HARBINGER...Gazit Stone

I'LL  LET  YOU  READ  WHAT  I  HAVE  REPRODUCED  FROM  THIS  CHAPTER  FROM "THE HARBINGER"  BOOK,  BEFORE  I  COMMENT.

"So what have you found so far?" he asked.

"On the Fifth Harbinger? Not a lot."

"Then let's start with the little... what have you found?"

"After the attack, the nation vows to rebuild, not with clay bricks, as before, but with stone. In the prophecy, the Hebrew word for stone is gazit!'

"Well done, Nouriel. You're going deeper. That's good. What else?"

''Gazit speaks of stone that's been cut out, chiseled, in particular, quarried from mountain rock. Thus the mountain on the seal...a place from which the gazit stone is quarried."

"That's more than a little."

"But it doesn't lead me anywhere."

"It led you here."

"But what does it have to do with America... or with the Tower? It's not as if New York City is about to build skyscrapers out of quarried stones."

"Piece the clues together, Nouriel. Then we can see if there's any connection to America. Where are we in the prophecy?"

"But we will rebuild with hewn stone."

"So they vow to rebuild and to do so stronger than before... to replace the fallen clay bricks with the gazit stone. They quarry their stones, carve them into massive blocks, and bring them back to the ground of destruction, to where the bricks have fallen. The first stone of building is always the most important—the cornerstone. The laying down of the cornerstone begins the construction. It's not just a necessary act, but a symbolic one. And in the case of Israel's rebuilding, the laying down of the first gazit stone would be filled with symbolic meaning, signaling the beginning of the nation's rebuilding and the fulfillment of its vow. May I have the seal?"

So I handed it to him, and he lifted it up as he revealed its meaning. "The Fifth Harbinger: The nation responds to the calamity with defiance in the form of stone. The stone is cut out of their mountains and bedrock. They chisel it into a block. They bring it back to the ground of destruction. The stone becomes a symbol, the embodiment of their vow, their confidence, and their defiance. Upon the stone they rest their plans of rebuilding and their vow of national resurgence. But the Gazit Stone is, in reality, a symbol of a nation's rejection of God's calling. When the sign of the Gazit Stone manifests, it's a Harbinger carrying a warning of future calamity. The Fifth Harbinger: the Gazit Stone."

"And what does it have to do with America?"

"They came here, Nouriel. They came here to find the Gazit Stone."

"Here?" I asked.

"Here... to the mountains. They came here and cut it out of the mountain rock and brought it back."

"Back?"

"Back to where the bricks had fallen."

"To Ground Zero?"

"Yes. For the vow declares, 'The bricks have fallen, but we will rebuild with quarried stone.' So the rebuilding must begin on the same site of the destruction. So the Gazit Stone must be brought to where the bricks had fallen, to the ground of the calamity. Thus, the quarried stone had to be brought back to Ground Zero. And so it was."

"And what happened at Ground Zero once they brought it back?"

"There was a gathering there, a gathering of leaders—the mayor of New York City, the governor of New York State, the governor of New Jersey, various officials involved with the rebuilding, other leaders, and a gathering of guests and spectators. They were all focused on a single object—the Gazit Stone. The Gazit Stone most often took the form of a massive rectangular block of cut rock, so too the stone that was laid on the pavement of Ground Zero."

"A massive rectangular block of quarried stone.. .laid at Ground Zero?"

"A twenty-ton massive rectangular block of quarried stone. The stone was to mark the beginning of the rebuilding."

"But we will rebuild with quarried stone."

"Exactly. The stone of Isaiah's prophecy was another symbol of national defiance. So too they made the Gazit Stone of Ground Zero into a symbol. They even gave it a name. They called it the Freedom Stone. It was created to be the symbolic cornerstone of the rebuilding—not just of Ground Zero, but of New York City and America. Its laying down was to be the first act in that rebuilding and the beginning of the Tower that was to rise up from the site. So, as in the last days of ancient Israel, the Gazit Stone would again become the symbol of a nation's rebuilding and restoration."

"Were there any such proclamations or vows spoken," I asked, "when the Gazit Stone was laid at Ground Zero?"

"Why do you ask that?"

"Because the stone in Isaiah 9:10 was linked to the proclaiming of the vow."

