Death, Hell and Immortality
What the Bible teaches on the subject of what happens to us at death
From the book "Life and Immortality" by Basil Atkinson PhD Part Four The Grave " The last division of this section is perhaps the most important of all. When the Scriptures speak of death they often couple it with the grave. The significant original words are sh'ol in Hebrew and haidees in Greek. As they occur in the Bible they correspond exactly in meaning. Haidees was the word used in Greek mythology for the underworld or abode of the dead and it is quite likely as a result of this that so many have sought to retain this meaning for it in the New Testament and to transfer the meaning back to Hebrew sh'ol. The Greek word however the New Testament is as always governed by the meaning of the in Hebrew in the Old. Both mean in fact the abode of the dead, but not at all in the sense of heathen mythology. Hebrew sh'ol occurs sixty-five times in the Old Testament. It is translated 'grave' thirty-one times in the text and twice in the margin, three times and 'hell' thirty-one times. 'Grave' and 'hell' inconsistent translations and this fact shows that the translators were in some confusion over the meaning of the word. In the New Testament haidees occurs eleven times, ten times translated 'hell' with 'grave' once in the margin and 'grave' once with 'hell' in the in the margin. The translation 'hell' is confusing, especially in the New Testament. There is there a competing word geenna occurring eight times, seven times in the Gospels and once in the Epistle of James. It is invariably translated 'hell' and rightly so, as it refers to the lake of fire, the place of the doom of the lost.....Here we shall look carefully at the occurrences of sh ol and haidees and shall discover that their true meaning is 'the grave,' where the dead lie buried in the earth in deep unconscious- ness until the day of resurrection. The two words occur about forty-one times meaning 'the grave' without any special emphasis. Thus we have Jacob saying that he would join his son in the grave (Gen. 37. 35). Again he says that if Benjamin came to any harm it would bring him down to the grave (Gen.42. 38). The words of Jacob are repeated by Judah to Joseph (Gen. 44.29,31). In I Kings 2.6 and 9 David instructs his son Solomon not to let Joab go down to the grave in peace and to bring Shimei down to it with blood. In Isaiah 5. 14 the prophet speaks poetically of sh'ol (hell) enlarging itself and the people of the Lord going down into it. In Isaiah 14. 11 the pomp of the king of Babylon is brought down to the grave (sh'ol), and in verse 15 the king himself is brought down to it. The eight occurrences that we have had hitherto do not tell us whether we are to think of sh'ol as the grave or an underworld of ghosts, but here in the context of Isaiah 14. 15 we have 'the sides of the pit,' the kings lying in glory in their own tombs (ver. 18), 'thy grave' and 'the stones of the pit,' 'a carcase' (ver. 19), 'burial' (ver. 20). All this points strongly to 'the grave' where the dead lie buried as the meaning of sh'ol. In Isaiah 28. 15, 18 we find death and hell (sh'ol) as parallels. Our study of the words muth and maveth earlier in this section have shown us that death means the cessation of life, and unconscious sleep without remembrance and without the possibility of praising God. The parallelism here thus again tends to 'the grave' as the meaning of sh'ol. In Isaiah 38. 10 king Hezekiah says that he had thought that in his illness he would go to the gates of the grave (sh'ol). By itself this reference is inconclusive as to the meaning of sh'ol, but its connection with verse 18, we shall look at later, brings out the meaning well. In Ezekiel 31. 15, 16 and 17 there are three references to the king of Assyria, and the great kings with him going down to sh'ol. In verse 15 it is called 'the grave' and in verses 16 and 17 'hell' and described as 'the nether parts of the earth.' This means underneath the earth, where the dead lie buried. Few Bible-believing Christians will believe, as the heathen did, that there is a world of spirits or shades in 'the nether parts of the earth.' Ezekiel 32. 27 is a text that shows conclusively that sh'ol is the grave where the dead lie buried. It speaks of those who have gone down to hell (sh'ol) 'with their weapons of war: and they had laid their swords under their heads.' They are said to be lying there. These are the great warriors and generals buried with their weapons. The enormous capacity of sh'ol and death to devour men is mentioned by the prophet Habakkuk (2. 