Long Day and Hezekiah's sun-dial
The facts are revealing
JOSHUA'S LONG DAY Concluded and HEZEKIAH'S SUNDIAL AND MISSING TIME Presented by Ralph Woodrow POETIC PASSAGE Finally, it should be pointed out that the wording about the sun stopping is in a portion of Joshua 10 that is unmistakably poetic in nature. As the "Pulpit Commentary" says: "The poetic form of this passage is clear to everyone who has the smallest acquaintance with the laws of Hebrew poetry" and that these words "belong rather to the domain of poetry than history, and their language is that of hyperbole rather than of exact narration of facts."" Poetic passages such as this do not require a literal meaning for each word or expression used. It was not uncommon for songs or poetic sketches about Israelite victories to be written using non-literal expressions. After the defeat of the Egyptians at the Red Sea: "Then sang Moses ... unto the Lord... he hath dashed in pieces the enemy... the earth swallowed them" (Exodus 15). "When Israel went out of Egypt ... the sea saw it and fled ... the mountains skipped like rams" (Psalm 114). The defeat of Sisera and his armies inspired the poetic portion of Judges 5: "Then sang Deborah... the earth trembled... the mountains melted ... the stars in their courses fought against Sisera." When David escaped from Saul, he "spake unto the Lord the words of this song... The earth shook and trembled, there went up a smoke out of his nostrils, and fire out of his mouth ... he did fly upon the wings of the wind... he drew me out of many waters" (Psalm 18). In all of these examples, the Bible records the actual historical account of what happened. These same events are then told poetically - stars fighting, mountains skipping, the frightened sea fleeing, the earth trembling, etc. All understand these expressions as figures of speech - all recognize the poetic liberty - even though written about literal, historical battles that occurred. So it is in Joshua 10. We have a historical account of what happened (in verses 1-11 and continuing in verses 16-43) and a poetic account (verses 12-15). Each account - the poetic and the historical - ends with the words: "And Joshua returned, and all Israel with him, unto the camp to Gilgal" (verses 15,43). If we did not distinguish between the historical account and the poetic, these two verses would be in conflict, implying that Joshua returned twice to Gilgal. This cannot be, for the night following the day of Joshua's command, the camp was established at Makkedah (verse 21). We know the historical account continues in verse 16 (from what had led up to the poetic account) because of the words: "But these five kings fled..." What five kings? This must tie back in and continue the historical account from verses 1-11. Because the wording about Joshua's command to the sun is contained within the poetic portion of Joshua 10, some have understood this simply as a poetic way of saying that "God and all nature fought on the side of Joshua," so that the work of two days was accomplished in one. Rabbi Levi ben Gersom, a well-known name in Judaism, put it this way: "The wish of Joshua aims only at this, that one day and night might be long enough for the overthrow of the so numerous forces of the enemy. It was the same as if he had said: Grant, Almighty Father, that before the sun goes down, thy people may take vengeance on this multitude of thy foes. The miracle of the day was, that, at the prayer of a man, God effected so great a defeat in so short a time" (Quoted in "Lange's Commentary, Vol.4, p.100). While such conclusions are certainly possible when dealing with poetry, the fact that the historical portion of Joshua 10 mentions a massive hailstorm provides strong reason to believe that the literal sun was involved, its light being stopped by that storm. Yet, being poetic, we are not required to understand each expression or phrase in a strictly literal sense. Bible scholars of all persuasions recognize that when we have a historical account and a poetic account of the same event, we always take the historical account to explain or clarify the poetic - not the other way around. If we apply this rule of interpretation in Joshua 10, a good harmony and sense can be given to this passage which has, otherwise, baffled and embarrassed Bible teachers who have sought to uphold the traditional view. .............. HEZEKIAH AND MISSING TIME? Presented by Ralph Woodrow In 1470, an Indiana newspaper carried a story about scientists in the space program who discovered 24 hours of "missing time." Soon other papers and religious periodicals picked up this thrilling and sensational story. It was printed in tract form. Millions of copies were circulated. But when inquiries were made, the source material could not be located, the part about the scientists could not be verified, and a number of magazines that had carried the story printed retractions. Others felt that any who doubted the story were yielding to Satan! We now reproduce the tract, word for word, as it was circulated and continues to be circulated by some. Quote: "THE MISSING DAY" I think one of the most interesting things that God has for us today happened recently to our astronauts and space scientists at Greenbelt, Maryland. They were checking the position of the sun, moon, and planets out in space, where they would be 100 years and 1,000 years from now. We have to know this so we don't send a satellite up and have it bump into something later on in its orbits. We have to lay out the orbit in terms of the life of the satellite, and where the planets will be so the whole thing will not bog down. They ran the computer measurement back and forth over the, centuries and it came to a halt. The computer stopped and picked up a red signal, which meant there was something wrong either with the information fed into it or with the results as compared to the standards. They called in the service department to check it out and they said, "It's perfect." The IBM head of operations said, "What's wrong?" "Well, we have found there is a day missing in space in elapsed time. "They scratched their heads. There was no answer. One religious fellow on the team said, "You know, one time I was in Sunday school and they talked about the sun standing still." They didn't believe him, but they didn't have any other answer so they said, "Show us." So he got a Bible and went back to the book of Joshua where they found the Lord saying to Joshua, "Fear them not, I have delivered them into thy hand; there shall not a man of them stand before thee." Joshua was concerned because he was surrounded by the enemy and if darkness fell, they would overpower them. So Joshua asked the Lord to make the sun stand still! That's right!" The sun stood still and the moon stayed... and hasted not to go down about a whole day." The space men said, "There is the missing day!" Well, they checked the computers going back into the time it was written and found it was close, but not close enough! The elapsed time that was missing back in Joshua's day was 23 hours and 20 minutes... not a whole day. They read the Bible and there it said, "about (approximately) a day." Joshua 10:12, 13. These little words in the Bible are important. But still they were in trouble because if you cannot account for 40 minutes you'll be in trouble 1,000 years from now. Forty minutes had to be found because it can be multiplied many times over in orbit. Well, this religious fellow also remembered somewhere in the Bible it said the sun went backwards. The space men told him he was out of his mind. But they got out the Book and read these words: Hezekiah on his death bed was visited by the prophet Isaiah who told him he was not going to die. Hezekiah did not believe him and asked for a sign as proof. Isaiah said, "Do you want the sun to go ahead ten degrees?" Hezekiah said, "It is a light thing for the sun to go down ten degrees; nay, but let the shadow return backward ten degrees." Isaiah spoke to the Lord and the Lord brought the shadow ten degrees backward. 2 Kings 20:1-11. Ten degrees is exactly 40 minutes, Twenty-three hours and twenty minutes in Joshua, plus 40 minutes in 2 Kings, make the missing 24 hours the space travellers had to log in the log book as being the missing day in the universe! Isn't that amazing? Our God is rubbing their noses in His truth! That's right! End quote There is no need to question the good intentions and sincerity of any who promoted this story. But, as with the Roskovitsky story (p.63), it is largely fiction. Not only does the story fail to represent what the Bible actually says, it is inconsistent with itself. First, even if time was literally extended almost a whole day for Joshua, it seems more likely this would have been about 12 hours, not 23 hours and 20 minutes. For Joshua's men to continue running and fighting all this time, plus a regular day, after having marched all the night before, seems very improbable. One gets the feeling that 23 hours and 20 minutes are introduced in the story so that when the 40 minutes at the time of Hezekiah are mentioned, it all fits together in a perfect and astounding manner, making the total exactly 24 hours - a missing day! Having already shown, we feel, that the miracle at the time of Joshua was not one of extended time, but the darkening of the sun by a vast hailstorm, we now turn to the other Biblical reference quoted in the tract about missing time. King Hezekiah had been sick. The Prophet Isaiah told him he would not only be healed, but fifteen years would be added to his life. Hezekiah asked for a sign. And Isaiah said, This sign shalt thou have of the Lord, that the Lord will do the thing that he hath spoken: shall the shadow go forward ten degrees, or go back ten degrees? And Hezekiah answered, It is a light thing for the shadow to go down ten degrees: nay, but let the shadow return backward ten degrees. And Isaiah the prophet cried unto the Lord: and he brought the shadow ten degrees backward, by which it had gone down in the dial of Ahaz. (2 Kings 20:9-11). What has been commonly assumed is that in order for the shadow to move back on the dial, the Lord had to make