"There were. There were such proclamations. And as in the ancient case, their proclamations joined the nation's rebuilding to the quarried stone. Their words were, in effect, a modern paraphrase of the ancient vow. On Ground Zero the American leaders declared that they too would rebuild with quarried stone. The stone, they declared, would be the beginning of the nation's rebuilding. It would:

"...forever remain a symbolic cornerstone for the rebuilding of New York and the nation.¹

"As it was in ancient Israel, the act of rebuilding with quarried stone was intended to send a message. So the governor of New York would proclaim:

"By laying this magnificent cornerstone of hope, we are sending a message to the people around the world."²

"A message of defiance."

"Yes, a message of defiance. On one hand, a defiance of the calamity; but on the other, beneath the surface, something much deeper...a much deeper defiance...just as it was with ancient Israel. One commentary explains it this way:

"Far from being humbled and becoming repentant as a result of the chastening judgments of the Lord, they are resolutely determined to withstand God and rebuild on an even grander scale: 'The bricks have crumbled, but we will rebuild with stone cut out of the quarry..."'³

"Stone cut out of the quarry—just as the rebuilding of Ground Zero and of America involved the stone cut of the quarry.. .here."

"Yes. And even the New York governor would allude to the stone cut out of the quarry as he spoke his proclamation over the stone:

"Today we take twenty tons of Adirondack granite, the bedrock of our state, and place it as the foundation, the bedrock of a new symbol of American strength and confidence."4

"As it was with ancient Israel, the quarried stone would become the embodiment of a nation's misplaced confidence in its own power to emerge stronger than before. And the act of laying down the quarried stone would be a manifestation of what the commentaries call the spirit of defiance:

"The bricks may have fallen down; it was of no consequence—

they would build with hewn stone Thus they breathed the

very spirit of defiance."⁵

"The nation... determines to act in a spirit of defiance... it will turn its fallen bricks into massive stones."⁶

"The spirit of defiance... Why is that significant?" "On the day that America officially began its rebuilding by replacing the fallen bricks of 9/11 with the Gazit Stone, the governor of New York would make a proclamation from the floor of Ground Zero. Listen to the words:

"Today, we, the heirs of that revolutionary spirit of defiance, lay this cornerstone..."⁷

"He used those exact words?"

"Those exact words."

"The same words...and the same act—the quarried stone and the spirit of defiance."

"Joined together."

"Unbelievable... the whole thing is so..."

"It is....but it happened. The ancient drama reenacted on Ground Zero."

"And what happened after," I asked, "after the stone was laid?"

"What happened after was especially striking. The rebuilding of Ground Zero had already become tangled in a continual stream

of controversy, confusion, obstacles, dissension, and conflict. Even after the stone was set in place, the tower's construction would be challenged, halted, redrawn, renamed, and reversed. The plans to rebuild Ground Zero would be frustrated for years. Eventually they would remove the stone from Ground Zero altogether."

"Strange," I said. "They removed the cornerstone, and after all those words."

"Strange and not so strange. The plans of ancient Israel to defiantly rebuild itself would likewise be frustrated. It would ultimately lead the nation to the point of destruction. The laying down of the Gazit Stone was one more link in a chain of judgment. The commentary goes on to reveal what it all leads to:

"It will turn its fallen bricks into massive stones that will not fail...it was to be followed with fearful penalty...to be pressed on every hand by its enemies... to be prepared for still impending miseries.⁸

"The defiance of God shuts out immeasurable good."⁹

"It's a replaying...it's all replaying itself, the whole thing. It's so.. uncanny. And they had no idea what they were doing."

"That they were reenacting the ancient prophecy? No. And yet they each ended up stepping into the ancient footsteps. It was a prophetic act, taking place according to the mystery."

"So what does it all portend for America's future?"

"If those who came to Ground Zero that day to issue their proclamations had realized what it all portended... they would have stayed home.".......

....................

AH! WOW!  NOW  THAT  REALLY  DOES  SOUND  LIKE  THE  PROPHECY  OF  ISAIAH  9  WAS  COMING  TO  PASS  AGAIN  IN  2001  AND  AFTER  9/11.  ON  THE  SURFACE  IT SOUNDS  PRETTY  IMPRESSIVE!  MOST  WOULD  BE  FOOLED  BY  WHAT  YOU  HAVE  JUST  READ.  FALSE  PROPHETS  HAVE  A  WAY  OF  SOUNDING  THINGS  THAT APPEAR  TO  BE  TRUTH,  THAT  IS  WHY  FALSE  PROPHETS  CAN  DECEIVE  THOUSANDS  IF  NOT  MILLIONS  OF  PEOPLE.  THE  FALSE  PROPHET  OF  THE  BOOK  OF  REVELATION  WILL  NOT  ONLY  SOUND  AS  IF  HE  IS  FROM  GOD,  HE  WILL  ALSO  BE  ABLE  TO  DO  MIRACLES.....ALL  THAT  WILL  REALLY  DECEIVE  HUNDREDS  OF  MILLIONS  OF  PEOPLE.