5). The passage couples sh'ol with death, but in isolation throws no light on the question of the nature of sh'ol. There is an important passage in Psalm 49. 14. The psalmist is encouraging the godly not to be afraid or envious of the wicked. Twice he says that man's fall has made him like the beasts that perish. Twice in verse 14 he mentions the grave (sh'ol). He says that men are laid in it like sheep. So sheep lie in sh'ol. This is proof positive that it cannot be a world of shades or spirits. There in the grave man's beauty consumes away, but on the resurrection morning the righteous will have dominion over the wicked. There is another reference in verse 15 which we shall deal with shortly. Another proof of the meaning of sh ol is found in Psalm 88. 3, where the psalmist Heman says that his life draws nigh to the grave (sh'ol). In verse 5 he compares himself to the slain that lie in the grave. The word here is kever meaning a tomb. To be in sh'ol is thus to be buried in a tomb. The 'pit' in verse 4 is Hebrew bor which we shall look at shortly. The psalmist Ethan in Psalm 89. 48 tells us that no man can prevent himself dying nor can he deliver his soul from sh'ol. In Psalm 141. 7 David says 'Our bones are scattered at the grave's mouth.' The grave here is sh'ol. It normally receives bones (not ghosts), but here they lie unburied. There are seven references in the book of Proverbs: I. 12; 5. 5; 7.27; 15. 11; 23. 14; 27.20; 30.16. The only one that needs comment is 15. 11. There we are told that sh'ol is before the Lord. If we are inclined to conclude from this fact that sh'ol is a place of departed spirits all of whom are known to the Lord, we are prevented from doing so by the addition to sh'ol of the word 'destruction.' The Lord knows all the living and all the dead as well. All will appear one day before His throne of judgment. In the book of Job there are six references, most of which are important. In Job 7. 9 Job tells us, 'As the cloud is consumed and vanisheth away; so he that goeth down to the grave (sh'ol) shall come up no more.' Thus the man that goes down to sh ≪ is like a vanishing cloud which disappears into nothing. This does not give the impression of a surviving spirit. Job also says that no one will come up from sh'ol. He does not mean to deny the final resurrection of which he himself elsewhere speaks. He means that the dead will never return to their houses and their old life, as the following verse shows. We have already noticed the important passage Job 14. 10-15. There is a reference in it to sh'ol (verse 13). It is a place in which man lies down and sleeps (verse 12). In Job 17. 13 Job again refers to sh'ol. It is a place of darkness, corruption and the worm (ver. 14). It is again mentioned in Job 17. 16 and translated 'the pit.' There in sh'ol men rest together in the dust. These references are proof positive that sh'ol means the grave. 'Departed spirits' do not rest in the dust. In Job 21. 13 there is what we might call a neutral reference. In isolation sh'ol might here be a lower world of ghosts or shades. We have however noted several passages in which sh'ol could not have this meaning, but must mean the grave. This shows how hasty conclusions from isolated texts can lead into error. All that Scripture says on a given subject must be taken together and compared. In Job 26. 6 there is a reference which is practically identical with that in Proverbs 15. 11. In Song of Solomon 8. 6 Solomon tells us that 'love is strong as death; jealousy is cruel as the grave.' For 'cruel' the Hebrew word means 'hard.' The king means that the grave goes on obstinately receiving men. When we come to the New Testament there are three references the Apocalypse which we should notice here. In Revelation 6. 8 we have death and haidees mentioned together, the reference probably being to Hosea 13. 14. A very interesting and informative reference in Revelation 20. 