Adam's Curse, is it with us Today? #2
Is the Curse put on the land because of the sin of Adam still with us today?
Adam's curse had very specific words within it. And PART of those words most have forgotten or most choose to ignore, but those words are also part of the whole total curse that was to be the punishment for Adam, until he returned to the dust, until "all the days of thy life." The overlooked words of Adam's curse: "......AND YOU SHALL EAT THE HERB OF THE FIELD" (verse 18). Matthew Henry in his Bible Commentary has this to say: " .....His food shall from henceforth become (in comparison with what it had been unpleasant to him. (1.) The matter of his food is changed: he must now eat the herb of the field, and must no longer be feasted with the delicacies of the garden of Eden:.......(2.) There is a change in the manner of his eating it; in sorrow, (v.17)and in the sweat of his face, (v.19) he must eat of it......." Indeed, Matthew Henry could see that in the garden of Eden, as chapter 1:28-30 shows, Adam and Eve had all the blessing of the seed bearing herbs good for food and ALSO every tree in which there was a fruit bearing seed. All this was their food. I can just imagine the wonderful variety of fruits and vegetable there must have been in that garden. It makes my mouth water as I think about what it surely was like. And the pleasant easy work it was for them to have "dressed and kept" that garden paradise. Now the curse of Adam meant not only a constant battle with thorns and thistles,but the food of Adam and his offspring as they were now to live outside of the garden(chap.3:22-24) and prevented from ever again entering, was to be ONLY herbs. The delicious fruit bearing trees of the garden were not a part of the land outside of that garden. And further more, the work to produce what herbs they would cultivate for food, would be fraught with hard toil, laborious labor, and much sweating of the brow. Is it possible to live without fruits? Yes, of course it is. So God was giving a punishment here that some others down through the centuries have found themselves in. People have and still do, live in parts of nations and land areas where no fruits trees grow. It takes a certain climate for fruits tress to flourish. The North American Indians have lived in many parts of that continent for thousands of years, and only certain parts have the climate to produce fruit trees. People can live without eating from fruit trees, but fruit does make eating that much more pleasant and enjoyable. From Adam's sin, the enjoyment of the wonderful variety of that part of eating made up of fruit from the trees that produced those fruits, would be denied him and his offspring, until he returned to the dust from whence he was taken (v.19). This must be the meaning here, just as Matthew Henry could also see, because eating the herb was part of this curse. Maybe it is also intimated here that ONLY herbs, that produced from the soil, was to be their food, with no meat or animal eating. We do know from 1 Timothy 4 and from the animals Noah brought into the Ark, that God created the animals clean and unclean from the beginning, hence with the full intention that mankind was to eat animal flesh as part of his diet. The curse of Adam being in part, herb eating, would, by saying such a pronouncement, mean that a part of this punishment was that fruits and animal flesh eating was to be taken away during all the days of Adam's life (v.17, 19, last parts). The IMPORTANT thing to note here is that the specific NATURE OF THE CURSE was TWOFOLD. 1. Thorns and Thistles so profuse the working of the ground would be very difficult. 2. Herb eating (and herbs were eaten in the garden of Eden), meaning ONLY herbs would now be the food supply. If ONE part of this curse is still in effect today, if it was given to be in effect until Jesus would establish the Kingdom of God on earth at His glorious coming, then the OTHER part of this curse is also still in effect! This, I submit, is the correct theological use and understanding of verse 18. It is theologically sound to have both parts of this curse fully in tact as a whole, IF the curse was to extend to the coming of the Messiah in glory. One part cannot be in effect and the other not. The first part of the curse cannot be still in effect and the second part not. The second part cannot still be in effect and the first part not. Selecting one part to be in effect while believing or teaching the other part is not, is what I call "selective theology." You select your theology by selecting what parts you want to select your theology from, while ignoring other parts that would show your selection may be on thin ice. Now, look around, look at the world, study some history, even from the time of after the flood of Noah's day. Has man, is mankind today eating MORE than herbs for food? Oh, indeed so! For those who especially know how to grow organic fruits.....wow, what a taste, what a delicious part of eating. Being a fruit eating