What does the Future Hold?
Going through Marvin Pate's book #3
WHAT DOES THE FUTURE HOLD? Part Three From the book by Marvin Pate: Pate has told us that the Jewish view was basically a two-part age. The first from Adam with Satan sin and wickedness; the second age from the time of the Messiah coming in glory to rule the nations of the earth, with peace, judgment, and righteousness - the kingdom of men giving way to the kingdom of God, which will be the age to come. But as Pate says, Jesus the Messiah "tweaked" the Jewish view of the two ages. His first coming started the Kingdom of God in the hearts and minds of individuals, so a present Kingdom in a spiritual base. Satan is already being put down, his power is already being shown to be weak by those who accept Jesus as Savior, Lord, and King. This will continue until Jesus does come in glory and might to indeed rule all nations, and bring a literal Kingdom of God on earth, under the Messiah's reign for 1,000 years. Fundamental Christianity does focus on the NOT YET age to come, and those people are called PRE-millennium. Certainly those who have read my website for any length of time, will see very clearly that I would be calssified among the PRE-millennium teachers. BUT, and it is a big "but" among the pre-millennium school of teachers, for there are 3 or 4 thoughts, or really "teachings" about the end days and the return of Christ. Before we get to the 3 or 4 teachings of HOW the end times will play out, which will include how and when Jesus returns, we need to note the OVERALL pre-millennium view. 1. Jesus will return suddenly. 2. The resurrection of deceased believers and the instant change of the believers alive on earth - both made into immortal glory. 3. The judgent of God on the nations of the earth. 4. The dawn of the Messianic Kingdom. 5. A new age in which even physical nature of animals like the lion, will be changed so the lion will eat straw like the ox. 6. The ned of the 1,000 year reign of Christ to hand over the Kingdomn to the Father. 7. A general resurrection of people back to physical life at the end of the 1,000 years. 8. The final defeat of sinners and Satan and the demons. The defeat of death itself. Those are the basic teachings that all pre-millennium teachers hold. As Pate says Revelation 20 gives the outline of the coming of Christ and the 1,000 year reign. There are as Pate shows agruments by people other than literal pre-millennium teachers, they spiritualize away all kinds of verses that need to be taken as literal. Then again "spiritualization" could be done with all the Bible, and so nothing is then literal. We have seen that Origin was the master of spiritual- ization, hence the Bible says what you want it to say according to your particular thoughts on theology. Pate answers some of the spiritualization" arguments in his book. I will not do so here as it is really pointless in this particular study. Revelation 19 and 20 mean what they say and say what they mean. The Bible should be taken literally except where symbols, parables, personification, and the like are used. Any other way to read the Bible would indeed make for hundreds of different views, and that is one reason as to why we have so many "denominations" in the "Christian" world today. When it comes to understanding the overall prophets of the Bible, I have given you on this website many many studies as to what the Bible prophets teach for the years ahead, for the very last 42 months of this age, and the coming again of Christ Jesus. I shall here point out as Pate does in his book, the teachings of the very last years of this age in regards to the coming of Christ. 1. PRE-tribulation This idea was made very popular by the "Scofield Reference Bible." They teach (I will say correctly) that the distinction between the prophecies made about Israel in the Old Testament and the Church of God in the New Testament must be maintained. The church has NOT replaced Israel in the plan of God. Romans 11 is given (correctly I say) that God will convert all Israel to Christ in the time appointed by God. Pre-millennialists teach Christ will come again and establish the Kingdom of God on earth for 1,000 years. ruling from Jerusalem (this is again I will say - correct). Dispensationalists (as they are often called) beleive in a pre-tribulation RAPTURE! That is, Christ will return in TWO STAGES - one invisible and the other very visible. They teach Christ will return invisible FOR His church, and spare them from