the sun go backwards. I believe this is reading more into the text than is required. Actually all this passage says is that the shadow on the sundial went back ten degrees. The parallel account in Isaiah 38:8 says that "the sun returned ten degrees" on the dial, meaning, obviously, the sunlight. It was not the sun itself that came down out of the sky and rolled around on the king's sundial! It was a miracle of sunlight and shadow on the dial. REFRACTION Just exactly how God moved the shadow back on the dial is difficult to say. The Bible does not tell us, but I believe the explanation given by Adam Clarke (c.1760-1832), whom no one would accuse of being a "modernist" in any sense of the word, is as good as any. He states that "by using dense clouds or vapors, the rays of light in that place might be refracted from their direct course ten, or any other number of degrees... rather than by disturbing the course of the earth, or any other of the celestial bodies." (Clarke, op.cit., Vol.2, p. 551). The following simple experiment demonstrates the effect of refraction: Place a vessel on the floor, and put a coin on the bottom, close to that part of the vessel which is farthest off from yourself; then move back till you find that the edge of the vessel next to yourself fairly covers the coin, and that it is now entirely out of sight. Stand exactly in that position, and let a person pour water gently into the vessel, and you will soon find the coin to reappear, and to be entirely in sight when the vessel is full, though neither it nor you have changed your positions in the least. Next, Clarke asks and answers a question about refraction: "Could not God as easily have caused the sun, or rather earth, to turn back, as to have produced this extraordinary and miraculous refraction?" I answer, Yes. But it is much more consistent with the wisdom and perfections of God to accomplish an end by simple means, than by those that are complex; and had it been done in the other way, it would have required a miracle to invert and a miracle to restore; and a strong convulsion on the earth's surface to bring it ten degrees suddenly back, and to take the same suddenly forward. The miracle, according to my supposition, was performed... without suspending or interrupting the laws of the solar systems" (Ibid.) The sun is approximately 93 million miles from the earth. If the sun travelled around the earth every day, the circumference of its journey would be about 584 million miles. If in 40 minutes it went back 10 degrees (a circle being 360 degrees), this would mean it had to move backwards sixteen MILLION miles in order to move a shadow a tiny distance on a sundial! This seems quite out of proportion to the actual purpose that was accomplished - a Rube Goldberg arrangement (see drawing on page 89). Of course time is not measured by the sun going around the earth anyway. On the other hand, it solves nothing to say it was the earth (not actually the sun) that stopped and went to reverse. I am reminded of a humorous story that was told back in the 50s when cars with automatic transmissions had become increasingly popular. Not understanding the various gear positions, a man said: "I put it in 'L' for leap, and then in 'D' for drag, but when I put it into 'R' for race, I really got into trouble!" This earth is turning at the rate of over 1,000 miles an hour (at the equator). It does not seem that God Almighty would put the gears of nature into a drastic "R" - reverse - causing all kinds of world-wide chaos (or miracles to prevent that chaos) simply to show Hezekiah he would be healed of a boil. A LOCAL SIGN If the sun moved backward for 40 minutes, or the earth reversed itself to give this appearance (as some suppose), such would have been observed over a vast area of the world. This was not the case, for certain ambassadors came from Babylon "to inquire of the wonder that was done in the land" (2 Chron. 32:31). They had heard, apparently, the news of this wonder and that Hezekiah "had been sick, and was recovered" (Isaiah 39:1). The International Standard Bible Encyclopedia says this wonder, being done "in the land" over which Hezekiah ruled, was a local miracle, not a world-wide phenomenon (ISBE, article: "Dial of Ahaz"). In the tract, the "religious fellow" told the scientists that "the Bible said the sun went backwards" for ten degrees which caused "40 minutes" of missing time. Of course this is totally inaccurate and the Bible does not say this! Even if time was measured by the sun moving forward, if it stopped, and reversed its direction for 40 minutes, and then reversed to continue on, this would be eighty minutes! Suppose I am driving from Riverside to Palm Springs, California. When I get to Banning I remember I forgot something at Riverside. It is 40 miles back to Riverside, but I decide to turn around and return. I pick up what I forgot and continue back on the highway. When I come to Banning again, how many miles have I gone out of the way? I went back 40 miles, so by the time I return to where I had been - round trip - I would have gone 80 