13. The verse is speaking of the general resurrection and makes a significant distinction between the dead in the sea, in death and in haidees. Now if haidees were a world of 'departed spirits' or shades, all the dead would be there, whatever the circumstances of their death, but we see from this verse that this is not so. It easy to understand how the dead can be in the sea, but what is the difference between death and haidees? It is quite easy to understand if we remember that, as so many occurrences of sh'ol have shown, sh'ol (haidees) is the grave where the dead lie buried. Obviously it is different from the sea. Death therefore, in this verse the abode or condition of those dead neither in the sea nor buried in the grave, must refer to those who are burnt, blown to bits or eaten by wild beasts etc. The purpose of this threefold distinction in this verse is to emphasize that ALL the dead, whatever their condition or position, will rise in the resurrection on the day of judgment. In the next verse (Revelation 20. 14) we find death and haidees cast into the lake of fire. This means that at the end of the world they are consigned to final and utter destruction and will never appear or function again. Rest in the Grave Before we go on to look at certain uses of sh'ol and haidees which show emphases there are three points which it would be well to We sometimes hear the phrase spoken of someone who has 'He has passed to his rest.' This phrase is unscriptural if we take it to mean rest in heaven or paradise, but it is quite Scriptural if take it to mean in the grave. The word 'rest' is used of the grave in Job 3. 17, 18. In that chapter (verses 11-19) Job asks why he did not die at birth. Had he done so, he would have lain still, been quiet, slept and been at rest (ver. 13). There is no world of living ghosts here. He would have been as unconscious as an unformed foetus born untimely (ver. 16). There in death or in sh'ol 'the wicked cease from troubling; and there the weary be at rest' (ver. 17). 'There the prisoners rest together; they hear not the voice of the oppressor.' So that death and the grave can come as a relief to sufferers such as Job was. How could these inspired words of Job be true if the spirits of the ungodly are suffering in hell after their death? All Men together in the Grave It is important to notice that in no reference to sh'ol is any distinction made between the godly and the ungodly. Sometimes the one are spoken of and sometimes the other. All are together in the grave. Efforts to overcome what is a difficulty to those who believe in survival have resulted in such theories as that of two divisions in sh'ol or haidees. Even paradise has been placed in haidees. For such theories there is no biblical foundation whatever. But if we understand that haidees is the grave, all difficulty vanishes. There is no distinction between the godly and ungodly in death. The great difference comes in resurrection. The Ancient Creeds All who know the Apostles' Creed and the Nicene Creed will realize that they follow Scripture in omitting reference to survival after death and emphasising 'the resurrection of the body, and the life everlasting' and 'the resurrection of the dead, and the life of the world to come.' Various theories have been built on the statement in the Apostles' Greed of Christ that 'He descended into hell,' which is commonly connected with the idea of the survival of His soul or spirit while His body lay in the tomb. In fact this statement was originally an alternative to the statement that He was buried. The latter was the usual expression. The former appeared in the Creed as used in a few churches. When the superstitious ages began to set in, the descent into hell was completely misunderstood and the statement was combined with that of the burial. The fact that it originally meant the same thing is confirmed by its absence from the Nicene Creed, the two Creeds being parallel in their phraseology. In the same way the phrase 'the communion of saints' is sometimes taken to imply an active fellowship between the church on earth and the 'departed' in heaven. Again the absence of this phrase or its equivalent in the Nicene Creed shows that it is a part of the preceding phrase. It is simply a definition of 'the holy catholic church.' Passing Alive into Sh'ol There are two passages in Scripture which speak of men going down quick, that is, alive, into sh'ol. They are (1). Numbers 16. 30-34. Moses declares that the proof that Korah, Dathan and Abiram had provoked the Lord would be their descent alive into sh'ol. In the sense in which many understand sh'ol, a land of living spirits, everyone descends alive into it. But it is obvious from this passage that to do so is a strange and exceptional thing. Immediately the ground split beneath them and swallowed them up and they went down alive into sh'ol (translated 'the pit') and the earth closed over them. This shows conclusively that sh'ol is the grave where the bodies of the dead lie buried under the earth. (2). Another passage is to be found in Psalm 55. 