FRED COULTER’S SERIOUS BIBLE MISTAKE!!!
I HAVE THE FIRST EDITION OF FRED COULTER’S RENDITION OF THE HOLY BIBLE [2007].
THERE IS A SERIOUS TRANSLATION MISTAKE IN DANIEL’S PROPHECY OF 12: 11.
IF THIS HAS BEEN ADMITTED AND RECTIFIED I AM PLEASED, BUT IF NOT, THEN I PRESENT THE TRUTH OF THE MATTER.
THE RENDITION BY FRED COULTER DANIEL 12:11 IS THIS——
“….FROM THE TIME THAT THE DAILY SACRIFICE SHALL BE TAKEN AWAY…..
NOTICE “SACRIFICE” IS NOT IN ITALICS BUT IN REGULAR PRINT AS THE OTHER WORDS OF THIS VERSE.
IF YOU HAVE A KING JAMES BIBLE VERSION, YOU WILL NOTICE THE WORD “SACRIFICE” IS IN ITALICS!
SO WHAT ABOUT ITALICS IN THE KJV BIBLE TRANSLATION?
IT SIMPLY MEANS WORDS NOT IN THE HEBREW TEXT ARE NOT IN THE HEBREW OF THE OLD TESTAMENT HEBREW MSS.
THE KJV ALSO TRANSLATE DANIEL 8: 10-13 CORRECTLY - THE WORD “SACRIFICE” IS IN ITALICS!
AND FRED COULTER’S BIBLE TRANSLATES THESE VERSES CORRECTLY—- THE WORD “SACRIFICE” BEING IN ITALICS.
A LITTLE ABOUT THE KJV SCHOLARS—— THERE WAS MANY OF THEM, SKILLED IN HEBREW AND GREEK OF THE HEBREW AND GREEK MSS. THEY WERE PUT INTO TEAMS, AND THEY JUDGED ONE ANOTHER; TEAMS OF MEN JUDGED BY TEAMS OF MEN. STILL SOME ERRORS WERE AND ARE IN THE KJV; ONLY ONE COULD YOU SAY PERTAINED TO BASIC BED-ROCK DOCTRINE—— THE WORD “EASTER” IN THE BOOK OF ACTS. THE GREEK IS PASCHER— FOR PASSOVER.
THE ITALIC WORDS FOR “SACRIFICE” IN THE BOOK OF DANIEL ARE CORRECT—— THE WORD FOR “SACRIFICE” IS NOT IN THE HEBREW MSS, FOR THE PASSAGES THE KJV SCHOLARS PUT ITALIC WORD FOR “SACRIFICE.”
THIS IS IMPORTANT FOR THE HEBREW DOES HAVE A WORD FOR “SACRIFICE.”
A LITTLE ON STRONG’S CONCORDANCE OF THE KJV BIBLE—- FRED COULTER DISPARAGES THE ORIGINAL STRONG’S CONCORDANCE; IT COULD BE HE ONLY KNOWS OF THE ORIGINAL STRONG’S CON. AND A FEW MISTAKES IT MAKES.
BUT THERE IS A NEW STRONG’S CONCORDANCE TODAY, CALLED— THE STRONGEST STRONG’S EXHAUSTIVE CONCORDANCE OF THE BIBLE.
THIS IS WHAT IT SAYS ON THE FRONT——
THE MOST ACCURATE AND COMPLETE STRONG’S EVER PUBLISHED
* THE ONLY STRONG’S COMPILED AND VERIFIED BY COMPUTER TECHNCOLIGY
* THE ONLY STRONG’S WITH NAVE’S TOPICAL BIBLE REFERENCE SYSTEM
* THE MOST UP-TO-DATE HEBREW AND GREEK DICTIONARIES FOR PRECISE WORD STUDIES
OKAY LET’S BEGIN OUR STUDY.
