some who had much were bringing
their own meal, some who had little or even nothing could not
bring anything, and those who had much WOULD NOT EVEN SHARE with
those who had nothing! So some went hungry. Then add injury to
insult, some were drinking so much wine that they were literally
GETTING DRUNK!  
     They were DOING, ACTING, literally in a wrong manner.  I
want you to remember this, for we shall come back to it when I
comment on verse 27,29, in connection with observing "unworthily"
which has caused some misunderstanding in the minds of too
many sincere Christians. I will cover that in our next study.

WERE THEY TO EAT THE LORD'S SUPPER?  IS THIS SERVICE CALLED "THE
LORD'S SUPPER"?

     Here we have two questions. Both of them need to be
answered.

     We need to note the phrase as it is in the KJV "this is not
to eat the Lord's supper."
     In the Greek/English INTERLINEAR  by  Berry it reads
literally as: "IT IS NOT LORD'S SUPPER TO EAT."

     The  NEW AMERICAN STANDARD BIBLE also gives a true
translation from the Greek: "Therefore when you meet together, IT
IS NOT TO EAT THE LORD'S SUPPER."

     VERY FEW have really seen what Paul was saying here in this
verse to them. They were making a SUPPER meal of the NT memorial
service of Christ's death. Jesus on the last night that He
partook of the Passover/True Lamb of God, memorial service
DID EAT A MEAL. It was the Passover meal supper - roast lamb,
unleavened bread and bitter herbs. During that meal Jesus
introduced the NT symbols of His broken body and shed blood for
the New Covenant service, as Paul points out to the church at
Corinth in the section we are now studying.
     It was a MEAL that Jesus did observe on that NIGHT, but it
is clear from the Gospels by what Christ DID and TAUGHT, and by
what Paul(who said he was taught and instructed by Jesus) had
delivered to them beforehand (verse 23), IT WAS NO LONGER
TO BE A MEAL!!  It was to be BREAD and the CUP.  Doing THIS was
showing or remembering the Lord's death till He come (verses
24-28).
     Those were NOW the TWO basic parts and symbols to this
remembrance NIGHT service of Christ's death, to be observed on
the NIGHT in which Jesus was betrayed (verse 23).
     IT WAS NOT TO BE A MEAL!!  Hence Paul said: "Coming together
therefore you into one place, it is not Lord's supper to eat"
(Greek/English Interlinear by Berry).

     To even get into this still more from a technical point of
view I will quote at length from the book by Fred Coulter THE
CHRISTIAN PASSOVER, pages 211-213.

     Quote:

     ".......Paul begins by correcting the Corinthians for their
heretical observance of the Christian Passover...........As we
shall see, one of the heresies which had taken root in the
Corinthian church was the practice of calling the NT Passover the
'Lord's Supper.' The Corinthians had apparently adopted the
practice of eating the OT Passover meal in conjunction with the
NT Passover!  This heresy is still with us to this day!  People
commonly call the Christian Passover the 'Lord's supper,'  and
there are those who still celebrate it with a meal. However, 
Paul strictly forbids both such practices in no uncertain
terms........'Therefore, when you come together into one place,
it is not to eat the Lord's supper!'  (1 Cor.11:20, author's
translation - FC). Can anything be clearer?.......If they
were not to come together to eat the Lord's supper, then the NT
Passover should not be called the 'Lord's Supper'!

     This fact is made abundantly clear in the Greek text. Paul
used the Greek negative adverb ouk to emphasize that they were
'not to eat the Lord's Supper.'  The word ouk denotes the
IMPOSSIBILITY of eating the Lord's supper!  Ouk is ' an objective
negative adverb denying the reality of an alleged fact '  (Arndt
& Gingrich, Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament).........