15, where David prays that his enemies may go down alive into sh'ol The Depth of Sh'ol There are nine passages in which the DEPTH of sh'ol is emphasised. It is down below us. Few would believe today that there is a world of living ghosts below the surface of the earth, but it is exactly there that the dead lie buried. Some of these passages contrast the depth of sh'ol with the height of heaven (or the sky, there being no distinction between the two in the language of the Bible)............. Sh'ol and the Resurrection There are twelve passages in which sh'ol and haidees appear in special connection with resurrection. We shall be dealing with these in detail in our next section and will only touch on them briefly here. (1). 1 Samuel 2. 6: Here Hannah in inspired language tells us that the Lord brings men down to sh'ol and brings them up in resurrection. (2. and 3). Hosea 13. 14 (twice). This is the prophet's great prediction of victory in resurrection over the grave. (4). Psalm 16. 10. This is David's prediction of the resurrection of Christ. We discussed this when dealing with the soul (Hebrew nephesh) . (5). Psalm 30. 3. This is not a direct reference to resurrection, but to prevention from descending into the grave, as the second part of the verse shows. (6). Psalm 49.15. This is a prediction of resurrection. (7). Psalm 86. 13. The meaning is the same as that of No. 5. (8). Matthew 16. 18. This is the saying of the Lord Jesus that the gates of 'hell' shall not prevail His church. Very many believe this to be a declaration that Satan will never overcome the church. But 'hell' is never used in sense for the devil in Scripture. The word is 'haidees' meaning ' the grave' and the saying is a promise of resurrection for every true believer. (9 and 10). Acts 2. 27, 31. Here we have the apostle Peter's quotation from the sixteenth Psalm, which is a prophecy of the resurrection of Christ. We dealt with the passage when we were studying the Hebrew word nephesh, when we found that 'my soul' means 'me.' Haidees here as elsewhere means 'the grave' where the Lord Jesus was lying. (11). 1 Corinthians 15. 55. It is customary now for Greek editors to substitute thanate meaning 'death' in this passage for haidees meaning 'the grave,' but judgment on literary grounds might well appear to favour the latter. The passage is adapted by the apostle from Hosea 13. 14. If haidees is the right reading, it means 'he grave,' as it is defeated by the resurrection of the righteous. No one doubts the meaning in this case, but perhaps few realize that the Greek word is the same as is often confusedly translated 'hell.' (12). Revelation 1.18. Here we find the risen Christ declaring, 'I have the keys of death and of hell.' 'Hell' here is haidees, meaning 'the grave.' There are no keys of hell, if we confine the meaning, as we should do, to the lake of fire, the place of destruction of the lost. No one will ever come out of it. The Lord's words here mean that He will open the doors of death and the grave and bring His people out of them in a glorious resurrection. The Sorrows of Sh'ol There are two passages which speak of the sorrows or pains of sh'ol. These are to be found in 2 Samuel 22.6 and Psalm 18.5, two recensions of the same psalm of David, where speaking in the name of Christ he says, 'The sorrows of hell (sh'ol) compassed me about: the snares of death prevented me.' Misled by the translation 'hell' and by the idea of hell as a place of eternal torment, many have supposed that the psalmist was speaking of the torments of hell. However, had he experienced them, he would not have been alive in this world to say so. These sorrows and pains are those that accompany dying. They came in acute measure to the Lord Jesus Christ on the cross. The same is true of verse 3 of the anonymous Psalm 116: 'the sorrows of death compassed me, and the pains of hell gat hold upon me.' Figurative Language about Sh'ol There are three passages in Scripture in which figurative, allegorical or poetic language is used about sh'ol and one in which the word itself is used in a figurative though easily intelligible sense. As we approach these passages, we must bear in mind the consistent and unmistakable language of Scripture about sh'ol, which describes it as the grave where the dead lie buried in the dust in profound and unconscious sleep. Our first passage is Isaiah 14. 