Church Government
What the New Testament teaches on how churches should be governed
STEPHEN'S WORK One of the seven chosen men was a man called Stephen. It is written that he did great wonders and miracles(Acts 6:8). He is not called an Elder, he was one chosen to serve "tables" and the brethren in physical matters. Yet he did WONDERS and spoke very boldly. Stephen was given some of the gifts of God's Spirit that Paul talked about in 1 Corinthians 12. In that passage of scripture Paul shows us that God can give through His Spirit, ANY of the different gifts listed to ANY member of the body of Christ, whether in the classified "ordained ministry" or not. Paul in discussing Spiritual gifts is talking to the whole congregation at Corinth not just the Elders (see chapters 12:27 and 1:1-10). We must always be careful not to "hand-cuff" the Lord in what we think He should or can do through any human being. At one point in Jesus' ministry the disciples found a man doing miracles in His name, and because he did not belong to their Group they asked Christ to give them permission to tell him to stop! Jesus said: "Do not forbid him to stop, for no one who does a mighty work in my name, will be able soon after to speak evil of me. For he that is not against us is for us" (Mark 9:39-40). How does this square you may ask with Jesus saying that there would be one shepherd and one fold? Quite simply this: All that are the children of God, with the Spirit of God, belong to the ONE spiritual body of Christ. The one true Church of God, the people of the Lord in whom is the Spirit of Christ are scattered all over the world, they are connected together through one spiritual organism called in scripture "the body of Christ" and this has NOTHING TO DO WITH MAN MADE CORPORATE ORGANIZATIONS REGISTERED in some physical BUILDING on some physical piece of paper, in a physical CITY in some COUNTRY on earth!! Here in the gospel of Mark is the plain truth that God can and does work with various persons in various parts of the country or world, AS HE CHOOSES! And these persons may or may not KNOW THE OTHERS EXIST! How vain and arrogant of man to think or proclaim to others that he and his work is the "only" work of God on the earth. I can think of only one man who could have claimed correctly to have been the only work of God on earth - that man was NOAH! Elijah, from an honest heart, believed he and his disciples were the only work of God on earth at the time, and in voicing this to God he was answered with a resounding NO! The Lord told him he was not the only work of God. The Lord had reserved 7,000 others who had not bowed the knee to Baal! Elijah DID NOT KNOW THEY EXISTED! How foolish is the heart of man at times. How deceivably pompous can the mind of man become, as to think God is limited to one man and/or one organization at a time, for His work to be done in the earth. God is God! Man is not God, we did not make Him, it was He who made us! He is the POTTER, we are now merely the clay. God can at ANY TIME He chooses, raise up as many persons and as many independent corporate organizations to do His work as He wishes. It is not we humans who tell God WHEN, WHERE, HOW, and with WHOM, He will work and do things. It is HE WHO TELLS US! One large Church of God organization in this 20th century, thought they were the only ones in the world doing the true work of God. They eventually adopted the Roman Catholic doctrine of Church Government and their head leader called himself the "only apostle of God on earth." Back in the 60's before this "head-master" became so vain with personal glory, the organization did believe they were the only ones around with all "these wonderful truths" of God. Then a few of their ministers went to South America, into the hills and valleys. There to their amazement they found peoples who believed and practiced all the same basic doctrines they practiced and taught. These people even observed the festivals of God and in some ways had more truth than the USA organization, for they were observing the feast of Pentecost on a Sunday which the organization in the USA thought was error, but later came to see was the truth. When will we ever learn that it is not God who needs us, it is us who NEED GOD! Why if need be, the Lord could raise up the stones on the road to preach His word. That being the case He certainly is able to use different men and different corporate organizations in different parts of the world to do His work, all at the SAME TIME! Peter was used by God to do a work towards the circumcision, while Paul was used by the Lord to do a work towards the UNcircumcision - so it is written, so it was done. Well let me get back to the account in the book of Acts about Stephen. Certain of the religious leaders and their followers started to dispute with Stephen. Now he did not say that he had no authority to discuss religious matters with them. He did not run off to get permission from the chief apostle or Church board in Jerusalem. He just disputed with them. And he did it so effectively they could not withstand his wisdom. He was brought before the council and defended himself so well answering them with power and inspiration, it actually ended up costing him his life (Acts 7:54-60). Stephen did ALL OF THIS and there's not one word about him being ordained to some set "rank" of authority in the Church. At best he was appointed to serve "tables." This account alone(we shall see others later) should blow away the idea that deacons and lay members are to just "pray and pay" and leave the