     Based upon this direct condemnation by the apostle Paul, the
NT Passover should never be called the ' Lord's Supper.'
............From the very tenor of Paul's rebuke, it is apparent
that this problem was not a minor misunderstanding. Paul's
writings are simple and plain. The NT Passover is not the Lord's
supper; therefore it should not be called the Lord's
Supper.............The NT Passover is not a meal. The NT
Passover is a solemn ceremony, not a festive meal..............To
end this gross misobservance, Paul made it clear that whatever
meals they desired to eat should be eaten at home before
assembling to partake of the NT Passover ceremony......(verse
22)..........Paul was not dealing with a single heresy, but
multiple heresies. In fact, the entire epistle of First
Corinthians addresses one heresy after another in Paul's attempt
to turn the Corinthians from these most unChristian
practices...........Jesus clearly nullified the observance of the
OT Passover with the introduction of the new symbols. The
footwashing and the new symbols of the unleavened bread and wine
have replaced the former paschal meal of the lamb and bitter
herbs. The ceremony and meaning were changed by Jesus Christ
Himself at His last Passover.  As the Son of God , He had the
authority to change it!  However the Passover day itself was not
changed. The Scriptures in both OT and NT show that it was and is
the 14th day of the 1st month............Paul had previously
taught the Corinthians the proper observance of the NT Passover,
but they apparently had decided that they could improve upon
those original instructions. The traditions of men are always
hailed as better than God's way. Heresy is always called an
'improvement'!  False doctrine is always touted as 'new
revelation.' .............Yes, the brethren at Corinth had been
taught the proper way to observe the NT Passover. Paul had
previously instructed them (1 Cor.11:23). They knew what was
right and good, but they were not doing it............As the
apostle James declared, ' Therefore, to the one who knows to do
good, and is not practicing it, TO HIM IT IS SIN ' (James 4:17,
author's translation - FC)............Can there be any higher
authority than the direct teachings of the Lord Jesus Christ? 
Absolutely not!..........."

     Fred Coulter then proceeds to quote Paul from verse 23-26.

     You will notice in those verses the phrase as it is in the
KJV, "in remembrance of me."  The Greek is even more SPECIFIC. 
There is the definite article "the" in the Greek.
It is: Tau as in tale. Eta as in obey. Nu as in no.  A three
letter word, that is translated MANY times in the NT as "the."

     So the Greek is: "....this do in THE remembrance of me." 
Then looking up the Greek word for "remembrance" in the
Analytical Greek Lexicon, page 24, we discover that the root to
this word means: remembrance; a commemoration; memorial.
     
     The OT Passover was actually God's true Lamb, that was slain
from the foundation of the world (in His Plan from the very
beginning). It was THE MEMORIAL of the death of the one who would
come to die for the sins of the whole world, for God so loved the
world, that He gave His only begotten Son, that whosoever
believes on Him should not perish, but have EVERLASTING LIFE!


     What a memorial!  It is THE MEMORIAL,  THE REMEMBRANCE 
NIGHT of the year.  No other night in the entire year is quite
like the NT PASSOVER NIGHT.  Let's never take it for granted. 
Let's observe it in the correct manner.  Let a man/woman EXAMINE
THEMSELVES and so let them eat of that bread and drink of that
cup(1 Cor.11:28).

     
              ..........................



PASSOVER— LESSONS IN GOSPEL OF JOHN #5

 

Passover Lessons from the Gospel of JOHN #5

Light, Truth, Commandments!

             
                                                      by

                                                Keith Hunt



     Chapter 11 is the great chapter on the truth of the
resurrection and the NT definition of "death" - you should be
able to find that truth if you really desire to.

     I'll skip over to chapter 12:23-26. We must in type die with
Christ. To bear fruit that is unto eternal life, we have to die
to the world, the way the world without God thinks and practices,
which in the main is thinking and doing without any regard to
God's Word or Commandments. If we love our own ways, love doing
"our own thing" - love our life, in a complete selfish way, we
shall loose it in the end. But he that hates to be like the
unconverted world, shall keep his life unto enteral life.
     Jesus is up front, He says if any man serves me, he must
follow me. Someone serving Christ will bring honor from the
Father to that person.