fanatic myself, after living for three years in the wonderful fruit belt that is the Okanagan Valley of British Columbia, Canada, after living for three years in southern Florida, among all the citrus fruit of oranges and grapefruit, with many mango trees as a bonus, I surely know a little of what the garden of Eden must have been like, but that garden was even more delicious than anything we have today. The point is, the second part of Adam's curse has never been in effect since the days of Noah's worldwide flood. So, I submit, sound and true theology must then see that there is no other recourse but to admit that the first part of Adam's curse has also never been in effect since the time Noah came forth from the ark and set foot on dry ground to plant his vineyard. NOAH, THE COMFORTER! "And Lamech lived an hundred eighty and two years and begat a son. And he called his name Noah, saying, This same shall comfort us concerning our work and toil of our hands, because of the ground which the Lord has cursed" (Genesis 5:28,29). Verse 29 as translated from the Hebrew by the scholar Jay P. Green reads this way: "And he called his name Noah, saying, This one shall comfort us from our work and the toil of our hands, from the ground which has cursed Jehovah." How was Noah going to comfort them, by inventing some chemical spray that would kill all the thorns and thistles they had to fight against ? I speak of course foolishly. By reading back you will see that Lamech was from Methuselah, who was from Enoch, one of the great righteous men presented to us in the Bible. Verse 29, is more than just interesting, its words are prophetic in nature. We are given nothing else to go on, so to speak, but the words of this one verse, kind of coming at us out of nowhere. We have to do some reading between the lines. Somehow Lamech was given this prophetic insight concerning the life of Noah, his son. Did God speak directly to him? Was and angel set to tell him about something to happen to the curse on the ground in the days of Noah? Did Lamech discover this through a dream from God? Perhaps his grandfather Enoch had passed this prophetic news on, which he had received from God. We are not told, neither does it really matter. The fact is that Lamech called the name of his son NOAH, because it means comfort or rest. And what we can understand from this verse is that the comfort would be to do with the working and toil of the hands as it pertained to the ground which the Lord had cursed. Now, I submit that something was going to CHANGE so there would be COMFORT to the workers of the land, which had a curse upon it. I submit that in the days of Noah, the curse on the ground was going to be changed in such a way as COMFORT would be the working of those who toiled on the land. The comfort that would take place in the life time of Noah, was to do with the working of the ground and the curse that God had placed upon it from the time of Adam's sin. I submit that the only comfort from that curse on the land, would be to LIFT that curse, do away with that curse, abolish that curse, so mankind could find comfort in the work and toil of his hands upon the ground which up to the days of Noah had a curse upon it, and which God, in the days of Noah would do something about, which would bring comfort to mankind. I submit, that it was to be in the days of Noah that this curse on the ground was to be ABOLISHED, cast away, taken away from the ground, and once more comfort was to be the order of the day as mankind tilled the ground. Can we find the time during the life of Noah when this situation came about? Oh yes, indeed we can. THE CURSE ON THE GROUND IS LIFTED "And Noah build an altar unto the Lord......And the Lord smelled a sweet savour, and the Lord said in His heart, I will not again curse the ground any more for man's sake; for the imagination of man's heart is evil from his youth; neither will I again smite any more ever living thing, as I have done. While the earth remains, seedtime and harvest, and cold and heat, and summer and winter, and day and night shall not cease" (Gen.8:20-22). Some say the curse spoken about here is the curse of the worldwide food in Noah's day. Wellllll, we shall see from the Bible, letting the Bible interpret itself, this is not the case. The compilers of my KJV Bible's centre reference point you to TWO verses concerning this "curse the ground" phrase. The two verses are Gen.3:17 and 6:17. Interesting that they saw this as in a DUAL application, the curse of Adam and the destruction of all flesh wherein is the breath of life, through the food of Noah's time. But, if we take one of the keys to correct Bible interpretation, that is, let the Bible interpret its own words and phrases, then we find rather simple the interpretation of the meaning of the phrase "curse the ground." Does this phrase as God used it in that part of verse 21 of chapter 8, really have anything to do with Noah's flood and the destruction of all flesh wherein was the breath