teaching and preaching and witnessing to the truths of God to the ordained Eldership. If the Lord chooses to use a deacon in a POWERFUL MIGHTY WAY for His truth and work, He will do so. And who is any man to withstand God? THE CHURCH IS SCATTERED One famous preacher of the Church of God in this century wrote a book before he died, and in it he had a section that he was going to prove to his readers and followers that the lay members were not to preach the gospel or go out expounding the word of God to the world in general. He was trying to prove from the scriptures that it was only the ordained ministers or elders of the Church that were given that commission. He used for the proof of his teaching verses from the beginning chapters of the book of Acts, some before and some after chapter eight. But like so many before him (and no doubt there will be others after him) who wandered off into doctrinal error, he took out the horse blinkers and wore them as he read the chapters he would get his so called "proof texts" from. He read right over and failed to show his readers a text that would have drilled holes in his doctrine to sink it to the bottom of the sea. That text friends is found in Acts 8. I want you to mark this in your Bible and never forget it! Let's begin with verse one: " And at that time (when Stephen was put to death) there was a great persecution against the Church which was at Jerusalem; and THEY (the 'ekkleesia' - called out ones - the church) were ALL scattered abroad except the apostles." The CHURCH is made up of all the collective members in whom is the Spirit of God and Christ. The Church is not the ministry - the ministry is PART of the Church. The only part of the Church that was not scattered abroad were the 12 apostles. Now notice it, verse four: "Therefore they that were scattered abroad (all the members of the Church, all but the 12 apostles) went everywhere PREACHING THE WORD!" I did not put it there friend. It has been in your Bible all these centuries. It was there when this leader I talked about above wrote his book in which he tried to prove the exact opposite. There it is in plain black and white, easy to understand, no College degree needed. Under certain circumstances and as He wills, when He wills, God can use the any members of His Church to PREACH THE WORD! So it is written, so it was done. God will not be limited by the wishes or false ideas of men. PHILIP PREACHES Among the seven of the "diakonate" of Acts 6, was a man named Philip. He also was given some mighty gifts of God's Spirit. He was not of the twelve apostles. He was not an ordained elder. But notice how the Lord used him: ".....then Philip went down to the city of Samaria and PREACHED Christ unto them" (Acts 8:5). He also did miracles and healings! (v.6-7). God used Philip to do a MIGHTY work in Samaria (v.8-12). This deacon did not have to get the "okay" from some head apostle before he went to do the work of the Lord. He did not have to ask his local minister/pastor for permission to be used by the Spirit of the Lord. The apostles in Jerusalem found out AFTER the fact what work Philip had done in Samaria, and then they as a collective decision, sent Peter and John to help out(v.l4). There is no indication or evidence in this section of scripture that Philip was performing spiritual works that were "out of rank" for his deaconship. That were only to be performed by some man ordained to some rank of ministry. This example alone should "blow to pieces" the idea that men are ordained to a rank ministry and have certain duties or workings they can not perform because those duties are only for "higher" ranked ministers. Such false teachings are derived from one Biblical error and one carnal human error. The Biblical error is found in ONLY looking to the Old Covenant and how God arranged things under that disposition, while ignoring the fact that today we are under a New Covenant and under that covenant certain changes have been made by God Himself (i.e. physical circumcision is not required, a change in the priesthood, no central city to worship God in, animal sacrifices not necessary). The New Covenant clearly shows by example and by direct teaching/commands, that the basic form of Old Church/State Government is not to be the order for the New Covenant Church of God during this present age. The carnal human error is that of the heart of man venting and taking pleasure in having dictatorial authority over other men, which in turn leads organizations to establish a "rank and file" system among its leaders. As Jesus said to His disciples, that is how the unconverted nations rule among themselves, but it was not to be so for His servants and followers. The Lord is plainly showing here in Acts chapter 8, that if He wants to take a deacon, or any man of the Church and use him to perform miracles or healings or preach the word some-where, He WILL DO SO! And He will do so without having to answer to any other human man He ordained to the Eldership or not, and certainly not answering to any man made rank system. After the work Philip did in Samaria, God gave him another assignment (v.26). He sent His angel to tell Philip to go to a certain place and to meet a man of great authority under the Queen of Ethiopia. Philip was used to expound the word of God more clearly to this eunuch and baptize (a deacon baptizing? Yes! And we shall see later that you did not even have to be a deacon to baptize people. Now that should blow a hole in more false doctrines of men. He was now in the very family of God (v.27-38).