     The disciples of the Lord had light right in their midst. It
was a wonderful blessing. It was very close to the end as for
what Christ was to accomplish while in the flesh. People were
around Him, and still asking questions for obviously they were
confused about what Jesus was teaching - things like He had to be
lifted up and in so doing all men would be drawn unto Him, and
still asking "Who is this Son of man?" Jesus simply was not going
to get into a once more simple explanation, He'd done so many
times before. He focussed right in on walking in the light, and
believing in the light. Many times before He's told them that HE
was the light. And so He told them again that they needed to walk
in the light of truth He had given them for three and one half
years. He told them once more they needed to BELIEVE in the
light, in Himself, for many, though seeing many of the miracles
He had done STILL did NOT believe on Him (verses 27-37).

     We need to make sure we are willing to see the light of
Jesus' teachings. We need to be reading about that light. It's
all recorded for us in the Gospels. We need to be reading over
and over again in our lifetime, the GOSPELS! Some of the clearest
teachings of what it means to follow Christ is there in the
Gospels. And with a red-letter New Testament, you can see them in
bright red. As a child growing up there were many parts of the NT
that I found difficult to understand (many of the things Paul
wrote about are not that easy to understand, even the apostle
Peter mentions that in one of his epistles), but the words of
Christ I found pretty straight-forward. So from about the age of
9 and all through my teenage years I read and re-read the words
of Christ in the Gospels .... wow, more times than I can
remember, which is just a way of telling you, it was MANY times!
It was LIGHT, what Jesus had to say, and it kept me from much
darkness and sin, especially as I came into my teens, and saw
many of my fellow friends that I'd grown up with, going off onto
the wrong pathway of life, and bringing them troubles. I praise
God and I thank Him, that I had the light to read, I believed in
the light, and though not perfect (but trying hard) I was a child
of light. My teenage years went smooth and well and I was kept
from trouble, and from giving my parents sleepless night for
concern and worry over me. Parents who have had sleepless nights
because of concern about the way and the what that their
teenager/s were getting into, know exactly what I'm talking
about.
     Jesus was concerned for the people looking at and listening
to Him. He wanted them to walk in the light, especially while
they had the light living with them in the flesh - Himself
(verses 27-36).

     This LIGHT of Jesus' word is so important that He made it
clear HOW important it is in verses 46-50.

"I am come a light into the world, that whosoever believes on me
should not abide in darkness. And if amy man HEAR my words, and
believe not, I judge him not; for I came not to judge the world,
but to save the world. He that rejects me, and RECEIVES NOT my
words, has one that judges him; the word that I have spoken, the
same shall judge him in the last day. For I have not spoken of
myself; but the Father which sent me, He gave me a commandment,
what I should say, and what I should speak. And I know His
commandment is LIFE everlasting; whatsoever I speak therefore,
even as the Father said unto me, so I speak"

     When the rubber hits the road, the bottom line, the acid
test, is NOT what well-known preachers and Christian "book
writers" say; it's not what is the traditions or customs or
popular practices of the churches of "Christendom" that count.
They can tell you the moon is made of Swiss cheese, they can hand
out every false doctrine and custom by the cart load, and tell
you it is "the truth" (and you see around you as to what they all
differ on as to what they claim is truth). When the hot water has
boiled away, when you are going to have to put on the pot is the
truth of the WORDS of Christ, and that is ALL the Bible. You are
not going to be judged on the ideas of men or women. You are
going to have to make the effort to STUDY, SEARCH, HUNGER AND
THIRST FOR RIGHTEOUSNESS AND "THE" TRUTH. You are going to have
to take the time to "Study to show thyself approved unto God, a
workman that needs not be ashamed, that right cuts the word of
God" and "Prove all things, and hold fast to that which is
right." Those two teachings from the apostle Paul, need to become
part of your very makeup, branded into your mind. When it's all
said and done - it will be the WORD of God that will be your
judge. Do you want its teaching and its correction ABOVE ALL
THINGS that this physical life can give you, jobs, money,
notoriety, fame, acclaim of men, praise for work well done, a
PhD. You can have all that IF you neglect and push aside the
Bible and all IT says is the pure and straight was to go. We
still have our part to do, I said it before, we have to take
the time to study and study to know what the true theology is all
about!! It's the attitude that counts in the end. Do we have the
attitude, are we willing to put in the hours of in-depth study. I
can remember back in my middle 20s, late 30s and into my 40s, often
spending all day Bible studying, using Bible Dictionaries, Bible
Concordances, as well as trying to find the truth by collecting
all the verses on any particular topic of the Bible.  