of life? Take a concordance such as Strong's Concordance of the Bible, and look up the words "curse" and "cursed" and see where they are used in the chapters of Genesis. Read the chapters to do with the great worldwide flood that Noah and his family were spared from, chapter 6 through 8. God uses many words to describe the evil of those days and what He intended to do about it, WHAT He intended to destroy from off the earth, and HOW He would go about to do it. Yet you CANNOT FIND ONE WORD where God said the flood He would bring upon the earth, upon the ground of the earth, was a CURSE! That word "curse" or "cursed" together with the word "ground" or "earth" is never used in chapters 6 through 8. IT IS JUST NOT THERE! God never called the flood of Noah's day "a curse on the ground" or "cursed is the ground by a flood I will being." The word "destroy" is used in chapter 6:17 but not the word "curse." Oh, yes, men can say it was a curse, all flesh being destroyed by a flood of waters, but the fact still remains that using only the Bible to interpret itself, the words "cursed" and "curse" in these early chapters of Genesis, in connection with the word "ground" is ONLY used in chapter 3:17 and here in chapter 8:21. So, Bible interpreting Bible, the PLAIN and CLEAR meaning of Chapter 8:21 using the phrase "curse the ground" and that God "....WILL NOT AGAIN curse the ground for man's sake..." can only mean ONE thing, God will REMOVE the curse on the ground from the time of Adam when he sinned, and that particular and specific curse will never again be on the ground. This curse was then REMOVED from off the ground in the lifetime of Noah, thus fulfilling the very prophecy of Lamech, the father of Noah, that his son was called Noah, meaning rest or comfort, because that in his days mankind would find rest and comfort from the "work and toil of our hands, because of the ground which the Lord had cursed" (chapt.5:29). By the time of the flood, the Lord God had come to see the full depths of what He had created in creating mankind with human nature, the free will and the ability to do either good or evil. God was now resigned to this fact of the human heart, hence was saying to Himself, "Because the imaginations of the human heart that I have created, is to do evil from their youth, I will do two things, and one of them is to NOT curse the ground any more." After the flood the ground was in effect CLEAN, cleansed and ready for a fresh start. That fresh start would NOT include any curse of the ground imposed upon it after the sin of Adam. This is what God was saying as one thing He would not again do as long as the earth remained. Then there was a second thing God would promise that He would never again bring on the earth........."neither will I again smite any more every thing living, as I have done." Now, THIS part of the two fold sectional promise from God is the part to do with the flood of Noah's day that killed all flesh in whom was the breath of life. The Eternal was here promising that He would never do this again, destroy all that He had destroyed in the worldwide flood.....well destroy all WHILE, the connecting word in the next verse, with the words to follow explain, for the plan of God IS THAT the earth will one day be BURNT UP and all that is therein, by a FIRE! That fact is recorded a few times in other parts of the Bible. Then will come a NEW heaven and earth, together with the prophecies of Revelation 21,22. But, "WHILE the earth REMAINS" mankind would never again be destroyed as in the days of Noah, for God has promised, "seed time and harvest, and cold and heat, and summer and winter, and day and night shall not cease." BOTH the curse on the ground imposed for Adam's sin, and the destruction of all flesh in whom was the breath of life, WAS REMOVED BY GOD AT THIS TIME, NEVER TO HAPPEN AGAIN WHILE THE EARTH REMAINED, IN THAT SAME MANNER. The contention of TWO Hebrew words It is sometimes contended that because a DIFFERENT Hebrew word is used in Genesis 8 (for "curse") and chapter 3 (for "cursed is the ground") that chapter 8 is only referring to the flood in Noah's day (it, the flood, being a curse) and not to Adam's curse on the ground in chapter 3. Here we get into certain technicalities, that really do not have a bearing on the overall truth of the matter. I have spent a lot of time studying the Lexicons on this, such a one as "Vine's Old and New Testament Words" and "The Theological Wordbook of the Old Testament" and "Strong's Concordance of the Bible." I will not endeavor in this study to do a full and detailed expounding of the subject, for it is not needed, but the basic points will prove useful, together with some comments on a certain aspect of "word" studying in the Bible used by some to uphold a doctrine that the words in context(coupled with other Scriptures) do not support. This will prove I hope edifying and useful to the reader. The KJV translators chose to use basically ONE English word - "curse" or "cursed" or "curseth" whereas