the Great Tribulation to come on the earth in the last years of this age. Christ will take the saints to heaven. Then some years later Christ will return WITH the saints to establish the Kongdom of God on earth. The coming of Christ in GLORY, POWER, and VISIBLE - THEY HAVE CORRECT! The Bible over and over does indeed teach the visible COMING IN POWER AND GLORY the Messiah to earth to bring the literal kingdom of God on earth, just as the Jewish Pharisees and their modern descendants believe. BUT the idea of Christ coming in SECRET - INVISIBLE - to catch away the saints to heaven BEFORE the Great Tribulation on earth in the last days, THEY HAVE TOTALLY INCORRECT!! The idea of Christ coming in TWO PHASES OR TWO STAGES, IS TOTALLY UN- SCRIPTURAL AND IS NOWHERE TAUGHT IN EITHER THE OLD OR NEW TESTAMENT. I had been reading the Bible from age 6 years - attending a Church of England school, from grade one to twelve. Attending a local Sunday-school (which would not be thought of today as "fundamental") but also reading my Bible for myself during all those years from grade one to twelve. When I came to Canada at age 18 and ran into the fundamentalists and their teaching of the "secret rapture" and the two phases of the return of Christ, I litewrally LAUGHED OUT LOUD, at such a silly and what I thought of as a CRAZY teaching that was no where taught in the Bible. So these PRE-tribulation teachers have it this way: The church age: the secret cominmg of Christ to take His church to heaven: the Great Tribulation (which most say is for 7 years, with certain things taking place during those 7 years): Christ returns with the saints: Jesus brings in the Kingdom age of 1,000 years: the resurrection of unbelievers: the eternal state. I have covered in other studies on this website the FALSEHOOD OF THE SECRET RAPRURE TEACHING, AND THE TEACHING THAT CHEIST COMES AGAIN IN TWO PHASES. THIS IDEA IS AS FAR AWAY FROM THE TRUTH OF THE MATTER AS YOU CAN GET, except maybe the teaching that Jesus is NOT to LITERALLY return to earth again. 2. MID-tribulation view Another view is that we have the church age: then the Great Tribulation - three and one half years: Christ comes and takes His church to heaven for three and one half years (a Daniel 70th week teaching): Christ returns with His church: the 1,000 year age begins: the eternal state after the thousand year age. THIS IS ALSO A FALSE TEACHING BASED UPON THE INCORRECT UNDERSTANDING OF DANIEL 9 AND THE 70TH WEEK. I HAVE ALSO COVERED IN DETAIL WITH STUDIES ON THIS WEBSITE, THE FALSEHOOD OF THIS POPULAR TEACHING. YOU WILL NOTICE THIS MID-TRIBULATION TEACHING ALSO HAS JESUS COMING IN TWO PHASES, AN INVISIBLE COMING AND A VISIBLE COMING. THIS TEACHING IS JUST A VARIATION OF THE PRE-TRIBULATION TEACHING. BOTH HAVE THE FALSE TEACHING THAT CHRIST'S SECOND COMING IS IN TWO PHASES - ONE INVISIBLE THE OTHER VISIBLE. 3. PRE-WRATH rapture This is not anywhere near as popular belief or teaching. It is: Church age; Great Tribulation: Day of God's Wrath and secret rapture to take Christ's church to heaven or on the sea of glass up somewhere, but un-noticed by the world: After the wrath of God is poured out Jesus returns, at the end of the day of wrath: the millennium: the Eternal state. So this idea still has some kind of secret rapture within it, but for a much shorter duration of time, than the two we have already looked at. IT ALSO IS AN INCORRECT TEACHING. 4. Posttribulation or Historic Premillennialism I have left this one to the last, as it is the MORE correct understanding of the NT Scriptures, but it still has its errors. I will give you the wole section about this teaching from Pate's book, with my comments as we go. The historic premillennial interpretation agrees with its sibling viewpoint - dispensationalism - that Christ will return to establish a thousand-year reign on earth at his "parousia." But sibling rivalry ensues between the two approaches on the issue of the relationship of the church and the end-time tribulation (Revelation 6-18). According to historic premillennialism, the church will undergo the messianic woes - the end-time tribulation. This is so because the church has replaced Old Testament Israel as the people of God (see Rom. 2:26-28;11; Gal.6:16; Eph.2:11-22;1 Peter 2:9-10; Rev.1:5-6; 7:1-8). (The idea that the church has replaced OT Israel is very wrong. And the verses given prove no such thing. It is very clear from the OT that God STILL has a plan and purpose for the physical people of