OKAY,  TIME  TO  SMASH  THE  STONE.

FIRST,  I'VE  JUST  SPENT  TIME  GOING  THROUGH  1 AND  2  KINGS;  1  AND  2  CHRONICLES.  THERE  IS  NOT  ONE  WORD  ABOUT  THE  ASSYRIANS  COMING  AGAINST  PART  OF  THE  HOUSE  OF  ISRAEL  IN  732 B.C. THE  KJV  BIBLE  I  HAVE  GIVES  THE  DATE  FOR  EACH  CHAPTER  IN  KINGS  AND  CHRONICLES.  THERE  IS  NO  DATE  FOR  732  B.C.  NOR  ANY  MENTION  OF  THE  ASSYRIANS  COMING  AND  TAKING  CAPTIVE  ANY  PART  OF  ISRAEL  IN  AND  AROUND  732 B.C.  IT  IS  JUST NOT  RECORDED  IN  THE  BIBLE  PERIOD!!

WHAT  IS  RECORDED  IS  THE  FINAL  DESTRUCTION  AND  DEPORTATION  OF  ISRAEL  BY  THE  ASSYRIANS  BACK  TO  THE  HOMELAND  OF  THE  ASSYRIAN  EMPIRE  IN  721 TO  718  B.C.

THE  BIBLE  DOES  NOT  RECORD  ANY  BRICKS  OR  BUILDINGS  COMING  DOWN,  WHEN  THE  ASSYRIANS  INVADED  PART  OF  ISRAEL  IN  732  B.C.  AND  TOOK  SOME  ISRAELITES  BACK  TO  THE  LAND  OF  ASSYRIA.

WE  HAVE  SEEN  FROM  BARNES'  BIBLE  COMMENTARY  THAT  THE  PHRASE  "THE  BRICKS  ARE  FALLEN  DOWN;  WE  SHALL  REBUILD"  COULD  BE  AS  BARNES  SAYS, "THE  LANGUAGE  OF  THIS  VERSE  IS  FIGURATIVE; BUT  THE  SENTIMENT  IS  PLAIN...."  THERE IS  NO  RECORD  IN  THE  BIBLE  THAT  ANY  BRICKS  IN  REALITY  EVER  CAME  DOWN  IN  ANY  LITERL  WAY,  WHEN  THE  ASSYRIANS  INVADED  ISRAEL  THE  FIRST  TIME,  AND  BARNES  GIVES  THE  DATE  AS  738 B.C  NOT 732  B.C.  BUT  THAT  EXACT  DATE  DOES  NOT  MATTER ANYWAY,  FOR  THE  POINT  WE  ARE  MAKING.

SO  THE  FIRST  MISTAKE  THE  AUTHOR  MAKES  ON  THIS  SECTION  HE  IS  EXPOUNDING,  IS  THAT  THERE  IS  NO  PROOF  FROM  THE  BIBLE  THAT  ANY  BRICKS  IN  REALITY  EVER  CAME  DOWN  IN  ISRAEL  AT  THIS  INVASION  BY  HER  ENEMIES.

THE  NEXT  MISTAKE  THE  AUTHOR  MAKES  IS  THAT  IN  THE  HEBREW  THE  WORD  FOR  "BRICKS"  IS  PLURAL!!  SO  JAY P. GREEN  RENDERS  IT  IN  HIS  HEBREW/ENGLISH  RENDITION  OF  ISAIAH 9:10.  AND  ALSO  THE  WORD  FOR  "STONES"  IN  THE  HEBREW  IS  IN  THE  PLURAL!!

WE  ARE  NOT  TALKING  HERE  IN  ISAIAH  ABOUT  ONE STONE  BUT  MANY  STONES.

THEN  DID  YOU  NOTICE  IT?  I  PUT  IT  IN  LARGE  LETTERS  FOR  YOU  TO  NOTICE.  THE  AUTHOR  SAID  THE  MASSIVE  STONE  AT  GROUND  ZERO  IN  NEW  YORK  WAS  REMOVED!!!