in the Hebrew there are at least SIX Hebrew words used - arar, qalal, ala, qabab, naqab, za'am. The THREE MAIN ones as Vine gives are: qalal, arar, ala. A study of these words shows they are really "nuances" of each other - a shade of expression, meaning, feeling etc. The bottom line basic meaning of all of them is to "slight" or bring down from a higher elevation, or as the Theological Wordbook says: "of intending a lowered position, technically, to curse." The aforementioned Wordbook has a lot to say on the Hebrew words for "cursed" and "curse" as in Gen.3:17 and 8:21. Strong's Concordance number for those words are respectively: number 779 and 7043. These two root words are used in Gen.12:3 and the Theological Wordbook says on this: "As God said to Abraham: 'he who curses (qalal) you' (pronounces a formula), 'I will curse (arar) him' (put him in the state)." You may also note Malachi 3:9 and two words used for "cursed" and "curse." In Strong's their numbers are 779 and 3994. Trying to make a little more nuance sense of these three words Vine says this: "On distinction from arar ('to curse by laying an anathema on someone or something')and qalal ('to curse by abusing or belittling'), ala basically refers to 'the execution of a proper oath to legalize a covenant or agreement.' ......The 'oath' was a 'curse' on the head of the one who broke the agreement......So ala functions as a 'curse' sanctioning a pledge or commission, and it can close an agreement or covenant......." The Hebrew and the Greek of the Bible are full of many words meaning basically the same thing but with nuance differences, and often are given as but ONE word in the KJV translation. I can give you the example of the words "coming" and "appearance" as in the Greek NT. Look at "Vine's Dictionary of Old and New Testament Word" and see ALL the different Greek words used in the NT under those two English words, kind of blows your mind. Now, the Jehovah Witnesses teach Jesus Christ will NOT literally, bodily, return to this earth. And they try to prove and uphold their teaching by getting somewhat "technical" with these Greek words for "coming" and "appearance." Here it's this one used, there it's that one used, and over in another passage yet another of these many words may be used. The words alone sometimes fit what the Jehovah Witnesses want to teach and want you to believe. Their arguments come crashing down to earth in a million bits, when the CONTEXTS and the PHRASES of the use of these words are taken into consideration. Then it becomes very clear that Jesus and the NT writers BELIEVED and TAUGHT that Christ would indeed return to this earth in a LITERAL and BODILY way. That His literal bodily feet would one day stand on the mount of Olives, just as prophesied in Zechariah 14. As I've tried to show above, from the context and from letting words within a PHRASE (in this case the phrase uses the word "ground") our phrases of Gen.3:17; 5:29; and 8:21 even using two Hebrew words for "cursed" and "curse" is TALKING ABOUT THE SAME THING - the curse placed on the ground for Adam's sin. There is just a nuance difference from Gen.3:17 and 5:29 with Gen.8:21. As I've stated, the LAST HALF of Gen.8:21 is God talking about not destroying every living thing "as I have done" - that being the part in the verse where the Lord is speaking about the worldwide flood of Noah's day. A rainbow covenant is then given to Noah and his offspring as to the promise and oath from God that a flood of waters will never again cover the earth to destroy all living creatures (chapter 9). But while the earth remains God would promise that seed time and harvest, cold and warmth, summer and winter, day and night, would continue. We have them to this day, not all summers are pleasant (some too hot), not all winters are pleasant (some too cold and stormy), and some seed times are not the easiest, just as some harvest times take some diligent work......BUT what I say is that God at this time LIFTED the terrible backbreaking, running battle, constant brow sweating fight mankind was having with thorns and thistles clogging up and overrunning the ground (not that sin was lifted, not at all, and with physical and spiritual sin comes various curses. Man has been polluting the air with his industrial smog for a few hundred years now, and we are destroying the ozone, which is resulting in more harmful and deadly rays of the sun reaching us to curse us with more skin cancers. We pollute our rivers and streams and even the sea with all kinds of chemicals, and we reap the cursed after effects) and when the Eternal was ready to give His chosen people Israel the land of promise, it was a land so free from Adam's curse that God called it a "good land" one that flowed with "milk and honey." ISRAEL AND THE LAND OF MILK AND HONEY As we read through the books of Moses (first five books of the Bible) we learn that the land that God intended to give to the people of Israel was "a good land" and "a land flowing with milk