1. It was not a difference in doctrine over-which Paul and Barnabas separated, but what we would call today administration - who was going with whom to do "the work." 2. Where administration of the work of the Lord is not defined by or in opposition to the word of the Lord, FREEDOM is allowed. Yet within that freedom men's ideas and personalities may on occasion - clash! In most cases it should be able to be solved, but this was one time it could not. 3. Paul and Barnabas remained servants and apostles of God. Both continued to do the work of the gospel. 4. Despite the weaknesses and differences of men, God is able to work with and in them, often turning what may appear to us as adversity into VICTORY for Him. Truly, the Lord works in mysterious ways at times His wonders to perform. 5. Neither Paul nor Barnabas took their disagreement to a higher court of Elders, or some "chief" apostle over them, to try and get the other "black listed" or kicked out of the ministry or disfellowshipped. IN RETROSPECT What can we see as we look back on our study? I will list 10 points that I see. 1. Jesus calling His ministers and telling them that, no ONE individual or small "board" of individuals would have total dictatorial control and authority over the entire Church of God or other Elders. Jesus taught that he who thought himself more important and above the rest, had better be the greater humbler servant to all. 2. A Church and ministry that was filled with the POWER of the Holy Spirit. A driving zeal to get on with spreading the gospel of the Kingdom of God. 3. As the Church grew and the physical burden increased, the establishing of an ordained/appointed "Deacon - servant" ministry (Acts 6) to help take care of such matters. 4. We see that the gifts of God's Spirit were boundless, given freely as He saw fit, to the Elders (Acts chapters 2-5), to the Deacons (Acts chapters 6-8), and to the whole membership of saints (1 Cor.12 and 14). 5. God directly called others to the apostleship and ministry (Acts 9). And ministers ordained other men to the ministry (Acts 14:23). 6. Local churches and elders that had a great deal of freedom within the law of God (Acts 11:19-26; 13:1-13). 7. Churches raised up with ordained elder S - (plural, Acts 14:23). 8. Brethren, Deacons, and Elders held together with the common bond of the Holy Spirit, the love of God, and the same basic fundamental truths of the word. 9. Major doctrinal issues resolved by ministerial conferences with the members of the host congregation in attendance, and participating in the decisions (Acts 15). lO. A Church not handcuffed or weighed down with over organization. In closing this section of our study I must, because of recent abuse within certain parts of the Church of God, re-emphasize the teaching of Jesus about a humble servant attitude that all His ministers and followers were to have towards one another and towards the spiritually blinded of the world. Satan has devastated parts of the body of Christ in the last 30 years because this humble servant attitude was not maintained by some Elders, and the sin of vain, authoritarian power and dictatorial rulership was exhibited by various ministers over other ministers and the brethren. The words of Phillip Keller (a one time keeper of sheep) are fitting at this point in our study. I will quote from chapter 3 of his book: A Shepherd Looks at Psalm 23. We pick it up as he is talking about the requirements needed for sheep to lie down. "The second source of fear from which the sheepman delivers his sheep is that of tension, rivalry, and cruel competition within the flock itself. In every animal society there is established an order of dominance or status within the group. In a penful of chickens it is referred to as the 'pecking order.' With cattle it is called the 'horning order.' Among sheep we speak of the 'butting order.' Generally an arrogant, cunning and domineering old ewe will be boss of any bunch of sheep. She maintains her position of prestige by butting and driving other ewes or lambs away from the best grazing or favorite bedgrounds. Succeeding her in precise order the other sheep all establish and maintain their exact position in the flock by using the same tactics of butting and thrusting at those below and around them..........Because of this rivalry, tension, and competition for status and self-assertion, there is friction in a flock. The sheep can not lie down and rest in contentment. Always they must stand up and defend their rights and contest the challenge of the intruder.......... This continuous conflict and jealousy within the flock can be a most detrimental thing. The sheep become edgy, tense, discontented and restless. They lose weight and become irritable. But one point that always interested me very much was that whenever I came into view and my presence attracted their attention, the sheep quickly forgot their foolish rivalries and stopped their fighting. The shepherd's presence made all the difference in their behavior....... In any business firm, any office, any family, any community, any church, any human organization or group, be it large or small, the struggle for self-assertion and self-recognition goes on. Most of us fight to be 'top sheep.' We butt and quarrel and compete to 'get ahead.' And in the process people get hurt......... In contrast to this, the picture in the Psalm shows us God's people lying down in quiet contentment.......The endless unrest generated in the individual who is always trying to 'get ahead' of the crowd, who is attempting always to be top man or woman on the totem pole, is pretty formidable to observe. In His own unique way, Jesus Christ, the Great Shepherd, in His earthly life pointed out that the last would be first and the first last. In a sense I am sure He meant first in the area of His own intimate affection. For any shepherd has great compassion for the poor, weak sheep that get butted about by the more domineering ones. More than once I have strongly trounced a belligerent ewe for abusing a weaker one. Or when they butted lambs not their own I found it necessary to discipline them severely, and certainly they were not first in my esteem for their aggressiveness. Another point that impressed me, too, was that the less aggressive sheep were often far more contented, quiet and restful. So that there were definite advantages in being 'bottom sheep.' But more important was the fact that it was the Shepherd's presence that put an end to all rivalry. And in our human relationships when we become acutely aware of being in the presence of Christ, our foolish, selfish snobbery and rivalry will end. It is the humble heart walking quietly and contentedly in close and intimate companionship of Christ that is at rest.......When my eyes are on the Master they are not on those around me. This is the place of peace. And it is good and proper to remind ourselves that in the end it is He who will decide and judge what my status really is. After all, it is His estimation of me that is of consequence. Any human measurement at best is bound to be pretty unpredictable, unreliable, and far from final " (A Shepherd Looks at Psalm 23, pages 31-33). To be continued. First written 1983. Re-written and revised 1996. |
No comments:
Post a Comment