Israel. There is a purpose for the "church" and there is a purpose for physical Istaelites. Both fit as like hand to a perfect glove in God's plan for all nations and all peoples of the earth. The purpose for both is fully expounded upon on this website - Keith Hunt) Like amillennialism, the historic premillennial view is based on the already/not-yet eschatological hermeneutic: the kingdom of God dawned with the first coming of Christ, but it will not be completed until the second coming of Christ. And in the between period the church encounters the messianic woes, which will intensify and culminate in the return of Christ. So historic premillennialism does not distinguish between the rapture of the church in secret and the second coming of Christ in visible glory to earth. Rather, the two are perceived to be the same event, and this will occur after the seven-year end-time tribulation. (The first part is very CORRECT! There is only ONE coming of Christ. And that coming is the visible in power and glory coming. The OT and the NT know nothing about some "secret rapture" or any "two-phase" coming of Christ with years inbetween the two phases. The part of 7 years of Tribulation is an ERROR! The book of Revelation ONLY speaks of 42 months, or 1260 days, or a time and times and the half of a time, which all work out to be 42 months or 1260 days. The 7 years idea is from a MIS-understanding of Daniel chapter 9, which I have expounded on this website and on Youtube under keithmhunt - Keith Hunt) The pretribulational view appeals to two major arguments in its claim that the church will be raptured from the earth before the advent of the messianic woes/end-time tribulation: 1. First Thessalonians 4:13-18 distinguishes the rapture of the church from the parousia, the second coming of Christ in glory. (This is fully and completely FALSE. 1 Thes. 4:13-18 is NOT talking about a rapture apart from the "parousia" - I have devoted a number of studies on this website to trash such a teaching as what Pate has just said - Keith Hunt) 2. The church is not destined to undergo the wrath of God, which would happen if it has to go through the tribulation. God's wrath is reserved for unbelievers and will be poured out on the earth precisely in the form of the end-time tribulation (compare 1 Thess. 1:10; 5:9 with Rev. 6:16-17). (There is protection for SOME of the people of God at the end time, but not in heaven as many teach with a secret rapture. The protection is in the WILDERNESS on this earth - Revelation 12. That is what it was during the middle ages when God's people had to FLEE into the mountains, hills, forests, caves and etc. to find safety from the Babylon Holy Roman Empire under the middle age Popes and the persecution it enacted upon those who differed with its theology. All this is again fully expounded to you in various studies on this website - Keith Hunt) But the posttribulationist begs to differ with these two claims. Regarding the first, it is clear that 1 Thessalonians 4:13-18 (the rapture) matches descriptions of the second coming found in 1 Thessalonians 5; 2 Thessalonians 2; and the Olivet Discourse (see p.63). Thus a comparison would look like the following: Olivet Discourse in Matthew - 24:5 Event - warning about deception . Paul 2 Thess. 2:2 Olivet Discourse in Matthew - 24:11,14 Event - lawlessness, delusion of the nonelect, signs, and wonders. Paul - 2 Thes.2:6-11 Olivet Discourse in Matthew - 24:12 Event - apostasy Paul - 2 Thes.2:3 Olivet Discourse in Matthew - 24:15 Event- Antichrist in temple (INCORRECT HERE - the abomination of desolation is NOT the antichrist in some physical temple in Jerusalem - the Bible interprets itself - the interpretation is given in Luke 21 as Jerusalem curcled with armies and the desolation of the Holy City by armies that will be an abomination to God - the last Babylon Holy Roman Empire of Europe. Explained in detail in studies on this website - Keith Hunt) Olivet Discourse in Matthew - 24:21-22 Event - tribulation preceding the end Paul - 2 Thes.1:6-10 Olivet Discourse in Matthew - 24:30-31 Event - parousia of Christ, on clouds, at the time of a trumpet blast, with angelic accompaniment Paul - 1 Thes.4:14-16 Olivet Discourse in Matthew - 24:30-31 Event - Christ coming in power Paul - 2 Thes.2:8 Olivet Discourse in Matthew - 24:31 Event - gathering of believers Paul - 1 Thes.4:16; 2 Thes.2:1 Olivet Discourse in Matthew - 24:36,42,44,50; 25:13 Event - unexpected coming Paul - 1 Thes.5:1-4 Olivet Discourse in