9-20. The prophet is addressing the great king of Babylon (ver. 4). When the king comes down to the grave, the kings and leaders are pictured as rising from their thrones on which they were seated in the grave and taunting him with his weakness. The impossibility of this passage being literal is proved by the fact that, if the kings were 'departed spirits' in sh'ol, the last thing that they would be doing would be sitting upon thrones. In verse 11 the actual state of the great king in the grave is described: 'the worm is spread under thee, and the worms cover thee.' Again in verses 18 and 20 we read that all the kings lie in magnificent tombs and are buried. This is the real state of things. Of the king of Babylon it is said (ver. 19, 20) that he is cast out of his grave like a carcase trodden under foot and will not be joined with the rest in burial. This language does not fit 'departed spirits,' but it fits the buried dead. Similarly in Ezekiel 32. 21 we find 'the strong among the mighty' speaking to Pharaoh 'out of the midst of hell' (sh'ol, the grave). In verse 31 the prophet says that when Pharaoh sees them there he is comforted over his own fate. This means that the sight and memory of great kings of bygone days dead and buried bring a message to Pharaoh and he is less troubled when he approaches defeat and death at the thought of them. Jonah 2. 2 needs to be mentioned at this point. Jonah called to the Lord when he was inside the fish. He says, 'out of the belly of hell (sh'ol) cried I.' He here confuses intentionally in a poetic phrase the grave in which men are normally buried and the inside of the fish in which he himself was at the time buried. He emphasises his burial and his helplessness by comparing his position to one buried in the grave. He was not actually in sh'ol, but he was in a place which in many respects was like it. The phrase also carries the meaning that the place in which he was was as terrible as sh'ol.........." Basil Atkinson next tries to answer the questions about Lazarus and the Rich Man parable found in Luke 16. His effort is commendable, but serves little justice and help in the overall subject of what the Bible teaches on death, hell, and resurrection. I have covered this parable of Jesus' in a separate in-depth study. I ask the reader and searcher for truth to study my article (Keith Hunt). Atkinson continues: The Silence of the Grave " There are four passages which speak of the absence of praise, the silence and the lack of activity in sh'ol. The first is Hezekiah's utterance in his beautiful inspired song of thanksgiving (Isaiah 38. 18). We have already noticed this passage in which death is spoken of as well as sh'ol. Hezekiah says that the grave (sh'ol) cannot praise the Lord. In Psalm 6. 5 David says the same thing: 'in the grave (sh'ol) who shall give thee thanks?' Here too sh'ol is joined with 'death' and we have already noticed the passage. The third passage shows us sh'ol as a place of silence: 'Let the wicked be ashamed, and let them be silent in the grave (sh'ol)' (Psalm 31. 17). Finally we find absence of activity and consciousness in the grave (sh'ol): 'there is no work, nor device, nor knowledge, nor wisdom, in the grave, whither thou goest' (Ecclesiastes 9. 10). Sh'ol used for Second Death There are three passages in the Old Testament where it is possible that the word sh'ol is used for the second death. There is no Hebrew word in the Old Testament corresponding to the New Testament geenna meaning 'hell,' the place of the destruction of the lost, so that it is possible that sh'ol could be used to express it, although we know from Revelation 20. 14 that haidees (sh'ol) will itself be destroyed in the lake of fire. The passages are Psalm 9. 17; 31. 17; Job 24. 19........ The Pit In a few instances the Hebrew word bor translated 'the pit' is used as the equivalent of sh'ol. The passages are Isaiah 14. 15, 19; 38. 18; Ezekiel 26. 20 (twice); 31. 14, 16; 32. 18, 23, 24, 25, 29, 30; Zechariah 9. 11; Psalm 28. 1; 30. 3; 88. 4; 143. 7; Proverbs 1. 12; 28. 17. The only two passages that need comment are Zechariah 9. 11 and Proverbs 1. 12. In the former the pit without water is sh'ol, the grave. The prisoners are the godly dead, whose Lord ('thy prisoners') has the keys of the grave (Rev. 1. 18). With these keys He opens the pit and sends out the prisoners as a result of His blood-shedding by which He made a covenant with them (Matthew 26. 