     Chapter 13 is the "foot-washing" chapter - I've covered that
in detail under the Passover studies on this Website.

     Jesus gave a bench mark for being a true Christian: "A new
commandment I give unto you: That you love one another, as I have
loved you, that you also love one another. By this shall all men
know that you are my disciples, if you have love one to another"
(chapter 13:34-35).

     It is a very sad commentary that this does not always happen
within the true Church of God. I've experienced some pretty wild
and nasty goings on in some churches of God, a few I've related to
you on this Website. When I think about them it is shameful,
degrading, disgusting, and unworthy to wear the Christian name. I
have been witness to verbal arguments, slander, lies, and the
disfellowshipping of members and ministers, just because they
disagreed with what the "head man" was saying or doing. But then
such local or worldwide organizations had stopped being a "church
of God" and had become a religious "cult."
     The true disciples of Jesus will be the salt of the earth,
the little flock, the scattered ones, and they will have love one to
another.

     Chapter 14. We have some wonderful true verses in this
chapter.

     Jesus declares: "I am the WAY, the TRUTH, and the LIFE; no
man comes unto the Father, but by Me!" (verse 6).

     It makes no difference what the arguments are given about
how persons can be saved WITHOUT knowing about Christ, saved by
their conscience being good or bad, living according to their
societies standards, good or bad. All such arguments to try and
get around the truth of a resurrection to physical life of all
that never had a chance of salvation in their first life. Too
many people I've met over the years, seem to hate the teaching of
people being raised to life and having an opportunity for
salvation, before they think, they cry out, "Oh, the second
change teaching." They do not stop and think that billions of
people down through time have never had even a FIRST chance!
Jesus, is the ONLY way to eternal life, and not one person in all
history is going to be with the Father but through Christ, and
that truth is again repeated in Acts 4:12 and other parts of the
Gospels. You need to study my study called "The Great White
Throne Judgment."

     Jesus spoke about the Father over and over again in this
Gospel of John. The disciple Philip asked: "Lord, show us the
Father, and we'll be satisfied" (verse 8).
     Jesus answered, "Have I been so long a time with you, and
you have not known me, Philip? He that has seen me has seen the
Father; so why do you say then, 'Show us the Father.' Do you not
believe I am in the Father and the Father in me ... Believe me
that I am in the Father, and the Father is in me; if you have
trouble with this then believe what I say from the very works I
do" (verses 9-11, paraphrased myself).

     Friends, when you read the life of Christ as given in the
Gospels you are reading also about the life, the nature, the
character, of God the Father. Jesus had said earlier "The Father
and I are ONE!" Jesus in the flesh, mind and character, was
a carbon copy, a clone copy, of the Father. They are two SEPARATE
beings, Jesus now sits on the RIGHT HAND of the Father in heaven,
not on top of Him, or inside of Him, as some strange planet Pluto
teachings of the "trinity" expound to you. As you see Jesus in
the Gospels so you are seeing the Father, it's just that simple!

     Jesus now goes back to "commandment keeping" and says, "If
you love me, KEEP my commandments!" (verse 15). Have you ever
found in the Gospels where Jesus DID AWAY with ANY of the Ten
Commandments (and that includes the 4th one)? If you find that
passage let me know, from the age of 6 when I first started
reading the Bible, I've never found it. All I've ever found is
that Jesus MAGNIFIED and made them even more binding, getting
right to the "spirit" of the letter of those great ten
commandments. Just read Matthew 5,6,7, for clear open proof of
what I've just stated. If you love Jesus you will love His
commandments of the "spirit" of the law that He taught and
amplified, in His words and in His life.

                          .......................


To be continued