DANIEL 8:11, 12, 13 ——— NH [NO HEBREW]
DANIEL 11: 31 ——— NH
DANIEL 12: 11 ——— NH
DANIEL 9: 27 ———- STRONG’S # 2077
#2077 —— STRONG’S SAYS— SACRIFICE - OFFERING [IT IS USED DOZENS UPON DOZENS UPON DOZENS OF TIMES FOR THE WORDS
“SACRIFIC/S” “OFFERING/S” - Keith Hunt]
#5930 —— STRONG’S SAYS— BURNT OFFERING/S - BURNT SACRIFICE/S
JAY P. GREEN SR. HEBREW/ENGLISH INTERLINEAR——
DANIEL 8: 11, 12, 13; 11: 31; 12: 11—— STRONG’S # 8548
DANIEL 9: 27—— STRONG’S # 2077
STRONG’S SAYS # 8548
CONTINUALLY - CONSTANTLY - REGULARLY - DAILY - ALWAYS - PERPETUAL - EVERMORE - CONTINUAL
THEOLOGICAL WORD BOOK OF THE OLD TESTAMENT
FOR THE WORD #8548 IS FOUND IN THAT BOOK AS 1157a
IT IS BASICALLY ANYTHING THAT IS DONE CONTINUOUSLY, DAILY, PERPETUALLY, CONTINUAL.
THE ENGLISHMAN’S HEBREW AND CHALDEE CONCORDANCE OF THE OLD TESTAMENT
I HIGHLY RECOMMEND THIS WORK; IT GIVES YOU THE HEBREW WORD AS IT IS USED THROUGHOUT THE OLD TESTAMENT; THIS WAY YOU GET THE MAIN MEANING OF THE WORD.
IT IS USED ABOUT 100 TIMES.
PREDOMINATELY AS— CONTINUALLY, PERPETUAL, ALWAYS, DAILY—- JUST AS STRONG’S CONCORDANCE HAS GIVEN YOU.
IT IS NOT THE HEBREW WORD FOR “SACRIFICE”——
AS WE HAVE SEEN THAT WORD IS PREDOMINATELY #2077 IN STRONG’S CONCORDANCE, AND WAS USED IN DANIEL 9: 27 WHERE JESUS’ DEATH CAUSED THE “SACRIFICE” AND OBLATIONS TO CEASE; NO LONGER NEEDED TO BE DONE. PHYSICAL SACRIFICES WERE NO LONGER REQUIRED UNDER THE NEW COVENANT.
THE SCHOLARS OF THE KJV BIBLE WERE RIGHT ON THE BUTTON IN THEIR TRANSLATION OF THE BOOK OF DANIEL AND SPECIFICALLY DANIEL 12: 11.
JAY P. GREEN SR. WAS RIGHT ON THE BUTTON IN USING THE HEBREW # 8548 IN THE PASSAGES OF DANIEL 8 AND 12, AND USING THE HEBREW # 2077 IN DANIEL 9: 27 WHERE THE PHYSICAL ANIMAL SACRIFICE WAS MEANT, AND NO LONGER REQUIRED AFTER THE MESSIAH’S DEATH.
SO THE WORD #8548 COULD HAVE A MEANING THAT IS DIFFERENT IN DIFFERENT TIMES IN HISTORY—— CONTINUALLY, DAILY, ALWAYS, PERPETUALLY—— CAN BE DIFFERENT THINGS IN THE CONTEXT OF TIME AND PROPHECY.
I HAVE SAID AND PROVED IN OTHER STUDIES, TO FULFIL END TIME PROPHECY AS IN DANIEL 12: 11, THERE IS NO NEED FOR A PHYSICAL TEMPLE AND ANIMAL SACRIFICES BY THE JEWS, BEFORE JESUS CAN RETURN.
THE IDEA OF A TEMPLE, ANIMAL SACRIFICES, A COVENANT WITH THE BEAST POWER AND JEWS, BROKEN IN THE MIDDLE, IS NO WHERE FOUND IN THE BIBLE. IT ALL CAME FROM A MAN BY THE NAME OF SCOFIELD IN HIS BIBLE NOTES PUBLISHED AT THE BEGINNING OF THE 20TH CENTURY.
THE FUNDAMENTAL PROTESTANT PROPHETS JUMPING ON HIS BAND-WAGON, MAKE IT A HUGE DOCTRINE AMONG THEMSELVES—— THEN ADDED FROM SCOFIELD A TWO EVENT COMING OF THE MESSIAH BACK TO EARTH—— THEIR “SECRET RAPTURE” DOCTRINE BEING THE FIRST COMING AT THE BEGINNING OF THIS LAST 7 YEAR GREAT TRIBULATION [NO 7 YEARS MENTIONED IN THE BOOK OF REVELATION] THEN JESUS COMING AGAIN SO ALL CAN SEE HIM, AT THE END OF THIS 7 YEAR PERIOD.