28). In Proverbs 1. 12 the thief compares the damage that he intends to do to his victims to their consumption by sh'ol, which he identifies with the pit. The pit of destruction in Psalm 55. 23 and the pit in Psalm 69. 15 are the same thing, but the Hebrew word here is b'er, which means literally a well, not bor, a water cistern, or pit. Conclusion Our study of the Hebrew words for 'death' and 'the grave' with their Greek New Testament equivalents and their usage has shown us that men lie asleep in death till they are raised at the last day and that the grave (sh'ol, haidees) is a place of darkness and silence where there is no activity, no remembrance of God and no praise of Him........ We can but conclude that natural immortality, what is called 'the immortality of the soul,' does not exist, and we are prepared to go on to our third section and examine the glorious victory over death by which God brings His children home to Him in eternal life. Death thus emerges as the deprivation of life, the 'enemy' of mankind (1 Corinthians 15. 26), the first instalment of the penalty of Sin, a deprivation that would have been permanent and final, as it is in the case of the beasts, were it not turned into sleep by the assured hope of resurrection. Only once in the Old Testament do we find poor suffering Job speaking of the grave as a relief, where 'he wicked cease from troubling' and 'the weary be at rest' and his utterance is matched by that of the Holy Spirit in Revelation 14. 13, telling us that the blessed dead rest from their labours. This rest is not in a life of activity in glory, but temporarily in the grave. We may strengthen this conclusion by referring to the following Hebrew and Greek words used on occasion to describe death. We need not burden the reader with full quotations, but urge all those who are interested or who may still doubt our conclusions to look up the occurrences of the words in a concordance: (1). shaghath, translated. variously 'pit,' 'corruption,' 'ditch,' 'destruction,' 'grave' and used eight times directly of death. (2). shoah, translated 'desolation,' 'storm,' 'wasteness,' 'destruction,' 'to destroy,' 'desolate' and referring once directly to death in Psalm 63. 9. (3). sho, translated 'destructions' and referring to death in Psalm 35. 17. (4) mashghith, translated 'destroy,' 'corruption,' 'trap,' 'destroying,' 'utterly' (marg. 'to destruction'), 'destruction' and referring several times to death. (5). ed, translated 'calamity' and 'destruction.' (6). avaddon, translated 'destruction,' used with reference to death and sh'ol. (7). avaddoh, translated 'destruction' and connected with sh'ol in Proverbs 27. 20. (8). apoleia, the Greek word meaning 'destruction,' used once of death in Acts 25. 16, though the reading is doubtful. (9). olethros, a second Greek word meaning 'destruction' used once with the probable reference to physical death in 1 Corinthians 5. 5. The usage of the following verbs will strengthen the case still further: (1). avad, meaning 'to destroy,' 'perish,' 'be lost,' used directly of death some thirty-nine times. (2). gharam, meaning to devote or utterly destroy, used some twenty-three times directly of death. (3). saphah, meaning to consume, used directly of death seven and perhaps eight times. (4). shaghath, meaning to destroy, and used five times directly of death. (5). shamad, meaning to destroy and used eighteen times directly of death. (6). apollumi, the Greek word meaning to destroy, perish or be lost, corresponding to Hebrew avad (see Revelation 9. 11), used about twenty-eight times directly of death. (7). exolothreuo, a strong word meaning to destroy utterly, used of death in Acts 3. 23 in quotation from Leviticus 23. 29. In all the occurrences of these words whether in the Old Testament or the New there is no hint that death as we know it means anything but destruction in the sense in which we speak of an animal being destroyed........" Basil Atkinson, while a short mention of Elijah and Moses appearing with Christ on the mount of transfiguration, does not attempt any real depth explanation of the event. This I do in a separate study, to which I refer the reader (Keith Hunt). With this we conclude up to about half the book written by Atkinson. We shall put most of the second half of the book under two separate studies. One will be called "The Resurrection" and the other "The Doom of the Lost." ...................................... Complied August 2000 |
No comments:
Post a Comment