Matthew - 24:42-25:13 Event - exhortation to watch! Paul - 1 Thes.5:6-8 So the unavoidable conclusion here is that, if 1 Thessalonians 5; 2 Thessalonians 2; and the Olivet Discourse describe the parousia (which all interpreters believe they do), and if 1 Thessalonians 4:13-18 (the rapture) matches the previous texts on the second coming, then the "two" events are the same. (AH CORRECT!! SIMPLE AS ADDING TWO PLUS TWO TO EQUAL 4!! ALL THE VERSES FIT TOGETHER; ALL THE TRUMPET SOUNDS FIT - THEY ARE THE SAME TRUMPET - THE LAST TRUMPET OF PAUL IN 1 COR.15 THE 7TH TRUMPET OF THE BOOK OF REVEALTION. ALL ARE THE ONE SINGLE EVENT!! THE COMING UNEXPECTEDLY BY THE WORLD OF CHRIST JESUS AT THE LAST OR 7TH TRUMPET - THE RESURRECTION OF THE DEAD SAINTS, THE CHANGING OF MORTAL SAINTS ALIVE ON EARTH, TO IMMORTALITY. THE ANGELS TAKING THEM ALL TO MEET CHRIST IN THE AIR, THE CLOUDS, ON THE SEA OF GLASS, AND IN THAT SAME DAY COMING FROM THE CLOUDS OF THIS EARTH TO STAND WITH CHRIST ON THE MOUNT OF OLIVES - ZECH.14 - Keith Hunt) How then do we explain the relationship between the rapture and the second coming? Posttribulationists reply: the background to all of this is the Roman general's triumphant procession. This was a parade that Roman citizens held in honor of a Roman general's defeat of a significant enemy of the Roman Empire. When the general appeared (parousia means coming) on the horizon outside Rome, an entourage went out from the city to meet him and his army to escort them back into the city for the parade (see 1 Thess. 4:13-18). With the Roman general's triumphant procession as the backdrop to Christ's victorious descent to earth after defeating the Antichrist, the following scenario will play out according to the historic premillennial interpretation: the trumpet will sound for the second coming of Christ at the end of the tribulation period. The church, Christ's entourage on earth during those messianic woes, will be caught up momentarily to meet Christ in the air for the purpose of escorting him to the earth in pomp and circumstance (1 Thess. 4:13-18-the rapture). Then he will descend to earth to celebrate his victory and establish his one-thousand-year reign (1 Thessalonians 5; 2 Thessalonians 2; Olivet Discourse; Revelation 19 - the second coming). (AND YES THAT IS WHAT HAS BEEN HISTORICALLY CORRECT, AND IS STILL CORRECT - Keith Hunt) Regarding the second claim, the posttribulationist agrees that the church will not undergo the wrath of God - but not because it is raptured to heaven before the tribulation falls on earth. Rather, God will protect the church from his wrath that falls on unbelievers during the messianic woes, just as he protected ancient Israel from the plagues he poured out on Egypt (see Revelation 8-9; 14-18; cf. Rev. 3:10). (AND THAT IS WHAT WAS HISTORICALLY CORRECT, AND IS STILL CORRECT. THE CHURCH, OR PART OF IT, WILL BE PROTECTED IN THE WILDERNESS - REV.12, BUT SOME AS IN AGES PAST, WILL HAVE TO DIE FOR THE FAITH ONCE DELIVERED TO THE SAINTS. IT'S ALWAYS BEEN THIS WAY. IT IS HISTORICALLY CORRECT, AND IS STILL CORRECT - Keith Hunt) The following chart, then, illustrates the posttribulational or historic premillennial perspective: Church age: Great Tribulation: Last Trumpt blows: Christ comes in visible glory: Dead Christians resurrected/living ones changed/ both groups made immortal and join Christ in the clouds: All come from the clouds to the mount of Olives: The 1,000 year reign begins: The resurrection of unbelievers for their jugment period: The eternal state. HOW SIMPLE AND HOW INDEED HISTORICAL. SO MARVIN PATE SAYS THIS IS HISTORICAL POSTTRIBULATION AND PREMILLENNIUM TEACHING. CALL IT WHAT YOU LIKE, IT HAS STOOD THE TEST OF TIME, AND SO IT WILL FOR IT IS THE CORRECT UNDERSTANDING OF THE COMING OF CHRIST JESUS BACK TO THIS EARTH - Keith Hunt. Pate finishes this chapter with these words: "The premillennium view, especially the pretribulation variety, is MOST POPULAR among the American masses, thanks to the "Scofield Bible," Hal Lindsey's "Late Great Planet Earth," and the "Left Behind" series....." So indeed the above three and much popular teaching of it all in the "fundamental" Christian churches of America, have made this idea of a "secret invisible" return and later a powerful glorious return of Christ - a two phrase coming - a very popular belief. BUT SUCH A TEACHING IS COMPLETELY A FICTION OF THE HUMAN MIND, AND HAS NO FACT IN TRUE BIBLE UNDERSTANDING. Keith Hunt To be continued |
No comments:
Post a Comment