HENCE  IT  DID  IN  NO  WAY  FULFILL  THE  PROPHECY  OF  ISAIAH  9:10.  THERE  IS  NO  REMOVING  OF  ANY  STONES  IN  ISAIAH  9:10;  IF  ISAIAH  9:10  WAS  EVER  FULFILLED  IN  ANY  LITERAL  WAY.

ONCE  MORE  ANOTHER  MISTAKE  WAS  EVEN  IF  ANY  LEADER  OF  AMERICA  USED  IN  ANY  SPEECH  ABOUT  THAT  MASSIVE  STONE  BEING  PUT  DOWN,  ANYTHING  THAT  COULD  BE  CONNECTED  WITH  THE  WORD  "DEFIANCE" DOES  NOT  OF  ITSELF  PROVE  THEY  WERE BEING  DEFIANT  AGAINST  GOD.  I  SUBMIT  THE  DEFIANCE  IN  ANY  SPEECH  REGARDING  RE-BUILDING  ANYTHING  AT  GROUND  ZERO  IN  NEW  YORK,  WOULD BE  A  DEFIANT  ATTITUDE  AGAINST  TERRORISTS.  I  HAVE  DETECTED  NO  DEFIANT  ATTITUDE  AGAINST  GOD  IN  ANY  SPEECH  BY  ANY  AMERICAN  LEADER  AFTER  9/11.  FOR  THE  AUTHOR  TO  STATE  SO  IS  SIMPLY  PUTTING  THOUGHTS  INTO  YOUR  MIND,  TO  MAKE  OUT  ISAIAH  9:10  WAS  A  PROPHECY  FORETOLD CENTURIES  AGO  ABOUT  THE  YEAR  2001  AND  9/11,  WHEN  IN  FACT  IT  HAS  NOTHING  TO  DO  WITH  9/11.

IT  IS  QUITE  NATURAL  FOR  LEADERS  OF  TOWNS  OR  STATES  OR  A  COUNTRY,  AFTER  A  TERRIBLE  DISASTER,  FROM  SOME  CARZY  FANATICAL  GROUP,  TO  BE  DEFIANT  AGAINST  THAT  GROUP,  AND  TO  TELL  THE  PEOPLE  OF  THE  NATION (AS  IN  THIS  TWO  TOWER  DESTRUCTION)  THAT  THEY  WOULD  RE-BUILD  AND  SHOW  DEFIANCE  AGAINST  THE  MAD-MEN  GROUP  THAT  BROUGHT  ON  THE  DISASTER  AND  KILLING.  AND  TRUE  TO  THAT  ATTITUDE  AMERICA  DID  GO  AFTER  THE  LEADERS  OF  THE  TERRORIST  GROUP,  FINALLY  KILLING  BIN  LADEN  [THE  MASTER  MIND  BEHIND  IT  ALL]  AND  OTHERS.

THE  AUTHOR  IN  THIS  SECTION  OF  HIS  BOOK  MAKES  IT  ALL SOUND  VERY  MUCH  LIKE  THE  PROPHECY  OF  ISAIAH  9:10  WAS  A  REALITY  OF  2001  AND  9/11,  UNTIL  YOU  BREAK  IT  DOWN  AND  ANALYZE  IT  ALL  IN  FINE  DETAIL.  THEN  YOU  CAN  SEE  THE  CLEVER  CONFIGURATIONS  HE  HAD  TO  PUT  IN  YOUR  MIND  TO  FOOL  YOU  IN  BELIEVING  YOUR  READING  A  PROPHECY  RE-ENACTED  FROM  THOUSANDS  OF  YEARS  AGO  IN  2001.  THE  PROPHECY  OF  ISAIAH  9:10  HAS  NOTHING  REMOTELY  TO  DO  WITH  TWO  TOWERS  IN  NEW  YORK  CITY  CRASHING  TO  THE  GROUND  AND  SOME  HUGE  STONE  BEING  PLANTED  THERE (WHICH  WAS  EVENTUALLY  REMOVED  ANYWAY).

A  VERY  CLEVER  TRY  BY  THIS  FALSE  PROPHET.  BUT  FALSE  PROPHETS  INSPIRED  BY  THE  GREAT  DECEIVER,  ARE  CLEVER  AND  CUNNING.  INDEED  THEY  ARE,  BUT  NOW  YOU  KNOW  THE  TRUTH  OF  THE  MATTER.

Keith Hunt