TWO COMINGS OF CHRIST FOR HIS SECOND COMING— UTTERLY DAFT, SILLY, AND THEOLOGY FROM PLANET PLUTO. SEE HOW JESUS WILL COME AGAIN FROM ACTS CHAPTER ONE.
ALL OF THIS IS FROM THE FUNDAMENTAL PROTESTANTS VIA SCOFIELD. WHO TOOK THE LATTER PART OF DANIEL 9 AND THE 70 WEEK PROPHECY AND PUT THE 70TH WEEK WAY DOWN TO THE LAST 7 YEARS OF THIS AGE, AND AT THE END OF THAT PERIOD JESUS WOULD RETURN VISIBLEY AND IN GREAT POWER. SCOFIELD WAS WAY WAY OFF TRACK IN HIS TEACHING OF THIS PROPHECY IN DANIEL 9. THE OLD PROTESTANT MINISTERS LIKE ALBERT BARNES, MATTHEW HENRY, ADAM CLARKE, HAD IT CORRECT; THE READER SHOULD CONSULT THE COMMENTARIES BY THOSE MEN.
THE FUNDAMENTAL PROPHETS CAN NOT POSSIBLY UNDERSTAND END TIME BIBLE PROPHECY, BECAUSE THEY WILL NOT OBEY ALL THE COMMANDMENTS OF GOD [PSALM 111]. THEY SAY OKAY TO 9 OF THE GREAT TEN, BUT WILL NOT OBSERVE THE GREAT FOUTH COMMANDMENT—— THE WEEKLY SABBATH DAY. THEY WILL NOT TEACH PEOPLE TO OBEY IT. THEY AND THEIR FOLLOWERS WALK ALL OVER THE 7TH DAY OF THE WEEK; WHY THEY DO NOT EVEN TEACH THEIR FOLLOWERS TO KEEP SUNDAY HOLY AS THEY ONCE DID. THEY KNOW WHAT THE 4TH COMMANDMENT SAYS; THEY KNOW SUNDAY WAS NEVER MADE HOLY, WAS NEVER ADOPTED AS THE WEEKLY SABBATH FOR CHRISTIANS, BY THE APOSTLES. SO THEY JUST IGNORE TEACHING THE 4TH COMMANDMENT PERIOD. HENCE THEY AND THEIR FOLLOWERS ARE LIVING IN SIN, THEY PRACTICE SIN, AND UNTIL THEY REPENT THEY HAVE NO SALVATION.
ANOTHER MISTAKE BY COULTER’S BIBLE TRANSLATION—— IN PSALM 111 THE WORD “HIS COMMANDMENTS” IN VERSE 10, ARE NOT IN ITALICS AS THE KJV TRANSLATORS GAVE THE HEBREW. YES TO DO…. INCLUDES KEEPING HIS COMMANDMENTS, BUT THE KJV TRANSLATORS WERE OFTEN MORE FAITHFUL TO THE HEBREW AND GREEK THAN COULTER’S BIBLE. HENCE I DO NOT USE FRED COULTER’S BIBLE AS MY EVERY DAY BIBLE. I STILL USE THE KJV AND THE NEWKJV BIBLE.
TO RENDER CORRECTLY DANIEL 8 AND THE ITALICS FOR “SACRIFICE” THEN DELIBERATELY NOT DO SO IN DANIEL 12: 11, IS NOT ONLY A MISTAKE, BUT IS DONE TO DELIBERATELY TEACH A FALSE DOCTRINE OF END TIME PROPHECY.
I HOPE FRED COULTER AND HIS ELDERS, IF NOT HAVING DONE SO ALREADY, REPENT OF THIS GROSS ERROR, AND REPENT OF NOT LEAVING ALL ITALIC WORDS AS THEY ARE IN THE KJV TRANSLATION.
Keith Hunt [MAY 11 - 2023]
No comments:
Post a Comment