miles out of my way. It would be the same with the sun. If it went back for 40 minutes, by the time it again reversed its direction and got back to where it had been, the amount of time "lost" would not be 40 minutes. It would be 80! Where did anyone ever get the notion of 40 minutes anyway? This is based on the idea of the sun making a circle around the earth every 24 hours. The 1,440 minutes in 24 hours are divided by 360 (the degrees in a circle) so that each degree equals 4 minutes. These 4 minutes are multiplied by 10 (the number of degrees the sun went back), thus 40 minutes. But this concept is completely erroneous. It was not until the time of Hipparchus (d. 126 B.C.) that the circle was divided into 360 degrees - centuries after the time of Hezekiah! (Ency.of Americana, 1981, article" "Circle"). The sundial sign occurred about 711 B.C. It would be absurd to suppose that Isaiah used a technical and precise scientific term about the degrees of a 360 degree circle when talking to Hezekiah, especially since this concept was totally unknown at the time. DIAL DESIGN The whole thing is cleared up once we understand the design of this "dial." According to the Bible, it was actually a series of steps, a staircase, running east and west. As the day progressed, the shadow on the steps indicated how much daytime was left. The accompanying drawing, based on the one given in the Encyclopedia Judaica (Vol.15, p.519) shows how this may have been accomplished. In contrast to what we think of as a dial today, with a flat surface, this "dial" could allow the shadow to go back and forth, or up and down, as described in the Bible (2 Kings 20:10; Isaiah 38:8). The Septuagint version of Isaiah and Josephus say this staircase was a part of the king's house, while a Qumran version specifies these were the steps of the upper story of the house. Whatever may have been the arrangement, there can be no mistake that this dial involved steps, for the very word translated "dial" in our text is "maalah," having the meaning of STEPS (Strong's Concordance, 4609). It is the word translated "steps" (1 Kings 10:19, etc.), "stairs" (2 Kings 9:13, etc.), and "degrees"! Notice how "maalah" is used in the text: "Shall the shadow go forward ten degrees [maalah-steps], or go back ten degrees [maalah-steps] ...And Isaiah the prophet cried unto the Lord: and he brought the shadow ten degrees [maalah-steps] backward, by which it had gone down in the dial [maalah-steps]" (2 Kings 20:9-11). It is certain, then, that when the shadow moved back ten degrees, it is the same as saying that the shadow moved back ten steps. To assume that 10 steps would equal 40 minutes is, of course, totally unfounded. The idea given in the tract - that there were "40 minutes of missing time" - would require us to believe that God moved the sun backward millions of miles. Or, he had to stop, reverse, stop, and start the earth turning again - in order to change the shadow on the sundial! All of this would be unproportional to the actual sign that was given. The magnitude of the miracles that would have been required world-wide - holding oceans in place, keeping buildings from falling over, etc. - would far outshine the sign given to Hezekiah. We would have to ignore the Hebrew word which clearly shows that the "dial" was a staircase and that the "degrees" were "steps" on this staircase. And, finally, we would be driven to the absurdity that Isaiah, in speaking of 10 degrees, meant 10 degrees of a circle of 360 degrees, even though that concept was not invented until centuries later! Since the scriptures imply that the cycle of the earth and sun has never been stopped or interrupted (Jeremiah 33:20), we favor the view that the shadow was moved on the dial for Hezekiah without involving the motion of the solar system. If the hands on a modern clock are moved back an hour - as when we switch from daylight saving time to standard time in the fall of the year - we have not changed the actual time the sun sets. Likewise, we believe a sign was given to Hezekiah in which the shadow moved on the dial (staircase) without changing the actual position of the sun. It was a miracle of sunlight and shadow, not time. NOTHING TOO HARD We know there is nothing too hard for the Lord (Genesis 18:14; Jeremiah 32:17). Consequently, if a Biblical passage is capable of two different explanations, some are prone to believe that the one that is the most miraculous is correct. This is not necessarily true. Roman Catholics are taught that during mass a miracle turns the elements of bread and wine into the actual body and blood of Christ. Are Protestants "unbelievers" because they hold an interpretation that does not require this miraculous change? Would God be any greater if he had taken the Israelites across the Mediterranean Sea instead of the much narrower Red Sea? Would the deity of Christ be greater if he fed 100,000 people instead of 5,000? Would the miracle of his resurrection be more important if he had been in the tomb 300 days instead of 3? ................. TO BE CONTINUED |
No comments:
Post a Comment