and honey." This promised land was ALREADY a bountiful physical land of wonderful fruits and seed crops of many varieties. If Adam's curse on the ground was still in effect, would this land of promise really have been described as flowing with milk and honey? If the people of that land were still having a running battle against thorns and thistles, and toiling in the sweat of their face to scratch out some food from the ground, I doubt God and the those sent out to spy the land (as they did before entering) would have spoken with such excitement about it flowing with milk and honey. Also there was plenty of fruit in that land, not just herbs, and Adam's curse as we have seen indicates only herbs (no fruit) was to be part of the penalty, the fruit being only in the garden of Eden, from which Adam and Eve were driven, not able to re-enter (remember God placed great Spirit Beings at the east of the garden and a flaming sword to "keep the way of the tree of life" - Gen.3:22-24). In passing let me add that Adam's punishment may also be telling us that "herbs" for him and his offspring, not only meant no fruits, but also no meat eating for food, somehow the Eternal keeping the animals way from the family of Adam. If this be the case, then it will answer as to why God later instructs Noah about all mankind now, after the flood, having all moving things that live, for food (but qualifying it by saying "as the green herb have I given you all things" - certain restrictions on all moving things, just as there was on green herbs, for not all green herbs are good for food, in fact some green herbs can kill you if eaten) - see Genesis 9:1-4. The law of clean and unclean flesh was from the beginning (Noah took pairs of clean and unclean animals into the Ark, seven pair of clean, one pair of unclean. More clean animals possibly for Noah and his family to kill and eat while in the Ark during the flood, then possibly just to have more clean animals to produce more, after the flood, as mankind was now allowed once more to eat flesh, returning to my comment on Gen.9:3-4) for the Lord created them clean and unclean from the beginning to be received by those who know the truth, that such as were sanctified (set apart) by the word of God (those created to be fit for food "as the green herb") could then be eaten (1 Tim.4). But the punishment on Adam for his sin, may have taken this flesh eating away from mankind, until it was restored to mankind after the flood, in the days of Noah, whom his father Lamech said would "comfort us concerning our work and toil of our hands, because of the ground which the Lord has cursed." Part of that comfort may have been the restoring of the law of eating animal flesh "as the green herb" law. Now, back to my main comments about Israel and the land of milk and honey. I suggest, and I believe I have proved, that the promised land was a "good land" because the curse on the ground from the time of Adam's sin had been removed, hence indeed it could be a land of milk and honey just from the NATURE of things. The Eternal seeing this wanted to give His chosen people an inheritance within some of the very best productive land on "the good green earth" as we often call our planet. Then I submit we have at least one section of Scripture that in its very wording would clearly tell us that Israel, if they would serve and obey the Lord with all their heart, with all their soul, and with all their mind, they as a people in the promised land WOULD HAVE NO CURSES OF ANY KIND UPON THEM.......JUST HAPPY PLEASANT PHYSICAL UTOPIA. Most of us in the Church of God have heard and read these words expounded MANY TIMES from the pulpit, and in magazine articles for decades. " And it shall come to pass, if you shall hearken diligently unto the voice of the Lord your God, to OBSERVE and to DO ALL His commandments which I command you this day, that the Lord Your God will set you on high above all nations of the earth: And all these BLESSINGS shall come on you, and overtake you, if you shall hearken unto the voice of the Lord your God. Blessed.......shall you be in the fields....... Blessed.......the fruit of your ground, and the fruit of your cattle.......Blessed shall be your basket and your store.......The Lord shall command the blessing upon you in your storehouses, and in all that you set your hand unto; and He shall bless you in the land.......And the Lord shall make you plenteous in goods.......in the fruit of your ground.......The Lord shall open unto you His good treasure, the heaven to give the rain unto your land in his season, and to bless all the work of your hand......." (Deut.28:1-14). Nothing here about Adam's curse still being on the ground, and Israel having to constantly wage a battle against thorns and thistles in the sweat of their brow, to attain these blessings. What we see is that if they would diligently serve the Lord God in obeying all His commandments, then they would have a society and a land that could only be described as a veritable "utopia" - the envy of all the other nations on the earth. I submit to you that God could only offer these blessing for obedience to Israel, because He had already (from the days of Noah as we have seen) REMOVED FROM THE EARTH, the curse on the ground because of Adam's sin. NEW WORLD INHERITANCE One of the famous fathers of the now new world land called the United States of America, said words to the effect that the people who settled that land, found themselves, as if given a gift, the receivers not through great hard work, but as it were a gift, the recipients of some of the most choicest and rich land that the earth has to offer. Probably the people of Canada could say the same thing. The tens of thousands of Bison or Buffalo roaming the vast plains were well looked after with the wild grasses covering thousands of square miles. No thorns and thistles to worry about, to any large degree, sure they are part of nature, so some are here and there, some in more areas than in other areas. The new settling farmers of the new land just had to turn the soil and plant, and yes, do some long hours of grass, weed, stone removal, bring in the cattle, bring in the sheep, in some areas plant the fruit trees, and blessing upon physical blessings was and still is the result from what is probably the richest large land area on the globe. God never promised mankind would not have to "work" to "dress and keep" things, that was given to him way back in the garden of Eden, but once dressed and kept, it takes not much hard toiling to keep it, if doing a little each day. Now, this does not mean to say there was no thorns and thistles to contend with in parts of North America. I do not mean to say the farmers and fruit growers and vegetable producers back in those early days did not have to toil to make a living on the land. Some areas did have to be cleared of thorns and thistles, where they grew, but North America was not covered with a blanket of thorns and thistles. Some areas do not have them. I have related already the experience of planting a garden on virgin soil in southern Ontario, where I did not have to pull any thorns or thistles, and very little work was needed to produce a wonderful garden. Yes, those early settlers had wild grass and weeds to pull, even stones to clear from their land, some had trees to clear in order to make productive land for themselves and their farming enterprise, but wild grass, weeds, stones, and trees, were NOT a part of the curse on the ground when Adam sinned, the curse was only to do with thorns and thistles, and the eating of herbs (which subject of only herb eating I've covered above). Apparently the Province of Alberta (where I have recently move to, as I write this in 1999) has a good share of thorns and thistles that workers of the land have to contend with, but even then the landscape is not covered as like a blanket with them, for God has seen fit, since the Noachian flood to make sure enough wild grass and other natural phenomena covered the land areas of North America and the world, to hold back thorns and thistles from taking over and choking out all plant life on the earth (remember Adam Clarke's comments above about how greatly thistles can spread and multiply). Some areas of some land masses are very easy to "dress and keep" while others take a little more work, and still other areas harder work still. But it can be hard work to build a house, especially if you live in the heat of the State of Florida, where I lived for three years. All of North America is one of the greatest proofs that the curse placed on the ground in Adam's day has long disappeared from the face of this good green earth. Let me go back for a while to the Old world, and especially to my home country where I was born - WALES. The Welsh country-side, with its valleys, its hills and dales, is noted as being some of the prettiest in the whole world, especially North Wales. It is still (I was back there for three months in the summer of 1997) mostly a farming and sheep raising country. Sheep farming is all over those Welsh hill sides, and so it has been for centuries, as well as the other types of farming. What a peaceful, lazy, quiet, friendly, country it is to this day, and the Welsh are still singing away. It is known as the "land of song." Those lush green hills and valleys are free from thorns and thistles, the people just do not have to worry about them. My contention is that the curse on the ground after Adam sinned, a curse from God sending thorns and thistles like this world has never seen since the time of the worldwide flood, was like no other in the history of man on this planet. I contend that the amount of work today needed to combat thorns and thistles as we work the land, is in comparison to what mankind had to battle with, and toil and work at, in the days before the flood, just no comparison at all, another ball game entirely, like trying to compare a coconut with a tomato. To be continued |
No comments:
Post a Comment